loady Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 No, it wasnt a typo, i have done two /, i have rectified that but in anycase i could not write to the folder and nor can i delete it, says its write protected now I had mine set to 770 as advised by you, but i also looked up permissions and got a bit confused..i saw that someone had set theirs to 775, im guessing that your setting is a more cautious setting whereas i may be opening the floodgates with 775 ? As requested... root@warptower:~# ls -al /mnt/cache/.apps total 1 drwxrwx--- 4 nobody users 104 2012-02-28 21:40 ./ drwxrwx--- 6 nobody users 128 2012-03-07 03:41 ../ drwxrwx--- 15 nobody users 904 2012-03-06 18:06 .sabnzbd/ drwxrwx--- 9 nobody users 640 2012-03-07 07:23 .sickbeard/ root@warptower:~# ls -al /mnt/cache/.apps/.sabnzbd total 619 drwxrwx--- 15 nobody users 904 2012-03-07 07:37 ./ drwxrwx--- 4 nobody users 104 2012-02-28 21:40 ../ -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 2270 2012-03-06 18:06 ABOUT.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 53372 2012-03-06 18:06 CHANGELOG.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 1071 2012-03-06 18:06 COPYRIGHT.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 17990 2012-03-06 18:06 GPL2.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 35147 2012-03-06 18:06 GPL3.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 5335 2012-03-06 18:06 INSTALL.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 4268 2012-03-06 18:06 ISSUES.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 311 2012-03-06 18:06 PKG-INFO -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 935 2012-03-06 18:06 README.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 5316 2012-03-06 18:06 SABHelper.py -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 62010 2012-03-06 18:06 SABnzbd.py -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 421 2012-03-06 18:06 Sample-PostProc.cmd -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 433 2012-03-06 18:06 Sample-PostProc.sh drwxrwx--- 3 nobody users 360 2012-03-07 03:13 admin/ drwxrwx--- 5 nobody users 1592 2012-03-06 18:06 cherrypy/ drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 560 2012-02-28 21:11 email/ drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 240 2012-03-06 18:06 gntp/ drwxrwx--- 7 nobody users 168 2012-02-28 21:11 interfaces/ drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 560 2012-02-28 21:11 licenses/ drwxrwx--- 9 nobody users 216 2012-02-28 21:11 locale/ -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 96689 2012-03-06 18:06 nzb.ico drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 520 2012-03-07 03:08 nzbbackup/ drwxrwx--- 5 nobody users 120 2012-02-28 21:11 po/ drwxrwx--- 3 nobody users 3240 2012-03-06 18:06 sabnzbd/ -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 287934 2012-03-06 18:06 sabnzbd.ico -rw------- 1 nobody users 3821 2012-03-07 07:37 sabnzbd.ini -rw------- 1 nobody users 3822 2012-03-06 18:06 sabnzbd.ini.bak drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 48 2012-03-06 11:56 scripts/ drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 112 2012-02-28 21:11 tools/ drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 144 2012-02-28 21:11 util/ root@warptower:~# /mnt/cache/.apps/.sabnzbd/scripts -bash: /mnt/cache/.apps/.sabnzbd/scripts: is a directory root@warptower:~# ps -ef | grep sab root 2048 26281 0 07:45 pts/0 00:00:00 grep sab nobody 4314 1 0 Mar06 ? 00:04:15 python /mnt/cache/.apps/.sabnzbd/SABnzbd.py --daemon -f /mnt/cache/.apps/.sabnzbd/sabnzbd.ini Not sure if its relevant, i added a password to the root account but i was getting similar troubles writing to shares, so i wiped it and set change/apply, i noticed now that when i log into telnet or when i open explorer to browse network it prompts me for password for root, i just leave it blank and press enter, its as though the password has been set to ...well...nothing I am greatful for your constant help, just so you know, i am not blindly following your instruction, i am interested is what they are doing.... The first two line are asking to list everything within the directories given ? The third line is just a query on what i typed, though i dont understand why..what else would it be other than a directory ? The fourth line im not to sure about, is it asking what processes are running in memory as a full listing and then going on to search for any instances of the word SAB within those processes ? Quote Link to comment
