Jump to content

JorgeB

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    67,125

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    703

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JorgeB

  1. JorgeB
    No, from Asrock's site: - 3 x PCI Express 2.0 x16 slots (PCIE2/PCIE4: single at x16 (PCIE2) / x8 (PCIE4), or dual at x8 (PCIE2) / x8 (PCIE4) ; PCIE5: x4 mode)
  2. JorgeB
    Those are hardware problems, also there's data corruption on disk3 (can't say if it's ATA10 without the diags), but check SMART and run a scrub on it.
  3. JorgeB
    Just an FYI this is still happening, it happens so many times that I now try to just browse the forums instead of clicking the unread list or I keep missing posts that are wrongly marked as read.
  4. JorgeB
    Without the diagnostics can't say for sure since there are 3 a 4 platter models, even the 3 platter is slow but the 4 platter models can barely crack 100MB/s on the outer sectors, much slower on the inner ones, so that's one the problems, until you get rid of them the first 2TB will always be on the slow side. SASLP or SAS2LP? SASLP can also be a bottleneck. Yes but the bottom one is x4 electrically, it won't matter if the HBAa are SASLP, it can if they are SAS2LP.
  5. JorgeB
    You may have another bottlenecks, it might also be that the 2TB disks are older models and just slow, post your diagnostics it can give a better idea, also indicate in what slots the controllers are installed.
  6. JorgeB
    SATA2 is not a problem, it's still capable of around 275MB/s, no disk can go above that, SSDs are a different story.
  7. JorgeB
    No, it will just use a little more RAM, but nothing noticeable, though it might not make much performance difference from the the origan values, in larger arrays it can make a very big difference.
  8. JorgeB
    This is low even for 2TB disks, unless it's in the end when reading the most outer sectors, if not make sure you have no hardware bottleneck and are using the recommended tunables for larger arrays: Settings -> Disk Settings Tunable (md_num_stripes): 4096 Tunable (md_sync_window): 2048 Tunable (md_sync_thresh): 2000
  9. JorgeB
    https://forums.unraid.net/topic/12114-lsi-controller-fw-updates-irit-modes/?do=findComment&comment=632252
  10. JorgeB
    Most Seagates use a multibyte value for both those attributes, for that disk the raw_read_error_rate is only reporting the total reads, errors are still at 0, for the seek_error_rate there are some errors, but low and better than at some some point in the past, so not much to worry about for now, of course it's never a good sign, same for the reported_uncorrected.
  11. JorgeB
    You can do a new config but parity needs to be synced, only after that the array will be in a protected state.
  12. JorgeB
    That's much better and close to full speed. You can remove it, bios is only needed if you plan to boot from one of the connected devices, if not it just increases boot time.
  13. JorgeB
    Nothing jumps out why it's going so slow, you'll need to do some testing to find the problem, but it's harder to do that with a disabled disk. You can cancel a rebuild at any time, but it can't be resume, i.e., it will always start from the beginning. This is for virtualization, it shouldn't affect rebuild speed, you can check with lspci is the HBA is linking @ x8, but with only 4 disks connected it shouldn't make so much difference even if it wasn't. lspci -vv -s 41:00.0 Look for LnkSta
  14. JorgeB
    after stopping the array
  15. JorgeB
    Change cache slots to 1
  16. JorgeB
    I'm on a phone and can't see the diagnostics now but if the cache itself also has transid errors it needs to be reformatted
  17. JorgeB
    Looks like a controller problem, if you can get an LSI to replace the Marvell controller do it.
  18. JorgeB
    Docker image is corrupt, delete and recreate, see the docker FAQ if you need help how to.
  19. JorgeB
    Same here, I use Tapatalk always in night mode, but for viewing on a PC I usually prefer light themes, and I do prefer this one instead of the dark one for this forum, thanks LT 👍
  20. JorgeB
    Yes
  21. JorgeB
    RC3 fixed it for me.
  22. JorgeB
    Ooh, so beginning now no more unRAID, it should be Unraid? It will take some take getting used to that after 10 years the other way, but I guess you won't mind either way for now. 😊
  23. JorgeB
    I'm used to using the US english layout for these, but since there are a lot of languages options, including Portuguese-Brazil please also add Portuguese-Portugal since it's completely different.
  24. JorgeB
    You can ignore those errors, it's because SAS drives don't spin down, it's a current known issue. You can also disable spin down to get rid of them for now.
  25. JorgeB
    Post new diagnostics if it happens again, grabbed before rebooting
×
×
  • Create New...