unRAID Server Release 5.0-beta14 Available


limetech

Recommended Posts

Is it safe to upgrade  5.0-beta14 ?

 

I am using version: 4.7, my server is HP Mini Server

 

If that uses LSI SATA controllers then beta 13 and beta 14 are AVOID AT ALL COSTS.

 

What are the problems with LSI controllers?

I have a M1015 (reflashed to IT mode P11) and a AOC-SASLP-MV8.

 

Currently running 3 preclears of 2TB drives under 5b14 and not seeing any issues, but then again, do not have the test array running yet.

Is the problem only with the disks sleeping/waking?

Any issues if you have spin down set to never?

 

Looking for the most stable beta what supports both the M1015 & MV8 card so I can do some testing prior to moving my unRaid 4.7 system onto a VM as I'm running out of space on my 4.7 system and no more space avail to put another HDD into that box.

 

Link to comment
  • Replies 496
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

First off, Happy New Year!

 

Unfortunately, it's not off to a good start for me & unraid.  Parity is currently rebuilding @ 4KB/sec - 7014330 minutes until complete!!!

 

Tons of errors in syslog with Supermicro SASLP-MV8, i believe first reported in b13 (http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=16125.msg152449;topicseen#msg152449).  Don't seem to recall these errors with previous betas, though.  

 

Other symptoms, unresponsive web GUI takes 10s of minutes to respond, parity sync errors...  Syslog zipped & attached for your perusal...

 

PS...  Is there a way to stop parity sync via the command line (since the GUI is not responding)?

syslog-2012-01-01.txt.zip

Link to comment

Hmm, I got these line in my logfile, doesn't look s normal, this is the last lines......

 

Jan  2 19:47:01 Tower kernel: crond[16846]: segfault at b787451c ip b787451c sp bfcb46b4 error 15 in ld-2.11.1.so[b7874000+1000] (Errors)
Jan  2 20:46:28 Tower emhttp: shcmd (120): /usr/sbin/hdparm -y /dev/sdk $stuff$> /dev/null (Drive related)
Jan  2 20:47:01 Tower crond[1188]: exit status 1 from user root /usr/bin/run-parts /etc/cron.hourly 1> /dev/null 
Jan  2 20:47:01 Tower kernel: crond[3174]: segfault at b787451c ip b787451c sp bfcb46b4 error 15 in ld-2.11.1.so[b7874000+1000] (Errors)


Total Lines: 2886

 

What is this?? /usr/bin/run-parts /etc/cron.hourly 1> /dev/null, its on several places in my logfile, looks that is causing the errors, I have rebooted my server now.

 

EDIT

 

And I can't go to http://tower/Main, but http://tower:8080/ is OK

 

 

And below is OK

http://192.168.0.199:8085/sabnzbd/

http://192.168.0.199:9000/

 

syslog-2012-01-02.zip

Link to comment

Getting these entries in log:

 

Jan 3 11:46:01 Storage crond[1137]: ignoring /var/spool/cron/crontabs/root- (non-existent user)

Jan 3 12:04:32 Storage afpd[13644]: deletecurdir: error deleting .AppleDouble in "@"

 

Anything I can do to sort this out?

I was getting the root- thing previously but it stopped on it's own. As for the AppleDouble thing, run the fix permissions function on the NAS GUI.

Link to comment

I'm sure there a lot of changes in the change log ... anything specific that might help unraid?

 

OK I stopped being lazy (and assuming I wouldn't know where to look) ... http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?action=post;msg=159200;topic=16840.180;sesc=27cd66bdf43027004e5cb750b542561c

 

I don't know -- I didn't look at the changelog very deeply.  I just thought I'd put it out there to see if it helped.

 

That link you posted doesn't work.

Link to comment

I'm sure there a lot of changes in the change log ... anything specific that might help unraid?

