bnevets27

Since moving the sickbeard.db over isn't helping you. And you have all the information in the files it would make more sense to start with a fresh db. Just point to your tv shows folder and Medusa will scan everything in right the first time. Hopefully.

I found rescan, for whatever reasons, doesn't really do a clean rescan. It's bugged me for awhile, probably should bring that up as an issue at some point. Delete the show. Restart medusa. Add the show and see what it does. I found that's the only way for it to forget and actually read the file name.

At least I know I'm not crazy. Ever since the move to the new forums I've found it definitely harder to navigate. But not being able to search for a keyword in topics with hundreds of pages really makes finding information next to impossible. I hate asking questions that have already been answered and much rather find the answer for myself but not having search is terrible. Further more I found a interesting way to search a thread if the forum didn't allow it was to click the printer friendly button and then the topic becomes one page which you can use ctrl + f on. Problem is this new forum also removed the printer friendly button.

Couple reasons why this could happen. I know they had a bug which I think is fixed now where all .mp4 files came up as unknown quality. Medusa just looks at the file name, type and I think may inspect the file a little bit. But it can never know the source of the file so it really only can determine resolution. Which in turn really only will use the labels, sdtv, 720p hdtv and 1080p hdtv. Even it the source is a bluray or DVD. Either way the most foolproof way to move from Sickrage to Medusa is to include the quality in the file name. Since the source is part of the quality when you rename. It's a pita but if you rename all your files to include the quality in Sickrage, then add that show to Medusa it will read the quality and source from the file name. As far as downloading files too small. If you are using the nzbtomedia script (you should be). There is a setting in there which you can set to a minimum file size. So if you set it to say 105mb anything smaller then that will return a failed download to medusa. Not of nice of a solution as not grabbing the file at all (like setting a minimum size in Medusa) but since that's not possible atm it's something. And regarding using ignored words. I know prefered and undesirable words have been broken for a few months now. Not sure if that also includes ignored. It will be fixed in 0.2.6 though. And I would definitely suggest finding groups to prefer. I personally think this is the best feature of Medusa.

Slightly better alternative to manual, again it will be a blanket for all shows but you could have them added to sabnzbd as paused so you can review whats queued up. Or switch to sonarr. Both programs have their strengthens and weakness. This is a good example of that. Another option is to run both if you like medusa for the most part but have a few shows that need to have a size limit.

I don't think sabnzbd has any size limit. The other thing you could do if you are into this kind of thing is a pre-queue script. It's likely possible to see the category, being TV and then fail/reject the download if above a specific size and then send that back to Medusa so it will try another version. It would unfortunately limit all your shows for a max file size. Unless you add show names to the script.

I'm guessing you have used sonarr or radarr.... That feature is in those programs, it's not possible in Medusa unfortunately. They do plan on a heavy redo of quality settings which is going to be really powerful but no idea when it will happen, I'm sure not soon. You could use prefered words, undesirable words, ignored or required words if there is a specific group or any thing in the title that you can try to single out and filter out the larger files.

Would be cleaner if built in. Rather then a docker/VM.

Thanks squid for the explanation. The feature request was just something that I've come across before. Plugins for whatever reason do not play nice and get marked as incompatible or need to be uninstalled. It doesn't happen a lot and I know you allow time for developers to get it fixed before having to make that change in CA. Its not a big deal just a small suggestion. if it is a bunch of work or you see no value in it, that's fine, this is your baby after all. No reason I can't keep checking if compatibility is restored. It really is a "I'm too lazy to check or remember, so could you tell me or do it for me" type of request. Though I'm sure I have probably uninstalled at least a couple and completely forgot about them. I don't reside to the fact that just because I forgot about them I wouldn't use them though. I don't know about anyone else but I have a decently long list of plugins and dockers I use and that list generally isn't getting smaller.

That's why I prefer to not uninstall plugins that break, that why when I finally see they have an update or that they have been updated it usually means they have been fixed which I then usually confirm by reading the change log. But since Advanced button causes such a problem I didn't want to risk accidentally using it. Preclear I wasn't sure what issues it may have caused but uninstalled it to be safe. Others if they just break functionality of the plugin itself and its likely they will get fixed I see no reason to uninstall them. Would it be possible to just have a "simple" notification sent if the plugin gets updated or becomes compatible, checkbox type idea? Didn't really expect that from a feature request. In this example, next time I want to preclear a disk I'll look to see if its compatible again. But with advanced buttons anytime I see updates (as I have auto turned off for a few reasons) I will miss it. Which means of course I could check everyday I do updates but again this was a simple feature request. Not saying it necessary by any means but the idea is to improve user experience, or so I thought.

