Everything posted by koshia
-
[Support] binhex - Plex
Glad you got it running. Not sure why mine showed .04 as latest but mine was way old so I had figured I'd update it. That and when I copied / pasted error in Gemini, first thing that it referenced was driver issues with nvidia. ... feels like summer's already here the last couple of weeks nearing 90* F.
-
[Support] binhex - Plex
Try updating your NVIDIA drivers to latest stable: v580.159.04. - this solved it for me. After update, I copied/pasted in the GPUID in the container's nvidia setting and it booted back up just fine. Try updating your nvidia drivers to latest stable: v580.159.04. I updated it and then copied/pasted the GPUID back in the plex container settings area and it booted up just fine. I had updated my UNRAID from 7.2 to 7.3.1 and had the same execution error message.
-
[Support] binhex - Plex Pass
On your docker container, click on the logo/image and select 'Logs', see if there's any errors there when you do a library scan. I'm only assuming but your config or data directory may not have the right permission for plex to tag/save data.
-
[Support] devzwf - LubeLogger
Thank you for the 'ZappyZap' response and checking. It was an ID10T error. I had implemented some segmentation of my web network and forgot to create an exception to the webgui port. It's accessible now.
-
[Support] devzwf - LubeLogger
Has anyone deployed this to their docker? I'm unable to get the webui to pull up. I've attempted to use the latest, but moved to Edge repository - neither worked. It's my understanding the docker image is self-contained with its own database? With it not working, i also attempted to create a postgresql database and passing the POSTGRES_CONNECTION environment variable and my own connection string based on documentation here: https://docs.lubelogger.com/Postgres and have been unsuccessful in getting the docker image to function properly. Docker Image Log ----------------------------------------------------------------------- LubeLogger 1.3.5 Website: https://lubelogger.com Documentation: https://docs.lubelogger.com GitHub: https://github.com/hargata/lubelog SMTP Not Configured Message Of The Day: info: Microsoft.Hosting.Lifetime[14] Now listening on: http://[::]:8080 info: Microsoft.Hosting.Lifetime[0] Application started. Press Ctrl+C to shut down. info: Microsoft.Hosting.Lifetime[0] Hosting environment: Production info: Microsoft.Hosting.Lifetime[0] Content root path: /App ---------------------------------------
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Netbox
It doesn't seem like this docker has gotten much love. I attempted to get this working last year and couldn't but was able to get through it this time around. One of the most common error was 400 bad gateway. Since I was using NGINXProxyManager, i knew it was the problem since I could access it via IP after adding my UnRaid's box's ip was placed in the CORS whitelist and for INTERNAL_IPS variable. For those that are running into 400 bad gateway errors and using NGINXReverseProxy- you must also designate in the /config/configuration.py, ~ Line 157/299, regarding HTTP_PROXIES so that it reflects your NGINX reverse proxies' IP & Ports, e.g.: # HTTP proxies NetBox should use when sending outbound HTTP requests (e.g. for webhooks). HTTP_PROXIES = { # 'http': 'http://10.10.1.10:3128', # 'https': 'http://10.10.1.10:1080', 'http': 'x.x.x.x:8080', 'https': 'x.x.x.x:8443', } You'll also want to put in your UnRaid box's internal IP under the INTERNAL_IPS = ('127.0.0.1', '::1', 'x.x.x.x')
-
Docker requests
Is it on CA? I searched for it and it doesn't come up with a result through CA. My CA version is 2021.03.28.
-
Docker requests
I would like to request a digital asset management platform - phraseanet. Information on product: https://www.phraseanet.com/en/ Docker deployment Instructions: https://github.com/alchemy-fr/phraseanet-docker Thank you!
-
[Support] binhex - Plex Pass
Hey folks, I have a general question that I couldn't find on this forum related to Plex/Plex docker images. As I understood it, Plex stopped supporting plugins, but still allowed plugins to be manually installed. I can confirm that I'm able to place plugins into the /mnt/user/appdata/..../plugins folder and it shows up in settings. The issue is, the plugins don't really work? Does this mean that the docker or lsio/binhex images do not support running plugins or are there directions i'm missing on how to activate it? Specifically, i'm trying to get the LyricFinds plugin to work for my music library but haven't been able to through the binhex/plexpass image. Running: UnRAID OS 6.9.0-RC2 binhex-plexpass Version 1.21.1.3876 Thanks!
