1812

works fine for me either way on both machines I have running 6.12.3. For reference, I'm on safari Version 16.5.1 (18615.2.9.11.7)

upgraded 2 similar machines from .2 to .3 no issues except this is new: Jul 17 14:54:50 Tower1 smbd[24128]: [2023/07/17 14:54:50.767379, 0] ../../source3/lib/adouble.c:2363(ad_read_rsrc_adouble) Jul 17 14:54:50 Tower1 smbd[24128]: ad_read_rsrc_adouble: invalid AppleDouble resource .DS_Store but I'm not that concerned about it at the moment because of the file type/what that does. I haven't had any file transfer issues (yet) will come back if it becomes a thing.

helped me out a few times (both in my own threads and when searching for previously solved threads), much appreciated and congrats!

regular user shares are a little bottlenecked on unraid. to increase smb performance look at https://forums.unraid.net/topic/100855-workaround-how-to-get-macos-smb-transfers-at-1gbs-on-10gbe/ and the original source https://forums.unraid.net/topic/97165-smb-performance-tuning/#comment-895985

Happy New Year! I'm new to 3d printing so I thought I'd give this docker a try my an ender 3 s1 pro. I ran into the same issue with serial/by-id issue and had the same result using "udevadm info --name=/dev/bus/usb/001/002" showing "device node not found". This may not be the "right" way but this is what I did to get my printer recognized: 1. open a terminal window on unraid server web page 2. enter "cd /dev/serial/by-id" 3. enter "dir" this showed me what I was after, which in my case was: usb-1a86_USB_Serial-if00-port0 in the docker template I changed it to "/dev/serial/by-id/usb-1a86_USB_Serial-if00-port0" I then followed the directions in the second post of this topic (even though I don't have multiple printers) which were 1) go to settings/serial connections and add /dev/serial/by-id/* to "Additional serial ports" 2) save 3) go to settings/serial connections and change AUTO in the serial port list to your device 4) save Just completed my first test and it all seems to be doing what it is suppose to. Hope that helps!

updated 2 machines from 6.11.x to this. no issues.

upgraded 2 boxes: one from 6.11.3, the other from 6.10.3. no issues currently observed. SPIFFY!

1. you can assign as many cores as you have to your vm or a number of vm's. 2. Any level of unRaid does this. The difference in the levels is the amount of disks you can attach. you can assign whatever and however many cores to any vm, and even stack vm's on the same cores (though you'll get an understandable performance penalty.) You can even isolate the cores away from unRaid running as host and reserve the cores to only be used by the vm's you choose. 3. open a question in the appropriate place on the forum and someone will probably be able to help you with that.

and I broke the open files plugin by running it out of memory

Then I'm not sure why this is currently working? I mean, I know what value I entered on purpose for max open files (just to see what would happen). But it seems like I'm chugging along beyond it. Maybe it'll all come to a screeching halt soon? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

just a heads up. A Mac photo library that is of any substantial size (like 175GB for example) blows past the 40964 open file limit when transferring to the server and the file limit has to be increased way beyond that. [learned from experience and several failures today before finding this thread and increasing to a ludicrous number to try and get this moved over]. Hopefully it will be more easily user adjustable in the future release.

Over 4 years later and now I'm changing my +1 to a +10

side note: you can get around the halted boot process for missing devices by disabling them in the bios.

why does it keep installing the newest Nvidia driver after every update? I use a gt for Plex and it always rolls to the latest vs keeping me on the 470.129.06 which is the one that works for this card.

FWIW I have 2 HP ML30 Gen 9 servers updated to 6.10.2, both with dual: 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries NetXtreme BCM5720 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe 02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries NetXtreme BCM5720 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe I did the "un-blacklist" procedure and have experienced no errors. I will also add that the Broadcom controllers are not eth0 in both systems either, and as far as I know there were no reports of this model of HP servers with issues.