Leaderboard

With current unRAID, unassigned devices (both stock or using the plugin), show all the SMART info from the Self Test option down, they are still missing the SMART settings section. There are also two other "issues": - like ljm42 mentioned some disks come with SMART disable, it won't work for those unless they are part of the array/cache pool (or SMART is manually enabled). - with the UD plugin installed it's not possible to access the SMART options for unmounted disks.

OK.... If you're running unRaid 6.3.3+, Hovering over a scripts name will bring up a couple of options: Edit Name, Edit Description, Edit Script, and Delete Script Edit name & description are both done in place, but Edit Script will open up a new spot at the bottom of the page where you can edit the script. Additionally, a new button will also exist to Add a new script.

Application Name: Lychee Application Site: https://lychee.electerious.com Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/lychee/ Github: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-lychee Please post any questions/issues relating to this docker you have in this thread. If you are not using Unraid (and you should be!) then please do not post here, instead head to linuxserver.io to see how to get support.

Cause I don't feel like fighting with it to sit still and shut up.

Thanks for am the help and advice. But so far I believe the only way to get what I want using my nuc is to install Windows on it and use the Windows Plex client. Then I could sync over gigabit Ethernet (not WiFi) and not be reliant on resorts wifi at all. Can use real remote control. Would rather not load Windows, but don't see any options. The genetic x64 version lacks the option to sync to external storage. Not sure why... Before doing that I need too look at other player options like pht to see if it allows syncing from a light Linux image. Using my phone is not a good option. I want to have my phone in hand to use, not lose it to whoever wants to watch a show. Wireless is too slow for syncing. I'm looking to take 4T of material, not 200G. (Although I do think I could connect my S7 to an external USB drive of arbitrary size.) But would take forever! So iPad / tablet isn't a very good option either. Buying something new like a Shield just for this is not so great. I do have an MS Surface 3 with docking station i could use. Might not be a bad option. But no remote (unless i can get my phone to connect to it through resort wireless). Also don't love that option as I'd lose my computer i use to dial home. Will play around this weekend with non-Windows options. If no-go, I'm buying Windows <palm slaps forehead>. ? Have about a month to go.

Thanks for the extra feedback! . So you're still getting the incorrect temp reporting for the cpus, but the extra ram solved the machine check and irq16 problems? Hmmm... I think what I'm taking from this is that you are suggesting that I have to buy more ram to fill the empty slots on my board.... Sounds like my hands are tied... No choice in the matter... !

The filesystem is empty. The original bits aren't part of the filesystem. If you write anything to the empty filesystem it will overwrite more of the original bits. The rebuilt disk will have the original bits that weren't overwritten when you wrote the empty filesystem (i.e.; formatted). The clear disk will have all zeros.

Use 4G. Its assuming either bytes or kilobytes without the suffix Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk

Its part of the preclear plugin, and it's an optional opt-in

I recommend using 1 SSD for cache and avoiding BTRFS entirely. It's not mature enough, yet.

I was the initial person on this forum to point out the issue the this container on Synology and the AppArmor issues. I am also the same person who posted that on Reddit. I have opened a trouble ticket, as well as put in a feature request and posted on the Synology forums (https://forum.synology.com/enu/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=118103). Unfortunately, I still have not found a resolution other than disabling AppArmor. Another interesting issue I have run into is Docker refuses to start other other containers after I disable AppArmor. I have a startup script that runs on my Synology, which starts all my other containers, loads the proper kernel modules for this docker, and then disables AppArmor. docker start mysql //EXAMPLE CONTAINER TO START insmod /lib64/modules/tun.ko insmod /lib64/modules/iptable_mangle.ko insmod /lib64/modules/xt_mark.ko ##Disabling apparmor /usr/syno/etc.defaults/rc.sysv/apparmor.sh stop I have recently been seeing posts indicating people have installed an un-castrated version of Docker on their Synology. I might give this a shot (after backing all my data up of course).

I want to run a container from docker hub, how do I interpret the instructions. Using the duplicati container as an example. Basically looking at the instructions: docker run --rm -it \ -v /root/.config/Duplicati/:/root/.config/Duplicati/ \ -v /data:/data \ -e DUPLICATI_PASS=duplicatiPass \ -e MONO_EXTERNAL_ENCODINGS=UTF-8 \ -p 8200:8200 \ intersoftlab/duplicati:canary --rm = remove the container when exits (Not sure we want that) But if you did then you could add it into the extra parameters box -it = open an interactive pseudoterminal (Not sure why with a webui) But if you did then you could add it into the extra parameters box -v /root/.config/Duplicati/:/root/.config/Duplicati/ = map a volume host:container therefore I would suggest -v /mnt/cache/appdata/duplicati:/root/.config/Duplicati -v /data:/data = map a volume host:container therefore I would suggest -v /mnt/user/share:/data -e DUPLICATI_PASS=duplicatiPass = Set webui password -e MONO_EXTERNAL_ENCODINGS=UTF-8 = Encoding - Leave at UTF-8 -p 8200:8200 = Port mapping container:port intersoftlab/duplicati:canary = dockerhub repository/image:tag Pasting all that into Unraid: And hey presto...

i run the same problem with port 53 already in use. after some search, i found that the virtIO uses dnsmasq with port 53 i m not using any VM at the moment, so i decided to disable the VM Manager. After this i was able to install the pihole docker successfull. Dont know if i have trouble in the future when i use some kind of a VM