tyrindor

This has never worked for me. I have 20 disks and it always says 16 are spun down even though I have them all spun up. If I manually enable turbo write, it'll disable it because it thinks too many drives are spun down.

Its not "slow" as in that slow. I just have gigabit internet and I prefer my usenet client to go 100MB/s, not 10MB/s. First world problems, eh? I'll try his VPN version of qbbittorrent thanks.

My VPN is pretty slow and I don't want to slow down the other tasks I use it for. However, I don't want my IP broadcast on my torrent client (qbitorrent) docker. I can't find a way to do this, other than installing a virtual machine and having the virtual machine setup to use my VPN. Not ideal since I don't need a whole virtual machine running and using resources.

I am still not seeing any caching taking place. If I disable it and re-enable it, there's no reads on any of my disks. Just going into random directories results in low amount of reads. When cache directories was working, I'd see it go through my disks 1 at a time and produce a fair amount of reads when I started it. Something possibly wrong with my settings?

All sorts of issues with this lately (I'm on unRAID 6.6.3). Constant reading all drives even though nothing is being accessed, not starting up on restart (despite the changelog saying that was fixed), and the removal of scanning user shares. Scanning user shares was necessary or I'd get constant spinups on my setup. Tested it many times prior to it being removed since the plugin always claimed it wasn't needed. Please add that feature back. I have tried adding -u but it still seems nothing is being cached despite it "running" and my shares selected. Every time I go into a folder I get reads on the disk. I think it started happening after 6.6.3 update but not positive.

Just finished clearing 3x 12TB on 6.5. Everything is fine but the log is filled with warnings. See my post here:

Thanks! Took me a bit to figure out, gotta enable advance view in the docker and set -e UMASK_SET=000 under extra parameters.

Same... there's no way to set permissions to 0777 in this like sonarr/nzbget/etc. Anything this program downloads I cannot modify via my SMB share. Is there no solution?

I'll be running this on 3x 12TB drives later this week. I will report back if there's any issues.

I got this up and running and most of the time it's fine. However, every now and then it'll download a file and not give it the correct permissions (need access from nobody). I have umask set to 000 as suggested in the OP. This only affects some downloaded files, majority are fine. Any ideas?

I ran it again, and now that I have 2 backups in the same folder I can select which backup. Seems when you only have 1 backup it shows "No backup found", probably just a display issue. Great tool this will save me a lot of time.

Backup settings/directory were never changed since I backed up. It should be reading from the same directory it exported too. What do you mean by "tar"? I don't see anything like that in the folder it created.

I just started using this and backed up everything (it made a folder called "[email protected]" and inside that a "CA_backup.rar" file). However, if I go to the restore tab under "Select a backup set to restore", it says "No backup sets found". Is this because I only have one backup?

Having the same issues as hus2020, the appdata/syncthing folder cannot be access via Windows (Windows 10 Pro x64 in my case) even though permissions are 99/100 (default). I have also tried forcing a umask of 000. The docker itself works fine, unRAID can access everything. If I want to back up the appdata, I must run a permission script on the folder, and then when I relaunch the Syncthing I lose access to that folder again. Edit 1: Just set this up on my friends server, and his has the same problem. I wonder if it has to do with a custom appdata directory? I use a share called "Stationary" which is a cache only share. The share is set to "Secure", with 1 user having read/write. EDIT 2: To clarify, this does not happen with your qBitorrent, Sonarr, and NZBGet dockers.

can't get this to work at all, the template is 404'd.

Alright thanks.

For some time now I've been trimming a raid10 pool without any issues, raid0 should be no different. Thanks, any idea why I am getting only ~700MB/s then? 2x 840 EVOs should be about 1GB/s. 10G network, SMB2.02 forced, and DirectIO on. EDIT: When transferring off the cache to a windows computer it's a solid 680MB/s line, but when writing to the cache from the windows computer its a very inconsistent 550-750MB/s. Overhead?

Is there any risk at running TRIM on a Raid 0 cache array? A few years ago on Windows OS, running TRIM on a Raid 0 array could corrupt data and potentially take the whole array down but that's a completely different file system and have since been fixed.