-
Docker Container - MayanEDMS - New Documents not showing up
Hello, I searched under the application docker container category and didn't find one related to MayanEDMS. Couldn't post new threads there - so i'll start here. I want to explore EcoDMS and MayanEDMS. I've got the ecoDMS running fine, but having a slight issue with MayanEDMS. Has anyone else in the community gotten this container to work correctly? UnRaid Version: 6.9.0-rc2 ENV in use for container: MAYAN_USER_GID: 100 MAYAN_USER_UID: 99 IMPORT_PATH: (container path: /docmonitor) (host path /mnt/user/IntakeFolder) - public security on IntakeFolder STORAGE_PATH: (container path: /var/lib/mayan/) (host path: /mnt/cache/appdata/mayanedms) MAYAN_DATABASE_PASSWORD: MAYAN_DATABASE_NAME: <postgres database name> MAYAN_DATABASE_HOST: <unraid ip> MAYAN_DATABASE_ENGINE: django.db.backends.postgresql MAYAN_DATABASE_PORT: 5432 MAYAN_DATABASE_CONN_MAX_AGE: 60 MAYAN_DATABASE_USER: <db username> WebGui Port: 8000 (container: 8000) First off, everything loaded fine after provisioning the docker image. The hiccup is when trying to import a document. Here's my process: New Document Select Document Type: Default (system default) Hit upload icon labeled Default (system default) Notification message pops up saying document will be ready in a sec Click on All Documents - nothing is there Troubleshooting notes: Verified in /mnt/cache/appdata/mayanedms/shared_files - file uploaded is there. /mnt/cache/appdata/mayanedms/ - no error file was generated, thus no error There was not a yaml config file located at /mnt/cache/appdata/mayanedms/ either (many of the threads I found at MayanEDMS's forum referenced a yaml config file being at this location) - there is a config_backup.yaml though. Docker log window shows (1) error - not sure what it is, but would think it's minor __ - ... __ - _ LocalTime -> 2021-01-04 01:58:35 Configuration -> . broker -> memory://localhost// . loader -> celery.loaders.app.AppLoader . scheduler -> django_celery_beat.schedulers.DatabaseScheduler . logfile -> [stderr]@%ERROR . maxinterval -> 5.00 seconds (5s) I'm not noticing any other issues or obvious problems to further investigate. Does anyone have any recommendation? Thanks.
-
[Support] FoxxMD - elasticsearch
Hey, thanks for tips and directions. I'm running into an issue that I'm not sure how to proceed since this docker thing's new to me. After following your directions and creating the script with the command in it - all I get is "/tmp/user.scripts/tmpScripts/vm.max_map_count/script: line 2: $'sysctl\357\273\277': command not found". Any hints?
-
ISCSI Support
+1 for this. I have Starwind and HPE MSAs for production data. Would love to get a couple of Unraid servers at different facilities and use them as archival/off-site backup storage w/ commodity drives. While I don't think I would ever run Unraid in ENT Production, it has its place in my environment at work.
-
[Support] Djoss - Nginx Proxy Manager
@Djoss I've added some hosts, now on the SSL Certificate screen and trying to get an LE certificate for one of the host. All I get is "Internal Error" once I submit the information. If I acknowledge the error it goes back to the main page but doesn't show anything. If I refresh the page, the cert that was created shows up but doesn't seem to be working. Update 2019/01/01 Got my problem figured out. Awesome and easy docker @Djoss. I've been using standalone NGINX standalone reverse proxies and never got around to doing LE, so with this - just like @Squid - no need to learn LE at this point or file it later for learning. For my specific issue, I tried creating the Hosts w/ LE before the hosts were actually ready and properly forwarded. After getting the other dockers bridged and setup correctly, I blew away the NginxProxyManager container and re-did it. It's definitely working now :). Now I just have to figure out getting this to work with NextCloud docker.
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - NZBGet
I've had my usenet applications run on a VM for years inside Unraid and it worked fine. I decided this weekend to make it easier by moving all my apps to individual docker images. After pulling down the images, they started up fine for initial configuration. Now that I've got some of them configured - the actual apps (nzbget, hydra2, etc...) don't seem to auto-start when the docker image starts up. Something's preventing the daemon from starting, but i'm not sure what to look at for info. I'm very new to the docker concept and i can get around Linux structure just fine, but i'm not sure where logs are to diagnose this issue. Could someone point me in the right direction? TL;DR - docker image starts fine, the app's daemon does not auto start but will manually start fine. Need location of logs to figure out why daemon isn't starting up - not sure where it is. Let's start with Linuxserver.io\nzbget docker image. thanks in advance! Update 2019/01/01 - Resolved @Squid's FAQ was super helpful. I was setting my docker in /mnt/user/appdata with the default container setup wizard. After blowing all of it away and redoing it to /mnt/cache/appdata - the docker did not have any issue. NZBGet daemon started up just fine after boot and so did Hydra2. Took two days, but i now have my nzbget, hydra2, sonarr, radarr, headphones setup and working great! Also, FYI to anyone else - I did try mv /mnt/user/appdata/ to /mnt/cache/ - to move everything to the cache drive and that did not resolve the issue with daemon service inside containers auto-starting. I had to re-install all containers and set them up fresh in the /mnt/cache path.