prostuff1 Posted March 7, 2012 Author Share Posted March 7, 2012 No, it wasnt a typo, i have done two /, i have rectified that but in anycase i could not write to the folder and nor can i delete it, says its write protected now I had mine set to 770 as advised by you, but i also looked up permissions and got a bit confused..i saw that someone had set theirs to 775, im guessing that your setting is a more cautious setting whereas i may be opening the floodgates with 775 ? Basically correct. I am setting read,write,execute permissions for owner and group and NO permissions for all others. You are giving read,write,execute for owner and group and also giving read,execute permissions to "others". Look here root@warptower:~# ls -al /mnt/cache/.apps total 1 drwxrwx--- 4 nobody users 104 2012-02-28 21:40 ./ drwxrwx--- 6 nobody users 128 2012-03-07 03:41 ../ drwxrwx--- 15 nobody users 904 2012-03-06 18:06 .sabnzbd/ drwxrwx--- 9 nobody users 640 2012-03-07 07:23 .sickbeard/ That is what I expected root@warptower:~# ls -al /mnt/cache/.apps/.sabnzbd total 619 drwxrwx--- 15 nobody users 904 2012-03-07 07:37 ./ drwxrwx--- 4 nobody users 104 2012-02-28 21:40 ../ -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 2270 2012-03-06 18:06 ABOUT.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 53372 2012-03-06 18:06 CHANGELOG.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 1071 2012-03-06 18:06 COPYRIGHT.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 17990 2012-03-06 18:06 GPL2.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 35147 2012-03-06 18:06 GPL3.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 5335 2012-03-06 18:06 INSTALL.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 4268 2012-03-06 18:06 ISSUES.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 311 2012-03-06 18:06 PKG-INFO -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 935 2012-03-06 18:06 README.txt -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 5316 2012-03-06 18:06 SABHelper.py -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 62010 2012-03-06 18:06 SABnzbd.py -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 421 2012-03-06 18:06 Sample-PostProc.cmd -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 433 2012-03-06 18:06 Sample-PostProc.sh drwxrwx--- 3 nobody users 360 2012-03-07 03:13 admin/ drwxrwx--- 5 nobody users 1592 2012-03-06 18:06 cherrypy/ drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 560 2012-02-28 21:11 email/ drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 240 2012-03-06 18:06 gntp/ drwxrwx--- 7 nobody users 168 2012-02-28 21:11 interfaces/ drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 560 2012-02-28 21:11 licenses/ drwxrwx--- 9 nobody users 216 2012-02-28 21:11 locale/ -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 96689 2012-03-06 18:06 nzb.ico drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 520 2012-03-07 03:08 nzbbackup/ drwxrwx--- 5 nobody users 120 2012-02-28 21:11 po/ drwxrwx--- 3 nobody users 3240 2012-03-06 18:06 sabnzbd/ -rw-rw---- 1 nobody users 287934 2012-03-06 18:06 sabnzbd.ico -rw------- 1 nobody users 3821 2012-03-07 07:37 sabnzbd.ini -rw------- 1 nobody users 3822 2012-03-06 18:06 sabnzbd.ini.bak drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 48 2012-03-06 11:56 scripts/ drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 112 2012-02-28 21:11 tools/ drwxrwx--- 2 nobody users 144 2012-02-28 21:11 util/ That is also what I expected root@warptower:~# /mnt/cache/.apps/.sabnzbd/scripts -bash: /mnt/cache/.apps/.sabnzbd/scripts: is a directory That was my fault, there should have been an ls -al in from of that line just like the previous 2 commands root@warptower:~# ps -ef | grep sab root 2048 26281 0 07:45 pts/0 00:00:00 grep sab nobody 4314 1 0 Mar06 ? 00:04:15 python /mnt/cache/.apps/.sabnzbd/SABnzbd.py --daemon -f /mnt/cache/.apps/.sabnzbd/sabnzbd.ini[/code] That is what I expected Not sure if its relevant, i added a password to the root account but i was getting similar troubles writing to shares, so i wiped it and set change/apply, i noticed now that when i log into telnet or when i open explorer to browse network it prompts me for password for root, i just leave it blank and press enter, its as though the password has been set to ...well...nothing ... that is the most relevant piece of information you have given me thus far. Had you mentioned this previously I would not have had to do all of the above. OK, what you need to do is STOP using the root account to log into the server and make changes. I have talked about this in other threads and it seems to hang up every new user. The root user is part of the root group and can only access those files/folders that have permission to. Most all apps under 5.0 beta of unRAID should be run as nobody in the users group which then prohibits the root user and root group from accessing those files. You can view this correlation by doing a cat /etc/passwd cat /etc/group What you need to do is create a new user from the unRAID webGUI, call it whatever you like, and give it a password. I created a user called admin and gave it a password. I then went through all my shares and DISABLED write access to the share by the root user. If I had allowed it crap could get screwed up because of the user:group permissions settings for unRAID 5.0bX. Note that the new permissions of unRAID 5.0 is correct and is "technically" broken under unRAID 4.7. The main gist from the above is that you should not be using the root user to write/modify files on the server via SMB/NFS/AFP. I am greatful for your constant help, just so you know, i am not blindly following your instruction, i am interested is what they are doing.... That is good to hear/see. The first two line are asking to list everything within the directories given ? correct and show me all information about the files it finds The third line is just a query on what i typed, though i dont understand why..what else would it be other than a directory ? That was my mistake... I forgot a part of the command The fourth line im not to sure about, is it asking what processes are running in memory as a full listing and then going on to search for any instances of the word SAB within those processes ? It is a command that will should be any running processes (the "ps -ef" part) that match a search string (the "grep sab" part). The pipe ("|") is used to send the output of the "ps -ef" command to the "grep" utility. Quote Link to comment
