June 7, 201511 yr anything like that in my opinion should be rating based, popularity doesn't mean much if it were based on downloads alone. someone could put out a docker, get bucket loads of downloads cos they're a popular author and if it's no good it still rates popular because it's been downloaded a lot. In my opinion a like style vote is better, the more people that "like" it the more popular the application is, having a rating 1-5 or allowing people to - an application is just asking for a world of butthurt from the developers. i can see it on the news... man burns house down because his app was rated a '1' Lol, you aren't far off, but I could see a case where a developer isn't responding quick enough so someone rates the app 1 in retaliation, the dev takes offence to it and decides to just quit, everyone loses in that case. All these problems are why it's not high on the list.
June 7, 201511 yr The moment there is only 1 possible solution for an application in the Linux world is when Linux itself has become a walled off garden. Naturally that carries over to unraid too. That is not something I will participate in. Remember, with only ever having 1 solution for an application need, you would never have unmenu, never have dynamix, never have the preclear script or the faster preclear script, never have the dockerman plugin you have now, never have the virtualman plugin you have now, never have rutorrent instead of transmission, never have nzbget instead of sabnzbd, never have sickrage, etc ... You really want a world without choice. Is that really the world you'd rather have?
June 7, 201511 yr The moment there is only 1 possible solution for an application in the Linux world is when Linux itself has become a walled off garden. Naturally that carries over to unraid too. That is not something I will participate in. Remember, with only ever having 1 solution for an application need, you would never have unmenu, never have dynamix, never have the preclear script or the faster preclear script, never have the dockerman plugin you have now, never have the virtualman plugin you have now, never have rutorrent instead of transmission, never have nzbget instead of sabnzbd, never have sickrage, etc ... You really want a world without choice. Is that really the world you'd rather have? i hope nobody is suggesting that, just some differentiation between apps that are similar.
June 7, 201511 yr anything like that in my opinion should be rating based, popularity doesn't mean much if it were based on downloads alone. someone could put out a docker, get bucket loads of downloads cos they're a popular author and if it's no good it still rates popular because it's been downloaded a lot. In my opinion a like style vote is better, the more people that "like" it the more popular the application is, having a rating 1-5 or allowing people to - an application is just asking for a world of butthurt from the developers. i can see it on the news... man burns house down because his app was rated a '1' Lol, you aren't far off, but I could see a case where a developer isn't responding quick enough so someone rates the app 1 in retaliation, the dev takes offence to it and decides to just quit, everyone loses in that case. All these problems are why it's not high on the list. This wouldn't be an issue with just a simple "like" button though, you could even have a total "likes" and a "likes this month", so new apps aren't unfairly disadvantaged.
June 7, 201511 yr The moment there is only 1 possible solution for an application in the Linux world is when Linux itself has become a walled off garden. Naturally that carries over to unraid too. That is not something I will participate in. Remember, with only ever having 1 solution for an application need, you would never have unmenu, never have dynamix, never have the preclear script or the faster preclear script, never have the dockerman plugin you have now, never have the virtualman plugin you have now, never have rutorrent instead of transmission, never have nzbget instead of sabnzbd, never have sickrage, etc ... You really want a world without choice. Is that really the world you'd rather have? Nope. Sorry. That's crap. There are baselines and standard engineering principals even in the Linux world. What we are talking about here is differentiation and control over releases and applications. Configuration Management. I use this analogy. Ubuntu. Imagine 6 versions of Ubuntu (which in fact there are) BUT with no differentiation between them. No indication of what's different. No central control. Would you just "pick one" based on your gut or if you had to read through pages and pages of code or forums posts. All we are looking for here is some "management" of docker applications. Variation is great and should not be discouraged BUT pegging these against individuals and thier "free time" or "whims" especially when such things can be subject to security issues (eg those dockers with web servers or ssl embedded) need to be dealt with pro actively!! Docker in Unraid offers allot. Functionality updates are I guess not a big issues but security ones are. SO if I have to wait for someone to be "Bothered, awake or available" to allow me to apply a security patch to a critical price of software then forget it. Let's all go back to using VM's and with Debian / Ubuntu where we can scheduled / run daily updates Docker NEEDS management. LT should step in here IMHO.
