Jump to content

JorgeB

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    67,675

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    707

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JorgeB

  1. JorgeB
    It does if you assign them to a pool, if you were talking about array devices no.
  2. JorgeB
    Unraid has no problems with multiple LSI controllers, usually a board issue.
  3. JorgeB
    If this is to/from the array it's normal due to parity, pool(s) should be much faster.
  4. JorgeB
    Try a different cable/switch/port, while it links at 100Mbits you'll be limited to that.
  5. JorgeB
    Do you mean they are using ntfs, or did you use a reiser or xfs reader for Windows?
  6. JorgeB
    That's not normal, it should be around 6H as mentioned in the SMART report: Extended self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 389) minutes. Disk might have slow sector zones, that together with the other issues makes me think you should consider replacing it now.
  7. JorgeB
    It's not needed if you set power supply idle control correctly.
  8. JorgeB
  9. JorgeB
    New config keeps all the data, just make sure to assign all devices as before, note also that depending on the raid controller used there's a small chance that the data devices are unmountable due to invalid partition layout, but data still won't be deleted, just don't format anything.
  10. JorgeB
    You can create a pool with all the devices, then select a raid level appropriate for the performance/redundancy you prefer.
  11. JorgeB
    Do a new config, assign them all in the previous slots and check parity is already valid before array start.
  12. JorgeB
    Start here: https://forums.unraid.net/topic/46802-faq-for-unraid-v6/?do=findComment&comment=819173
  13. JorgeB
    That doesn't matter. An it's not just filesystem corruption, no filesystem is being detected on those disks, which is very strange. Don't know what you mean, you are seeing the data from the disks that mount only, if that's everything you should have good.
  14. JorgeB
    You should backup and reformat that device, there are some recovery options here if needed
  15. JorgeB
    Cache device dropped offline: Jul 27 16:43:40 TardisDataCore kernel: sd 2:0:0:0: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery Check/replace cables and post new diags after array start.
  16. JorgeB
    See if this applies to you: https://forums.unraid.net/topic/70529-650-call-traces-when-assigning-ip-address-to-docker-containers/ See also here: https://forums.unraid.net/bug-reports/stable-releases/690691-kernel-panic-due-to-netfilter-nf_nat_setup_info-docker-static-ip-macvlan-r1356/
  17. JorgeB
    There will be the test result in the report.
  18. JorgeB
    Docker image is corrupt, delete and re-create, VM service is disable in the diags posted, enable and post new diags if there are still problems.
  19. JorgeB
    You need at least one data device assigned in the array.
  20. JorgeB
    Please post the diagnostics: Tools -> Diagnostics
  21. JorgeB
    Other then using a different board that's your best bet.
  22. JorgeB
    Disk is showing a pending sector and recent UNC @ LBA errors, run an extended SMART test.
  23. JorgeB
    Jul 27 14:25:42 Area51 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected. Jul 27 14:25:42 Area51 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.1: Reload the driver after installing a supported module.
  24. JorgeB
    Disks 6 and 11 should be fixable if you run xfs_repair again without -n, the other two don't look so good, for disk5 you can check if the actual disk mounts.
  25. JorgeB
    Didn't read everything , but the rebuilt disk2 will be mostly corrupt. if you still have the old one don't wipe it, is disk1 the old disk or was also replaced?
×
×
  • Create New...