takkkkkkk

did you recreate it? or decided not to use it?

Anyone else getting error like the one below? It seems like it's working fine, but just get the error: 2021-06-07T09:03:11Z ERR error="Unable to reach the origin service. The service may be down or it may not be responding to traffic from cloudflared: EOF" cfRay=XXXX-LAX originService=https://IP:PORT

I have enabled remote access, everything "seems" to be working. I'm abit concerned about the comment above, so I'm going to try to explain what I'm seeing, though I'm helpless determining what exactly is going on though... - I have enabled remote access, in "my servers" page , it shows local access when I'm on local network, and shows remote when I'm not. - Everything appears to be working when with my browser's pia vpn turned off. - when I enabled PIA on my browser and when I'm on the same physical network as the server, and try to access http://serverip, it directs to http://hash.unraid.net, I get an error: ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED try to access http://www.hash.unraid.net, I get an error: ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR The reason I mentioned about NGINX was because one of the reco was to turnoff ssl, but I was abit worried of doing this because according to unifi, I'm getting alot of attempt to NGINX port, and I didn't know what turning off SSL meant, so I thought I better be safe and keep it turned on. - I think the simple fix was, on pia creating a rule to bypass http://hash.unraid.net, and everything seems to be working now. but not really sure why I got ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR error when I tried accessing http://www.hash.unraid.net, feels like it should have worked as though I'm browsing remotely.

Thanks, I couldn't get the www. working (kept getting ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR), and I was kind of worried about disabling SSL given my unify keeps telling me there's an active threats against my unraid NGINX ports. But I was able to add the hash.unraid.net to bypass list, and is now working fine. thank you!

what's interesting is that I can access all dockers fine even if I have PIA turned on, so I'm not sure if it's blocking accessing to my local network. when I try to go to my unraid server, it attempts to open hash.unraid.net (even if I type the IP address), returns an error ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED...

When I said browser VPN plug-in, I meant PIA Chrome plugin that I have. I often user that browser VPN plugin. when I have that enabled, I cannot access unraid whetner I try the local IP or hash.unraid.net

I'm also not sure what the issue is, but when I use the browser VPN plugin, it tries to connect to https://personalhash.unraid.net even if I'm on the same physical network, and returns an error saying ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED. it works fine when I'm using non-browser VPN though.

Are you saying I can't have unraid vpn turned on to use the remote access?

For some reason I'm having issue with the remote access, I've gone through certification, forwarding my port. and on unraid setting it says "Your Unraid Server is reachable from the internet". Yet on my servers, it says "local access", and can't login remotely. not working is fine, but the biggest issue when I try to go to the server, it automatically goes to hash.unraid.net, and when I'm using vpn, I can't even go to my server even if I'm on local network, and rerouting from IP to hash.unraid.net won't get turned off even if I turn off the remote access. is there anyways to fix this? it's super annoying

I've been researching about nextcloud for the entire night, I'm seeing that I need to do ALOT of customization in order for me to get this working... I know this is "free", but is it just me or this is ridiculously complex compared to other docker containers? I originally thought it was a cool way of moving my OneDrive photos, but when I start reading all these customization to make nextcloud equipped with similar functionality, I'm starting to appreciate M365 more... am I the only one feels this way?? I can't be that stupid...

I'm trying to install face recognition, and it tells me pdlib is missing... I'm reading that there was a plan on the integration back in January, anyone know if there's been any update?

So, it's normal that everything (including CPU load, memory/network usage are all showing zero? eventhough netdata works out of the box?

Is it normal that everything is showing up as N/A? or did I screw up something during the setup?

Thanks! for some reason I thought the guide had apt for alpine and apk for latest, changed, and the docker is running fine now!

I tried that, and now I'm getting /bin/sh: 1: apk: not found

I first installed telegraf without completing the config changes (some changes were there, not all). I then deleted telegraf including ISO, deleted the config file, deleted databse, and then re-installed telegraf after putting cofig file in the folder. Now, telegraf wouldn't start saying "/bin/sh: apt: not found". Any one getting this error?

Can someone help me understand what's happening? This happens pretty often, where nothing happens when a file is post processing, eventhough I don't have "Pause Downloading During Post-Processing" selected. Any thoughts?

yeah honestly, I made so many changes this week including going through somewhat complicated methods of getting rid of ISP's modem (I had to get us-16-xg to get full 1gb/s), I don't know what actually caused the speed to improve...

It's been running overnight, it's holding up pretty steady, It really does depend on the file though it seems like more recent files are, better speed I get. but the speed does fluctuate, and drops to ~70MB time to time. I think that's more to do with IOs than WAN bandwidth.

It really depends on the file, a few files, I get only 5MB, but in most of the time I get at least 80MB, and some files, I can actually get 1gb/s sustained

Is there anyways to see the performance of indexers? trying to figure out which ones gives me the best result

Everything Docker, no VM

Just FYI... I made a significant improvement in home network, Changed my router to ubiuiti UDM Pro (didn't change speed much). Bought US us-16-xg, to use as bridge my ISP GPON to regular 10GB SFP. and then, got myself PCIE SFP, which I'm using link aggregation to us-16-xg. now I'm getting 100MB/s sabnzb!!! Not sure if it was all the investments, but I'm super happy!

Have you tried mapping the networkdrive (assignes drives letter)? I'm assuming you're trying to access the smb from windows right?

were you maxing out the LAN connection or external network? what was your bandwidth? The reason I mentioned it may be unraid's how it handles connecting to external network, is because my VMs would get 350 mbps on speedtest whereas my desktop gets 750mbps (even though my desktop is actually further from the router.