June 7, 201511 yr anything like that in my opinion should be rating based, popularity doesn't mean much if it were based on downloads alone. someone could put out a docker, get bucket loads of downloads cos they're a popular author and if it's no good it still rates popular because it's been downloaded a lot. In my opinion a like style vote is better, the more people that "like" it the more popular the application is, having a rating 1-5 or allowing people to - an application is just asking for a world of butthurt from the developers. i can see it on the news... man burns house down because his app was rated a '1' Lol, you aren't far off, but I could see a case where a developer isn't responding quick enough so someone rates the app 1 in retaliation, the dev takes offence to it and decides to just quit, everyone loses in that case. All these problems are why it's not high on the list. This wouldn't be an issue with just a simple "like" button though, you could even have a total "likes" and a "likes this month", so new apps aren't unfairly disadvantaged. Now that we're completely off topic, I would hope that a moderator is going to split this conversation onto a new thread. Quick thoughts on automatic / generated ratings: Keeping track of total downloads (btw this method would have to be done through dockerMan since CA has no idea if the app has been downloaded or not) doesn't mean anything because you could try each of the Sab's out there, decide that the first one is terrible and stick with the second. They would wind up both rated the same. Currently running apps is a possibility. But then I keep some containers downloaded and only run them when required (eg: Dolphin), so the numbers are skewed again. Likes / Dislikes on the forum could be rating the app or the developer so not a bad idea (no idea if its even possible), but TBH whenever my phone bugs me to like an application I just dismiss it. Ratings on the developer's posting habits / history. Let's you know that he's at least active on the forum, but not what he's actually doing (eg: my first 1000 posts came from helping users with problems. The remainder are when I switched gears and began some development - but, the situation could be reversed for some users) Activity in the support threads. Lots of activity could indicate tons of problems with the apps. The least popular threads could either mean no one wants the app or that it has zero problems. If we had a large sample size (Android app store users), then likes / dislikes / ratings would be meaningful. In our relatively small sample size (only LT would really know how many actual users there are) I don't see much value in any automated system. But, if I was going to have to make a decision today (which I'm definitely NOT doing) I would lean towards a 1->5 rating.
June 7, 201511 yr The moment there is only 1 possible solution for an application in the Linux world is when Linux itself has become a walled off garden. Naturally that carries over to unraid too. That is not something I will participate in. Remember, with only ever having 1 solution for an application need, you would never have unmenu, never have dynamix, never have the preclear script or the faster preclear script, never have the dockerman plugin you have now, never have the virtualman plugin you have now, never have rutorrent instead of transmission, never have nzbget instead of sabnzbd, never have sickrage, etc ... You really want a world without choice. Is that really the world you'd rather have? Nope. Sorry. That's crap. There are baselines and standard engineering principals even in the Linux world. What we are talking about here is differentiation and control over releases and applications. Configuration Management. I use this analogy. Ubuntu. Imagine 6 versions of Ubuntu (which in fact there are) BUT with no differentiation between them. No indication of what's different. No central control. Would you just "pick one" based on your gut or if you had to read through pages and pages of code or forums posts. All we are looking for here is some "management" of docker applications. Variation is great and should not be discouraged BUT pegging these against individuals and thier "free time" or "whims" especially when such things can be subject to security issues (eg those dockers with web servers or ssl embedded) need to be dealt with pro actively!! Docker in Unraid offers allot. Functionality updates are I guess not a big issues but security ones are. SO if I have to wait for someone to be "Bothered, awake or available" to allow me to apply a security patch to a critical price of software then forget it. Let's all go back to using VM's and with Debian / Ubuntu where we can scheduled / run daily updates Docker NEEDS management. LT should step in here IMHO. Personally, I do not want Limetech being the gatekeeper or manager of dockers for numerious reasons. Out of respect to them I wont explicitly spell out why. Docker management is better handled by the community. I know I'm not the only one who thinks this way.
June 7, 201511 yr ... There are baselines and standard engineering principals even in the Linux world. What we are talking about here is differentiation and control over releases and applications. Configuration Management. I use this analogy. Ubuntu. Imagine 6 versions of Ubuntu (which in fact there are) BUT with no differentiation between them. No indication of what's different. No central control. Would you just "pick one" based on your gut or if you had to read through pages and pages of code or forums posts. All we are looking for here is some "management" of docker applications. Variation is great and should not be discouraged BUT pegging these against individuals and thier "free time" or "whims" especially when such things can be subject to security issues (eg those dockers with web servers or ssl embedded) need to be dealt with pro actively!! Docker in Unraid offers allot. Functionality updates are I guess not a big issues but security ones are. SO if I have to wait for someone to be "Bothered, awake or available" to allow me to apply a security patch to a critical price of software then forget it. Let's all go back to using VM's and with Debian / Ubuntu where we can scheduled / run daily updates Docker NEEDS management. LT should step in here IMHO. Dockers are not OSes. In some sense, they are not really even applications. They are instead containers for applications that are not written by LT or the docker developers. Without some specific and fairly simple to implement recommendation for managing this, I doubt LT is going to be able to do much with their limited staff.
