shpitz461

'Not correctly' in what way? I'm passing a 3090, MSI is enabled on the host (unraid): Enabling MSI in Windows improved the smoothness of the experience, I'm remoting to the VM via Parsec.

Another thing to do on Windows to improve latency is turning on MSI feature for PCIe devices. See here for the utility: https://forums.guru3d.com/threads/windows-line-based-vs-message-signaled-based-interrupts-msi-tool.378044/ I've turned on all mine on and set priority to High:

Do you experience the same issue logging in with another user? Trying to rule out corrupt user hive.

Sweet, it works!!! Used vi to put in your code change: Now the editor is using the available space:

Interesting... I've got a score of 66:

Hi, is there a way to make the xml editor of a VM use the whole available space? Thanks

Hi, I've installed the plugin via ssh, and when I call 'status' I get the following: When I run one of the parity status scripts available in this post: I get the correct status: And here are the stats from var.ini: Any idea why the plugin shows the 0.1%? It's stuck at 0.1% for hours. Thanks

Another option would be to get a DAS, aka disk shelf, suck as the NetApp DS4243/6 or DS4486, Dell MD12xx or MD14xx, etc... There's also a 60-drive shelf available (DE6060) but it is way too expensive, and very loud. Note that some units accept SATA in the SAS enclosures and some don't.

Is there a way to pause parity check from commandline? My GUI is unreponsive, but I was able to get a command window to open. I can't access any GUI pages, so I cannot install the parity tuning plugin. I've ran the script @blender50 posted, so I know parity is running:

Hi, any idea if I can use Traefik's letsencrypt process to generate certs for mailserver? Right now I have Traefik set to generate wildcard certs, so essentially I only have my main domain cert used for all subdomains. Thanks EDIT: Yep, I just followed their documentation here: https://docker-mailserver.github.io/docker-mailserver/edge/config/security/ssl/#traefik-v2

Haha,nice fix!

Thanks, that seem to do the trick!

So all 4 ports are on the same subnet? I think this is bad practice. Why would you need to directly connect the two on top of connection to the switch? This is what my ifconfig shows: I noticed that your eth0 doesn't state RUNNING, mine does. Is eth0 the port for direct connection between servers? What happens if you remove the direct cable between servers and just have each one connect via the switch?

Is there a way to share /mnt/user via NFS similar to the trick done via SMB? I'd like to access all shares with a single drive letter.

Or maybe bad/loose data cable connection? Maybe there's a firmware update? It's also weird how unbalanced the writes are to the 2nd parity, 7M vs 675K writes. I would expect they should always match exactly. Here's what mine looks like: Also, some of your drives appear to be running hot, heat is the no.1 HDD killer. See if you can get some more fans blowing on them. Did you try to change their physical location in your case? Recheck cables (data and cable) are fully seated.

Did you try resetting network.cfg on the Unraid USB stick? /config/network.cfg You can install unraid to another stick and then copy the network.cfg to your existing install and try setting up the network again? Here's what mine looks like: I have two cards, dual-port each. My eth0 port is the 'main' one, eth1 is not connected, and eth2 and eth3 are passed-through to VM's. Now, you said they are directly connected, so none are connected to a switch so they are available to other devices in your network? Or you have dual ports and one port is connected to a switch and the other directly to the other NAS?

Run the commands so we can see the exact models you have. Here's a good thread for flashing hdd firmwares: https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/updating-the-hgst-hdd-ssd-firmware.22381/page-9 Here's a link to Hitachi firmwares: https://files.hddguru.com/download/Software/

Run this command: Then run this command on your specific disks to get the full firmware version: I have 4 of the He10, one failed a few months ago after 4 years of usage. Mine are all on firmware 'LHGNT384': Are yours on this firmware also? Also, are there any jumpers on the drive? It's odd the drives downgrade to SATA2 (3gbps) instead of SATA3 (6gbps). What happens when you connect only the He10 on the same controller?

Hi Everyone, I'm seeing this error in syslog: Any idea how to track the root cause of the issue? Is this complaining about PCIe slots? If so, which one? This is what the system device 80:01.x is: The motherboard is an ASRock ROMED8-2T. Thanks!

There's already a docker container for it you can use. It has a full gui: And if you open its console, you can run mkvmerge, mkvinfo, mkvextract to manually process files:

Is your system experiencing overheating? Memory issues? I'm looking at your syslog, why do you have the following boot params? Did you turn on iommu in your motherboard? Have you turned on sr-iov as well? For AMD cpu you need at least the following params: I also turn off all video buffering so unraid doesn't steal my gpus: I also reserve hugepages for my VM's: And specify in the VM xml to use hugepages: It could be your crashing is cause of the ACS override. In general it should be avoided and only used as last resort.

I'm also getting this error on my Epyc 7742:

Looks like it. Did you try to reset BIOS to defaults and reboot? Did you check for BIOS updates for the motherboard? You can try removing all cards and see if you can boot a bare system (memory, cpu, gpu if needed). You can try to boot ubuntu or debian live cd and see if you get the same errors? The new flash drive you tried, did you install a fresh unraid on it? or copied files from original flash drive?

Did you zero/pre-clear the drives before adding?

I've also seen this video about the IO Wait issue: