GreenEyedMonster

No worries! When I enter this command: docker exec -it nextcloud updater.phar It says this: Nextcloud Updater - version: v20.0.0beta4-11-g68fa0d4 Current version is 20.0.1. Update to Nextcloud 17.0.10 available. (channel: "stable") Following file will be downloaded automatically: https://download.nextcloud.com/server/releases/nextcloud-17.0.10.zip Open changelog ↗ Still saying this as well: "root@Media:~# docker exec -it nextcloud occ upgrade Nextcloud or one of the apps require upgrade - only a limited number of commands are available You may use your browser or the occ upgrade command to do the upgrade Setting log level to debug Exception: Updates between multiple major versions and downgrades are unsupported. Update failed Maintenance mode is kept active Resetting log level" Also this: Nextcloud or one of the apps require upgrade - only a limited number of commands are available You may use your browser or the occ upgrade command to do the upgrade I'm at a loss....

I've followed that. I'm constantly stuck at this command. "root@Media:~# docker exec -it nextcloud occ upgrade Nextcloud or one of the apps require upgrade - only a limited number of commands are available You may use your browser or the occ upgrade command to do the upgrade Setting log level to debug Exception: Updates between multiple major versions and downgrades are unsupported. Update failed Maintenance mode is kept active Resetting log level"

I'm on latest on gui and when I do docker exec -it nextcloud updater.phar says up to date. =/

Hey guys, Quick question! I've been waiting on Nextcloud 20 but I'm still on 19.0.4. Do I have to just wait till the update comes out to docker? Thanks!

Yep! I am. I tried a different video with 4k format and it only went up to 1080p. Thankfully, it did go to 1080p at least. So this video still only downloads at 360p https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60ruvzfXQoE No idea why as it goes all the way to 4k.

So now it's working after the last update without making changes. Only issue is that it is NOT getting the highest quality. Instead it is going down to super low quality video. Any ideas?

@tzahi12345 I am having issues with youtubedl-material. (Great work by the way.) I just did my first and only install and this is what i get when I try to download a video. 2020-11-03T16:27:57.617Z INFO: YoutubeDL-Material v4.0 started on PORT 17442 2020-11-03T16:28:14.708Z ERROR: Error during parsing:Error: Command failed with exit code 1: /app/node_modules/youtube-dl/bin/youtube-dl --dump-json http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60ruvzfXQoE 2020-11-03T16:28:14.709Z ERROR: failed to parse for urls starting with https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60ruvzfXQoE 2020-11-03T16:28:14.809Z ERROR: Command failed with exit code 1: /app/node_modules/youtube-dl/bin/youtube-dl --dump-json -f best -o video/%(title)s.mp4 --write-info-json --print-json -f best[ext=mp4] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60ruvzfXQoE Any ideas?

Hey guys! I can't get the Matomo docker to work with mysql db. I get this error: nami INFO Initializing matomo Error executing 'postInstallation': "size" argument must not be negative Error executing 'postInstallation': "size" argument must not be negative Any ideas? Figured out the db user had to be root on mariadb. No idea why since the user already had admin status.

Now would be the time to include it! You can buy used AMD FirePro™ S7150 x2 for cheap on ebay now. Would be a great addition for us that want multiple VM's but don't have the space in our cases. +1

That worked! Thank you!

I've tried all this and can't connect. It seems like the db won't start? I thought this docker included one? Here is my log. https://pastebin.com/ksbtTgp3. Any help would be greatly appreciated! . @PSYCHOPATHiO

Anyone else want to take a stab at it??

@bastl From my understanding this is a bit different since it is already running in the Docker as a reachable through VNC OSX install. I don't know what variables etc... to give it so that I can VNC into it. I'm stuck at KVM values.

Hey everyone, I found this amazing docker https://github.com/sickcodes/Docker-OSX and I would love to use it on my Unraid server. I would like to keep all my jailbreaking stuff in it. (Don't like having that software on my macbook.) Does anyone know how to install it correctly? I get this error: Unable to init server: Could not connect: Connection refused Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory qemu-system-x86_64: failed to initialize kvm: No such file or directory Thanks!

Has anyone seen this: https://github.com/sickcodes/Docker-OSX. Seems like it would be an interesting docker to get working!

No worries! I'll try to make it a little bit more clear. So in Terraria when you search for a server you enter the IP address of that server and then the port number. The first screen you enter the IP address of the server. (In my case the web site I have the docker forwarded to.) In the next screen you enter the port number of server. (I used my dockers port number. This might be the issue.) The last screen translate the website address to an IP address. This sometimes translate to my servers IP address sometimes it translates it to the my website hosts provider IP address. So I think part of it is that I should be forwarding my port on my router. The second part I don't understand why IP switches at times to NameCheap vs my servers IP. Also, thank you for all you have done. This docker is my favorite by far!!