June 7, 201511 yr The moment there is only 1 possible solution for an application in the Linux world is when Linux itself has become a walled off garden. Naturally that carries over to unraid too. That is not something I will participate in. Remember, with only ever having 1 solution for an application need, you would never have unmenu, never have dynamix, never have the preclear script or the faster preclear script, never have the dockerman plugin you have now, never have the virtualman plugin you have now, never have rutorrent instead of transmission, never have nzbget instead of sabnzbd, never have sickrage, etc ... You really want a world without choice. Is that really the world you'd rather have? Nope. Sorry. That's crap. There are baselines and standard engineering principals even in the Linux world. What we are talking about here is differentiation and control over releases and applications. Configuration Management. I use this analogy. Ubuntu. Imagine 6 versions of Ubuntu (which in fact there are) BUT with no differentiation between them. No indication of what's different. No central control. Would you just "pick one" based on your gut or if you had to read through pages and pages of code or forums posts. All we are looking for here is some "management" of docker applications. Variation is great and should not be discouraged BUT pegging these against individuals and thier "free time" or "whims" especially when such things can be subject to security issues (eg those dockers with web servers or ssl embedded) need to be dealt with pro actively!! Docker in Unraid offers allot. Functionality updates are I guess not a big issues but security ones are. SO if I have to wait for someone to be "Bothered, awake or available" to allow me to apply a security patch to a critical price of software then forget it. Let's all go back to using VM's and with Debian / Ubuntu where we can scheduled / run daily updates Docker NEEDS management. LT should step in here IMHO. Personally, If this is an issue ( or a possible issue ) with a docker you want to use, just clone the GIT repo and maintain it yourself, then you would be in control of when / how it gets updated. nice and simple...
June 7, 201511 yr 2 pages of replies since I made my post about NZBGet, and I only vacuumed the house and made dinner. Wow.
June 7, 201511 yr The moment there is only 1 possible solution for an application in the Linux world is when Linux itself has become a walled off garden. Naturally that carries over to unraid too. That is not something I will participate in. Remember, with only ever having 1 solution for an application need, you would never have unmenu, never have dynamix, never have the preclear script or the faster preclear script, never have the dockerman plugin you have now, never have the virtualman plugin you have now, never have rutorrent instead of transmission, never have nzbget instead of sabnzbd, never have sickrage, etc ... You really want a world without choice. Is that really the world you'd rather have? Nope. Sorry. That's crap. There are baselines and standard engineering principals even in the Linux world. What we are talking about here is differentiation and control over releases and applications. Configuration Management. I use this analogy. Ubuntu. Imagine 6 versions of Ubuntu (which in fact there are) BUT with no differentiation between them. No indication of what's different. No central control. Would you just "pick one" based on your gut or if you had to read through pages and pages of code or forums posts. All we are looking for here is some "management" of docker applications. Variation is great and should not be discouraged BUT pegging these against individuals and thier "free time" or "whims" especially when such things can be subject to security issues (eg those dockers with web servers or ssl embedded) need to be dealt with pro actively!! Docker in Unraid offers allot. Functionality updates are I guess not a big issues but security ones are. SO if I have to wait for someone to be "Bothered, awake or available" to allow me to apply a security patch to a critical price of software then forget it. Let's all go back to using VM's and with Debian / Ubuntu where we can scheduled / run daily updates Docker NEEDS management. LT should step in here IMHO. Personally, If this is an issue ( or a possible issue ) with a docker you want to use, just clone the GIT repo and maintain it yourself, then you would be in control of when / how it gets updated. nice and simple... Dockers are not OS's / no they are not. BUT they can almost have as many security issues as an OS can have imho. Some may have many different things running in many unconfigurable sets of config which can have so many security flaws. Yes one can just "fork an application" "register with git" "release thier own version" BUT Unraid is supposed to be able to be used by those who are not developers, Linux enthusiasts or EVEN by thier own admition those who know how to use a command line. Is Unraid for the enthusiast or the basic user. If it's the basic user (which I would imagine LT would say it is for) the all the concerns I've touched on NEED to be managed for those users. Sigh. I can't believe this is so hard for people to get. Those who are replying - imagine you don't know what you know - imagine you are your mum (which is who LT market their product to (eg those who don't have to use the command line and be Linux gurus) would you be comfy then. Would your interests and security be protected. Or are we really saying that Unraid is an enthusiast product. A product where to use its full features and be secure you need to understand more advanced Linux and programming principals! I can't believe the premise I am pushing and as it appears also arguing here has so little support. Funny that those arguing appear (to me) to be those who are comfortable on the command line, those who create docker repos and templates, plugins etc etc I wonder what the standard new user who had never even used Linux thinks. Those who LT is trying to attract to their product. Ok I really am going to bed now. I give up for now.
