Ystebad

I've got binhex vpn container installed and working. However linking another container through it works for getting an outside connection (verified from console ifconfig) but I can't now access GUI for the linked container despite adding port to the VPN container for the linked one. Just get a timeout when I try to access from browser using IP:port Was just hoping for a nice "setup outgoing vpn then assign to desired dockers" option

Thanks. This plugin allows wireguard VPN server support only, correct? I'm struggling to find a way to run docker container through a (paid) VPN and would love to be able to configure and outgoing wireguard tunnel that I would assign to a docker.

Wireguard in 6.9? thought it was 6.10 (beta) only?

What do you mean by "access both from outside network?"

I have not. I read somewhere that host access to docker and vice versa was prohibited for security reasons so I'm a little unsure at this point what to do. Maybe there is a better way of doing what I'm trying to do - I want to be able to send port forwarding to some dockers (i.e. plex) and have others go out over my VPN. Since my router can assign vpn by IP I was assuming getting a separate IP for each docker that needed special attention was the best way to go, but maybe not.

I tried to make this as clear as I could , but it's a bit confusing, if you know docker networking though I'd really appreciate the help! Here is my problem as I see it: My dockers using custom IP networking cannot connect to the bridge or vice versa but the dockers using custom IP can see each other. My details / testing: Docker1 (Sabnzb) is custom network and setting a fixed IP on my LAN. Docker2 (Sonarr) is using bridge within unraid Docker3 (Plex) is using a custom network and fixed IP on my LAN Computer1 is separate machine from unraid server, running on same LAN Since ping can't check ports and docker doesn't have telnet so I've used curl IP:port to check connectivity to a bridged docker, NC for the computer (mac) and ping when checking IP to IP without port. Computer1 can access -all- dockers. Using NC/curl I see that the port 8090 on docker1 is open. Docker1 cannot reach docker2 (curl: (7) Failed to connect to 10.0.0.11 port 8989 after 3068 ms: No route to host) Docker1 can reach docker 3 Docker1 can reach computer1 Docker2 cannot reach docker1 (ping returns: icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable), (curl: (7) Failed to connect to 10.0.0.15 port 8080 after 2149 ms: No route to host) Docker2 can reach docker3 Docker2 can reach computer Docker3 can reach docker1 Docker3 cannot reach docker2 (same error as docker1 above) Docker3 can reach computer How do I fix this? addendum: Router has VPN set for Docker1 WAN access and WAN port forwarding for Docker3. I don't think this affects anything above since I'm working on LAN, but I suppose I might be wrong.

so is there any idea whether this is a file system error (ie should have used Xfs not btrfs) , software glitch or it’s a drive hardware problem?

Got this: root@Monster:/dev# mount -o usebackuproot,ro /dev/nvme0n1p1 /x mount: /x: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/nvme0n1p1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error. same result if I use the degraded option as well.

trying to follow that - the dead drive is called "Cache_nvme" under device and SPCC_M.2_PCIe_SSD_CD8E07080A9E04566172 (nvme0n1) under identification. I don't see either of these under /dev not sure therefore what to use for the "mount -o usebackuproot,ro /dev/sdX1 /x" argument for /sdX1 thank you so much for the help.

Now that I think about it, I -might- have installed this. Since I started in safe mode no plugins show up so I'm not sure how to see if I actually have a backup.

Well @$%^ me. Here I thought have 2 parity drives would keep this kind of thing from happening. So disappointing. I've ordered 2 new drives and will be installing into mirror for cache going forward. Is there a best practice for auto-backup of app data?

My dockers (appears) all used this drive as cache prefer. If I remove this drive or cannot recover it do I lose all my docker setup?

