June 7, 201610 yr Installing dynamix file integrity has been giving these errors for several days now from China. Since github has been accessible again in China, this might be a real issue, not sure.... Or just China related (behind the GFWC) plugin: installing: https://raw.github.com/bergware/dynamix/master/unRAIDv6/dynamix.file.integrity.plg plugin: downloading https://raw.github.com/bergware/dynamix/master/unRAIDv6/dynamix.file.integrity.plg plugin: downloading: https://raw.github.com/bergware/dynamix/master/unRAIDv6/dynamix.file.integrity.plg ... done plugin: downloading: http://mirrors.slackware.com/slackware/slackware64-14.1/slackware64/a/inotify-tools-3.14-x86_64-1.txz ... failed (Invalid URL / Server error response) plugin: wget: http://mirrors.slackware.com/slackware/slackware64-14.1/slackware64/a/inotify-tools-3.14-x86_64-1.txz download failure (Invalid URL / Server error response) From your log, it seems like this site is blocked, since it failed to download http://mirrors.slackware.com/slackware/slackware64-14.1/slackware64/a/inotify-tools-3.14-x86_64-1.txz
June 8, 201610 yr anyone know a solution for my previous error? Hey peeps, I keep getting the "download of source file has failed" error. I even tried "update applications" to trigger the re-download of it. I also checked: http://tools.linuxserver.io/unraid-docker-templates.json and thats available (even wgetting on the unraid box fetches the right result) any ideas? also, when I try to change a setting I get: Warning: file_get_contents(/tmp/community.applications/tempFiles/Repositories.json): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix/include/DefaultPageLayout.php(292) : eval()'d code on line 35 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix/include/DefaultPageLayout.php(292) : eval()'d code on line 37 Warning: natcasesort() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix/include/DefaultPageLayout.php(292) : eval()'d code on line 40 Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix/include/DefaultPageLayout.php(292) : eval()'d code on line 44
June 8, 201610 yr Author Hey peeps, I keep getting the "download of source file has failed" error. I even tried "update applications" to trigger the re-download of it. I also checked: http://tools.linuxserver.io/unraid-docker-templates.json and thats available (even wgetting on the unraid box fetches the right result) any ideas? The errors when making changes to settings is because I didn't consider that the downloads might fail on the settings. Will update and fix As far as not being able to download at all, - What version of CA? - Try uninstalling and reinstalling - Are you behind a VPN?
June 9, 201610 yr Author Hey peeps, I keep getting the "download of source file has failed" error. I even tried "update applications" to trigger the re-download of it. I also checked: http://tools.linuxserver.io/unraid-docker-templates.json and thats available (even wgetting on the unraid box fetches the right result) any ideas? I've been playing around, and as far as I can tell the code in CA works perfectly. (Assuming that permissions in the tmp folder are correct - which if they are not somehow [no clue how they could ever change]) Which leaves me with only two suggestions - Either somehow its in your network and/or ISP, or your root folder (/tmp) is full due to maybe a previously installed plugin / docker app / memory starvation due to over provisioning a vm, etc
June 10, 201610 yr http://mirrors.slackware.com Resolves differently depending on your location. Other people had similar issues and the workaround is to manually download the package from a 'good' source and copy it to the folder on the flash.
June 10, 201610 yr I am setting up unRAID from new with default settings. You know a plugin is awesome when it's the first one you install! I really like how easy this makes installing everything again; plugins and dockers. THANK YOU Squid for all the time spent working on this plugin.
June 10, 201610 yr Added in an option to significantly speed up backups when using dated backups in conjunction with automatic deletions I'm really digging the work on the Backup Appdata feature - thanks! Have you considered using hard links to create subsequent backups? Since we're already working off of /mnt/diskX rather than a user share, they should work. It would mean that each subsequent backup would only require the space of the differences, rather than all files again. It may also speed up backups a bit more.
June 11, 201610 yr Author If you're like me (hopefully not), you've probably got a ton of excess appdata folders for applications which you no longer have installed, and probably will not install again. Added in a module which goes through the list of your previously installed applications, find's the appdata folder locations, compares it to the appdata list for your installed applications and then prompts you to delete the orphaned ones. This will not touch any appdata that might happen to be used for a plugin, a VM, etc.
June 12, 201610 yr I'm trying to install it. But i'm getting 'Network failure" I've just updated to version 6.1.9 (from 5.0.rc16) The system is running the first parity check in the background. Any pointers to where i should look to fix the issue?
June 12, 201610 yr I'm trying to install it. But i'm getting 'Network failure" I've just updated to version 6.1.9 (from 5.0.rc16) The system is running the first parity check in the background. Any pointers to where i should look to fix the issue? Try settings ==> network settings ==> Set DNS to 8.8.8.8
June 12, 201610 yr I'm trying to install it. But i'm getting 'Network failure" I've just updated to version 6.1.9 (from 5.0.rc16) The system is running the first parity check in the background. Any pointers to where i should look to fix the issue? Try settings ==> network settings ==> Set DNS to 8.8.8.8 I had a DNS setting from the old system, but moved DNS 1 to DNS 3, and entered 8.8.8.8 in the DNS 1 box. And the plugin's now run. But does my change have any other effect?
