mattie112

Great thanks I will try that! Probably had that set when testing unraid (as this is a case I've tested) but now it was set to 0 indeed.

I have been using Unraid for about a year now and today I have been sorting/moving some stuff. At some point my cache drive was full. Not a problem right? It should go to the array? But it does not seem to work, I thought it would automatically do that but perhaps I'm wrong and a full cache drive simply has never happend yet. My cache pool: (I cancelled the file transfer so I guess ~10gb will be removed soon) The share I am writing to: "Yes indicates that all new files and subdirectories should be written to the Cache disk/pool, provided enough free space exists on the Cache disk/pool. If there is insufficient space on the Cache disk/pool, then new files and directories are created on the array. When the mover is invoked, files and subdirectories are transferred off the Cache disk/pool and onto the array." So "if there is insufficient space the file will be created on the array". Right? Then why when I transfer a file through SMB I get a "There is not enough space on <share>"? Am I missing something? I will now run the mover which will most likely fix it but this simply seems strange to me. Thanks for any advice!

For the people using my fork, (the port 80/443 one): I have just merged the latest v1.16.1 into my branch and pushed a new version. I'm doing this manually so I don't really push every version (as I have to notice it). But if there is any major issue of a fix that you'd like just send me a message and I will push it

You could check the location of the .htpasswd file (if you use one). That should not be readable by the web. Some generic pointers: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6441578/how-secure-is-htaccess-password-protection/6442113 Not sure if NPM has somekind of bruteforce protection.

I did not know that it was so 'fresh' But thanks! Was planning on trying it out this weekend.

Hm this looks good! When checking out dockerhub (I always roughly check what containers contain) and I noticed: So what is the plan? Can I still use the unraid template and then edit it to fireflyiii/core? Why not change the template now to prevent confusion?

I have no issues with the latest version (no update available). Does this happen with all mails? Or only a certain document?

https://forums.unraid.net/search/?q=Redis password&quick=1&type=forums_topic&item=100843

I don't use CloudFlare: does it also proxies traffic for port 80? If you want to use letsencrypt it will need access to that. Or perhaps cloudflare blocks the .well-known directory?

So your bitwarden is on 182.168.100.99 right? In your browser I don't see a port appended so it is running on port 80? Then why are you using port 8888? Or am I missing something?

You can try it manually: docker exec -it NginxProxyManager bash And then something like: certbot renew --dry-run or certbot renew --force-renewal Run certbot --help renew to see all options available

Try: nc 192.168.100.99 8888 <enter> and then the commands to fetch a webpage (or use curl http://192.168.100.99:8888 to 'download' the page)

Please confirm that you can access yourdomain over UNENCRYPTED port 80. Try it from your phone 4G or from an other network then the one your server is in.

See: https://forums.unraid.net/topic/76460-support-djoss-nginx-proxy-manager/?do=findComment&comment=944261

I only see INFO messages: What kind of DEBUG messages do you see?

Just updated my server with the new version. Was a bit more work because I manually editted the existing plugin so I could test my changes so it did not allow me to update Simply removed it, rebooted just to be sure, downloaded the new version and pasted my config. Works like a charm Fantastic that now everybody can do it like this simply through the UI!

That's not an other question, that is the same question. Either use CA backup or backup the directories listed above with any other tool.

These folders contain the data: Simply backup those with whatever tool you like and you are good to go

Just backup the mounted folder in your appdata or use the CA backup plugin

You can only request SSL certificates on a hostname (some.domain.xyz) not on an IP (*). So if you either have your own domain or make up a domain and add it to your local DNS server you could do that yes. *) technically you can sign an IP but this will always be somekind of untrusted self-signed certificate Or are you talking about the service you want to proxy being on an other IP, that should be no problem

Paperless has its own app. But I use Microsoft Lens (free) as it also supports multi page documents.

What if you access paperless directly and not through a reverse proxy. Does it work then? If so the issue is not with paperless. And about the consume: is there anything in the logs?

And the certificate is indeed correct? With all the required intermediate certificates? Is it from letsencrypt or an other provider? You can test your certificate with a site like ssllabs.com

So :80 works great but :443 does not? What is the issue then when visiting a https link? Do you get an error? No connection? You can also run a wireguard docker: https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/wireguard And then on your NPM container:

Is there anything in the logs? If the certificates are "to new" it will not renew them.