June 7, 201511 yr Increasing LT staff x100 will not make it possible for all product features to be used by anyone who doesn't want to make any effort to understand things. If the advertised "target market" includes all those people then I would say that is just marketing and not reality.
June 7, 201511 yr Increasing LT staff x100 will not make it possible for all product features to be used by anyone who doesn't want to make any effort to understand things. If the advertised "target market" includes all those people then I would say that is just marketing and not reality. Come on man you've been around long enough to understand what I am getting at. Maybe you are right - but then LT have to reconsider who they are marketing thier product at. Just remember the argument about the "Nerd Pack". They won't include the likes of Screen natively into Unraid as thier target user shouldn't have to access the command line. Screen - an application that lets a user run a preclear (among other things I use it for) in the background when their main access method is a dropable telnet session - which imho Is ESSENTIAL for any Unraid user to successfully stress test a disk before adding to Unraid. Yep. Screen, a command prompt and some basic command prompt tools are too complicated for the average user BUT let's expect them to fork a version of SW on GIT and create, maintain and release thier own versions. Sigh. Once again.
June 7, 201511 yr Per Documentation unraid is not secure to begin with http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php/Configuration_Tutorial#Security so if your opening ports in your router or giving your unraid box direct internet access, you are not a novice / standard user and should have a good understanding of the implications to begin with.
June 7, 201511 yr Per Documentation unraid is not secure to begin with http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php/Configuration_Tutorial#Security so if your opening ports in your router or giving your unraid box direct internet access, you are not a novice / standard user and should have a good understanding of the implications to begin with. Your conclusions I agree with - BUT contradict LT's position. See my above post re nerd pack (as just one example) to contradict. I am not being argumentative on purpose here. I'd just like us all to walk in the same direction following the same map! Coming back to my original issue: I feel the scalability of the software available for Unraid needs management and control.
June 7, 201511 yr Per Documentation unraid is not secure to begin with http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php/Configuration_Tutorial#Security so if your opening ports in your router or giving your unraid box direct internet access, you are not a novice / standard user and should have a good understanding of the implications to begin with. Your conclusions I agree with - BUT contradict LT's position. See my above post re nerd pack (as just one example) to contradict. I am not being argumentative on purpose here. I'd just like us all to walk in the same direction following the same map! Coming back to my original issue: I feel the scalability of the software available for Unraid needs management and control. i feel that would stifle one of the good things about unraid, the vibrant community led developement of addons/dockers etc...
June 7, 201511 yr I have been around long enough to understand what you mean, and I have been around unRAID long enough to understand that they have made some improvements in this area but have such a long way to go that I will not hold my breath. I don't think LT is alone in not being able to adequately support everyone's mum. I would say that is the rule rather than the exception. Sometimes I think outsourcing support to non-native speakers is a strategy to get people to give up and go away.
