steve1977

Terrific, thanks, getting there! I am aware of this, but I don't want to specify the album. Is there a way that Beets can keep memory of the files already in library. And then pick up the new files through an import or update of some form? I actually have the local mirror already up and running. It works flawless and I have been using it together with Picard well. For some reasons, I cannot get it to work with Beets though. I added the following in my config file without success: musicbrainz: host: 192.168.11.215:5000 ratelimit: 100 The files are still ok as long as they are in the importfolder. They change permission after being moved from importfolder to musiclibrary folder. I believe this is done by Beets? Still worth checking otherwise? What could be set wrongly in Beets? And another one: can beets handle more than one library?

And another two 5) I read through all the tags, but didn't find a way to let beets tell me what albums in beets are incomplete (i.e., 14 files for an album tagged for a release with 15 tracks; or looking for albums that miss artwork or a MBZ release ID) 6) Possible to configure somewhere what coverart will be download / embedded? Also including fanart.tv with respective API? Thanks a ton. I am turning into a big fan of beets and this docker!

Thanks. I wasn't aware of this feature and it seems interesting. Reading the link you've sent. Mbsync is also a great plugin. Does it work with the docker and how it is different from beet update? Having said this, above actually does not answer my question and is not what I am looking for. Let me describe what I mean with more color: /importfolder/ [mapped via docker] /importfolder/Abba-Album1 /libraryfolder/ [mapped via docker] When I use "beet import /import", the album gets tagged and moved (I have move=yes in config). Folder then looks like below: /importfolder/ /libraryfolder/Abba-Album1 I'll now add an album to "/libraryfolder" directly. Either not tagged or maybe including some tags from itunes. /importfolder/ /libraryfolder/Abba-Album1 /libraryfolder/Abba-Album2 Abba-Album2 is now not part of my beets library as it was not imported through Beets. Is there a way to get Abba-Album2 to my library without importing it through the "importfolder" and without retagging Abba-Album1 (already in my beets library and already tagged). Does it make it clearer that I am trying to accomplish? Beets queries musicbrainz API heavily when importing a large library. I have a local mirror of musicbrainz, so would hope to reduce load for musicbrainz.org by using it instead. I've run "docker safe new perms". That's how I get music files to work after running beets. But that's obviously not the idea to run the command every time after I use beets PUID/PGID are set correctly. Any other ideas what I could check? Both linked folders are on the array.

And yet another Q 4) If I import music files via beets (docker), I have a permission issue. Imported files in the new folder don't have RW permission. Is there a setting in the docker that I need to change?

And one more 3) I'd tried to use my MBZ mirror to run things locally. Didn't get this to work. Any idea what to do?

Brilliant, thanks a lot. Now, it seems to be working much better. I have a few more questions: 1) I used to tag my releases under the release name with release comment via a script ($set(album,%album%$if(%_releasecomment%, \(%_releasecomment%\)))). is this also possible with beets? 2) Can I tag with beets without "import". I.e., I have a music library folder that includes all my beets tagged music. I'd like to directly add to this folder and than tag with beets (instead of placing files in a separate and have beets move/import them to the library. Is this possible? If so, does it change folder names to match artist? Thanks!

First of all, thanks for the docker. This is great! It is working ok, but I am facing two issues: 1) Quite often, I am receiving the error message "fingerprinting of 'XXX' failed: audio could not be decoded. I checked the respective files and they play well, so there is no file corruption 2) I am getting other related error messages at times, which I can post, but likely are connected to the first Any thoughts? As a quick fix, how to turn off fingerprinting? It's not as critical, is it?

I installed it and got it working. This is really cool stuff! Big thanks for this container!!!

Can you say a few more words what to do with these two commands?

I ran chmod -R 777. Still a permission issue, but different result of ls -la: -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8441 Feb 23 18:27 sabnzbd.ini* -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8441 Apr 5 17:05 sabnzbd.ini.bak*

Thanks. Let me reset the permissions first. What’s the command?

What exactly does this docker allow me to do? Does it create a mirror of an indexer? Does this require a subscription to nzbhydra? It seems from the web-site that Nzbhydra does not support music?

