dalben

cool, that looks all good now. Thank you.

Ah, ok, thanks. Let me know when it's ready to test and I'd be happy to do so if you want

um, thanks, but how do I fix that ? I've deleted the container and recreated it with no luck. Here's the log if that helps kodi.log.txt

I can't seem to get Helix loaded. Here are my settings in the Docker. Whenever I start to container it kicks off the upgrade vid db from 90 to 93 and music db from 48 to 52. Any clues ?

My Docker image slowly fills up for no known reason that I can think of. I'm assuming the docker updates come down but the old versions never get killed. I am now close to my size limit again. What's the easiest way to clear out unused files/containers bits without wiping the entire img file and restarting again (that's what I have had to do a couple of times before. Label: none uuid: 5143f85b-b38f-4e19-89bf-a7c6a96b1f29 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 7.08GiB devid 1 size 10.00GiB used 9.04GiB path /dev/loop0 btrfs-progs v4.1.2

+1 +2 Best out there at the moment.

Still not working. No rush, I was just trying it out to see if I could use it.

Trying to get UrBackup going and this is what the log file pops up with and then the containwer stops /usr/bin/docker logs --tail=350 -f UrBackup 2>&1 2015-04-05 15:52:42: ERROR: Error preparing Query [sELECT tvalue FROM misc WHERE tkey='db_version']: no such table: misc 2015-04-05 15:52:42: ERROR: Error preparing Query [sELECT tvalue FROM misc WHERE tkey='db_version']: no such table: misc 2015-04-05 15:52:42: ERROR: Error preparing Query [CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS files_idx ON files (shahash, filesize, clientid)]: no such table: main.files 2015-04-05 15:52:42: ERROR: Error preparing Query [CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS files_did_count ON files (did_count)]: no such table: main.files 2015-04-05 15:52:42: ERROR: Error preparing Query [CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS files_backupid ON files (backupid)]: no such table: main.files 2015-04-05 15:52:42: ERROR: Error preparing Query [sELECT value FROM settings_db.settings WHERE key=? AND clientid=0]: no such table: settings_db.settings 2015-04-05 15:52:42: ERROR: Error preparing Query [uPDATE misc SET tvalue=? WHERE tkey='files_cache']: no such table: misc 2015-04-05 15:52:42: ERROR: Error preparing Query [sELECT linkname, linktarget FROM directory_link_journal]: no such table: directory_link_journal 2015-04-05 15:52:54: ERROR: Error preparing Query [sELECT tvalue FROM misc WHERE tkey='db_version']: no such table: misc 2015-04-05 15:52:54: ERROR: Error preparing Query [sELECT tvalue FROM misc WHERE tkey='db_version']: no such table: misc 2015-04-05 15:52:54: ERROR: Error preparing Query [CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS files_idx ON files (shahash, filesize, clientid)]: no such table: main.files 2015-04-05 15:52:54: ERROR: Error preparing Query [CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS files_did_count ON files (did_count)]: no such table: main.files 2015-04-05 15:52:54: ERROR: Error preparing Query [CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS files_backupid ON files (backupid)]: no such table: main.files 2015-04-05 15:52:54: ERROR: Error preparing Query [sELECT value FROM settings_db.settings WHERE key=? AND clientid=0]: no such table: settings_db.settings 2015-04-05 15:52:54: ERROR: Error preparing Query [uPDATE misc SET tvalue=? WHERE tkey='files_cache']: no such table: misc 2015-04-05 15:52:54: ERROR: Error preparing Query [sELECT linkname, linktarget FROM directory_link_journal]: no such table: directory_link_journal Any ideas?

Is this script still valid for the 64bit beta versions of unRAID?

Installed this yesterday. Ran it 4:40am nicely. Thanks.

Is this container working ? I run TMM from my desktop but if I could trigger it via cron /command line running on my server that would be very cool

Network, Environment, Research & Development Pack sounds good to me,

Who wants to sell me an unpublisghed container so I can release it as my ownwork ?

As a non-dev who would be excluded from this type of subforum, I think it's a great idea if it helps deliver stable, consistent and "official" unraid containers with the same sort of path structures which means anything we install would require minimal customisation. Wouldn't alienate me in the slightest.

I do like the idea of a master unraid set. Already I look at the templates and see more than one version of a containerised app and I have no idea what, if any, differences there are and which I should use.

I wonder what % of the unRAID user base need VMs. Especially with docker containers available these days. Totally uneducated guess but to a layman like me it looks like the time lt are spending on VM integration is disproportionate to the amount of users who will use it.

I'd also have a setting that can force the array to spin up if a certain directory gets viewed. This would be the best of both worlds as I have seen media players timeout waiting for the disks to spin up. Having a disk with a root folder of say /movies/ spin up when a media player starts vuiewing the directory would be well handy. this could be further tuned by having cache_dirsd react differently with different users. i.e. from my PC I wouldn't need the array spinning up because I could just be looking for what I have. but if a user that I have assigned to the media player(s) starts searching, it's most likely going to want to read content off the disk.

After reading it deeper I frealised it's not waht I'm thinking of. I thought of 1 docker container that has nzbdrone, sickrage, couch potato, transmission, flexget and headphones all together. So instead of needed 6 containers, I just use 1. They all pretty much work together to produce a desired result. I'm assuming as single container would mean less HD requirement and less memory requirement. But maybe I don't understand the unerlying advantages of Docker and it makes no sense.

I like the idea of a "PirateShip" docker like this one: https://github.com/GeoffreyPlitt/docker-pirateship Having moved to sickrage and nzbdrone, this particular pirateship doesn't do it for me. But the idea is very cool I reckon

hmm, not for those of us who run headless. Prefer it to be a menu option.

yes, I use that combo as well. gfjardim did stick a flexget container on guthub that used the small footprint bvase insterad or arch, but I havent had the time to work out how to checkout of guthub and create a container out of it.

Is there any chance of implementing group level permissioning on shares ? In my use case, I'd like all 4 XBMC clients to have their own login name but ideally members of a group that has the permissions. Then a goup for kids, maybe one for guests or visitors. I like my unRAID server to be locked down pretty hard so access has to be granted as opposed to revoked. Groupe would make it so much easier. (if it makes a difference, i predominantly use SMB)

This is available as a plugin. Not sure I see any benefit for this to be a docker container.

I don't know what's out there in Linux land but I'd love a setup,that can act as a home DNS/dhcp with an day to use front end GUI. Though thinking about it, the might have to reside in the unRAID core instance and not a docker container. Ignore me.

Here it is http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=4500.msg220061;topicseen#msg220061