July 28, 201411 yr I have just installed gfjardim's Dropbox docker. In the template it says to check the logs for the authorization link. Where can I find these logs?
July 28, 201411 yr Author I have just installed gfjardim's Dropbox docker. In the template it says to check the logs for the authorization link. Where can I find these logs? Click on the link in the STATUS column and Dropbox row.
July 28, 201411 yr I have just installed gfjardim's Dropbox docker. In the template it says to check the logs for the authorization link. Where can I find these logs? Click on the link in the STATUS column and Dropbox row. OK, it says I'm linked now, and the docker did create a dropbox folder for me where I told it to, but it is not filling up with my dropbox files. I also tried restarting it after I got it linked but no go.
July 28, 201411 yr Author I have just installed gfjardim's Dropbox docker. In the template it says to check the logs for the authorization link. Where can I find these logs? Click on the link in the STATUS column and Dropbox row. OK, it says I'm linked now, and the docker did create a dropbox folder for me where I told it to, but it is not filling up with my dropbox files. I also tried restarting it after I got it linked but no go. Ok, I've updated the container, please update yours and see if it works.
July 28, 201411 yr I have just installed gfjardim's Dropbox docker. In the template it says to check the logs for the authorization link. Where can I find these logs? Click on the link in the STATUS column and Dropbox row. OK, it says I'm linked now, and the docker did create a dropbox folder for me where I told it to, but it is not filling up with my dropbox files. I also tried restarting it after I got it linked but no go. Ok, I've updated the container, please update yours and see if it works. Still not working for me.
July 29, 201411 yr Erase everything and start again, would be my advice. I assume you mean everything related to that dropbox docker. I already removed it completely earlier today when it wasn't working for me the first time. Then when you updated I installed it from scratch.
July 29, 201411 yr Version 2014.07.28: - Add Transmission template I'm having issues using transmission in bridge mode. Host works fine. Has anyone else seen at or is it just a local problem I need to resolve ?
July 29, 201411 yr Author Version 2014.07.28: - Add Transmission template I'm having issues using transmission in bridge mode. Host works fine. Has anyone else seen at or is it just a local problem I need to resolve ? What issues? Port mapping only works on host mode. In bridge, you have to manually setup the NAT forwarding.
July 29, 201411 yr Version 2014.07.28: - Add Transmission template I'm having issues using transmission in bridge mode. Host works fine. Has anyone else seen at or is it just a local problem I need to resolve ? What issues? Port mapping only works on host mode. In bridge, you have to manually setup the NAT forwarding. couldnt reach the transmission webgui page no matter what come I tied. When I gig home I'll Ty a clean install (not use my existing settings and db) and see if I can get it work that way. I notice you open up a single port for connection to the outside world. That's sometimes g I I'll have to play with as currently transmission changes port upon every restart.
July 29, 201411 yr Version 2014.07.28: - Add Transmission template I'm having issues using transmission in bridge mode. Host works fine. Has anyone else seen at or is it just a local problem I need to resolve ? What issues? Port mapping only works on host mode. In bridge, you have to manually setup the NAT forwarding. