@grtgbln I am trying to set up surfsense but am not having any luck. When I look at the logs of the container this is all I see: python: can't open file '/app/main.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory

I'm guessing it fails because it is looking for main.py files in /app which is mapped to an appdata folder but nothing exists inside the folder.

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!

@grtgbln Dawarich just added back Sidekiq, but it's not avaliable on the UnRaid app store anymore. Will you add it again?
Thank you!

11 minutes ago, Stabster said:

@grtgbln Dawarich just added back Sidekiq, but it's not avaliable on the UnRaid app store anymore. Will you add it again?
Thank you!

I am working with the Dawarich developer on a PR to get it back in the CA store.

On 6/10/2025 at 6:12 PM, grtgbln said:

I am working with the Dawarich developer on a PR to get it back in the CA store.

Just wanted to say thanks — I see Dawarich is back up and working again!

One thing I ran into: I had to install a separate Redis container to get it working.

When I set REDIS_URL=redis://<host>:<port>/1, it refused to start and threw the following error:

ArgumentError: invalid value for Integer(): "1/0"

It seems something inside the container tried to parse 1/0 as the Redis database number instead of just /1.

I didn’t try using /2, so maybe that could’ve worked — but at the time, I didn’t think to test anything other than /1.

Just wanted to mention it in case others run into something similar or if it’s a bug worth looking into.

Thanks again for the continued development.

10 hours ago, Stabster said:

Just wanted to say thanks — I see Dawarich is back up and working again!

One thing I ran into: I had to install a separate Redis container to get it working.

When I set REDIS_URL=redis://<host>:<port>/1, it refused to start and threw the following error:

ArgumentError: invalid value for Integer(): "1/0"

It seems something inside the container tried to parse 1/0 as the Redis database number instead of just /1.

I didn’t try using /2, so maybe that could’ve worked — but at the time, I didn’t think to test anything other than /1.

Just wanted to mention it in case others run into something similar or if it’s a bug worth looking into.

Thanks again for the continued development.

GitHub

Updated container 0.27 won't start on Unraid · Issue #129...

Hi, I updated the container, added the new volumes and variables but now it won't start anymore - this is the output of the log: 14:14:11 web.1 | from /var/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.4.0/gems/activer...

Would anyone be willing to share a walkthrough or at least how you've got Dawarich to work with the 2 different containers it needs to run properly? Sadly I'm not able to do it correctly as the docker fails to load (probably something broken between all 3 instances that need to be running)...

I am having trouble getting the Dynamix container to start correctly. I touched the files listed in the templete into the appdata folder, but I get an 'Internal Server Error' when I try to access the webUI. The logs say the config.json is misconfigured, but I saw elsewhere you are supposed to edit that from the GUI. Any ideas?

On 6/4/2025 at 7:38 PM, 4554551n said:

Looks like it's Python....

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

| Processes: |

| GPU GI CI PID Type Process name GPU Memory |

| ID ID Usage |

|=========================================================================================|

| 0 N/A N/A 781427 C /usr/bin/ollama 4758MiB |

| 0 N/A N/A 1844693 C python 2794MiB |

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

0 781427 root 4758MiB /usr/bin/ollama runner --model /root...........
0 1844693 root 2794MiB python -u webui.py ................

Hi, just following up on this?

6 hours ago, 4554551n said:

Hi, just following up on this?

Nothing to do on my end, please direct to the GPU Stats GitHub linked earlier. Thread here: https://forums.unraid.net/topic/89453-plugin-gpu-statistics/

Edited June 18, 20251 yr by grtgbln

On 6/8/2025 at 7:31 PM, dingwat said:

@grtgbln I am trying to set up the Gramps Web docker container. In the Gramps Web docker documentation, it states that when the docker container is started, it will display a first-run wizard. When I install the container on Unraid and go to the web UI in a browser, it simply shows the login page, and I cannot login because I haven't configured a user yet.

Is there an additional option that I need to pass when creating the container? Or is there a default username/password to get into the container after it is started?

Thanks!

