Community Developer
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

hotio's Achievements


Apprentice (3/14)



  1. It includes a screenshot of the plex settings it corresponds's a pretty common issue with plex when running in bridge mode, iirc they even mention it in their docs. Maybe not as explicitly mentioned as you'd like in my docs, but feel free to create a PR, it's not always the easiest to write helpful docs when you know the inner workings. Somebody will also be happy to assist on the discord server.
  2. This is because I by default use the most secure option for plex (or any other container), which is "bridge" instead of the lsio template that uses "host" by default. So you had two choices, also use "host" (quick to do from the select box, not recommended) or the proper way, by making use of the env var ADVERTISE_IP, so that your local clients know where to look. Would have been nice of @Zonediverto elaborate on this, instead of just merely implying that there's something wrong with the image.
  3. You're not alone in this, lots of others would prefer this, compared to the template mess...I have no idea though on how to convince them to go with the more commonly used compose way...would make life so much easier for so many.
  4. The FBI thanks you for that btw...
  5. FYI, DyonR his containers have the same leak...
  6. I provide seperate templates for some of my images...a non-vpn one and a vpn one.....does that make them "SUPER Unraid Optimized"? But seriously now, I've seen at first hand for many years how a drag it has been for the different *arr support people teaching people how to properly deal with docker + paths....slowly they've been making progress, but now you come in and start telling everybody that the wrong way of doing things is "Unraid Optimized"? That doesn't sound productive at all. Surely people are capable of creating a new folder and pick a custom bind mount according their own preference, no? Afterall they managed to install Unraid too. Also, why would you brush an entire argument away, because you know nothing about torrents, while the point he's making has nothing to do with torrents, but IO intensive tasks that can be avoided?
  7. All support is done on the discord server. But, yes switch to hotio/cloudflareddns
  8. There's no point in you putting puid and pgid in your template, because sct's image doesn't support it. Did you actually ask sct permission? I think he rather do the template himself maybe in collab with the selfhosters repo....for me it's all the same
  9. I'm always gonna be slower, since sct knows when he's going to push the button. Certainly not hours....the build does take 30-40 because I'm also releasing arm64 and armhf. Got puid pgid support, images slightly smaller, shared alpine base with some other of my containers, app is tested to see if it starts before pushing to dockerhub and (no limits)....
  10. Unpackerr dev trying to get info on the best approach to get his own template into CA...gets ignored and the responses he does get are besides the point. @limetech you as a person don't need to apologize to me, you've been nothing but friendly towards me. People also seem to not understand the meaning of my post, the main point I was trying to make is that people shouldn't try and guilt other people into accepting an apology, trying to make them the bad guys, because they won't respond.... BTW Tom you know damn well that I haven't been treated fairly here and that's also why the plan is to find a different server solution as per your suggestion... TrueNAS Scale looks promising... so I guess this will be my final post then...
  11. Could be, maybe my welcome party has given me a bad aftertaste, then again it's just your opinion and we all have one. Having said that, it doesn't make it any less true.
  12. Although I can't speak for my fellow team members, decisions like these usually aren't taken by a single event, in most cases it's just the final drop...not saying it was like that in this case....but don't start "expecting" stuff in return just because a cheap apology was made. Some new developers trying to get into the Unraid community are belittled and left hanging without a proper response, you don't see them getting an apology.... IMO, the backlash was just too big in this case and that's why you get this nice apology, just simple business damage control at its finest. Don't let that be a reason to guilt others into doing things they maybe want/don't want to do. Enjoy the post while it lasts...
  13. It's not as if they've been very welcoming to new community developers wanting to get in on the unraid something like this was bound to happen to older highly respected community developers....just my 2 cents. Luckily time heals all wounds and in 6 months time a new unraid user has no idea this even happened. Burning bridges is a thing and people will keep doing it.
  14. People seeking support here are encouraged to visit the discord server (, any lack of activity on this forum is no indication of container maintenance/updates speed, those will remain best in class. I can however make no promises on the longterm availability within CA, in that case I suggest people to manually add an unraid templates repository or switch to linuxserver if that's a possibility. More info is always available on the discord server.