enigma27

Morning all. anyone having trouble with Transcoding with the recent update? Yesterday morning everything was working fine... On my main PC I usually just use the web interface through edge or chrome if I want to watch something. I was playing some games last night and then after thought I would watch TV on my plex server... Now any video that needs to be transcoded (Mostly x265 files in Edge) I can no longer play and get an error saying 'not enough CPU for conversion' or 'this server is not powerful enough to convert video' The server itself is an x1700 with 16gb Ram and has been running this plex server for a few years now. I tried deleting and reinstalling the docker image and its giving me the same errors. Direct play seems to work fine but if I play a file on my android phone or Nvidia shield and try to force it to transcode it also falls over. The server itself seems to be working fine and I have other dockers that are using the CPU to transcode from time to time and they are not experiencing the same issue. Any ideas?

@ich777 Ignore was me being dumb.

ok tried everything I can think of this evening and still cannot connect to any windows 10 machine using the hostname like i can with the RDP client in windows. I can only successfully connect with an IP address. any other solutions I could try?

In windows using RDP I have no problems simply using the host name connecting to them. So I will try and use XXXhostname.localdomain which is what they show up as in my Pi-Hole interface as see if that works.

great docker i never knew about. quick question. I have successfully set-up access to two computers using RDP using IP addresses but is there anyway to get the connections to work connecting to the hostnames of the computers rather than IP as the two computers currently dont have static ip addresses?

Another great video space invader... although cant seem to get it to work.. can login to the webui and add connections but just get a timeout message and cant connect to any rdp connections. any ideas?

Does anyone have an issue with this plugin disappearing when server is rebooted? Im on unraid 6.0.0 Rc2 and when i reboot the server I have to re install this plugin each time.

ok I changed the option in the Radarr settings for "Certificate Validation" from enabled to disabled for local addresses and it seems to now connect

just to add it seems using the https port number it says it cant connect to the server IP even though both Sonarr and Lidarr are working fine

@binhex Have you tested connecting to SABNzb using V3? I can connect using the HTTP port but trying to use the HTTPs port gives me the following error Test was aborted due to an error: Unable to connect to SABnzbd, An error occurred while sending the request. The response ended prematurely.: 'http://XXX.XXX.XXX.X:XXXX/api?mode=get_config&apikey=3XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX&output=json' I have X'ed out my IP address and API key for obvious reasons. The exact same settings in Sonarr which is still on version 2 connect just fine.

I just turned on the flag for strict port forwarding and seems to be working ok now and populating the fields.

Thank you binhex. So why do I get connection failed when refreshing that page? dose the docker keep the VPN connection open or does it only establish when a DL is initiated? whenever i click the wrench icon it seems random as to whether it brings back my public IP address or whether its says failed connection

ok do we know what happens if the VPN in this container falls over? So was testing this last night with PIA + the wiregaurd option and getting consistent speeds of around 55 MB/s which I can deal with (first world problem I know) But today I noticed when clicking the wrench icon it keeps coming up saying Public IPv4 address and DNS name lookup failed (this was not present last night) then if I refresh it will show the public IPV4 address and then another refresh says connection failed although this does not seem to affect downloads. The reason I ask is I set off a test download when I first noticed this and it was downloading at twice the speed almost indicating the VPN was not connected. next download it was back to the regular 55 MB/s Also anyone explain exactly what Privoxy is and what it does?

although I must say there is definitely something up with unraid and pass through speed. Im on BT 1gig fibre and through my windows PC and running firefox in a docker I can max out the line easy.. trying to use download something with SAB without a VPN at all and i can only max the line to 60%

Funny I have been experiencing the same over the last few days. With Sab running through my VPN with PIA i was getting 12MB/s where usually i would get around 60. was racking my brain as what it could be but maybe its just PIA as when i turn the VPN off it shoots back up

I give up.. this is far too complex to get working correctly. easier to just go to the jitsi website and start a room

ok so this seems to be an issue ongoing with setting things up and running a server but I don't know how to fix. Basically if you have more than 2 people and its a mixture of internal to lan and external lan clients the internal and external people cant see eachother. Seem multiple fixes but no idea how to fix it as its way above my head. https://github.com/jitsi/docker-jitsi-meet/issues/403 https://github.com/jitsi/docker-jitsi-meet/issues/398

ok thought i had sorted out my issues but something else has come up now. Before i had only tried connecting with 2 people one on local network and one on cellular which seemed to work ok. just tried to setup a meeting for my daughter and her friends and soon as more than 2 connect everyone seems to loose video... any Ideas?

ok so just tested forwarding port 4443 and that indeed does need to be forwarded to be able to allow access for external clients. is there a way you would not have to forward this port? it was not in spaceinvaders video unless I missed that part. p.s any guide on how to update the containers?

Hi Spaceinvader So to confirm with this new config do you have to port forward both 10000 and 4443 ports? because I just tested with My PC hosting a meeting and then using my mobile to connect as a client... Phone on Wifi can connect with video Phone on cellular can connect but no video is show for either person in the meeting (Each can see themselves)

No not for me. only port I had to forward (for external people to connect) was port 10000 on UDP

just tried chrome (although I don't use it) and it asked straight away to allow camera and mic and worked fine.

which browser do you use? If I use brave I have to turn off auto play or video does not show.

I can access it via Lan using UNRAIDIP:8000

I believe that is the case yes. it separates them from other containers and directs the traffic via lets encrypt. For me I have my own domain so mine goes Domain CNAME for jitsi (Points to) --> single duckdns domain (Maintains my public ip) --> Firewall has dynamic DNS setup for duck DNS (updates my public IP to duck DNS) --> ports forwarded in my firewall as per Lents encrypt video (443 to 1443 & 80 to 180) --> lets encrypt container includes my jitsi domain & letsencrypt config (proxy conf) setup with my domain rather than the default. nothing else changed. if any of that makes any sense as i am far from an expert on any of this.