I have a "dumb" question. I have a Terraria docker setup for my niece and nephew to use. I used NPM to pass the ip and port to a specific web page. http://terraria.randomwebpage.com When I use Terraria to log in and put the web address in it shows the correct Ip for my server but I can't connect. I assumed that this would allow me not to have to port forward anything on my router as NPM would handle that. Am I wrong? Update: After more testing... once in a while it starts giving me NameCheaps (my provider - 192.64.119.194) IP address instead of my own servers IP address. Any idea why??

I have a question about using another device that has Wireguard running and my unRaid server. Ideally, I would have my unRaid server be one hub and then multiple raspberry pi 4's as other hubs. Do you guys think that would be possible? Thanks!

All of a sudden I can't access my container anymore. I get the error below and don't have web access to the docker anymore. Any ideas?? 2020-04-16 13:51:42,209 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] Starting OpenVPN... 2020-04-16 13:51:42,224 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Thu Apr 16 13:51:42 2020 WARNING: file 'credentials.conf' is group or others accessible Thu Apr 16 13:51:42 2020 OpenVPN 2.4.8 [git:makepkg/3976acda9bf10b5e+] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [LZ4] [EPOLL] [PKCS11] [MH/PKTINFO] [AEAD] built on Jan 3 2020 Thu Apr 16 13:51:42 2020 library versions: OpenSSL 1.1.1f 31 Mar 2020, LZO 2.10 2020-04-16 13:51:42,224 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] OpenVPN started Thu Apr 16 13:51:42 2020 NOTE: the current --script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts 2020-04-16 13:51:42,226 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Thu Apr 16 13:51:42 2020 TCP/UDP: Preserving recently used remote address: [AF_INET]172.98.67.58:1198 Thu Apr 16 13:51:42 2020 UDP link local: (not bound) Thu Apr 16 13:51:42 2020 UDP link remote: [AF_INET]172.98.67.58:1198 2020-04-16 13:51:42,497 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Thu Apr 16 13:51:42 2020 [26bdbf7600612ac4bc63113e87dcc560] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]172.98.67.58:1198 2020-04-16 13:51:43,802 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Thu Apr 16 13:51:43 2020 TUN/TAP device tun0 opened Thu Apr 16 13:51:43 2020 /usr/bin/ip link set dev tun0 up mtu 1500 2020-04-16 13:51:43,803 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Thu Apr 16 13:51:43 2020 /usr/bin/ip addr add dev tun0 local 10.14.10.6 peer 10.14.10.5 2020-04-16 13:51:43,804 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Thu Apr 16 13:51:43 2020 /root/openvpnup.sh tun0 1500 1558 10.14.10.6 10.14.10.5 init 2020-04-16 13:51:43,808 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Thu Apr 16 13:51:43 2020 Initialization Sequence Completed 2020-04-16 13:51:43,916 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] Port forwarding is enabled [info] Checking endpoint 'ca-toronto.privateinternetaccess.com' is port forward enabled... 2020-04-16 13:51:43,918 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] Attempting to curl https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/vpninfo/servers?version=82... 2020-04-16 13:51:44,416 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] Curl successful for https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/vpninfo/servers?version=82, response code 200 2020-04-16 13:51:44,472 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] PIA endpoint 'ca-toronto.privateinternetaccess.com' is not in the list of endpoints that support port forwarding, DL/UL speeds maybe slow [info] Please consider switching to one of the endpoints shown below 2020-04-16 13:51:44,472 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] List of PIA endpoints that support port forwarding:- [info] ca-montreal.privateinternetaccess.com [info] ca-vancouver.privateinternetaccess.com [info] de-berlin.privateinternetaccess.com [info] de-frankfurt.privateinternetaccess.com [info] sweden.privateinternetaccess.com [info] swiss.privateinternetaccess.com [info] france.privateinternetaccess.com [info] czech.privateinternetaccess.com [info] spain.privateinternetaccess.com [info] ro.privateinternetaccess.com [info] israel.privateinternetaccess.com [info] Attempting to get dynamically assigned port... 2020-04-16 13:51:44,476 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] Attempting to curl http://209.222.18.222:2000/?client_id=takenoutbyme............ 2020-04-16 13:51:44,542 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] Response code 000 from curl != 2xx [warn] Exit code 7 from curl != 0 [info] 12 retries left [info] Retrying in 10 secs... 2020-04-16 13:51:54,611 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] Response code 000 from curl != 2xx [warn] Exit code 7 from curl != 0 [info] 11 retries left [info] Retrying in 10 secs...

Hey guys, A random question. Could I use wireguard as a remote tunnel access for a whole network instead of just 1 client? Anyone done this?

Nope. Only through NPM. Only certain docker's as well. It's a strange one! Regardless, thank you for making this! It is freaking amazing!

I'm new to this so please ignore my ignorance... but why this over pi-hole?

Anyone else having this issue??

Hey guys, I love this Docker. I have an issue where some of my sites take a long time to load vs others. For example I have a Ghost Blog going and that can take up to 4 minutes and several reloads for the page to finally load. While others like Ombi are quick to be served. Any ideas? Thanks for this btw... it is amazin!

Can you only have one connection to a peer at a time? Would I have to make a new peer for every device?