January 26, 20233 yr I've got a weird one for you guys, I had my flash drive corrupt, and had to install a new drive from scratch. I set all my HDDs to the same thing in my array, and all my containers and everything are just as they were before I lost my flash drive. Now though, I can't auto update because it says no configs are found. Any idea how I could start to tackle that?
January 26, 20233 yr 1 minute ago, scarves55 said: can't auto update because it says no configs are found. The templates that allow you to work with your dockers are on flash drive. If you don't have a backup of flash you will have to delete all your dockers and reinstall them.
February 20, 20233 yr If I have set a delay of 3 days and a daily check, pending updates should not be installed directly but only in 3 days, right? I ask because an update was installed without delay despite these settings. Also the defined time of 9 o'clock in the morning was not taken into account, see screenshot. Thanks for your help
February 20, 20233 yr Author Feb 20 08:19:44 unRaidA Plugin Auto Update: Checking for available plugin updates Feb 20 08:19:49 unRaidA Plugin Auto Update: dynamix.active.streams.plg version 2023.02.19 does not meet age requirements to update Feb 20 08:19:49 unRaidA Plugin Auto Update: dynamix.cache.dirs.plg version 2023.02.19 does not meet age requirements to update Feb 20 08:19:49 unRaidA Plugin Auto Update: dynamix.file.manager.plg version 2023.02.19 does not meet age requirements to update Feb 20 08:19:49 unRaidA Plugin Auto Update: dynamix.local.master.plg version 2023.02.20 does not meet age requirements to update Feb 20 08:19:50 unRaidA Plugin Auto Update: unassigned.devices.plg version 2023.02.20 does not meet age requirements to update Feb 20 08:19:50 unRaidA Plugin Auto Update: Checking for language updates Feb 20 08:19:50 unRaidA Plugin Auto Update: Community Applications Plugin Auto Update finished (Time in log is off as I manually ran an update) But, I did find a bug in the calculation which *may* have resulted in it ignoring the difference in days Your notification showing up at a completely wrong time implies that something else (AppData Backup?) updated the plugins
February 20, 20233 yr 44 minutes ago, Squid said: Your notification showing up at a completely wrong time implies that something else (AppData Backup?) updated the plugins Am just setting up UnRaid and have not yet set up a backup. I don't think Unraid has an active default setting for a plugin installation, does it?
March 17, 20233 yr I became this Error in the syslog on my servers: For example: Event: Unraid Status Subject: syslog fail Description: Mar 17 18:00:08 Lucy Plugin Auto Update: plugin: run failed: /bin/bash Importance: alert
March 18, 20233 yr Author 11 hours ago, Revan335 said: I became this Error in the syslog on my servers: For example: Event: Unraid Status Subject: syslog fail Description: Mar 17 18:00:08 Lucy Plugin Auto Update: plugin: run failed: /bin/bash Importance: alert Can you post your diagnostics
March 18, 20233 yr 5 hours ago, Squid said: Can you post your diagnostics Yes, I have sended to you. Many Thanks!
March 22, 20233 yr On 1/22/2023 at 5:24 PM, TurboStreetCar said: Been receiving these " Plugin run failed" entries in my system log. Everything seems to be working, but seems to be related to auto update? It shows for every plugin, every time it runs. Not sure what to do? Have you the issue today? I have this errors to and when the plugin running the Plugins are not updated. I have updated the plugin's manually. I send actually diagnostics from the servers to dlandon. Maybe this can help by fixing. Many Thanks! Greetings
April 17, 20233 yr i get an error when i try to disable update Notifications: Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/ca.update.applications/include/exec.php on line 61 Update Notifications always revert to yes:
April 17, 20233 yr Author Only thing I can think of is that your flash drive is offline (pulled out / defective etc) and there are no plugins installed (which is obviously impossible) But looking at the coding I'm not quite sure how that error could actually happen, but I do see a minor fix to handle it, but I think you have bigger fish to fry.
