takkkkkkk

I have an array with 16SATA drives + 2 Parity (8-14TB SATA), and 2 pools (with 1TB SATA SSDs). They're all connected to 4*6 SAS2 backplanes. My array write peaks at around 110MB/s, but then drops to ~55MB/s, the 2 parity drives are shucked wd140edfz, which, from what I read, should give me a decent transfer speed. Other drives are mixture of 8-14TB SATA drives. The 2 pools are made up of 1TB 860 EVO, and I'm getting sustained read/write of ~160MB/s When I'm downloading it downloads using one of the pool (download), when it's completed, it moves to the other pool that has a media share (temp), then mover moves to an array. I'm using this approach because I then have 2TB of buffer storage, so that even if I'm only getting 55MB/s on array, it has enough buffer to move the downloaded files before it runs out of space. However if/when I'm downloading a huge list of files, it 2TB buffer isn't enough, and my downloader starts telling me I'm running out of space. So, I'm trying to see if I can increase array speed in anyways. Any thoughts / Ideas? My Tunable is set as "auto", if that makes any difference.

Thanks team! I just moved around files, and somehow it started working as I wanted. Not really sure what triggered it...

All the disks are included in the share, split level is set to automatic, so based on what you're saying it should do what I assumed it would... I really don't know why it's not changing the drive it would move the files to...

My share's allocation method is set to "fill-up" because I wanted my drives to fill up before it goes to the next one. And my drive 1 is completely filled, though I have 64TB left across all my drivers.. The issue is, my mover doesn't seem to be moving to the next drive. the log says "No space left on device", and just doesn't even move the file. How can I make sure mover is using fill-up approach when moving the files?

I have enabled remote access, everything "seems" to be working. I'm abit concerned about the comment above, so I'm going to try to explain what I'm seeing, though I'm helpless determining what exactly is going on though... - I have enabled remote access, in "my servers" page , it shows local access when I'm on local network, and shows remote when I'm not. - Everything appears to be working when with my browser's pia vpn turned off. - when I enabled PIA on my browser and when I'm on the same physical network as the server, and try to access http://serverip, it directs to http://hash.unraid.net, I get an error: ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED try to access http://www.hash.unraid.net, I get an error: ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR The reason I mentioned about NGINX was because one of the reco was to turnoff ssl, but I was abit worried of doing this because according to unifi, I'm getting alot of attempt to NGINX port, and I didn't know what turning off SSL meant, so I thought I better be safe and keep it turned on. - I think the simple fix was, on pia creating a rule to bypass http://hash.unraid.net, and everything seems to be working now. but not really sure why I got ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR error when I tried accessing http://www.hash.unraid.net, feels like it should have worked as though I'm browsing remotely.

Thanks, I couldn't get the www. working (kept getting ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR), and I was kind of worried about disabling SSL given my unify keeps telling me there's an active threats against my unraid NGINX ports. But I was able to add the hash.unraid.net to bypass list, and is now working fine. thank you!

what's interesting is that I can access all dockers fine even if I have PIA turned on, so I'm not sure if it's blocking accessing to my local network. when I try to go to my unraid server, it attempts to open hash.unraid.net (even if I type the IP address), returns an error ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED...

When I said browser VPN plug-in, I meant PIA Chrome plugin that I have. I often user that browser VPN plugin. when I have that enabled, I cannot access unraid whetner I try the local IP or hash.unraid.net

I'm also not sure what the issue is, but when I use the browser VPN plugin, it tries to connect to https://personalhash.unraid.net even if I'm on the same physical network, and returns an error saying ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED. it works fine when I'm using non-browser VPN though.

Are you saying I can't have unraid vpn turned on to use the remote access?

For some reason I'm having issue with the remote access, I've gone through certification, forwarding my port. and on unraid setting it says "Your Unraid Server is reachable from the internet". Yet on my servers, it says "local access", and can't login remotely. not working is fine, but the biggest issue when I try to go to the server, it automatically goes to hash.unraid.net, and when I'm using vpn, I can't even go to my server even if I'm on local network, and rerouting from IP to hash.unraid.net won't get turned off even if I turn off the remote access. is there anyways to fix this? it's super annoying

I've been researching about nextcloud for the entire night, I'm seeing that I need to do ALOT of customization in order for me to get this working... I know this is "free", but is it just me or this is ridiculously complex compared to other docker containers? I originally thought it was a cool way of moving my OneDrive photos, but when I start reading all these customization to make nextcloud equipped with similar functionality, I'm starting to appreciate M365 more... am I the only one feels this way?? I can't be that stupid...

I'm trying to install face recognition, and it tells me pdlib is missing... I'm reading that there was a plan on the integration back in January, anyone know if there's been any update?

Oh Weird, I tried it today after reading your comment, and it seems to work fine now...

I was reading that and unfortunately, I do not have pihole..

I'm trying to provision certificate, and I'm getting the following error: Sorry, an error occurred in processing your SSL certificate. The error is: Your router or DNS server has DNS rebinding protection enabled, preventing The help message seems to show that I need to add configuration line: Ubiquiti USG router: you can add this configuration line: set service dns forwarding options rebind-domain-ok=/unraid.net/ and I've been reading that it seems like UDM Pro / UDM would not allow for configuration changes? Is this true? If it's this is possible are there any documentation as to how to get this done? I've tried with SSH, and it doesn't seem to be working

That seemed to have done it! thank you!!

I had Telegraf installed although I don't use it. I've removed it from the server, just waiting to see if it spins down...

I realized many of my HDs aren't spinning down even though it's not doing anything, and I'm seeing that spindown issue isn't specific to my server. Anyone know the culprit?

Does this resolve the issue with BTRFS's performance issue?

Feels like I'm on this page everyday just to see if they've released rc3

So, it's normal that everything (including CPU load, memory/network usage are all showing zero? eventhough netdata works out of the box?

Is it normal that everything is showing up as N/A? or did I screw up something during the setup?

Thanks! for some reason I thought the guide had apt for alpine and apk for latest, changed, and the docker is running fine now!

I tried that, and now I'm getting /bin/sh: 1: apk: not found