Jcloud

As a concept, what about using a Mini-SAS to 4-sata port cable for the "unR" in unRaid; like cursive script lines but each line is part of the cable. Top-left of "u' would be the mini-sas port; line goes down bends to form the curve; the top right of the "u" is one of the Sata-ends. The bundle of 3 sata cables tails out of "u" and starts lower "n" goes up, cruves over and down to form the 'n' and terminates with another sata-port. Last two ends could form the "R." Too busy? Anyways just an idea I'll leave here for those with talent to send to trash or exploit and use.

Might be worth double checking warranty period, versus date of purchase?

Are you using the extension from the Noctura packaging? If so those are not extension cords but will slow down the rpm of your fans. If the system still complains of fan speed, but your system is stable, in OS or like a few hours of memtest, then it's the BIOS freaking out that the fans are going too slow, probably from all the passive cooling of Noctura; if that's the case you'll want to disable the alarm/warning for RPM speed in BIOS. Sorry would have added to my last note, but I glazed over the text. Edit, also isn't 30-31C Okay range for CPU? I'd have to research the temp range again, I never remember it. Okay couldn't leave it alone, looked it up on ark.intel.com I'm convinced the system is complaining the RPM is too low, but your temp is good. So stablity tests then tell BIOS to shut off alarm, notice.

For RAM just go into your BIOS and set the D.O.C.P. profile from auto, to whatever option it gives you -- probably just one option. For the fans they'll have proper voltage, I'm betting it was more for setting RPM ie want fans to be more quiet (slower), or for OC (always at 100%). I wouldn't give this much of a second thought, personally. Depending on the board you may have some CHA headers (or Chassis) if you want the "optional cpu" fan to show up as a chassis fan. Other then that, I'd have to see system with my hands to give you anything direct with your build. Unless, we're talking about the CPU cooler, then what you have is fine.

Yeah, I found someone's Docker app of Cacti and setup made a template for it. It's in the Community Apps selection now if you want to grab it and try it. I'd say based on response to it, consider it alpha/beta in function.

Is this Windows 10 guest, and was it trying to do an update, per chance?

Out of curiosity, have you tried with UEFI vm (OMVF right? at work trying to remember off top of my head), where it Boots with "TitanCore" and get the same graphics behavior?

By all means it should work, my first gut thought is there is something wrong with the ports and or cables for HDMI, so I would try using a different HDMI cable, a different HDMI/DVI port on monitor, or different monitor to check the ports on monitor. Also to double check that the ports are working normally, so if you have a spare HD, or system, try using just that card on a normal OS install or something. If all the testing comes back and says the hardware is OK. Then I would guess it's a drivers issue on guest OS, of your virtual machine. What you're wanting/describing from VM-config should already be done if you're getting video out in your VM. My two cents.

I have a Raspberry PI, has KODI use it to stream from my unRAID host through SMB/user shares. Getting tired of wanting to watch a movie, PI locks up, oops it was an H265/HVEC encoded, reboot PI. Idea: what if I made a user share mediaPI. Now in mediaPI I would like to make a series of symbolic links to my H264 files, and just have my Raspberry PI access, "MediaPI." Would the use of symbolic links from one user share to another be OK for unRAID services and array? If the idea is sound here's what I got, or have muddled so far: Since I use FileBot all of my movies in file name have the encoding, as part of the file name. So I can run: find /mnt/user/media/Video/Movies/ | grep x264 and produces a good list. What would be a way of dumping the list into "ln -s " such that, to invoke the second form (for which I would be in /mnt/user/mediaPI/) and step through the list? Easy stuff for those with good kung-fu, but mine is weak. Otherwise it's off to the search engines. Any info, advice and time are appreciated. If this is the wrong place let me know I'll nuke the post if MODS don't first. Good day.

I feed it leafy green things and it grew. Second graphics card just to test multiple gpu VMs, yup working ... semi-disappointed a number of people in forums having problems with Threadripper and multiple gpu's; sorta wanted to help look for the 'silver-bullet' instead, either my bios is correctly configured with all the tweaks, OR I picked a good board. Also, should remain quiet for the irony-faeries not to strike at me, after all VM2 run-time is so far in minutes.

Couple of google searches, also came up with the synonyms: NAT Reflection or NAT Hairpinning, you could check your router for those. However if the answer is still nope, then yes looks like you need router.

Well it is an ICO, so on hand sketchy already, and Storj still has to prove the concept both technically (easy) and as a business (much harder) in reality. But, I don't disagree with your point, for me I'm sitting on empty space, so miserly rate is easily accepted on my end. I don't know if the container supports it, but if it does I may. First off that's for the Storj GUI client, in case you missed that, but everything covered there is more about networking between your Storj node to the internet. We're unRAID community, I doubt you have host sitting on the edge of the network on the public side, So it's going to use Tunnel or UPnP. I have ports forwarded on my router to host for Storj and status still reports "UPnP,." ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┬─────────┬──────────┬──────────┬─────────┬───────────────┬─────────┬──────────┬───────────┬──────────────┐ │ Share │ Status │ Uptime │ Restarts │ Peers │ Allocs │ Delta │ Port │ Shared │ Bridges │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────┼──────────┼──────────┼─────────┼───────────────┼─────────┼──────────┼───────────┼──────────────┤ │ 09ecfee3004001336fc2050531a55695ed326ee3 │ running │ 8h 44m … │ 0 │ 101 │ 21 │ 20ms │ 4000 │ 9.1GB │ connected │ │ → /storj/share │ │ │ │ │ 2 received │ │ (uPnP) │ (0%) │ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────┴─────────┴──────────┴──────────┴─────────┴───────────────┴─────────┴──────────┴───────────┴──────────────┘ If you're expecting digits to just start flooding in, it's more like watching digital paint drying. If status = running AND Bridges=connected AND Peers > 0; Storj is working and on the Storj cloud. "Shared" is cumulative and, for me, moves at the rate of paint drying or grass growing. The important thing now, as far as I can tell, is being UP (uptime).

