Jump to content

JorgeB

Moderators
  • Posts

    67,504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    706

Everything posted by JorgeB

  1. You're using a Marvell controller, which are already not recommended, with (or connect to) a SATA port multiplier, which is also not recommended, 3 of your disks are sharing a single SATA port, this isn't good for performance and it tends to produce timeouts, or even drop disks, though it does sometimes work reasonably well for some.
  2. Should be similar performance, though some users complain of bad performance with some devices in a pool, in that case latest beta should help due to the new partition alignment.
  3. Yes, if it works, it doesn't work for everybody.
  4. P.S. I have an Intel 600p NVMe device that won't format with latest xfs, it does format with btrfs or older xfs, I see you have a Samsung so probably not the same issue.
  5. There would be a reason for the format failing, but as long as it's fine now.
  6. SMART test completed successfully, so disk is good for now, but it failed two previous ones: # 1 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 21384 - # 2 Extended offline Completed: read failure 90% 21288 9432616 # 3 Short offline Completed: read failure 10% 21127 9432616 For now acknowledge the SMART attributes but any more read errors in the near future best to replace it.
  7. Not seeing any format attempt, if you rebooted since you need to try again then post new diags.
  8. Tools -> Diagnostics then attach the complete zip.
  9. This works for some, but even if it works Marvell controllers are not recommended: https://forums.unraid.net/bug-reports/stable-releases/disks-missing-after-upgrading-to-670-r536/?do=findComment&comment=4583
  10. You can test the disks with dd, just make sure they aren't being accessed or the results won't be reliable: dd if=/dev/sdX of=/dev/null bs=4k status=progress Do it one at a time to avoid controller bottlenecks and post the results.
  11. That cannot be the reason. Yes, but like all hadware any disk can go bad at any time, like developing slow sectors, just because it was fine yesterday, doesn't mean it is today, though I still think that is too of an average speed for it to be a disk issue, but you should still rule that out first. Your controller configuration is also not the best, but that shouldn't cause slow downs out of the blue without any changes.
  12. Please stay on topic and start another another thread if you want to continue that discussion.
  13. Those WD SMR disks (WS10SPZX) are known to be bad performers, especially on writes but also on reads, and that's visible in the graphs where they are reading on average about 3x slower then they should, diskspeed test only reads a few sectors from the disks so first thing would be to run a complete surface test on each of those disks so see how they are really performing.
  14. Please post the diagnostics: Tools -> Diagnostics
  15. Please don't crosspost and use the existing plugin support thread:
  16. There is but parity needs to be valid, why is parity "wrong"?
  17. I missed it was in an enclosure, most WD USB enclosures encrypt the contents, no way to read the device outside it (or without using another similar WD enclosure).
  18. Run another check without rebooting and post new diags if more sync errors are found.
  19. No, I only use server boards, with ECC support it's not just important that ECC is supported but that any errors are reported by the board. Yes, there's the IPMI plugin for server boards with IPMI, this was the warning I got, board is from Supermicro: Event: unRAID Server Alert Subject: Notice [TOWER2] - IPMI Event Description: localhost *Warning* Memory - Correctable memory error ; OEM Event Data3 code = 00h Importance: warning These errors also appear on the board's system event log in the BIOS or though IPMI.
  20. Depends mostly on how important data integrity is for you, if it is very important then yes, use ECC RAM, all my servers have ECC, and memory errors are extremely rare, but they happen, I got ECC corrected errors twice one one server (in the same day) in the last 10 years, or worst case scenario and a dimm goes bad it can go several days or more without being noticed corrupting all the written data in the meantime.
  21. If the ntfs partition was damaged/deleted use testdisk, free and very good to recover damaged partitions.
  22. If it was for example a media file it would read normally until the error, then stop, but if you wanted to still keep it, say you didn't have a backup and there would probably just be a small glitch on play, you could use btrfs restore to copy the file since it doesn't validate checksums.
  23. That is already a SATA device, do you mean an m.2 to 2.5" adapter? You need to let Unraid formatted any device before use, next to array start/stop buttons.
×
×
  • Create New...