nimble_bitz Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 Anyone else having random freeze/reboots on 6.3.5? I can't start my VM with any passthrough. As soon as I do the unraid either reboots or completely locks up. Dockers include Plex, hdhomerun. Upon revert everything is back functioning. Quote Link to comment
euphonimaniac Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 First of all, I want to thank everyone so far in this thread for all the research and information you've put together. After reading your comments, I decided to build my very first server using Ryzen and unRAID. I put this build together a little over a week ago, and it's been running great: unRAID v6.3.5 | Ryzen 5 1600 | Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H (BIOS update: April 2017) | EVGA GeForce 8400 GS Passive Graphics Card (for BIOS only) | 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 | 500GB Samsung 850 EVO (cache & VMs/dockers) | 2x8TB WD Red HDD (one as parity) | EVGA 450W B3, 80 Plus BRONZE | LG Blu-ray Burner WH14NS40 | Fractal Design Define Mini MATX Case | VM: Windows 10 Pro (4GB RAM; CPU cores 9, 10, & 11; VNC graphics) | Dockers: Plex, MakeMKV, HandBrake, OpenVPN It's mainly a Plex media server (plus DVD/Blu ray ripping), Time Machine backup, and occasional Windows machine right now; in the future, I intend to add a Vega GPU (whenever those are available...) and run my Windows VM as a gaming system. I followed the advice in this thread as far as Global C-state (and a few other settings, I think), and the only times in the last week I've shut down the server is when I wanted to change some settings. It hasn't failed on me once. I have assigned the GeForce 8400 as the graphics card for the Windows 10 VM and the VM worked fine when accessed through VNC and Windows Remote Desktop, but I've never actually plugged it into a monitor to see if the graphics were really passing through. The only issue I have is that I can't quite access the temperature sensors, even when using the advice earlier in this thread with modprobe it87 force_id. I've tried a couple of the 86xx numbers, but I can't get the CPU and MB temperature labels; all I get are generic "temp 1," "temp 2," etc., and I don't know which temp is which. If I figure out which number to use for this motherboard's ITE chips, I'll post it in this thread. You guys are awesome; thank you all for giving me the courage to take the plunge and build my first server! Quote Link to comment
ufopinball Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 5 hours ago, euphonimaniac said: The only issue I have is that I can't quite access the temperature sensors, even when using the advice earlier in this thread with modprobe it87 force_id. I've tried a couple of the 86xx numbers, but I can't get the CPU and MB temperature labels; all I get are generic "temp 1," "temp 2," etc., and I don't know which temp is which. If I figure out which number to use for this motherboard's ITE chips, I'll post it in this thread. It's certainly worth trying out the other options, but failing that I would reboot and go into the BIOS and try to record nominal values for the CPU/MB temp and CPU fan. Then boot into unRAID and see which of the items in your "sensors" outputs comes closest and use those. Afterwards you can always run a Prime95 or similar test and see if the output values follow the expected progression. - Bill Quote Link to comment
ufopinball Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 (edited) On 5/27/2017 at 10:30 AM, sentryjez said: That done, started to play arround, and was able to pass the 460 to a Win10-VM. I was even able to pass the RX550, wich is my primary GPU, to the VM and run Unraid headless. But when I stop the VM, Unraid doesn't get the GPU back. Guess it has to do with reinitialising, or something. Gonna scoop the forum a little further. For what it's worth, this has always been the behavior that I have experienced. Even when I was doing pre-testing with an Asus F2A85V-PRO motherboard and AMD A10-5800K Trinity 3.8GHz FM2 Quad CPU. The three GPUs I tested were the ASUS Radeon HD 3450, ASUS Radeon HD 4350 and Asus Radeon HD 6450. Dunno if it's something specific to AMD CPUs, ASUS motherboards or ASUS Radeon GPUs ... or even the Windows OS? Are others seeing this same sort of behavior where you shut down the Windows VM and it doesn't return you to the unRAID console? Or is this just how it's expected to work? Thanks... - Bill Edited June 2, 2017 by ufopinball Quote Link to comment
lionceau Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 (edited) Does anybody happen to know if this works in unRAID? https://github.com/r4m0n/ZenStates-Linux If so, I wonder if some of these options may fix the Global C-State bug at a finer granularity than completely disabling the feature in the BIOS. Edited June 2, 2017 by lionceau Quote Link to comment