Not sure which one is the appdata folder? I ran the command in my sabnzbd docker folder. Please see below: root@Tower:/mnt/disks/nvme/Docker/sabnzbd# ls -la total 24 drwxrwxrwx 7 nobody users 121 Feb 24 10:12 ./ drwxrwxrwx 8 root root 123 Mar 31 07:58 ../ drwxrwxrwx 6 nobody users 64 Mar 31 09:35 Complete/ drwxrwxrwx 4 nobody users 126 Apr 5 07:20 Incomplete/ drwxrwxrwx 3 root root 144 Apr 5 07:20 admin/ drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 130 Apr 3 08:57 logs/ -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 8441 Feb 23 18:27 sabnzbd.ini -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 8441 Apr 5 07:58 sabnzbd.ini.bak drwxrwxrwx 4 root root 30 Feb 23 18:27 wanted/

I am still facing the issue and it even seems to increase in frequency. It now seems to show up all the time. Any thoughts? 2019-04-04 20:55:22,638::INFO::[config:848] Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/sabnzbdplus/sabnzbd/config.py", line 844, in save_config shutil.copymode(filename, bakname) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/shutil.py", line 105, in copymode os.chmod(dst, mode) OSError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted: '/config/sabnzbd.ini.bak' 2019-04-04 20:55:55,690::ERROR::[config:847] Cannot create backup file for /config/sabnzbd.ini.bak

I've never used Beets before and am wondering whether it can do what I'd like it to do. I have a folder "/music" with sub-folders, which I have both MP3 and FLAC files in. I'd like to keep the MP3 files as is, but convert the FLAC files to ALAC/M4A (and delete the orignal FLAC thereafter). Can this docker help me do this? If so, any guidance how to do it?

Hadn't heard of Linarr. I used to be an active user of headphones, but stopped using it as it just didn't work well enough. Has the ram issue mentioned above been solved? Does it allow to use my Unraid MBZ mirror to avoid hammering MBZ with API requests? What's the overall experience and does it allow to download based on chart lists rather than just missing albums from added artists?

I never thought about enabling HW-acceleration. Just enabled it and transcoding seems to work better for HEVC. Having said this, is this even possible? I have an i7-7800X that - from what I know - does not have an iGPU. I have an Nvidia 1060, but that's passed through to my VM. So, is this even possible? Does it use the GPU (Nvidia) even though it is passed-through? Does it make a difference whether the VM is on or not?

Ok, I went ahead and moved everything docker-related from cache/array to my second NVME, which is a UD. All has been successfully moved. "Fix common problems" reported that I should switch the docker mounts from "RW" to "RW slave", which I did. Sabnzbd docker seems to work, but shows "Cannot create backup file for /config/sabnzbd.ini.bak" everytime I start/restart the docker. Any thoughts?

Would it be sufficient to move "incomplete" to the cache and keep "complete" on the array?

Not enough space for an extra disk, but I can try moving the complete/incomplete/wanted folders to the NVME cache disk. Radarr is moving things to the array anyways after unpacking, so this may be sufficient to speed up and still contain the space. The other idea would be to use my second NVME disk (UD), but it's holding my VMs and sabnzbd activity may slow down the VM.

Got it. Could this also explain download speeds or has any advantage? If not, I am not sure whether the advantage of faster unpacking outweighs the need for more space requirements on the cache disk. My cache disk is a rather small NVME disk.

I am using the docker for a long time already. It is working very well, thanks for the development. There are two issues that I never bothered with, but they indicate that I can improve how to set things up: Context: Docker installed on an NVME cache disk. Isolated 4 CPU cores to the Unraid and all dockers and have at least 16Gb of ram assigned to it. Complete, incomplete and wanted folders are mapped to the array. Config path is mapped to the cache disk (next to docker). My two issues are as follows: 1) Unpacking files is taking a very long time period. Much longer compared to when I had it running inside a Windows VM (on NVME). I thought that this may be caused by the array just being slower than nvme, but starting to ask myself whether there is some other reason as it is really slow. Also, it seems to be even slower once several downloaded files queue up (show "waiting"). I am thinking what role ram or CPU may play? Or potentially the size of the docker image? Not sure anything is happening inside the docker image? 2) Download speed can be "spotty". It sometimes goes from 3mb/s to 0.3mb/s and then back to 3mb/s. I always thought this is just how it is due to bandwidth changes. Not sure it was the same when I still used it in Windows. But curious whether this could also be docker related?

Thanks, this solved it.

Thanks @SpaceInvaderOne for the guide. I just tried to shrink my Windows VM from 120G to 60G. Something is not working. I followed all steps and reduced the VM disk size. It shows correctly in Unraid in both "capacity" and "allocation" with the new 60G. Also, good news is that I can start the VM. So far so good. If I access "computer management", it still shows the higher amount of 120G (55G as my disk and 65G as unassigned). Any thoughts?

@kaiguy, were you able to upgrade to v3 or was this for a fresh install? I have a "fully loaded" Sonarr docker and don't want to set up everything from scratch. Is v3 as easy as an update and things keep functional? Also, can I go back to the stable branch once v3 is released?