June 7, 201511 yr The moment there is only 1 possible solution for an application in the Linux world is when Linux itself has become a walled off garden. Naturally that carries over to unraid too. That is not something I will participate in. Remember, with only ever having 1 solution for an application need, you would never have unmenu, never have dynamix, never have the preclear script or the faster preclear script, never have the dockerman plugin you have now, never have the virtualman plugin you have now, never have rutorrent instead of transmission, never have nzbget instead of sabnzbd, never have sickrage, etc ... You really want a world without choice. Is that really the world you'd rather have? Nope. Sorry. That's crap. There are baselines and standard engineering principals even in the Linux world. What we are talking about here is differentiation and control over releases and applications. Configuration Management. I use this analogy. Ubuntu. Imagine 6 versions of Ubuntu (which in fact there are) BUT with no differentiation between them. No indication of what's different. No central control. Would you just "pick one" based on your gut or if you had to read through pages and pages of code or forums posts. All we are looking for here is some "management" of docker applications. Variation is great and should not be discouraged BUT pegging these against individuals and thier "free time" or "whims" especially when such things can be subject to security issues (eg those dockers with web servers or ssl embedded) need to be dealt with pro actively!! Docker in Unraid offers allot. Functionality updates are I guess not a big issues but security ones are. SO if I have to wait for someone to be "Bothered, awake or available" to allow me to apply a security patch to a critical price of software then forget it. Let's all go back to using VM's and with Debian / Ubuntu where we can scheduled / run daily updates Docker NEEDS management. LT should step in here IMHO. Personally, If this is an issue ( or a possible issue ) with a docker you want to use, just clone the GIT repo and maintain it yourself, then you would be in control of when / how it gets updated. nice and simple... Dockers are not OS's / no they are not. BUT they can almost have as many security issues as an OS can have imho. Some may have many different things running in many unconfigurable sets of config which can have so many security flaws. Yes one can just "fork an application" "register with git" "release thier own version" BUT Unraid is supposed to be able to be used by those who are not developers, Linux enthusiasts or EVEN by thier own admition those who know how to use a command line. Is Unraid for the enthusiast or the basic user. If it's the basic user (which I would imagine LT would say it is for) the all the concerns I've touched on NEED to be managed for those users. Sigh. I can't believe this is so hard for people to get. Those who are replying - imagine you don't know what you know - imagine you are your mum (which is who LT market their product to (eg those who don't have to use the command line and be Linux gurus) would you be comfy then. Would your interests and security be protected. Or are we really saying that Unraid is an enthusiast product. A product where to use its full features and be secure you need to understand more advanced Linux and programming principals! I can't believe the premise I am pushing and as it appears also arguing here has so little support. Funny that those arguing appear (to me) to be those who are comfortable on the command line, those who create docker repos and templates, plugins etc etc I wonder what the standard new user who had never even used Linux thinks. Those who LT is trying to attract to their product. Ok I really am going to bed now. I give up for now. You are probably correct. Probably just about everyone in this conversation (and the majority of heavy forum contributers) are all comfortable in the command line. TBH, what started this line about Git was your asking about contributing to my project. unRaid is moving towards having their client base to be closer to the knowledgeable noob. They will never have my mother as a customer (nor do I believe that they believe they ever will). The complete and utter noob / computer illiterate will merely pick up an external harddrive for their NAS / backup needs. Great strides have been taken by this community (with their guidance / input / whatever you want to call it) towards making this all a reality. Community Applications, VM Manager, etc are all letting people use their systems with less and less under-the-hood knowledge all the time. Huge improvements are still required. On docker for instance, I keep trying to come up with a good way of describing container paths vs host paths and port mappings in ENGLISH that anyone can understand. This right now is the biggest stumbling block I think towards wider adoption. Adding an app isn't as easy as it is on your phone. And there is no FUNDAMENTAL reason why it can't be. Would I want LT to oversee the applications displayed by CA? Definitely not. They are not the proper people to do this. I am not the proper person to do this. I don't think anyone on the forums is the proper person to do it. However I think that the forums as a whole is capable to manage this. And don't get me wrong - if LT was to completely manage the entire docker system, some of the planned features for CA would be far easier to implement. Security issues - sure they can and do exist. They exist everywhere. (When was the last time you actually READ the permissions that an app on your phone is asking for and DENIED it because you didn't like what it was capable of) Community policing is capable of handling everything. If a bug is found in an app somewhere and when its posted in the appropriate support thread, I can't recall an author outright saying just deal with it) LT is taking steps to further manage docker containers behind the scenes. jonP has already broached a couple of feature requests to me for CA which I believe if implemented would make the entire system more robust / stable. Features like minimum requirements, dockers depending upon another docker, etc. The problem with any evolving system, is that you just don't know what feature you need / want until a feature exists before it. I have my quibbles with LT, I even have a few posts that have been "bilged", but all in all everything considered I do believe that they are doing an incredible job. Absolutely their job has been made immensely easier with the contributions within the forums. But right now I wouldn't have it any other way.