Josecitox Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Something i found in the Level1 forums about npt=0 Quote There's indeed a problem with kvm npt, but it is not a blocker for gpu passthrough. Here's what I learned from testing my new R7 1700 system: With npt=1, you get very good KVM CPU performance, possibly very near native speed, but on some workflows the GPU seems to have bad performance. Note that this is not for all applications/games, and depending on what software you run there may not even be a difference. For example, I have a radeon rx460(a low end card) and with npt=1 I got the same 1920x1080(AA x4) score on unigine heaven benchmark as running on bare metal(I keep a windows partition to perform these comparisons as ryzen-supporting software improves). I also tried some old games such as neverwinter nights 2 and the performance doesn't seem to suffer. Another strange behavior: on windows 10 as guest, I got bad performance on google chrome when gpu acceleration is enabled, but on windows 8 google chrome runs perfectly! This strange behavior makes me think this npt=1 is a pure software issue that may soon be fixed in the future. Maybe @wendell learned something about this from his AMD contacts Now, there seems to be some wrong ideas that running kvm with npt=0 yields to horrible CPU performance(while fixing GPU performance). From my experience this is definitely not the case! What seems to happen is that when npt=0 and -cpu host is passed as qemu parameter(apparently the default for libvirt), qemu will only allocate 1 CPU for the guest, so this could give the impression of the bad CPU performance. If you tell QEMU to emulate an older CPU, it will pass the requested number of cores to the VM which will yield a very acceptable performance. The CPU performance is not as good as with npt=1, but more than good enough for gaming: Currently using a VM as headless gaming server with in home streaming and it works very well(can get consistent 40-60 fps on GTA IV, but using a RX 460)! Quote Link to comment
mikeyosm Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, Josecitox said: Something i found in the Level1 forums about npt=0 Have to agree with the above. I too use an RX460 is my second PCIe x16 slot on the Asus Prime Pro, no issues with it at all. What score did you get in Ungine Josecitox? Quote Link to comment
Donach Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 37 minutes ago, mikeyosm said: Have to agree with the above. I too use an RX460 is my second PCIe x16 slot on the Asus Prime Pro, no issues with it at all. What score did you get in Ungine Josecitox? Hello, I tried to do this npt=0 on unRAID, however I was not able to do so... How can you set this setting? Or more precisely, where? Many thanks. Quote Link to comment
sentryjez Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 22 minutes ago, Donach said: Hello, I tried to do this npt=0 on unRAID, however I was not able to do so... How can you set this setting? Or more precisely, where? Many thanks. Via the commandline, but you first need to shut down all the vm's and stop the libvirt services. There's a step by step in the link. That's how i did it. It's at the end of Jonp's post. Quote Link to comment
nimble_bitz Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 I'm rebuilding a VM tonight for testing with the new 6.4rc with GPU passthrough due to issues with my old one and getting stuck in the UEFI shell. I'll report on GPU performance in gaming to see if it's any better for some standard benchmarks and 3dmark. Quote Link to comment
Guest Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 Id like to add my thanks to those pioneers who are doing a Ryzen build.Your efforts benefit all of us who are interested in team red. Go unraid, go team red Quote Link to comment
Tuftuf Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 (edited) I'd be interested to see any Nivida GPU passthrough XML's from a OVMF boot. I can't get it to display now, it was before but I was getting stuck at the UEFI screen. My seabios system works well but performance is not perfect. Regarding passing through your main GPU. I actually found that Unraid never really lets go of the GPU, but it does not recover after you shutdown the VM.*This is related to passing through your primary and only GPU. By this I mean. Start Unraid with GUI and then start a VM, If you have two keyboard or mouse plugged into the system and only 1 passed to the VM. If you move the mouse still connected to Unraid I can see the Unraid GUI trying to draw on top of the VM. When I shutdown the VM everything goes black. The actual effect was the UI was drawn 3 or 4 times but squashed, reminded me of some strange display issues I've seen years ago. I was able to find the shutdown button though. Edited June 7, 2017 by Tuftuf Quote Link to comment
Tuftuf Posted June 7, 2017 Share Posted June 7, 2017 I can safely say npt=0 does not help me, maybe due to using seabios? Experianced slowdowns and increased cpu usage, audio dropouts. Quote Link to comment
ufopinball Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 Some minor updates. A new "system stability" BIOS has been posted for the ASUS Prime X370-PRO motherboard, version 0612. I've been on it for about a week and have not encountered any issues. Likewise, I upgraded to unRAID 6.3.5 in a similar time frame, and things are going smoothly. I know there's an unRAID 6.4 pre-release RC available, but I haven't had a chance to load it yet. Might have better support for Ryzen, since it's based on a Linux 4.11.* kernel. Also there appears to be a ASUS Prime X370-PRO beta-test BIOS with the AMD/Ryzen AGESA 1.0.0.6. If I have time I may load that as well. Just throwing it out there for those who are looking for a weekend project. :-) - Bill Quote Link to comment