June 12, 201610 yr Author But does my change have any other effect? No. It's just forcing unRaid to use a particular address to resolve domain names (in this case Google's DNS servers) and bypassing whatever your ISP has chosen to use (in my case, Bell Sympatico's DNS servers are beyond crap)
June 12, 201610 yr But does my change have any other effect? No. It's just forcing unRaid to use a particular address to resolve domain names (in this case Google's DNS servers) and bypassing whatever your ISP has chosen to use (in my case, Bell Sympatico's DNS servers are beyond crap) Hey Squid... Love the appdata backup part of this, any chance of adding a /boot backup as well?
June 12, 201610 yr But does my change have any other effect? No. It's just forcing unRaid to use a particular address to resolve domain names (in this case Google's DNS servers) and bypassing whatever your ISP has chosen to use (in my case, Bell Sympatico's DNS servers are beyond crap) Hey Squid... Love the appdata backup part of this, any chance of adding a /boot backup as well? See here
June 12, 201610 yr But does my change have any other effect? No. It's just forcing unRaid to use a particular address to resolve domain names (in this case Google's DNS servers) and bypassing whatever your ISP has chosen to use (in my case, Bell Sympatico's DNS servers are beyond crap) Hey Squid... Love the appdata backup part of this, any chance of adding a /boot backup as well? See here /hangs head in shame that he didn't search. Thanks Trurl
June 12, 201610 yr Author /hangs head in shame that he didn't search. Thanks Trurl Nobody searches in this thread as 90+% of the posts are all OT (just the way I like it ) But my stance on flash drive backup hasn't changed. And TBH I don't really see much need for it as in this world of VMs and Docker, most of the settings are actually stored within the array / docker image / system image etc.
June 12, 201610 yr /hangs head in shame that he didn't search. Thanks Trurl Nobody searches in this thread as 90+% of the posts are all OT (just the way I like it ) But my stance on flash drive backup hasn't changed. And TBH I don't really see much need for it as in this world of VMs and Docker, most of the settings are actually stored within the array / docker image / system image etc. Only thing is the user template XMLs for docker and XMLs for VMs (passthru) stored on flash drive. I know I'm probably an odd use-case here, but when I had my flash drive die resetting up all my volume/port mappings was a real PITA. That would be the only argument I have for the flash drive. EDIT: I agree its most of the time a one time backup, but adding some ease for users would be nice.
June 12, 201610 yr Author /hangs head in shame that he didn't search. Thanks Trurl Nobody searches in this thread as 90+% of the posts are all OT (just the way I like it ) But my stance on flash drive backup hasn't changed. And TBH I don't really see much need for it as in this world of VMs and Docker, most of the settings are actually stored within the array / docker image / system image etc. Only thing is the user template XMLs for docker and XMLs for VMs (passthru) stored on flash drive. I know I'm probably an odd use-case here, but when I had my flash drive die resetting up all my volume/port mappings was a real PITA. That would be the only argument I have for the flash drive. EDIT: I agree its most of the time a one time backup, but adding some ease for users would be nice. Good point. But its such an easy thing to do yourself that it's almost criminal to not do it yourself periodically.
June 12, 201610 yr /hangs head in shame that he didn't search. Thanks Trurl Nobody searches in this thread as 90+% of the posts are all OT (just the way I like it ) But my stance on flash drive backup hasn't changed. And TBH I don't really see much need for it as in this world of VMs and Docker, most of the settings are actually stored within the array / docker image / system image etc. Only thing is the user template XMLs for docker and XMLs for VMs (passthru) stored on flash drive. I know I'm probably an odd use-case here, but when I had my flash drive die resetting up all my volume/port mappings was a real PITA. That would be the only argument I have for the flash drive. EDIT: I agree its most of the time a one time backup, but adding some ease for users would be nice. Good point. But its such an easy thing to do yourself that it's almost criminal to not do it yourself periodically. /whinyvoice but I want someone else to set it up for me to happen automatically I agree with you though.