Yeah this is amusement and learning how to use Docker for me. So the earnings are extra to me -- I'm curious about the numbers I'll see, but any fiat money is gravy to me. I have empty space on my array, so, "why not?" for me. Simple Docker; almost as good as "hello world" learning how to use Docker.

Sorry, spelling has never been my strongest suite. To peek, peer, look at. Or in command line using something like: more, less, cat, or nano commands (or n-more) to view the file.

Looks right. If you don't want it throught uPnP see Nuhll note about editing confi.jason file. Might be worth double checking, peaking at the config.jason file to make sure everything looks right in there. It's all waiting now. For web interface, not with what Storj provided, and I'm not that good at programming to write my own at this time. I like to use console history to just re-exec the command, or could make it into a shell script simply enough.

Just fixed the typo thanks! I also noticed that the template settings act almost more as initial settings, I had increased the max size of my "share" on template, but noticed status was more with old size. I'm think I'm following out what you where pointing out before with the config.jason holding more importance over the template settings. 24th? that was the start of my flu, can I blame it on that? ... nah, that was my bad looking back.

Off original topic, but you can always try it for a month and see if it's something you like. The data is stored in standard Linux file-systems, so your data is never locked away in some DRM-locked-space. Sure the Distro isn't free, but considering the product: A stable distro. User setup/config has been done for you, and what setup/config to do has been wrapped into templates and a web interface. Then given the fact Lime-Technology has given the user a strong storage/data management, Application server, and KVM (hyper-visor). It's a one time fee, and price scales linear. Data is not DRM wrapped. For me it was, queue Fry-meme: "Take my money," as a total-linux-newb when I first bought unRAID. But that's me, and simply the ramblings of a satisfied customer/user (Plus key).

You're right about the reason, and in networks there could be multiple kinks.I too also run a pfsense router (external box not as a docker), and I made my noted change and my Docker status went from Tunnel to uPnP; you do need to click on "apply" rather then "save" when you change the template. I also noticed that just clicking on, "save," and restarting the container, did nothing to change the port status.

The Docker reports tunneling due to a choice I made making template, If you want to remove that tunnel, in the template settings change "Network Type" from, "Bridge" to "Host" and then remove "Storj network ports" (which is a port forward from host to container, the source of your tunnel). I'm running it on the host port, I did notice the reported Delta went down; perhaps I made a bad setup choice. My logic at the time of setup, was that containers should be fully contained, also thought it would make potential port conflicts easier to change/explain on forums. Sorry nuhll I don't have those numbers yet, just been doing this for about the last few weeks myself -- for something to tinker with and learn how to setup Docker containers. Okay to be fair I have space, but not payout, I've allocated 3TB to Storj Daemon since the time of my OP I've shared 8.02GB. Willing to report back that number once payout occurs. I simply made a template, which launches the stock Storj container, but I'll see about maybe taking things to next level and making a custom repo with stats. May be a while, we shall see what life throws at me.

Sorry about confusion, you definitely don't have one there. Here's mine: https://i.imgur.com/EUpZqzl.jpg And, yeah 'apply' definitely re-builds it each time. I think the save button is activated, by going to ://YourBox/Apps/ca_settings Advanced "Enable Template Developer Mode?" --> Change to Yes and apply.

You have your CPU and RAM, why not just source out, and buy a new logic board of same RAM/CPU specs? If it was what you wanted before, and you don't have green for a rebuild now, that seems like best consumer option to me. New board should about $100-250 range, I'd imagine. Versus MOBO, CPU, RAM ... which is how I interpreted your statement.

OP, based on I think Johnnie has the likely culprut. OP your system is crashing in 15-30 minutes in memtest, and you swapped the PSU but no memory errors and I'm assuming no thermal warning in bios; I think Johnnie hit your likely culprit. Are there any bulging, or crusty looking stuff on the top of any capacitors? If yes, then I would definitely call it a bad main board. If CAPS look good, and you still don't want to call it the logic board, you could try disconnecting all peripheral hardware so it's just MLB, RAM, CPU, (if the motherboard has onboard video remove video card), keyboard and monitor then run memtest again. If the system crashes with everything disco, very high probability of bad logic board. If the system is rock solid in memtest, for say 12+ hours, then that means something unplugged is causing your crashes (either directly being the part, or warn out component of MLB as it's interacting with the component. You'll want to introduce a component, test, then add another part, test, repeat this until your system goes back into FUBAR. I.E. process of elimination.

Old topic, and sorry if this is the wrong place to propose this. Wha Another possibly might be to have it /boot/previous, and make "previous" entries in syslinux menu. Have a sort of ring-buffer of current past, and on an upgrade the previous would get flushed out? I'm splitting hairs on implementation, and it's just a suggestion. But in general, I'm +1 for this being a useful troubleshooting feature for people.

Sounds right to me. If you really need an open forwarded port, and your router supports it, you could apply a white-list of allowed remote networks. If you're road-warrior and need it to be wide open to 0.0.0.0 you could have two rules: A white-list rule for most-every-day use, and a secondary rule (probably just as it is now) which is disabled most of the time, but you enable before you go on the road.

Haven't tested it, but from your documentation, I would bet $5 on working, for Windows 8/8.1 systems. As for Windows updates I think that is appended to end of shutdown routines, so I too would think that would work. If it doesn't work, that would be some interesting errors. :-) My two wooden-nickels of theory-crafting.