Tuftuf Posted June 8, 2017 Share Posted June 8, 2017 (edited) Took the f6g bios for Gaming 5 x370 board, includes AGESA 1.0.0.6. Think I've seen someone else post about it already, the IOMMU groups are better. Full IOMMU list raw IOMMU group 11 [10de:1189] 0f:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK104 [GeForce GTX 670] (rev a1) [10de:0e0a] 0f:00.1 Audio device: NVIDIA Corporation GK104 HDMI Audio Controller (rev a1) EDIT - I had audio dropouts with ACS Override disabled. Enabled it again. Edited June 9, 2017 by Tuftuf Quote Link to comment
Tuftuf Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 (edited) Can some VM XML's be supplied for gaming ryzen builds that are working well? Still working on trying to use "npt=0" but I'm still seeing slow down even though I switched to OVMF and some audio dropouts, that been said I'm getting almost a 50FPS increase most of the time. I have a config that is mostly stable but only with npt=1. I do get the odd audio dropout but thats since switching to OVMF, did not happen in seabios. Tried many changes to XML based on suggestions, looking to see what people actually are using today now. EDIT - A better question is how many people with similar platforms enabled npt=0 or did you not feel the need? I get around 70 FPS in Overwatch less in other games with npt=1 and its stable at the moment with a missing audio issue every so often. The CPU is around 70% with 4 cores, similar with 4+4 core also the cores and pairs are isolated. When testing with npt=0 I get 130 FPS. But with 4 and their 4 pairs total 8 vcores they reach 100% quite often and each time cause stutter. With 4 hover around 90% and cause stutter when they reach 100%. Edited June 12, 2017 by Tuftuf Quote Link to comment
ufopinball Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 On 6/8/2017 at 1:40 PM, ufopinball said: Some minor updates. A new "system stability" BIOS has been posted for the ASUS Prime X370-PRO motherboard, version 0612. I've been on it for about a week and have not encountered any issues. Likewise, I upgraded to unRAID 6.3.5 in a similar time frame, and things are going smoothly. I know there's an unRAID 6.4 pre-release RC available, but I haven't had a chance to load it yet. Might have better support for Ryzen, since it's based on a Linux 4.11.* kernel. Also there appears to be a ASUS Prime X370-PRO beta-test BIOS with the AMD/Ryzen AGESA 1.0.0.6. If I have time I may load that as well. Just throwing it out there for those who are looking for a weekend project. :-) - Bill Okay, so I have loaded the ASUS Prime X370-PRO beta-test BIOS 0803 with AMD/Ryzen AGESA 1.0.0.6. I am still running unRAID 6.3.5, though. The BIOS upgrade seemed to take longer this time. As usual, I had to go in and redo all my preferred settings. The system accepted them and rebooted, then did nothing for like 10 minutes. I finally powered down, counted to 10, and started it up again and this time it worked. No idea what was up with the weird hang. I've rebooted about 3-4 times since then trying different things, and have not encountered it again. Just be-aware that this may occur, at least the first time after the BIOS upgrade. Otherwise, my system temperatures are a bit higher, but we're in the middle of a heat wave and that may have something to do with it. My memory is rated at 2133, so I'm not testing for the 3000-4000 speeds that others are looking for. I did turn off all the ACS override stuff, but the "new" IOMMU table doesn't look all that impressive: IOMMU group 0 [1022:1452] 00:01.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 IOMMU group 1 [1022:1453] 00:01.3 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1453 IOMMU group 2 [1022:1452] 00:02.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 IOMMU group 3 [1022:1452] 00:03.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 IOMMU group 4 [1022:1453] 00:03.1 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1453 IOMMU group 5 [1022:1452] 00:04.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 IOMMU group 6 [1022:1452] 00:07.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 [1022:1454] 00:07.1 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1454 [1022:145a] 29:00.0 Non-Essential Instrumentation [1300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 145a [1022:1456] 29:00.2 Encryption controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1456 [1022:145c] 29:00.3 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 145c IOMMU group 7 [1022:1452] 00:08.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 [1022:1454] 00:08.1 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1454 [1022:1455] 2a:00.0 Non-Essential Instrumentation [1300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1455 [1022:7901] 2a:00.2 SATA controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] FCH SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 51) [1022:1457] 2a:00.3 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1457 IOMMU group 8 [1022:790b] 00:14.0 SMBus: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] FCH SMBus Controller (rev 59) [1022:790e] 00:14.3 ISA bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] FCH LPC Bridge (rev 51) IOMMU group 9 [1022:1460] 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1460 [1022:1461] 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1461 [1022:1462] 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1462 [1022:1463] 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1463 [1022:1464] 00:18.