bally12345

This SSD feels so painfully slow! I'm sure there is something wrong with it... Is there any simple test I can do just to write to the disk and see the speed? My Win10 VM is pretty much griding to a halt... And for some reason after restore appdata using CA plugin and moving all my system /domain folders to back to cache using PREFER in share settings I have had to redo my dockers but pulling them is taking forever... Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Tried this, still didn't work tried the other options too. Super annoying. Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Ha! Already on latest firmware will see if I can send back but doubt I will get a response from seller on ebay. Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Im having same issue within 48 hours of swapping my Crucial 240GB SSD... Got mine in July but only installed now, will update firmware but will try to get RMA Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

I'm just backing up appdata from the SSD will perform firmware update but the last one was December 2018 and looks like people still having issues. Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Upgraded to my 240GB cache drive with a 1TB drive but now I have had the following alert Event: Unraid Cache disk SMART health [197] Subject: Warning [sERVER] - bogus current pend sect is 1 Description: CT1000MX500SSD1_1910E1EE9FE0 (sdm) Importance: warning It has returned to normal now but it seen this before? I probably bought it over 6 months ago so maybe a firmware update? Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Good spot looks like 2 sticks not showing. I will try later. Unraid now showing 40Gb RAM Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Just my luck it didn't work, so now Iv put the 2 E5645 back in and it's working! Only thing I can think of is the X5690 aren't a matching pair Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Omg just posted with the 2 E5645 Put I I put 3 stick of ram in blue slots. Going to swap to X5690 try get post then add extra ram! Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Yep I think the board must be at fault I'm waiting for a reply from Supermicro but not looking good. As they suggested to reinstall the bios. Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Changed the PSU, changed ram slots. Got fed up and decided I would go back to the original Xeon E5645 and same issue! It won't post with both! As it's refurbished server from ebay I don't know if Supermicro will be able to help but now its not a case of faulty cpus It's something preventing it from posting with processors Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

I have pair of Supermicro 800w server PSU which I can swap the 1200w. I will give that a try today but no other spare PSU that I can use.

Got a response from Supermicro who have said there's very little they can do as it's an OEM board. But if if each socket works independently it could be a power issue. I have Supermicro 1200w redundant PSU. Plan of action remove all but 2 sticks of ram. If still having issue then either sell the x5690 on bay and keep old cpus or buy a different supermicro LGA1366 motherboard (any recommendations?) Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Iv reached out to Supermicro and submitted a ticket. I can't test anything until the weekend now but im hoping a simple bios fix will the fix rather than having to replace motherboard. I might put the original cpus you back and just make sure 100% I'm not going mad. Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

I just noticed only half my memory showing with one cpu. But with one cpu it doesn't matter what socket use will have to pull some sticks out. This was meant to be my last 2019 upgrade! Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

All dimms are in I will try take them out but the fact the 2 old cpus work baffles me For now in just running one Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Found almost identical issue here https://superuser.com/questions/1072866/why-wont-my-motherboard-work-with-two-cpus But I don't think it can be a bent pin because it doesn't matter what socket I use or what cpu. Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Yep all power connected, I have removed one CPU for now and everything running but as soon as I add the 2nd one it will fail to post. Then it doesn't matter what which one I remove. If I put both E5645s back in it works. Also cleared CMOS just incase it was some BIOS issue Model: N/A M/B: Supermicro X8DT3 Version 2.0 - s/n: NM13AS004395 BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. Version 2.2. Dated: 07/09/2018 CPU: Intel® Xeon® CPU X5690 @ 3.47GHz HVM: Enabled IOMMU: Disabled Cache: 384 KiB, 1536 KiB, 12288 KiB, 0 KiB, 0 KiB, 0 KiB Memory: 24 GiB DDR3 Multi-bit ECC (max. installable capacity 384 GiB) Network: eth0: 1000 Mbps, full duplex, mtu 1500 eth1: interface down Kernel: Linux 4.19.88-Unraid x86_64 OpenSSL: 1.1.1d Uptime: 0 days, 00:27:05

Hi I was trying to upgrade my dual xeon setup with a pair of X5690s but for someone reason it does not post when both cpus are in. If I take one out it posts fine, but both together and nothing. Motherboard has most up to date bios available. If I put the original 2 cpus in it posts fine. I tested the X5690s individually thinking one might have been dead but this is not the case. What else should I look for? I have reseated memory modules. Swapped CPUs around into opposite socket but same result. Spec in Sig

I have just replaced my 4TB WD Red with a 12TB parity and completed the rebuild. If I want to use the 4TB drive I took out do you need to do anything different as it will automatically remember the serial number... Assuming I just pop into drive bay and add to array and hit start to format? Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

This seems a great price for 2x 12TB WD Reds WD 24TB My Book Duo Desktop RAID External Hard Drive USB 3.1 Gen 1 https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/offer-listing/B07W5V8GC9/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

I almost went for GTX 1050 mini maybe 6 months back but decided against it as most of viewing is done outside of my LAN and as @binhex the 1st, 2nd and 3rd rules of 4k transcoding is dont do it! Instead spent the money upgrading my dual xeons and now have a pair of X5690s, just need time to install them!!

