Jump to content

JorgeB

Moderators
  • Posts

    67,557
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    707

Everything posted by JorgeB

  1. https://forums.unraid.net/topic/46802-faq-for-unraid-v6/?do=findComment&comment=781601 Not sure it's fully working with v6.9 though.
  2. https://wiki.unraid.net/Troubleshooting#Re-enable_the_drive
  3. One more thing you can try it to boot the server in safe mode with all docker/VMs disable, let it run as a basic NAS for a few days, if it still crashes it's likely a hardware problem, if it doesn't start turning on the other services one by one.
  4. That tunable no longer exists in current Unraid.
  5. https://wiki.unraid.net/Troubleshooting#Re-enable_the_drive
  6. Disk dropped and reconnected again, disk itself looks fine, check/replace cables.
  7. Please post the diagnostics: Tools -> Diagnostics
  8. Data should be fine since Unraid successfully wrote back the failing sectors (assuming parity was valid), disk doesn't look very healthy though.
  9. Stop/start the array, if nothing changes run a filesystem check on disk6.
  10. It's possible, and it should be replaced anyway.
  11. The mover should work now, but data corruption is not a good sign, start by running memtest.
  12. All the call traces I see are Macvlan related, this is usually the result of having dockers with a custom IP address, more info below:
  13. Checksum failed means corrupt data, run a scrub and post the diagnostics.
  14. SMART test failed, so the disk should be replaced.
  15. Yes, you can have a script doing that after every reboot. This, 2.5" drives are usually much more aggressive with power saving features, WD black are usually a exception since they are optimized for performance.
  16. That's nothing to worry about. The trim issue is a known issue with SAS2 LSI controllers and current firmware/driver, some users found that downgrading to firmware p16 allows trim to work, and while I don't personally recommend using an old firmware it might be an option, more info below: https://forums.unraid.net/topic/74493-samsung-ssd-hba-trim/page/4/
  17. No, it's the worst setting for write speed. Whichever you prefer from the other ones, high water is the usually the best compromise. Read speeds won't be affected, unless you plan on reading multiple files at the same time, in that case if they were dispersed speed could be better, but you'd need a way of only reading multiple files from different disks. No, but it won't make any difference for reads.
×
×
  • Create New...