I've had this thought before but it was never a big deal. But with things like Advanced Buttons and Pre-clear now not working with 6.4 and needing to be uninstalled until they are updated. It would be nice to have a way to disable them but have them update when they get marked as being compatible again. Rather then having to remember to go and keep checking if its been updated and now compatible so it can be re-installed.

Sorry I completely missed the release dates. Shouldn't look at this stuff or post when tired. Thanks guys

Well the compare of changes starts on December 6th so its been over a month. Unless I'm missing something.

Why does this look like this haven't been updated in a while? Mine shows it is up to date in unraid but is showing 13349 commits behind inside of medusa.

Guess I should have looked one more page back. Thanks jonathanm

Am I going crazy or is the gear icon gone? The one that takes me the docker running stats

Tried with manual on different servers and on auto. Same result. Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk

Looks like I can't connect securely anymore. If I try to run a test I get this in the dialog box and log when secure connection is enabled. Looks like when enabling secure connection Host: is blank. First log entry is secure connection disabled, second is secure connection disabled. Internet bandwidth test started Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Could not retrieve speedtest.net configuration: HTTP Error 404: Not Found Jun 18 19:57:19 Excelsior emhttp: cmd: /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/speedtest/scripts/speedtest-xml --verbose Jun 18 19:57:19 Excelsior speedtest: Internet bandwidth test started Jun 18 19:58:04 Excelsior speedtest: Host: Host Name Redacted (xxxx, xx) [10 m] Jun 18 19:58:04 Excelsior speedtest: Ping (Lowest): 524.81 ms | Download (Max): 30.64 Mbit/s | Upload (Max): 5.11 Mbit/s Jun 18 19:58:04 Excelsior speedtest: Internet bandwidth test completed Jun 18 19:58:41 Excelsior emhttp: cmd: /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/speedtest/scripts/speedtest-xml --verbose Jun 18 19:58:41 Excelsior speedtest: Internet bandwidth test started Jun 18 19:58:43 Excelsior speedtest: Host: Jun 18 19:58:43 Excelsior speedtest: Jun 18 19:58:43 Excelsior speedtest: Internet bandwidth test completed

To clarify Zan quoted me. I said my tuner was not supported and was not surprised it didn't work. My post was mainly to confirm if using --device=/dev/dvb to pass through the tuner was the correct thing to do. Assuming Zan also used that, it looks like he has confirmed he has passed through the tuner but plex doesn't see it. He hasn't mentioned what tuner he has.

Has anyone passed through a pci tuner to plex and have it working?

Yeah I'm a little confused too. Linuxserver releases updates on Fridays so you would expect that the current release isn't the latest. But I'm on Version 1.7.2.3878 and Plex changelog shows 1.7.2 as the latest and checking for updates inside of plex doesn't show any updates as being available. I have my tuner passed through with this in the container Extra Parameters: --device=/dev/dvb Plex doesn't find it but its also not supported so was just going to try...

admin rutorrent It's on the docker page/link Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk

A mess is to be expected. It's nice that you can hide all the mess with how you have this built, another advantage of this design. Expected as much but it does add to the overall look and gives you some general temperatures at a glance. I forgot to ask what you are using for the ultra light win 10 VM. I was looking for exactly that just a few days ago. Most I found was Server 2016, win 10 LTB and using nlite to strip the stock win 10 iso. (haven't used it since win xp). Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk

Wow! Amazing. So glad you included your story. I like how you explained your whole working VM setup, learned a bit more about it. Liked that you included a picture of the mess during testing, people don't usually post those. One request, do you have any pictures of the cabling? I assume you basically just extended the ports on the motherboard so all connections were made at the end there. Also, I assume those displays are for temperature. What are you using for them? I love that fact that having everything mounted like that makes it extremely easy to work on. Don't have to take any covers off and different components don't get in the way. And it looks so clean of a setup. Really wanted to upgrade to the same type CPUs but it looks like I missed the boat a bit on the good prices and I still can't afford to do it at the moment. Your whole build is inspirational. Would really like to build something this beautiful in the future. Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk

attached both servers