May 1, 20233 yr Support link at the bottom of the settings page is dead, BTW. It point to http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=53693.0
May 6, 20233 yr Hey guys had a quick question, I see some stale docker containers in the update portion of the plugin (these were not installed via the CA apps pre-generated template but custom generated), how do I clean up the old container files so they don't show up for selecting to update in the plugin?
May 7, 20233 yr Author Plugin offers to update everything installed. remove the containers either via the GUI or the appropriate docker command
May 7, 20233 yr 2 hours ago, Squid said: Plugin offers to update everything installed. remove the containers either via the GUI or the appropriate docker command The listed containers that show up in the plugin are not visible in the gui nor in `docker ps` / `docker images`. Can you specify where the plugin is looking so I can clean up the files there? I've taken a look in the USB files under /boot/config/../dockerMan/templates* and I could not find where the plugin is sourcing the stale plugins from, its not really an issue but I would prefer to clean it up
May 8, 20233 yr 3 hours ago, Squid said: It gets it from the GUI itself. Do a docker prune I did a docker prune and that only reaped a stopped container (not one of the ones from the issue described) and an unused network. I don't see any of the problem dockers in the GUI so I don't quite follow how it obtains the list of containers from the GUI?
May 13, 20233 yr Any idea how I can resolve the above mentioned bug? <edit> all is fine in the world after a system reboot Edited May 14, 20233 yr by Ghostie
June 3, 20233 yr This plugin looks like it's only updating Dockers I pulled from the community 'store' and not ones I have running from Compose files using Compose Manager, even though I get update notifications saying an update is available for those Dockers. Is there a particular reason why this is the case? I have update Dockers set to yes in the plugin.
June 4, 20233 yr I am using custom icon for each docker container, which stored in /mnt/user/isos/icons, pair with auto update plugin But every time my docker auto update new imagine, my custom icon disappear, but if I do it manually, it's fine, is this a bug or some setting I mess up?
June 4, 20233 yr Author 33 minutes ago, xyzeratul said: I am using custom icon for each docker container, which stored in /mnt/user/isos/icons, pair with auto update plugin dockerMan (ie: the OS) is not designed for local storage of docker icons. It needs to be stored somewhere on the internet (GitHub works great if you're using your own) and the reference in the template refers to the internet version. The plugin does not update any icons, nor force an explicit update. But, dockerMan will repull icons in certain circumstances and this is probably what you're seeing.
June 4, 20233 yr Author 17 hours ago, at0m said: This plugin looks like it's only updating Dockers I pulled from the community 'store' and not ones I have running from Compose files using Compose Manager, even though I get update notifications saying an update is available for those Dockers. Is there a particular reason why this is the case? I have update Dockers set to yes in the plugin. Not able to test, but I wouldn't be surprised, since everything effectively runs through the template system of which docker compose isn't conformant with
June 4, 20233 yr 4 minutes ago, Squid said: dockerMan (ie: the OS) is not designed for local storage of docker icons. It needs to be stored somewhere on the internet (GitHub works great if you're using your own) and the reference in the template refers to the internet version. The plugin does not update any icons, nor force an explicit update. But, dockerMan will repull icons in certain circumstances and this is probably what you're seeing. But why the manual update is fine? I don't understand dockerman's logic behind this.
June 4, 20233 yr Author IDK. But I can tell you that the OS does NOT support local storage of icons. Never has. It is designed around cloud storage for them and then saves a local copy to serve to your browser. It is detecting a change in the "URL" and is attempting a re-download. I'd guess it is displaying a question mark for you.
June 4, 20233 yr 1 hour ago, Squid said: IDK. But I can tell you that the OS does NOT support local storage of icons. Never has. It is designed around cloud storage for them and then saves a local copy to serve to your browser. It is detecting a change in the "URL" and is attempting a re-download. I'd guess it is displaying a question mark for you. Thx, I think they need to add this function, I'd rather have local storage for this.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.