@grtgbln any follow up on this? Thank you

Hey @grtgbln ,

I'm the author of An Otter Wiki, for which you provide a template. First of all: Thanks for that!

I'm not familiar with unraid, can I review the template? Where can I findt it?

(1) Is in the template there is a PUID=99 and GUID=100 set by default? This leads (in this case) to problems with debian based images, since there the user group exists with gid=100.

With the lateest version 2.11.0 An Otter Wiki supports PUID and GUID, I added a workaround to avoid users running into errors.

Is running images as 99:100 the best practice in unraid templates?

(2) The image in this template is configured to use redimp/otterwiki:latest I highly recommend to use redimp/otterwiki:2 as image to avoid running into breaking changes with an update of the major version.

Cheers!

18 hours ago, redimp said:

Hey @grtgbln ,

I'm the author of An Otter Wiki, for which you provide a template. First of all: Thanks for that!

I'm not familiar with unraid, can I review the template? Where can I findt it?

(1) Is in the template there is a PUID=99 and GUID=100 set by default? This leads (in this case) to problems with debian based images, since there the user group exists with gid=100.

With the lateest version 2.11.0 An Otter Wiki supports PUID and GUID, I added a workaround to avoid users running into errors.

Is running images as 99:100 the best practice in unraid templates?

(2) The image in this template is configured to use redimp/otterwiki:latest I highly recommend to use redimp/otterwiki:2 as image to avoid running into breaking changes with an update of the major version.

Cheers!

Hey there, thanks!

The template is available here: https://github.com/nwithan8/unraid_templates/blob/main/templates/otterwiki.xml

Feel free to open a PR if there's any changes. I also have a semi-automated process of monitoring upstream apps for changes; if you have a Docker Compose file in your repo, I can enroll it into the system, which will help me be notified if changes are made to the Docker app.

1. 99:100 is the standard user:group for Unraid, which helps avoid permission errors. It can be overridden by PUID and PGID (1000:1000 is also common in a lot of Docker containers).

2. I'll update the template to indicate that latest could cause breaking changes on major version releases, and offer the "2" tag as a stable branch. The issue will be I'll need to manually update the template with the new stable tag if a major version is ever released. And users using "2" won't necessarily be made aware that there's a new major version available. Ah, the joys of Docker version pinning :)

Edited June 26, 20251 yr by grtgbln

6 hours ago, grtgbln said:

The template is available here: [..]

1. 99:100 is the standard user:group for Unraid [..]

2. I'll update the template to indicate that latest could cause breaking changes on major version releases [..]

Thank you for your answer. That all sounds reasonable.

With the "warning" added I'm fine with using :latest.

On 6/16/2025 at 3:33 PM, CopesaCola said:

I am having trouble getting the Dynamix container to start correctly. I touched the files listed in the templete into the appdata folder, but I get an 'Internal Server Error' when I try to access the webUI. The logs say the config.json is misconfigured, but I saw elsewhere you are supposed to edit that from the GUI. Any ideas?

@grtgbln any ideas for this?

@grtgbln

Just wondering if it would be possible to provide SurfSense as its 'full stack deployment', so it has everything available all in one?
Struggling to set up all the dependencies for the backend/frontend.

Tried to install the MediaManager containers through CA and I get: Error response from daemon: No such container: MediaManager---Backend. ghcr.io/maxdorninger/mediamanager/backend:latest just gives a 404.

13 minutes ago, PackRatt said:

Tried to install the MediaManager containers through CA and I get: Error response from daemon: No such container: MediaManager---Backend. ghcr.io/maxdorninger/mediamanager/backend:latest just gives a 404.

Looks like the developer consolidated the frontend and backend into one container, I'll deprecate the two separate containers and add a new template for the new one, thanks for letting me know.

Hi @grtgbln,
When you have a moment, it appears that the configuration of your Community Apps Template for Profilarr utilizes the same configuration as the one from one of the Profilarr app developer's Seraphys.

After installing either instance, both show as installed even though only one has actually been installed (screenshot attached).

For context, I had no previous version of Profilarr installed when discovering this issue.