 

Linux kernel v3.2.0 is out.  Here's a 3.2.0 unRAID kernel / bzroot to test on beta14:

 

3.2.0 files for beta14

 

OK I stopped being lazy (and assuming I wouldn't know where to look) ... http://www.h-online.com/open/features/What-s-new-in-Linux-3-2-1400680.html

 

EDIT: Link fixed

 

Here is a more complete listing of all the changes in the 3.2.0 Linux Kernel:

 

http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.2

 

 

Link to comment

Hmm, I got these line in my logfile, doesn't look s normal, this is the last lines......

 

Jan  2 19:47:01 Tower kernel: crond[16846]: segfault at b787451c ip b787451c sp bfcb46b4 error 15 in ld-2.11.1.so[b7874000+1000] (Errors)
Jan  2 20:46:28 Tower emhttp: shcmd (120): /usr/sbin/hdparm -y /dev/sdk $stuff$> /dev/null (Drive related)
Jan  2 20:47:01 Tower crond[1188]: exit status 1 from user root /usr/bin/run-parts /etc/cron.hourly 1> /dev/null 
Jan  2 20:47:01 Tower kernel: crond[3174]: segfault at b787451c ip b787451c sp bfcb46b4 error 15 in ld-2.11.1.so[b7874000+1000] (Errors)


Total Lines: 2886

 

 

The above errors come from Transmission package (plg) ! I don't know if this is something to be worried about, BUT it's doesn't looks right.

Transmission is now uninitialised.

 

 

//Peter

Link to comment

Again its quiet from Tom's side..

No new versions?

I'm still on 4.7 and waiting to go to 5.?

 

Sounds like the next release is not far off, and 5.0 final soon after that.

 

The LimeTech forum has been updated to latest SMF release.  Please let me know if you see any problems.

 

Other news:

 

Next unRaid release - now that linux kernel 3.2 is released, I will integrate and post one more 5.0-beta, thereafter, 5.0-rc1, then 5.0 "final".

 

Website - after forum update and some website tweaks we will be moving from shared hosting to a VPS.  They tell me this will be "painless", we'll see.

 

Company - We are changing to a C-Corp and moving to San Diego, CA area sometime in February.  As soon as we have secured space out there I will post another announcement regarding this.  Probably the main thing anyone would care about is that once in CA, we have to start charging CA sales tax...

 

Servers - We are working with a company in So. Calif. to design a new series of servers.  These servers will all include "trayless" hard drive cages with choice of three electronic packages: "Low Power", "Standard", and "High Performance".

 

More later......

Link to comment

My server is supposed to go to sleep each night at 10 pm as long as no one is accessing it.  Just noticed in the logs something is croaking everytime the server tries to go to sleep:

 

Jan  5 22:01:08 Tower kernel: PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel: Freezing user space processes ... 
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel: Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel: find            D c14a6fc0     0 17344  17328 0x00800004
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  f062fed8 00000082 c14a6fc0 c14a6fc0 c14a2000 f04c269c c14a6fc0 f061c62c
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  00000003 f04c2520 00000003 f062fe88 c1025870 f062feac c101f3fa 00000000
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  f7546034 f04c2520 f062feb4 c10328d5 00000292 00000292 f04c2520 f062fecc
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel: Call Trace:
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] ? default_wake_function+0xb/0xd
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] ? __wake_up_common+0x34/0x5c
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] ? __set_task_blocked+0x66/0x6c
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] ? set_current_blocked+0x27/0x38
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] schedule+0x48/0x4a
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] request_wait_answer+0x11d/0x1b5
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] ? wake_up_bit+0x5b/0x5b
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] fuse_request_send+0x96/0x9c
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] fuse_readdir+0xb9/0x170
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] ? generic_block_fiemap+0x43/0x43
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] vfs_readdir+0x53/0x7e
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] ? generic_block_fiemap+0x43/0x43
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] sys_getdents64+0x63/0xa5
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel:  [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel: 
Jan  5 22:01:28 Tower kernel: Restarting tasks ... done.

 

Anyone have any ideas?  I am using the server only as an SMB server - nothing fancy...  Only additions are Joe's cachedirs script, a sleep script, and a script to control the fan.  Nothing else.

 

Full log attached. 

log.txt

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.