I was assuming using VM would be the same as having win10 on a normal pc directly the my network switch... Only getting around 50mbps out of 350mbps down

Not quite sure whats causing this, but for some reason my Windows10 VM is only getting around half or little less than half of my capable download speed. Everything in dockers download fast and often maxes out the connection but for some reason in the VM its usually less than half. Is there a different setting or config I should be using? Here's the XML <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <domain type='kvm' id='4'> <name>Windows 10</name> <uuid>6adf78b3-580c-c31b-a250-1852ee4565fd</uuid> <metadata> <vmtemplate xmlns="unraid" name="Windows 10" icon="windows.png" os="windows10"/> </metadata> <memory unit='KiB'>16777216</memory> <currentMemory unit='KiB'>16777216</currentMemory> <memoryBacking> <nosharepages/> </memoryBacking> <vcpu placement='static'>8</vcpu> <cputune> <vcpupin vcpu='0' cpuset='6'/> <vcpupin vcpu='1' cpuset='18'/> <vcpupin vcpu='2' cpuset='7'/> <vcpupin vcpu='3' cpuset='19'/> <vcpupin vcpu='4' cpuset='8'/> <vcpupin vcpu='5' cpuset='20'/> <vcpupin vcpu='6' cpuset='9'/> <vcpupin vcpu='7' cpuset='21'/> </cputune> <resource> <partition>/machine</partition> </resource> <os> <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-i440fx-3.0'>hvm</type> </os> <features> <acpi/> <apic/> <hyperv> <relaxed state='on'/> <vapic state='on'/> <spinlocks state='on' retries='8191'/> <vendor_id state='on' value='none'/> </hyperv> </features> <cpu mode='host-passthrough' check='none'> <topology sockets='1' cores='4' threads='2'/> </cpu> <clock offset='localtime'> <timer name='hypervclock' present='yes'/> <timer name='hpet' present='no'/> </clock> <on_poweroff>destroy</on_poweroff> <on_reboot>restart</on_reboot> <on_crash>restart</on_crash> <devices> <emulator>/usr/local/sbin/qemu</emulator> <disk type='file' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='writeback'/> <source file='/mnt/user/domains/Windows 10/vdisk1.img'/> <backingStore/> <target dev='hdc' bus='virtio'/> <boot order='1'/> <alias name='virtio-disk2'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x06' function='0x0'/> </disk> <disk type='file' device='cdrom'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <source file='/mnt/user/iso/cyg-win1803x64en.iso'/> <backingStore/> <target dev='hda' bus='sata'/> <readonly/> <boot order='2'/> <alias name='sata0-0-0'/> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='0'/> </disk> <disk type='file' device='cdrom'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <source file='/mnt/user/iso/virtio-win-0.1.160-1.iso'/> <backingStore/> <target dev='hdb' bus='sata'/> <readonly/> <alias name='sata0-0-1'/> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='1'/> </disk> <controller type='pci' index='0' model='pci-root'> <alias name='pci.0'/> </controller> <controller type='ide' index='0'> <alias name='ide'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x1'/> </controller> <controller type='sata' index='0'> <alias name='sata0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x04' function='0x0'/> </controller> <controller type='virtio-serial' index='0'> <alias name='virtio-serial0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x05' function='0x0'/> </controller> <controller type='usb' index='0' model='ich9-ehci1'> <alias name='usb'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07' function='0x7'/> </controller> <controller type='usb' index='0' model='ich9-uhci1'> <alias name='usb'/> <master startport='0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07' function='0x0' multifunction='on'/> </controller> <controller type='usb' index='0' model='ich9-uhci2'> <alias name='usb'/> <master startport='2'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07' function='0x1'/> </controller> <controller type='usb' index='0' model='ich9-uhci3'> <alias name='usb'/> <master startport='4'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07' function='0x2'/> </controller> <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:95:f8:8a'/> <source bridge='br0'/> <target dev='vnet0'/> <model type='virtio'/> <alias name='net0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/> </interface> <serial type='pty'> <source path='/dev/pts/0'/> <target type='isa-serial' port='0'> <model name='isa-serial'/> </target> <alias name='serial0'/> </serial> <console type='pty' tty='/dev/pts/0'> <source path='/dev/pts/0'/> <target type='serial' port='0'/> <alias name='serial0'/> </console> <channel type='unix'> <source mode='bind' path='/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/channel/target/domain-4-Windows 10/org.qemu.guest_agent.0'/> <target type='virtio' name='org.qemu.guest_agent.0' state='connected'/> <alias name='channel0'/> <address type='virtio-serial' controller='0' bus='0' port='1'/> </channel> <input type='tablet' bus='usb'> <alias name='input0'/> <address type='usb' bus='0' port='1'/> </input> <input type='mouse' bus='ps2'> <alias name='input1'/> </input> <input type='keyboard' bus='ps2'> <alias name='input2'/> </input> <graphics type='vnc' port='5900' autoport='yes' websocket='5700' listen='0.0.0.0' keymap='en-gb'> <listen type='address' address='0.0.0.0'/> </graphics> <sound model='ich9'> <alias name='sound0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x09' function='0x0'/> </sound> <video> <model type='qxl' ram='65536' vram='65536' vgamem='16384' heads='1' primary='yes'/> <alias name='video0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x02' function='0x0'/> </video> <memballoon model='virtio'> <alias name='balloon0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x08' function='0x0'/> </memballoon> </devices> <seclabel type='dynamic' model='dac' relabel='yes'> <label>+0:+100</label> <imagelabel>+0:+100</imagelabel> </seclabel> </domain> The more I have started using my VM the more it has started to bug me, stuff like downloading ISO that should just take a minute is taking around 10mins. Is there anything obvious?

Definitely loud and not really suitable for any living space. You could probably get away with keeping in loft space or under the stairs but then airflow will be an issue. Quieter fans are available but iv got the stock ones which are not too bad imo. The server I bought also as redundant PSU so those add to noise levels. Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk