Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Unraid

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

unRAID OS version 6.4.0-rc20a available

Featured Replies

Successful update from rc18 to rc20 on Ryzen. System once again indicated unclean shutdown.

 

Edit: The Win10 VM (has GPU passthrough) seems to have hanged on boot. Other two Linux VMs and Docker containers have auto-started successfully.

Edited by realies

  • Replies 61
  • Views 12.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Not sure if this was caused by the rc (but the prior one I was running, rc15e (?) didn't have it)...

 

I have 2 network interfaces that created a br0. br0 shows as using an assigned IP (192.168.1.x) but unRAID seems to think my IP is an unassigned 169.x IP address. This naturally causes problems with my dockers.

 

If I try to statically set 192.168.1.x for one of my ethernet interfaces, the web interface stops responding (I wonder if it creates an IP address conflict by having br0 and eth0 have it?).

 

See here for screenshots.

 

Thoughts?

Edited by atl-far-east

You have bonding enabled with eth0 and eth1 as members, therefor no configuration of eth1 is required.

 

A 169.254.x.x address indicates no communication with a DHCP server. Check your cables. E.g. disconnect one after the other to determine the correctness of each cable.

 

Yes, thanks - that I understand. My point is my system is getting an IP correctly, unRAID is just seeming to use the wrong one for system purposes. My DHCP server is working just fine, since br0 is getting an IP.

 

E.g.:

 

root@Tower:/mnt/user/appdata/letsencrypt/nginx/site-confs# ifconfig 
bond0: flags=5443<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,MASTER,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fe2b:104  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether 00:25:90:2b:01:04  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 575490  bytes 783274307 (746.9 MiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 104  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 53312  bytes 8696214 (8.2 MiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

br0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.1.106  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
        inet6 fe80::e8a3:6eff:fedb:3884  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether 00:25:90:2b:01:04  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 350184  bytes 763473005 (728.1 MiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 42  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 51026  bytes 8525269 (8.1 MiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

docker0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 172.17.0.1  netmask 255.255.0.0  broadcast 0.0.0.0
        inet6 fe80::42:c2ff:fe48:bacf  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether 02:42:c2:48:ba:cf  txqueuelen 0  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 44959  bytes 6085598 (5.8 MiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 302593  bytes 609460023 (581.2 MiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

eth0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        ether 00:25:90:2b:01:04  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 394865  bytes 567704913 (541.4 MiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 52  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 1074  bytes 121170 (118.3 KiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
        device memory 0xc0600000-c061ffff  

eth1: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        ether 00:25:90:2b:01:04  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 180625  bytes 215569394 (205.5 MiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 52  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 52238  bytes 8575044 (8.1 MiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
        device memory 0xc0660000-c067ffff  

 

Before the update my plex server running on my i7-970 box could not live encode faster than 0.7 (1.0 beeing realtime)
After the update, it is up to 1.5 O.o

Edited by isvein

38 minutes ago, isvein said:

Before the update my plex server running on my i7-970 box could not live encode faster than 0.7 (1.0 beeing realtime)
After the update, it is up to 1.5 O.o

 

You should send @limetech some money for the bonus cpu power.

OK

 

so I upgraded a z400 that only runs 2 vm's. ran cinebench before and after on 4vcpus. 

 

on rc19 175

on rc20 199

 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

 

3 hours ago, atl-far-east said:

My point is my system is getting an IP correctly, unRAID is just seeming to use the wrong one for system purposes. My DHCP server is working just fine, since br0 is getting an IP.

 

Somehow the GUI went out of sync. Can you do

create_network_ini

And refresh the network settings page

That fixed it - thanks! Never had to do that on any prior RCs/versions, so thought I'd flag.

 

Thanks!

Upgraded this morning, so far so good.   

On 1/7/2018 at 10:42 PM, JustinChase said:

I've just noticed that I no longer seem to have write permissions for one of my user shares.  It's set as hidden/public, as it has been for a long time.  I just tried to add a folder in windows, and it's telling me "Destination Folder Access Denied - You need permission to perform this action"

 

It's letting me write to if from within my media center program, but not from windows.  I disconnected the share and re-mapped it, but same issue.

Unclear why you are posting in this thread. Are you sure it was working correctly immediately before updating to this version?

On 1/8/2018 at 9:02 AM, realies said:

Successful update from rc18 to rc20 on Ryzen. System once again indicated unclean shutdown.

 

Edit: The Win10 VM (has GPU passthrough) seems to have hanged on boot. Other two Linux VMs and Docker containers have auto-started successfully.

MS pulled the patch for AMD reasons, I know you are on Ryzen but might’ve affected you. I think I got lucky with mine. 

  • Author
On 1/8/2018 at 7:02 AM, realies said:

Successful update from rc18 to rc20 on Ryzen. System once again indicated unclean shutdown.

 

There should have been a diagostics zip file in flash config/logs directory.  Do you see one corresponding to your shutdown?  If so, please post.

8 hours ago, limetech said:

 

There should have been a diagostics zip file in flash config/logs directory.  Do you see one corresponding to your shutdown?  If so, please post.

I’m also on Ryzen and shutdown my VMs prior to upgrade due to issues with “unclean shutdown” notifications tripping a parity check. Don’t think this is isolated. 

  • Author
2 minutes ago, phbigred said:

I’m also on Ryzen and shutdown my VMs prior to upgrade due to issues with “unclean shutdown” notifications tripping a parity check. Don’t think this is isolated. 

 

That's wonderful, got diags from such an instance?

Is there a way, or kernel option to not patch the Meltdown vulnerability? I'd rather not lose the 30% performance hit in a home server. 

  • Author
19 minutes ago, daze said:

Is there a way, or kernel option to not patch the Meltdown vulnerability? I'd rather not lose the 30% performance hit in a home server. 

 

There is.  Add 'pti=off' to end of your APPEND line in proper section of syslinux.cfg.  Note we have not tested this and don't know if it works or not.  Use at your own risk.

 

Have you seen a 30% drop?  I think that is way overstated in the press.

Unclear why you are posting in this thread. Are you sure it was working correctly immediately before updating to this version?
because I think this issue is related to this new version, obviously.

it's been some time since I've tried to create a new folder with Windows, and it's always worked previously.

how might I figure out the cause of this new issue

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk

57 minutes ago, JustinChase said:

because I think this issue is related to this new version, obviously.

it's been some time since I've tried to create a new folder with Windows, and it's always worked previously.

how might I figure out the cause of this new issue

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 

Roll back to the previous version you were running and see if doing the same thing works.  That's what I'd do.

My ryzen stability happiness lasted 30 days of continuous uptime on RC14. When it crashed I updated unRaid to RC19, had a daily crash and now I am on RC20 with crash once a day again.

 

I have disabled Global C-states i BIOS. If it crashes again I will try with the zenstates python script.

  • Author
1 hour ago, Dazog said:

Intel has released this to fix one of the security issues from the past week.

Got it, thank you.

  • Author
14 minutes ago, JohanSF said:

I have disabled Global C-states i BIOS. If it crashes again I will try with the zenstates python script.

You can use our version of zenstates that supports enabling/disabling/listing C6 state.  See OP.

@limetech

 

u say 30% decreased pferformance is too much.

 

But could you please test how much it affects us?

 

VM Windows?

VM Linux?

SMB Speeds?

9 hours ago, limetech said:

 

That's wonderful, got diags from such an instance?

Like bringing a car to a mechanic I went back to rc14 turning VMs off and rebooting, no issue. Updated to rc20a and rebooted without turning off no issue. Need to play with it for a while to see if I can trip it again. I know I had an issue with rc9 that’s how I figured out the workaround. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.