Jump to content

JorgeB

Moderators
  • Posts

    66,977
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    700

Community Answers

  1. JorgeB's post in Degraded array - but only have larger replacement disk was marked as the answer   
    https://wiki.unraid.net/The_parity_swap_procedure
  2. JorgeB's post in Libvirt Service failed to start after disk replacement was marked as the answer   
    There was a QEMU related crash:
     
    Jul 4 17:06:42 Tower kernel: qemu-event[9717]: segfault at 0 ip 0000148e82990396 sp 0000148e7e03d930 error 4 in libvirt.so.0.6005.0[148e82846000+1f6000]  
    Rebooting should fix it, if it doesn't post new diags.
  3. JorgeB's post in Unraid 6.9.2 parity check errors was marked as the answer   
    Start by running memtest, also a good idea to replace that old JMB controller, it's causing ATA errors on both connected devices.
  4. JorgeB's post in Most folders are "gone" after updating to Unraid OS 6.10.3 - but they're still kinda present.... was marked as the answer   
    Apple and Samba..., several Samba errors in the log, see if disabling the SMB macOS specific options helps or not.
  5. JorgeB's post in (SOLVED) Reboots and Memory Errors was marked as the answer   
    Try with just one DIMM at a time and see if those hardware errors go away.
  6. JorgeB's post in Slow Read-Speeds from Array/Cache, Writespeeds are good was marked as the answer   
    Try a different NIC if available, ideally an Intel one.
  7. JorgeB's post in array gone after parity failure was marked as the answer   
    Problem with the controller:
     
    Jul 2 04:16:27 CMNSVR01 kernel: smartpqi 0000:0b:00.0: controller is offline: status code 0x1111 Jul 2 04:16:27 CMNSVR01 kernel: smartpqi 0000:0b:00.0: controller offline  
    Power cycle the server and if the controller comes online, and it should, post new diags after array start.
  8. JorgeB's post in Cannot connect to Internet to update was marked as the answer   
    Not a network guy but pretty sure you should only have one gateway, remove the gateway from eth1 and try again.
  9. JorgeB's post in (Solved) 6.10.3 Unmountable: Wrong or no file system after adding a precleared disk to the array. Need Help Please! was marked as the answer   
    Some strange crashes, including the Unraid driver, rebooting should fix the problem for now.
  10. JorgeB's post in Can't boot server after upgrade to 6.10.3 was marked as the answer   
    You'll need to replace the flash drive, to get the array up see here:
     
    https://wiki.unraid.net/Manual/Changing_The_Flash_Device#What_to_do_if_you_have_no_backup_and_do_not_know_your_disk_assignments
  11. JorgeB's post in 6.10.3 Restore data after assigning old cache disk to array and adding new disk as cache was marked as the answer   
    As expected no fs detected, but since current cache is xfs lets assume old one was the same, so try this:
     
    xfs_repair -v /dev/sdb1  
    This will take some time while it looks for a backup superblock.
  12. JorgeB's post in Web GUI inaccessible after failed cache drive was marked as the answer   
    Jul 3 11:49:01 Darkness kernel: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1107! Btrfs crashed during the balance, this suggests there are fs issues, reboot, force it you have to, and try again, though most likely the same will happen, if yes best bet is to mount the pool read only, backup and re-format.
  13. JorgeB's post in nvme Cache Pool Unmountable No file system was marked as the answer   
    If you think the device was wiped the correct command would be:
     
    btrfs-select-super -s 1 /dev/nvme1n1p1  
  14. JorgeB's post in Intel E1G42ET (82576 Chip) NIC not showing was marked as the answer   
    Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/bzimage vfio-pci.ids=8086:10c9 initrd=/bzroot  
    They are stubbed to vfio-pci, remove that from syslinux.cfg and reboot.
  15. JorgeB's post in Error after Parity Check - BTRFS error (device loop3) was marked as the answer   
    Docker image is corrupt, delete and re-create.
  16. JorgeB's post in Problem adding new drive was marked as the answer   
    Reboot, it's no longer part of the array.
  17. JorgeB's post in Machinaris - Change Time Zone was marked as the answer   
    You cannot create new threads, you're supposed to use the existing docker support thread,  in this case:
     
     
  18. JorgeB's post in Proliant DL380P G8 not functioning with storageworks 2nd controller was marked as the answer   
    Unraid doesn't support SAS multipath, connect just one cable from the HBA to each enclosure, i.e., only use one module in the enclosure.
  19. JorgeB's post in Stale Configuration was marked as the answer   
    That's because of this pesky "stale configuration" error, array is starting, just not showing in the GUI, make sure there are no other browser windows open in the GUI, including phones or tab, also clear browser cache.
  20. JorgeB's post in GTX650ti code 43 with Windows 10 was marked as the answer   
    @songI can replicate your issue with a GTX670, works fine with v6.9 and get code 43 after updating to v6.10, I found that this works for me, please try it, edit the XML and in the features section, below </hyperv> add this:
     
    <kvm> <hidden state='on'/> </kvm>  
    Note that if you have "fast startup" enabled in Windows, and it's enabled by default, first boot after the change will still have the problem, you need to re-start the VM (not shutdown and turn on again).
     
    P.S. besides the code 43 issue I also had to dump the VBIOS to use the GTX670 with v6.10, but that's a different issue since there's no display output without it.
  21. JorgeB's post in (SOLVED) (6.10.1 -> 6.10.2) Unraid refuses to start after update was marked as the answer   
    Based on the dates those diags look old, if Unraid is not finishing boot start by trying to boot in safe mode, if still the same try with a new trial flash drive, just to see if it boots.
  22. JorgeB's post in Cache pool BTRFS missing device(s) was marked as the answer   
    Cache device dropped offline:
     
    Jun 23 07:43:03 ForwardUntoDawn kernel: ata2.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x100) Jun 23 07:43:03 ForwardUntoDawn kernel: ata2.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5) Jun 23 07:43:09 ForwardUntoDawn kernel: ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310) Jun 23 07:43:09 ForwardUntoDawn kernel: ata2.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x100) Jun 23 07:43:09 ForwardUntoDawn kernel: ata2.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5) Jun 23 07:43:09 ForwardUntoDawn kernel: ata2.00: disabled  
    Then it came back with another identifier, suggest you shut down, check/replace cables, power back up and the device should be correctly assigned, if yes just start the array, if not start it without that device assigned, then stop, re-assign it and start again.
     
  23. JorgeB's post in [6.10.3] Cache SSDs "overheating?" issue was marked as the answer   
    It's a problem with that device and newer kernels:
     
    https://us.community.samsung.com/t5/Monitors-and-Memory/SSD-980-heat-spikes-to-84-C-183-F/td-p/2002779
     
     
  24. JorgeB's post in HELP: BTRFS Cache Unmountable: Invalid pool config was marked as the answer   
    You just need to unassign them all, them when the disks are re-formatted xfs (or btrsf encrypted) just re-assign all the pool devices and start the array, it will import the existing pool.
  25. JorgeB's post in Some or All files unprotected - Yes I have done the basics. was marked as the answer   
    Any shares that have data on a single device pool will appear as unprotected, since there's no redundancy, that's normal.
×
×
  • Create New...