Jump to content

JorgeB

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    67,485

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    706

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JorgeB

  1. JorgeB
    It's not being detected by Linux, so there might be a driver, if you can get it detected, it will never work if it's not, and this is not a software problem.
  2. JorgeB
    Best bet is to use the existing plugin support thread:
  3. JorgeB
    Tools -> Diagnostics
  4. JorgeB
    btrfs is not really standard RAID. You can add (and remove) disks at any time, you can even uses different size disks. But note that btrfs raid5/6 is not yest considered safe for production use, it can be used, I have several raid5 pools, but I only recommend them for anyone with stable hardware and good backups.
  5. JorgeB
    Any LSI with a SAS2008/2308/3008/3408 chipset in IT mode, e.g., 9201-8i, 9211-8i, 9207-8i, 9300-8i, 9400-8i, etc and clones, like the Dell H200/H310 and IBM M1015, these latter ones need to be crossflashed.
  6. JorgeB
    You have, RAM is running @ 3200MHz, 1st gen Ryzen officially supports 2133Mhz max with 4 SR DIMMs.
  7. JorgeB
    Next beta is going to align the partition on SSDs on the 1MiB boundary, like Windows does, this should improve performance, try that that once it's available, you'll need to reformat the cache though.
  8. JorgeB
    Only btrfs supports pools, xfs can only be single device.
  9. JorgeB
    Lots of ATA errors, looks more like a connection issue, start by replacing both cables.
  10. JorgeB
    Any new VM will default to virtio-net, existing VMs need to be updated.
  11. JorgeB
    Changed Status to Closed Changed Priority to Other
  12. JorgeB
    Overclocked RAM is a know issue with Ryzen, see here, also check the power supply idle control setting, even if before you were overclocking you should stop.
  13. JorgeB
    It's very easy to confirm if it's this same issue, the line above always appears when the shares go away.
  14. JorgeB
    Please remind me, is this issue mainly when writing to cache SSD/pool or also when writing to array disks?
  15. JorgeB
    Main difference it that on the array you have individual data drives each with its own filesystem protected by one or two parity disks, each pool is one btrfs filesystem that can be or not redundant, you can use any of the available btrfs profiles, depending on the number of devices.
  16. JorgeB
    Yes, this is an old issue, not related to this release, it appears to be a fuse issue that happens when a file is removed and then moved, I believe it happens mostly when using for example a media processing docker.
  17. JorgeB
    Now it wouldn't be able to sync 100% because of the read errors. Correct, parity needs all others disks except one to recover, so a known bad disk should be replaced ASAP or if another one fails you'll be in trouble.
  18. JorgeB
    Almost certainly unrelated, if there's nothing logged and it started doing it out of the blue it's most likely a hardware issue, though you can still try safe model without VMs/dockers to rule that out first.
  19. JorgeB
    Yes, by default it creates a raid1 pool.
  20. JorgeB
    Like mentioned the fist check was non correct, so next one will still encounter the same errors.
  21. JorgeB
    Previous one was non correct.
  22. JorgeB
    IIRC it also happens with some B450 based boards, it doesn't happens with all Ryzen boards, regardless of chipset, best bet it to use v6.9.
  23. JorgeB
    Yep.
  24. JorgeB
    I'm not seeing any disk read errors, there are some ATA errors on disk7, and since the disk look healthy it could be the typical SASLP problem, parity was updated after some of those, possibly incorrectly, you can swap that disk with another one using the onboard SATA ports and run another check, also I would recommend replacing the SASLP with an LSI ASAP.
  25. JorgeB
    Please post the diagnostics instead: Tools -> Diagnostics
×
×
  • Create New...