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1464 [1022:1465] 00:18.5 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1465 [1022:1466] 00:18.6 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1466 [1022:1467] 00:18.7 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1467 IOMMU group 10 [1022:43b9] 03:00.0 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b9 (rev 02) [1022:43b5] 03:00.1 SATA controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b5 (rev 02) [1022:43b0] 03:00.2 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b0 (rev 02) [1022:43b4] 1d:00.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b4 (rev 02) [1022:43b4] 1d:04.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b4 (rev 02) [1022:43b4] 1d:06.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b4 (rev 02) [1022:43b4] 1d:07.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b4 (rev 02) [1000:0072] 21:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic SAS2008 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-2 [Falcon] (rev 03) [1b21:1343] 25:00.0 USB controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. Device 1343 [8086:1539] 26:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I211 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 03) IOMMU group 11 [1002:677b] 28:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Caicos PRO [Radeon HD 7450] [1002:aa98] 28:00.1 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Caicos HDMI Audio [Radeon HD 6450 / 7450/8450/8490 OEM / R5 230/235/235X OEM] I ended up switching the ACS override back on, since my Windows 10 VM wouldn't start without it. Unfortunately, that's about all the time I have at the moment. I'd still like to switch from the USB audio to the onboard audio, and will hopefully find some time to poke at that soon. Dunno if anyone is monitoring the unRAID 6.4 board, but they're up to RC3 now. No idea how close they are to a final cut. That's still on my list, though. Anyone else give it a try? - Bill Quote Link to comment
mikeyosm Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 5 hours ago, ufopinball said: Okay, so I have loaded the ASUS Prime X370-PRO beta-test BIOS 0803 with AMD/Ryzen AGESA 1.0.0.6. I am still running unRAID 6.3.5, though. The BIOS upgrade seemed to take longer this time. As usual, I had to go in and redo all my preferred settings. The system accepted them and rebooted, then did nothing for like 10 minutes. I finally powered down, counted to 10, and started it up again and this time it worked. No idea what was up with the weird hang. I've rebooted about 3-4 times since then trying different things, and have not encountered it again. Just be-aware that this may occur, at least the first time after the BIOS upgrade. Otherwise, my system temperatures are a bit higher, but we're in the middle of a heat wave and that may have something to do with it. My memory is rated at 2133, so I'm not testing for the 3000-4000 speeds that others are looking for. I did turn off all the ACS override stuff, but the "new" IOMMU table doesn't look all that impressive: IOMMU group 0 [1022:1452] 00:01.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 IOMMU group 1 [1022:1453] 00:01.3 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1453 IOMMU group 2 [1022:1452] 00:02.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 IOMMU group 3 [1022:1452] 00:03.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 IOMMU group 4 [1022:1453] 00:03.1 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1453 IOMMU group 5 [1022:1452] 00:04.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 IOMMU group 6 [1022:1452] 00:07.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 [1022:1454] 00:07.1 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1454 [1022:145a] 29:00.0 Non-Essential Instrumentation [1300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 145a [1022:1456] 29:00.2 Encryption controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1456 [1022:145c] 29:00.3 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 145c IOMMU group 7 [1022:1452] 00:08.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1452 [1022:1454] 00:08.1 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1454 [1022:1455] 2a:00.0 Non-Essential Instrumentation [1300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1455 [1022:7901] 2a:00.2 SATA controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] FCH SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 51) [1022:1457] 2a:00.3 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1457 IOMMU group 8 [1022:790b] 00:14.0 SMBus: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] FCH SMBus Controller (rev 59) [1022:790e] 00:14.3 ISA bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] FCH LPC Bridge (rev 51) IOMMU group 9 [1022:1460] 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1460 [1022:1461] 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1461 [1022:1462] 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1462 [1022:1463] 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1463 [1022:1464] 00:18.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1464 [1022:1465] 00:18.5 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1465 [1022:1466] 00:18.6 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1466 [1022:1467] 00:18.7 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 1467 IOMMU group 10 [1022:43b9] 03:00.0 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b9 (rev 02) [1022:43b5] 03:00.1 SATA controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b5 (rev 02) [1022:43b0] 03:00.2 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b0 (rev 02) [1022:43b4] 1d:00.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b4 (rev 02) [1022:43b4] 1d:04.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b4 (rev 02) [1022:43b4] 1d:06.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b4 (rev 02) [1022:43b4] 1d:07.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Device 43b4 (rev 02) [1000:0072] 21:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic SAS2008 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-2 [Falcon] (rev 03) [1b21:1343] 25:00.0 USB controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. Device 1343 [8086:1539] 26:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I211 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 03) IOMMU group 11 [1002:677b] 28:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Caicos PRO [Radeon HD 7450] [1002:aa98] 28:00.1 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Caicos HDMI Audio [Radeon HD 6450 / 7450/8450/8490 OEM / R5 230/235/235X OEM] I ended up switching the ACS override back on, since my Windows 10 VM wouldn't start without it. Unfortunately, that's about all the time I have at the moment. I'd still like to switch from the USB audio to the onboard audio, and will hopefully find some time to poke at that soon. Dunno if anyone is monitoring the unRAID 6.4 board, but they're up to RC3 now. No idea how close they are to a final cut. That's still on my list, though. Anyone else give it a try? - Bill Same board, same issue with the grouping. I updated to latest 6.4rc3 and no change. Quote Link to comment
mikeyosm Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 Guys - what's your experiences with Windows 10 and either 4 cores or 8 cores, which performs better for you in gaming? I passed through my 980ti today and getting really poor physics scores in 3dmark, In firestrike extreme i get 6fps on just the physics test. I dedicated 8 ryzen cores in the usual pairs 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. GPU scores seem normal so not sure why my CPU is taking a big hit in physics. What's everyone else's scores? Quote Link to comment
rachid596 Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 Guys - what's your experiences with Windows 10 and either 4 cores or 8 cores, which performs better for you in gaming? I passed through my 980ti today and getting really poor physics scores in 3dmark, In firestrike extreme i get 6fps on just the physics test. I dedicated 8 ryzen cores in the usual pairs 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. GPU scores seem normal so not sure why my CPU is taking a big hit in physics. What's everyone else's scores?Hello, i dont know why your problems come from. But can you tell me your build because I plan to build a ryzen build with easy pass-through. Thanks Envoyé de mon FRD-L09 en utilisant Tapatalk Quote Link to comment
mikeyosm Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 1 minute ago, rachid596 said: Hello, i dont know why your problems come from. But can you tell me your build because I plan to build a ryzen build with easy pass-through. Thanks Envoyé de mon FRD-L09 en utilisant Tapatalk Asus Prime x370 Ryzen 1800x 32GB Gskill Zotac 980ti Amp! UNRAID 6.3.5 1 Quote Link to comment
ufopinball Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Last week, I had upgraded to the ASUS Prime X370-PRO beta BIOS 0803 with AGESA 1.0.0.6 ... so far, the server is running smoothly. Today, I tried a test run with unRAID 6.4-rc2 (sorry, it's what I had on the thumb drive), but the later Linux kernel didn't include any new support for the sensor chip on the ASUS Prime X370-PRO motherboard. Since I was only curious, I built a temp thumb drive to run the test. Afterwards, I booted back on my regular thumb drive that's running unRAID 6.3.5. If you're interested in using the Dynamix System Temp plugin on the ASUS Prime X370-PRO, check my previous post for details. Bill Quote Link to comment
Vr2Io Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 8 hours ago, ufopinball said: Last week, I had upgraded to the ASUS Prime X370-PRO beta BIOS 0803 with AGESA 1.0.0.6 ... so far, the server is running smoothly. Today, I tried a test run with unRAID 6.4-rc2 (sorry, it's what I had on the thumb drive), but the later Linux kernel didn't include any new support for the sensor chip on the ASUS Prime X370-PRO motherboard. Since I was only curious, I built a temp thumb drive to run the test. Afterwards, I booted back on my regular thumb drive that's running unRAID 6.3.5. If you're interested in using the Dynamix System Temp plugin on the ASUS Prime X370-PRO, check my previous post for details. Bill Thanks, I am using same MB too, keep for ref. Quote Link to comment
lionceau Posted June 25, 2017 Author Share Posted June 25, 2017 Are Global C-States stable with the new 6.4-rc? It brings a new Kernel that should fix some Ryzen issues. Quote Link to comment
JIM2003 Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, lionceau said: Are Global C-States stable with the new 6.4-rc? It brings a new Kernel that should fix some Ryzen issues. I tried enabling Global C-States on 6.4-rc5, and my system ended up crashing within an hour. I can't say for certain, but I disabled it again immediately after and have been rock solid since. Edited June 25, 2017 by JIM2003 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.