June 12, 201610 yr Author /hangs head in shame that he didn't search. Thanks Trurl Nobody searches in this thread as 90+% of the posts are all OT (just the way I like it ) But my stance on flash drive backup hasn't changed. And TBH I don't really see much need for it as in this world of VMs and Docker, most of the settings are actually stored within the array / docker image / system image etc. Only thing is the user template XMLs for docker and XMLs for VMs (passthru) stored on flash drive. I know I'm probably an odd use-case here, but when I had my flash drive die resetting up all my volume/port mappings was a real PITA. That would be the only argument I have for the flash drive. EDIT: I agree its most of the time a one time backup, but adding some ease for users would be nice. Good point. But its such an easy thing to do yourself that it's almost criminal to not do it yourself periodically. /whinyvoice but I want someone else to set it up for me to happen automatically Already exists: Read here and And here
June 12, 201610 yr /hangs head in shame that he didn't search. Thanks Trurl Nobody searches in this thread as 90+% of the posts are all OT (just the way I like it ) But my stance on flash drive backup hasn't changed. And TBH I don't really see much need for it as in this world of VMs and Docker, most of the settings are actually stored within the array / docker image / system image etc. Only thing is the user template XMLs for docker and XMLs for VMs (passthru) stored on flash drive. I know I'm probably an odd use-case here, but when I had my flash drive die resetting up all my volume/port mappings was a real PITA. That would be the only argument I have for the flash drive. EDIT: I agree its most of the time a one time backup, but adding some ease for users would be nice. Good point. But its such an easy thing to do yourself that it's almost criminal to not do it yourself periodically. /whinyvoice but I want someone else to set it up for me to happen automatically Already exists: Read here and And here
June 13, 201610 yr 2 small things Squid A typo here: https://i.imgur.com/pVTZJjZ.png[/img] And why does this appear then I select "put backups into sparate dated sub folders?", if I click it I get a list of folders of my appdata share (same as the one on the top right corner). https://i.imgur.com/L7gOK2V.png[/img]
June 13, 201610 yr If you're like me (hopefully not), you've probably got a ton of excess appdata folders for applications which you no longer have installed, and probably will not install again. Added in a module which goes through the list of your previously installed applications, find's the appdata folder locations, compares it to the appdata list for your installed applications and then prompts you to delete the orphaned ones. This will not touch any appdata that might happen to be used for a plugin, a VM, etc. Hi Squid I just ran the clean appdata module. It found 2 appdata folders from old apps. So i selected them to delete. Unfortunately it deleted all my appdata folders. Looking at the module it still says i have one folder listed SABnzbd: /mnt/cache/appdata/ however that isnt there in my appdata? edit .. Just selected the above to be deleted again and message i get is Are you sure you want to delete these folders? /mnt/cache/appdata/ is it is deleting everything in my appadata. I let it then folder again. Then ran module again this time i said i have no orphaned appdata folders. I then started emby which created the emby appdata folder again. I checked the module again and it once again tells me i have one orpaned appdat SABnzbd: /mnt/cache/appdata/ Any idea why this is happening on my system? edit 2.... ok I remember. i guess at one time SABnzbd put its files in the root of my appdata folder. As i manually deleted these files with krusader your module thought they are still present and deletes all files in appdata :-(
June 13, 201610 yr Author 2 small things Squid A typo here: https://i.imgur.com/pVTZJjZ.png[/img] And why does this appear then I select "put backups into sparate dated sub folders?", if I click it I get a list of folders of my appdata share (same as the one on the top right corner). https://i.imgur.com/L7gOK2V.png[/img] I'm sure its not the only typo... Thanks That drop down when you're in dated backups is to select which backup to restore from. In your case, since you've already been using non-dated backups, it's going to display all the folders available. On a nice clean fresh backup folder it would only display the dated ones. I'm displaying every folder because if you're not using the autodelete feature in conjunction with dated backups, then you are free to rename the folder as you choose (ie: the date followed by a comment)
June 13, 201610 yr Author If you're like me (hopefully not), you've probably got a ton of excess appdata folders for applications which you no longer have installed, and probably will not install again. Added in a module which goes through the list of your previously installed applications, find's the appdata folder locations, compares it to the appdata list for your installed applications and then prompts you to delete the orphaned ones. This will not touch any appdata that might happen to be used for a plugin, a VM, etc. Hi Squid I just ran the clean appdata module. It found 2 appdata folders from old apps. So i selected them to delete. Unfortunately it deleted all my appdata folders. Looking at the module it still says i have one folder listed SABnzbd: /mnt/cache/appdata/ however that isnt there in my appdata? edit .. Just selected the above to be deleted again and message i get is Are you sure you want to delete these folders? /mnt/cache/appdata/ is it is deleting everything in my appadata. I let it then folder again. Then ran module again this time i said i have no orphaned appdata folders. I then started emby which created the emby appdata folder again. I checked the module again and it once again tells me i have one orpaned appdat SABnzbd: /mnt/cache/appdata/ Any idea why this is happening on my system? edit 2.... ok I remember. i guess at one time SABnzbd put its files in the root of my appdata folder. As i manually deleted these files with krusader your module thought they are still present and deletes all files in appdata :-( ok... There was a possibility I just never considered... The key here is that as you've recalled, SAB used to be pointed at /mnt/cache/appdata instead of /mnt/cache/appdata/sab CA went through, saw that sab is no longer installed (and the last installation of it had the incorrect mapping), so CA dutifully (after you said yes to the confirmation prompting to delete the entire appdata) deleted it. It winds up coming back prompting to delete it because other docker apps have recreated the appdata share. Sorry. I just never considered an app completely misconfigured like that as a possibility I'll add some checks to prevent this from happening again. In the meantime, I hope that you have a backup of the appdata folder, and I would suggest going to CA's previous apps section and clicking on the red-x next to sab to get rid of that template so that this cannot happen again.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.