Let me know if you have any questions or need more information 😊

Edited August 6, 2025Aug 6 by infiniterookie

8 hours ago, infiniterookie said:

Hi @grtgbln,
When you have a moment, it appears that the configuration of your Community Apps Template for Profilarr utilizes the same configuration as the one from one of the Profilarr app developer's Seraphys.

After installing either instance, both show as installed even though only one has actually been installed (screenshot attached).

For context, I had no previous version of Profilarr installed when discovering this issue.

Let me know if you have any questions or need more information 😊

It looks like that other contributor published their template shortly after I published mine, but since they both use the same Docker image, the Community Apps store says both are installed on your system. The spirit of the CA Store is to not have duplicates of the same exact Docker image. Since Seraphys is one of the devs of Profilarr, I'll reach out to them about deprecating my version and handing over official control to them. Thanks for letting me know.

Hello. The Threadfin v1.3 (0) update is reported as a bad build in GitHub, is there a repository setting in your template that would revert to the previous version?

1 hour ago, cpthook said:

Hello. The Threadfin v1.3 (0) update is reported as a bad build in GitHub, is there a repository setting in your template that would revert to the previous version?

Hopefully they overwrite their latest tag on Docker Hub and un-publish 1.3.0. In the meantime, you can edit the repository to pin to a specific version: https://hub.docker.com/r/fyb3roptik/threadfin/tags

Ex. fyb3roptik/threadfin:1.2.35

Hey everyone, using threadfin with Emby I am having 1204 errors related to FFMPEG. This error happens randomly a few minutes in or even close to an hour. Does anyone else have this issue? I’m wondering if it might be my IPTV provider. I’ve seen a lot of people have issues with FFMPEG and I’m not sure how to overcome it. Thanks!

[Threadfin] [ERROR] FFMPEG error (Streaming was stopped by third party transcoder (FFmpeg / VLC)) - EC: 1204

In unraid fix common problems, it is showing the following warning:

Tunarr (ghcr.io/chrisbenincasa/tunarr:latest) has the following comments: Default tag (:latest) does not exist on dockerHub Additionally, this application has been blacklisted from Community Applications for that reason.

This seems to have just started up recently. And I noticed on the github page it shows the following instructions for installation:

docker pull ghcr.io/chrisbenincasa/tunarr:edge

Is this something to be concerned about?
Is there anything that can be done to resolve this?

3 hours ago, last.rogue said:

In unraid fix common problems, it is showing the following warning:

Tunarr (ghcr.io/chrisbenincasa/tunarr:latest) has the following comments: Default tag (:latest) does not exist on dockerHub Additionally, this application has been blacklisted from Community Applications for that reason.

This seems to have just started up recently. And I noticed on the github page it shows the following instructions for installation:

docker pull ghcr.io/chrisbenincasa/tunarr:edge

Is this something to be concerned about?
Is there anything that can be done to resolve this?

This is outdated. Tunarr as of August 2024 has a :latest tag and is currently not blacklisted on the app store. It was previously due to a configuration issue. The latest tag is also regularly updated now that Tunarr is out of beta. You can simply ignore this warning from Fix Common Problems.

I'm trying to get tailscale setup on anythingLLM but it fails iwth

text error warn system array login

npm notice

npm notice New major version of npm available! 10.8.2 -> 11.5.2

npm notice Changelog: https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v11.5.2

npm notice To update run: npm install -g [email protected]

npm notice

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐

│ Update available 5.3.1 -> 6.15.0 │

│ │

│ This is a major update - please follow the guide at │

│ https://pris.ly/d/major-version-upgrade │

│ │

│ Run the following to update │

│ npm i --save-dev prisma@latest │

│ npm i @prisma/client@latest │

└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

=======================

Executing Unraid Docker Hook for Tailscale

ERROR: No root privileges!

ERROR: Unraid Docker Hook script throw an error!

Starting container without Tailscale!

Starting container...

=======================

I tried enabling privilege but nope.
I also tried installing within the container but looks su has a password set...