loady Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Thanks a lot prostuff !! i really think that is going to make things a lot smoother now...i was just getting thwart with constant troubles !!..i will go off an do all that now, once i have done it i will reboot the server, is it safe to say it will be fixed or should i go from scratch again ?? just to be sure. It is a command that will should be any running processes (the "ps -ef" part) that match a search string (the "grep sab" part). The pipe ("|") is used to send the output of the "ps -ef" command to the "grep" utility. Been so used to / \ over the years..i wondered what | was !!, took a while to get it on screen at first. So...where is the user 'nobody' ??..seems a silly question, its not in my user groups on the webgui, i assume its like a default account created by the package/application that you dont see or need to ?..the application using it grants its own access to where it needs ? same as plex-unraid user ?...so if i was creating a package myself called..lets say, FTPMYMUM and i needed to have access to certain things with write permissions, i would create a background user as such and call it whatever i wanted within the package..for example 'ftpMMadmin' if i wanted Quote Link to comment
sweigh Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 I am running into an issue with download speeds in Sabnzbd on my Unraid server. On my Windows PC I hold a steady 2.7-2.8MB/s downstream, but on my Unraid box I can't manage anything over 2.0MB/s. I updated to the latest package tonight and that hasn't made a difference. I've looked around and can't find anyone with any similar problems... Does anyone have any suggestions why I am achieving slower download speeds on Unraid vs any other system? Quote Link to comment
generalz Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 I am running into an issue with download speeds in Sabnzbd on my Unraid server. On my Windows PC I hold a steady 2.7-2.8MB/s downstream, but on my Unraid box I can't manage anything over 2.0MB/s. I updated to the latest package tonight and that hasn't made a difference. I've looked around and can't find anyone with any similar problems... Does anyone have any suggestions why I am achieving slower download speeds on Unraid vs any other system? Do you have it installed on your flash drive? Quote Link to comment
sweigh Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 I am running into an issue with download speeds in Sabnzbd on my Unraid server. On my Windows PC I hold a steady 2.7-2.8MB/s downstream, but on my Unraid box I can't manage anything over 2.0MB/s. I updated to the latest package tonight and that hasn't made a difference. I've looked around and can't find anyone with any similar problems... Does anyone have any suggestions why I am achieving slower download speeds on Unraid vs any other system? Do you have it installed on your flash drive? No, it's running from and downloading to my cache drive. install-dir: /mnt/cache/.sabnzbd install-host: 192.168.1.50 install-port: 8081 log-dir: /mnt/cache/.sabnzbd/var download-dir: /mnt/cache/.sabnzbd/downloads complete-dir: /mnt/cache/.sabnzbd/complete Quote Link to comment
generalz Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 well if you have over 2gb you could tweaking "Article Cache Limit" 128M or -1. I have set mine to -1 but i have 4 gigs of ram. What kind of nic? make sure "Download Speed Limit" is not set how many connections do you have it set to for the server? Quote Link to comment
sweigh Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 well if you have over 2gb you could tweaking "Article Cache Limit" 128M or -1. I have set mine to -1 but i have 4 gigs of ram. What kind of nic? make sure "Download Speed Limit" is not set how many connections do you have it set to for the server? I've got 4GB of RAM and thus have the cache set at a modest 200MB currently, but tried -1 and it made no difference. The NIC is from the onboard motherboard. I used the same hardware for a Windows environment before I set up the server, so aside from a driver issue with the server I believe the hardware to be solid. Network transfers are also solid. There is no download speed limit set. Quote Link to comment
generalz Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 I've seen realtek nics cause slowness because of non optimized linux drivers that work fine in windows. If your cache drive is not busy all the time im not sure why it would go slow, sab runs more in memory until its time to unpack. unless you don't have enough connections to the server. I think the one im using allows 30 connections and im using 29. Using SSL? tried changing the port? Quote Link to comment
