BRiT

According to the forum stats, 87.4% of the users here will never read a manual (or ask for directions). http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?action=stats That's because this forum is archaic and doesn't have proper spam-bot prevention. That went over your head. [emoji14] Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk Oh. I thought you were pointing out that the majority of all "registered users" in these forums are really spam-bots. Though I think that number is far larger than 87%.

According to the forum stats, 87.4% of the users here will never read a manual (or ask for directions). http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?action=stats That's because this forum is archaic and doesn't have proper spam-bot prevention.

First all, I applaud everyone who keeps working to provide functionality that spans the gaps in unRAID. As it is, this plugin should not exist at all. The moment unraid started limiting the number of all devices attached is the moment unraid needs to provide real management of all those devices. Let's hope LT realizes this and builds in the required support. In the mean time, keep up the great work and try not to take things too personally when users remain human and refuse to help themselves by looking at the provided help and manuals.

I cant see any pic, but you might be navigating up to the parent directory which is /mnt/user, which is the entire contents of your array. The simple fix is don't.

Those are built in shares for WinOS, such as C$ or D$, so one can not rename those. They can however create their own shares with the proper share names.

Well that was the only way you were ever going to get it without posting what the problem was in the first place.... Sent from my LG-H815 using Tapatalk speak for yourself, i'm psychic and knew what his problem was all along, but i just didn't feel like sharing. Et Tu Sparkles?

I have 4 docker containers that handle irc bots, usenet downloads, torrent downloads, and pushing items to the Tivo. My Docker image file is a consistent 1.7GB. After months of usage it may hit 1.8GB. I really don't know what dockers you're using or why they're so large.

You really should be running the latest beta21 first. Earlier betas of 6.2 are no longer supported by LimeTech and thus shouldnt be supported by the community either.

I don't want it because I already have my network permissions setup properly with appropriate users on other systems and I have my local docker docker containers properly configured. Your proprosed forced change would completely undo all of that.

I request this setting is not made globally. I dont want it. Others won't want it. Let it be an option, but do not put it as default.

Any idea what is causing this? If i had to guess I'd say its special characters in the directory filenames, the apostrophe and the semicolon causing script issues.

what is the point in leaving a dead drive in the array. Once you get any write errors to a drive unRAID will stop writing to it so no point in keeping it in the array. You also increase the chance of encountering a multiple drive failure scenario which will lead to data loss. I meant keeping it in till it dies. As in reallocated sectors could go into the 100's and you'd still keep running with it. Heck, don't even bother with parity. It's your data, take whatever risks you want with your data.

One suggestion is to not use the built in Firefox browser in unraid 6.2 GUI series to surf the web as root.

Well I checked while cache dirs is running and I have 3,5GB free acording to free -m command information If you're using windows explorer to check, be aware that it will inspect the files which is not part of what is cached, just the directory entries. You need to use a file client that wont inspect the files themselves. The best way to check if a disk directory is part of the cache is using a linux command shell and typing "ls /mnt/user/share/dir/subdir" or "ls /mnt/disk#/share/dir/subdir". If the disk is spundown and cached by cachedirs it should not spin up using that command.

Uhm have you tried doing what you were instructed to do? Tried that, but still gets an authentication screen when accessing the portal. Am I doing something wrong? Login as the readonly user at that point.

Uhm have you tried doing what you were instructed to do?

Most users who want docker containers that are maintained switch away from the Limetech repository. There are several other plex containers out there. The LinuxServer.io developers do a great job with their containers. You might want to check theirs out. Also, if you havent done so yet, install Community Applications plugin. It takes the docker experience to the next level and no user should be without it.

wow rly? So my problem is that i did't calculate it with the kibibyte system? Well ok, i must tell my server that it's the problem, sure it will fix it right away! Ya,RLY! Your problem has nothing to do with the fact that 64GB = 65536 MB. Your problem is entirely something other than the basic scientific computing facts.

Units. Conversions. Learn them.

Any chance of triggering an updated container build? Thanks as always hurricane!! Capt.Insano, please read the immediate post above yours.

It works with parity since the operation is against the parity-protected device(s) that you specify, /dev/md#. It really is no different than other various writes to the array devices.

You will get your command prompt back, when it's complete. There really is no other means of telling when it's finished.

Mine finished sometime late yesterday after I called it a night... It completely defragmented files. I'm talking 0% fragmentation! Directory fragmentation remained the same as before. Before Stats: #xfs_db -r /dev/md2 xfs_db> frag actual 17087, ideal 15986, fragmentation factor 6.44% xfs_db> frag -f actual 16522, ideal 15513, fragmentation factor 6.11% xfs_db> frag -d actual 565, ideal 473, fragmentation factor 16.28% After stats: # xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/md2 actual 16078, ideal 15986, fragmentation factor 0.57% # xfs_db -c 'frag -f' -r /dev/md2 actual 15513, ideal 15513, fragmentation factor 0.00% # xfs_db -c 'frag -d' -r /dev/md2 actual 565, ideal 473, fragmentation factor 16.28%

Mine's still running. # xfs_db -c frag -r /dev/md2 actual 16154, ideal 15986, fragmentation factor 1.04% # xfs_db -c 'frag -f' -r /dev/md2 actual 15589, ideal 15513, fragmentation factor 0.49%

As far as personal email address and accounts, I have free accounts on all the major providers, such as GMail or Outlook. As far as hosting for your own domains for yourself and others, I used to do my own domain email hosting using SendMail for a number of years (decade or more), but things became a lot easier for me when the larger mail providers started offering cheap hosting or even free hosting such as GMail.