-
Preclear plugin
Correct - The eye only shows up after you initiate a preclear job.
-
Preclear plugin
if that matters? EDIT2: I guess something is still wrong, I don't see the 'eye' that was being discussed earlier and in gfjardim's screenshot. I can confirm that there is a .preclear file that exists at /boot and that did not resolve the retrieving information problem. I followed your lead by creating a preclear_reports folder and my unassigned drives appeared immediately. Thanks!
-
Preclear plugin
I'm running into the same issue. Fresh install of UNRAID from scratch and plugin installed through community-app.
-
Web Gui https
Sorry, I have to disagree. A reverse proxy acts as an intermediary between the client and the web application you're accessing. It adds an additional layer between the client and the web application. A reverse proxy (in the scenario of using it to expose applications to the Internet) is available on the internet so generally anyone (unless you are going to set some really tight firewall rules) who knows the url will have access to that application. Although setting additional security like SSL (which just encrypts client to server) it is still directly connected to the web. In this case you are also going to be relying on the security system of each application for access. Much of the applications we all use (in a home server scenario) have different levels of maturity when it comes to their vulnerability to attack. In addition many of these applications authors advise (such as unRAID) not to expose their interfaces directly to the Internet. In contrast, a VPN has an additional layer of security as a client has to first authenticate itself with a server before a user has access to the VPN. If you therefore trust users of your LAN (which most people I know who use unRAID in a home setting would) you can even leave the applications unsecured by userids and passwords) as the security is managed by the VPN server. I would also add that if there are vulnerabilities I would be more confident of the ongoing security of OpenVPN (being a widely used enterprise technology) and exploits being patched than the exploits being found, patched etc in many of these applications we all use. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I am not in disagreement with what you are telling users as we both acknowledge that the weakest link here are the applications security controls of each application-in this case UnRAID. For the intent of the OP's request for https; it is possible. If the need was for just accessing ones server-vpn would be better for end to end. With that said I recant what I typed about openvpn not being safer than RP. For clarity: my previous statement about openvpn being any more safer; the post was concentrated on the subject of encryption. Strong traffic encryption could be had with both vpn and ssl offloading because they both can use the same type of encryption. The problem then exists after the handshake (in rp-ssl offload), in which case vpn is the better choice if you do not have the need for it to be public facing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.
-
Web Gui https
While i wholeheartedly agree with the fact that you shouldn't expose your server to the public domain-i respectfully disagree that using openVpn is any more safer than a reverse-proxy server with a proper tls certificate handling encryption of authentication and traffic. As i understand it - you have 2 methods of encryption with openVPN, a preshared secret or a tls/ssl-vpn method. The tls/ssl method is much like the reverse proxy with a proper tls/ssl certificate. There is specific uses for each of these types and I use both. I plan on having many web servers/services so it would be in my interest to use the latter. I won't get into it more than this as it is beyond the scope of the OPs question. I would not recommend doing either if you are unclear on the security risks or methods for mitigation . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.
-
Web Gui https
This product requires a bit tinkering. You could just load a linux VM and do a basic reverse proxy w/ SSL offloading to your storage server. Just another thought.
-
LSI Controller FW updates IR/IT modes
Thanks Fireball3. I will give it a go with the 6/ir. I have a bunch of 2TBs laying around, so not too worried about the 2.2+s yet. I had originally bought a few of the aoc-saslvp-mv8s, so i may move to that when I can get a better deal on a norco 4224 case. As far as these firmware goes, it is dependent on the manufacturers like LSI, right?
-
LSI Controller FW updates IR/IT modes
I just inherited a r710 with 8bays with a perc 6/i. I was wondering if anyone has had good luck with flashing it back to LSI and it working with unraid, yet? Did a search but only found 6/ir amd some people abandoning the 6/i projects. In preparation for it not working, i do have a 6/ir i got off ebay for cheap. I am willing to try and get the 6/i tested - but i would meed exact instructions on what I should do. Thanks!