sweigh Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 Not using SSL. I ran 6 connections in Windows to max my connection, maybe it requires more in Unraid.. I'll let you know.. Also, I would expect network transfers to be affected if there was a driver issue. I can read from my Unraid server at a steady 80MB/s with 100MB/s bursts. Writing is between 20-40MB/s... It's only this download speed that is suffering. Quote Link to comment
sweigh Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 Yep, looks like I just needed to add more connections. I'll play with the number to find the sweet spot. Thanks for helping me walk myself through the possibilities Generalz, much appreciated! Quote Link to comment
loady Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Yep...back again .... I am still managing to break this by running 'new perms', when doing so i loose the sabToSickbeard.py in the cats section on SAB. I done what you suggested, i gave root READONLY access on EVERY share, including cache and flash. I set an admin account and gave full access to every share, including again, cache and flash...i have other users that have access to certain folders (my girls for thier homework and movie/tv folders)..i was getting access denied on thier pc upsatairs to the shares with correct username/pass so i done the usual new perms, after that SAB is broken again, i have read back a few posts ago by generalz... Id have to agree, looking that the back posts on the permissions issue. this probably is not the best way to do this, but telnet or ssh into unraid cd /user/cache/.apps chmod -R 777 /.sabnzbd chmod -R 777 /.sickbeard then find the auto process files and chmod -x filename.py or you could do it with winscp if your a gui person I had similar issues because I was running it standalone as root and I move to Prostuff1's excellent setup and it runs as 'nobody' so it did not have access to the folders that 'root' created. After setting the permissions you advised for ROOT and setting up an admin user, that post is how i got SAB working again, it is also how i have just now got it working again after doing new perms, i thought that i wouldnt be seeing this problem again and its so frustrating that i cant get my head around it...the only logical explanation i can think of and through reading generalz comments is that i need to again wipe my flash and install unraid from scratch and the first thing i do is set the ROOT account to read only and then set up an admin account and THEN...only THEN after that go ahead with installing SAB and SB..i can only think that it is still causing me problems because even though i followed your advice SAB and SB were installed prior to that when ROOT was still READ/WRITE ?? EDIT: confusing myself... NOT reinstall UNraid fresh..maybe just uninstall SAB and SB and reinstall again ?? Quote Link to comment
prostuff1 Posted March 13, 2012 Author Share Posted March 13, 2012 Do not run 'new perms', the reason it breaks the SAB stuff is because it does not expect anything on the server to be executable so does not set that bit. Quote Link to comment
jaychamp Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 In case anyone needs it, I have a package made for the 0.7.0Beta3 version. I'm a newb to this package stuff but I used myself as a guinea pig for about a week and everything is working OK. I had to switch to the beta version because of nzb errors with NZBMATRIX. It was suggested at the SAB forums and it did indeed fix the issue. There's some nice added features too http://www.mediafire.com/?mqbdezc2egscok9 prostuff1 if you get bored take a look at the file and let me know if I missed anything Quote Link to comment
TyantA Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 Sweet, getting errors myself. Will give this a go this weekend! Quote Link to comment
PsyVision Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 So I set this up this weekend to finally start making use of my giganews account and I am finding it rinsing the memory in my NAS and then failing to start again once it has crashed. I have Sabnzbd 0.7.0-beta3 as posted by jaychamp along with the most recent Sickbeard. I have 2GB of RAM in my system and shortly after Sabnzbd starts I get some memory issues mentioned in my syslog and then it falls over and the only way to start it again is a complete reboot. I'm not 100% sure whether it's Sabnzbd or Sickbeard that is causing the issue but when looking at memory usage on the server (through a script I found) I can see 'python' is using the majority of mine. Is it worth rolling back to an earlier version or does Sabnzbd and Sickbeard just require a lot of RAM? The Sabnzbd logs show no errors either. Quote Link to comment