I didn't realize the IP server login would work in safe mode .. duh. This time after booting in safe mode I logged into server over IP to get access to GUI and start array. It did note an error with one of my 3 cache disks and mentioned I would have to format it. I hope not. New diagnostics attached. monster-diagnostics-20211119-0657.zip

@Squid @JorgeB- ran diagnostics from safe boot. Attached. Appreciate any help as machine will still not boot in normal (non-gui) mode monster-diagnostics-20211118-0831.zip

It won’t let me login. The login prompt appears first but before I can enter my name and password the error message will occur and then nothing will work after that. It’s locked up just before login it says warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh

server went down. Was unable to stream over WAN. came home to find it nonresponsive over the lan via IP login. wouldn't respond to ping rebooted and it will get to login but shortly (within a few seconds) then locks up saying: "login: BTRFS: error (device nvme0n1p1) in btrfs_replay_log:2279: errno=-22 unknown (Failed to recover log tree). I can boot to safe mode. please help I need to get server back up and running.

My network settings in unraid are correct for my router (10.0.0.1) and my router WAN dns is set to cloud flare 1.1.1.1. However since it seems to be having trouble resolving the pool connection, maybe this explains all the troubles I've had never being able to get connected to mine my pool plots. I completely deleted machinaris and the data folder and reinstalled including entering my wallet phrase and redownloading the whole blockchain. So I don't think the "upgrade" would apply. However it says: Extra Parameters: -h $HOSTNAME and my extra parameters is blank. This is stupid question: but what do I put for "HOSTNAME" ?

@jortan I am this forum's most pathetic member. I've been trying to get chia and machinaris to work for over 5 months now without success. Poor @guy.davis knows and dreads my name and I have a terminal case of sunk cost fallacy as I've got over 1300 plots and not one penny earned. Anyway, all that to say that just today I found some references in my log which said " 2021-10-27T03:38:16.745 farmer chia.farmer.farmer : ERROR Exception in GET /farmer https://xch-us-east.flexpool.io, Cannot connect to host xch-us-east.flexpool.io:443 ssl:<ssl.SSLContext object at 0x14d25b789ec0> [Temporary failure in name resolution]" So I'm thinking that maybe some of my problems may be related to networking or firewalling. Accordingly I was hoping to take Machinaris off host network and assign to a custom IP so I can manage it separately in my firewall/router rather than being clumped in with my unraid box which runs through a VPN. I selected "bridge" network option in edit but when it runs the docker I'm still seeing Machinaris connected at a port of my main server instead of a separate IP. How are you doing this?

Had notice "Nvidia driver update downloaded, reboot to install" So I did. Machine wouldn't come back up. Went an attached a monitor to my machine and see this: I can SSH into machine, but my normal method of logging in via GUI over web browser on my LAN it doesn't respond.

That is a great idea - not exactly sure how to add the original vm disk to the "stripped" vm though.

Thanks. Appreciate all the detail. didn't realize you couldn't adjust partition while it's online - I think you can do that in windows I gave up and just created a new VM and downloaded the chia blockchain all over again - but saving your advice for next time! Appreciated.

I am trying to use a hard drive for CCTV storage and therefore do NOT want it on the array being parity written. the drive has been pre-cleared and shows up in unassigned devices as completed preclear. mount is greyed out and I can't figure out how to format or use this disk. I need to be able to pass to docker or potentially VM for my CCTV system. Destructive mode is turned on in UD options.

I'm not great in either linux or unraid, so there's that.... Made a linux VM and it has a 25G primary partition/disk. Downloading chia blockchain and it's all full and giving errors. I expanded the vdisk in the unraid GUI to 100G. within ubuntu VM I ran parted and tried resizepart (ran as sudo) but it says "Error: The location 50000 is outside of the device" Can you not expand partition of the VM as it's running from within linux? That seems silly. Not sure what I'm doing wrong. Here's what I see in parted (after increasing size to 100GB in unraid): (parted) print Model: Linux device-mapper (linear) (dm) Disk /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu--lv: 26.0GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: loop Disk Flags: Number Start End Size File system Flags 1 0.00B 26.0GB 26.0GB ext4

Yes that fixed it thank you! However under plotting and workers I now see two different choices with with same name. Want to start plotting again, but unsure if I should or which one to select.