We tried both ways. 1. I have 1000/500, he has 1000/25 (His upload shouldn't affect us when files are coming from my server, going to his?) 2. No, he lives in 20 miles out of town with a "very" small local ISP. 3. Yes I contacted some help from someone who knows VPNs and he remoted in. Getting 2MB/s to him as well. Tried direct connection with no routers on both ends. Tried VPN hosted on unRAID, as well as VPN hosted on router. Every single test results in roughly 2MB/s. He said it's unfixable and due to bad routing between our houses as well as his house. Seems unlikely, but I am out of ideas and that one makes the most sense. We have about 130TB of data each that we want to share with each other, so 2MB/s just won't cut it... guess we'll be stuck with external hard drives and driving 20 miles to share data... Umm yeah, you would think transferring from you to him it should be way better with that upload speed Have you tried testing what kind of speeds do you get transferring files in another way. Maybe using a file transfer with TeamViewer or Splashtop desktop to compare? I just tested FTP and it's the same issues. The catcher? If I enable multi-part connections using CuteFTP it maxes the connection out on his side. So the bandwidth is there, but I need to use multi-connections to achieve it. Does this provide any insight on what the problem could be? I'd rather use VPN than FTP.

We tried both ways. 1. I have 1000/500, he has 1000/25 (His upload shouldn't affect us when files are coming from my server, going to his?) 2. No, he lives in 20 miles out of town with a "very" small local ISP. 3. Yes I contacted some help from someone who knows VPNs and he remoted in. Getting 2MB/s to him as well. Tried direct connection with no routers on both ends. Tried VPN hosted on unRAID, as well as VPN hosted on router. Every single test results in roughly 2MB/s. He said it's unfixable and due to bad routing between our houses as well as his house. Seems unlikely, but I am out of ideas and that one makes the most sense. We have about 130TB of data each that we want to share with each other, so 2MB/s just won't cut it... guess we'll be stuck with external hard drives and driving 20 miles to share data...

Well i've seen multiple complaints on pfsense forums about openvpn speeds, the issue was fixed by adjusting a setting which was later forced by default and removed from the settings. I'm guessing it really wasn't, so in a couple hours we will do a direct connection on his end to ensure it's not his overly complex router. If that doesn't fix it, we'll be calling ISPs and push harder because that's the only thing left it could possibly be. It can't be a direct port throttle either, the NETGEAR's OpenVPN uses entirely different ports than OpenVPN-AS.

If with a completely different device gives the same output, why do you think it's a problem with the OpenVPN config? Well give me some ideas what it could be... Both ISPs claim they don't throttle VPN (they offer gigabit with zero bandwidth caps, so doubtful they throttle anything). One router is a NETGEAR R7000 (very popular router), and the other is a pfsense router (very popular as well). Both have overkill processors. I have no idea what else it could possibly be, and it seems no one else has this problem or everyone is OK with <2MB/s transfers. Is there some other way to test our speed to each other outside of VPN? Should I try getting rid of the routers and doing a single direct connection to 1 computer on each network?

For the record I set up the netgear R7000 router openVPN too, headache free very easy guide. Still 2MB/s. So I have no clue what it could possibly be. I connected to two windows 10 PCs, both with 6700k processors and high end intel NICs. There absolutely must be some setting that everyone changes because clearly this can't be on my end. Either that or one of our ISPs is throttling us, or a router is causing problems.

Have you tried the OpenVPN Forum? Just an idea. Bound to be a lot more users there and a better chance that someone has experience with this issue. Yes, I tried there. I am giving up as this has already consumed two full days for me. I tried to connect to him today and it's not even working now. Nothing has changed and he has a static IP. Doesn't make any sense that I have all these issues when I followed the video exactly. It sucks because I recently moved and a large part was so I could get gigabit internet to sync my friend and I's unRAID servers. There's no way we're sending TBs of data over 2MB/s. I feel like there should be a much easier way to connect two local networks.

Well can anyone confirm they are getting significantly more than 2MB/s with this app?