generalz Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 So I set this up this weekend to finally start making use of my giganews account and I am finding it rinsing the memory in my NAS and then failing to start again once it has crashed. I have Sabnzbd 0.7.0-beta3 as posted by jaychamp along with the most recent Sickbeard. I have 2GB of RAM in my system and shortly after Sabnzbd starts I get some memory issues mentioned in my syslog and then it falls over and the only way to start it again is a complete reboot. I'm not 100% sure whether it's Sabnzbd or Sickbeard that is causing the issue but when looking at memory usage on the server (through a script I found) I can see 'python' is using the majority of mine. Is it worth rolling back to an earlier version or does Sabnzbd and Sickbeard just require a lot of RAM? The Sabnzbd logs show no errors either. I don't think I've seen sab even use 256 same with sick. do you have other mods running? I would try a stable release before a beta. Quote Link to comment
PsyVision Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 Yea I need to go back to a stable version. I first tried the version on the first post but I kept getting a message that Newzbin protocol had changed, hence the jump to the most recent. I've just installed the Windows client and notice its still 0.6.15 as opposed to 0.7.0. Other mods include transmission which is doing nothing at the moment. Simple features GUI with the iTunes plugin (although this is currently disabled). I also have unMENU with a few supporting packages for other mods plus OpenSSL. I am going to try find a version between the one on the first post and the beta posted above and try that. Coincidentally, the client I have installed on my windows machine which is 0.6.15 is failing to start too now FFS!! This is in my syslog: May 6 15:46:27 nas kernel: Out of memory: Kill process 31515 (python) score 11 or sacrifice child (Errors) May 6 15:46:27 nas kernel: Killed process 31519 (python) total-vm:25516kB, anon-rss:17952kB, file-rss:816kB (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: python invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0, oom_score_adj=0 (Minor Issues) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: Pid: 31559, comm: python Not tainted 3.1.1-unRAID #1 (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: Call Trace: (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c105cda7>] T.582+0x55/0x15f (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c119bb3b>] ? ___ratelimit+0xaf/0xc4 (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c105cee0>] T.581+0x2f/0x108 (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c102fbb1>] ? has_capability_noaudit+0x18/0x21 (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c105d1b6>] out_of_memory+0x1fd/0x283 (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c105fc7f>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3f8/0x47f (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c106c565>] do_anonymous_page+0x103/0x21c (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c106d2c1>] handle_pte_fault+0x83/0x20f (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c106d8b4>] handle_mm_fault+0x138/0x14a (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c101b09a>] ? mm_fault_error+0x129/0x129 (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c101b3b1>] do_page_fault+0x317/0x332 (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c1071f82>] ? do_brk+0x277/0x2be (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c101b09a>] ? mm_fault_error+0x129/0x129 (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c130befa>] error_code+0x5a/0x60 (Errors) May 6 15:46:37 nas kernel: [<c101b09a>] ? mm_fault_error+0x129/0x129 (Errors) Quote Link to comment
generalz Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 you could try and use the pagefile addon, and if the problem goes away, you may need more then 2 gigs of ram. Transmission uses a lot. Quote Link to comment
PsyVision Posted May 6, 2012 Share Posted May 6, 2012 Could it be due to the article caching? I notice some chat referring to this and RAM usage on Pags 19/20. Edit: Right, I didn't actually have transmission on. A reboot without SimpleFeatures iTunes, cache dirs and NOT using SSL in Sabnzbd seems to have stabilised it. I am not sure what was causing it though as cache dirs and iTunes were disabled previously and I still had RAM errors. I did notice some SSL errors last night in Sabnzbd so I think it may be that! BAH! Sorry for the running commentary... I don't have a cache drive and so I think it's using RAM, once my downloads hit ~1.6 then BAM it falls over... haha I feel rather dumb now!! --------------------- Should I put it on /mnt/user/nzb for instance or /mnt/disk1/nzb? Quote Link to comment
jaychamp Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 Should I put it on /mnt/user/nzb for instance or /mnt/disk1/nzb? The 2nd one Before I had a cache drive I installed everything to disk1 /mnt/disk1/sabnzbd /mnt/disk1/couchpotato /mnt/disk1/sickbeard Quote Link to comment
marcusone Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 could we bug you for a 0.7 update? Quote Link to comment
prostuff1 Posted June 18, 2012 Author Share Posted June 18, 2012 could we bug you for a 0.7 update? Yeah, I should have something up by the end of this week. Busy starting at a new client but should be able to get it working. Quote Link to comment
prostuff1 Posted June 24, 2012 Author Share Posted June 24, 2012 updated to 0.7 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.