June 7, 201511 yr i've waivered my POV regarding a centralised repo a few times though. i'd be more in favour of a few from the community having super user rights to the various gits and if the need arises due to a developer absence, take it over.
June 7, 201511 yr Per Documentation unraid is not secure to begin with http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php/Configuration_Tutorial#Security so if your opening ports in your router or giving your unraid box direct internet access, you are not a novice / standard user and should have a good understanding of the implications to begin with. Your conclusions I agree with - BUT contradict LT's position. See my above post re nerd pack (as just one example) to contradict. I am not being argumentative on purpose here. I'd just like us all to walk in the same direction following the same map! Coming back to my original issue: I feel the scalability of the software available for Unraid needs management and control. i feel that would stifle one of the good things about unraid, the vibrant community led developement of addons/dockers etc... Until it gets out of control. And 2 years down the line there are dozens (if not more) of forks of the same application from users both past present uninitiated unskilled ignorant or devious. How does an average user select what to use. How do they trust what they are using is safe!? To use Apple as an example. All thier community coded software has to be vetted and approved. Has that stifled development!? Multi Million Dollar Indistry.
June 7, 201511 yr Per Documentation unraid is not secure to begin with http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php/Configuration_Tutorial#Security so if your opening ports in your router or giving your unraid box direct internet access, you are not a novice / standard user and should have a good understanding of the implications to begin with. Your conclusions I agree with - BUT contradict LT's position. See my above post re nerd pack (as just one example) to contradict. I am not being argumentative on purpose here. I'd just like us all to walk in the same direction following the same map! Coming back to my original issue: I feel the scalability of the software available for Unraid needs management and control. i feel that would stifle one of the good things about unraid, the vibrant community led developement of addons/dockers etc... Until it gets out of control. And 2 years down the line there are dozens (if not more) of forks of the same application from users both past present uninitiated unskilled ignorant or devious. How does an average user select what to use. How do they trust what they are using is safe!? To use Apple as an example. All thier community coded software has to be vetted and approved. Has that stifled development!? Multi Billion Dollar Indistry. LT is not apple....... approval is a double edged sword though, how many apps get rejected by Apple for no seemingly good reason ?
June 7, 201511 yr Per Documentation unraid is not secure to begin with http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php/Configuration_Tutorial#Security so if your opening ports in your router or giving your unraid box direct internet access, you are not a novice / standard user and should have a good understanding of the implications to begin with. Your conclusions I agree with - BUT contradict LT's position. See my above post re nerd pack (as just one example) to contradict. I am not being argumentative on purpose here. I'd just like us all to walk in the same direction following the same map! Coming back to my original issue: I feel the scalability of the software available for Unraid needs management and control. i feel that would stifle one of the good things about unraid, the vibrant community led developement of addons/dockers etc... Until it gets out of control. And 2 years down the line there are dozens (if not more) of forks of the same application from users both past present uninitiated unskilled ignorant or devious. How does an average user select what to use. How do they trust what they are using is safe!? To use Apple as an example. All thier community coded software has to be vetted and approved. Has that stifled development!? Multi Million Dollar Indistry. these are all things that have been discussed before on here ad infinitum and indeed are still being discussed.
June 7, 201511 yr Huge improvements are still required. On docker for instance, I keep trying to come up with a good way of describing container paths vs host paths and port mappings in ENGLISH that anyone can understand. This right now is the biggest stumbling block I think towards wider adoption. Adding an app isn't as easy as it is on your phone. And there is no FUNDAMENTAL reason why it can't be. The nature of dockers and the fundamental need for those paths isn't going to change (at least not that i can see). however the implementation could certainly use some work, i don't know about the feasibility of a wizard type scenario with clear (author definable) instructions as to what the various settings do.
June 7, 201511 yr That was an example to demonstrate benefits of reviewing releases. But I agree - it is a double edged sword. All I am looking for here is a middle ground which involves a community / LT group and not an individual! Don't I have any supporters out there. I'm getting tired. I've already missed out as the missus is asleep!!!
June 7, 201511 yr ... On docker for instance, I keep trying to come up with a good way of describing container paths vs host paths and port mappings in ENGLISH that anyone can understand...Not only this, but it requires users to understand linux file paths and what those are with respect to the unRAID shares. Some users only know about network shares in Windows Explorer.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.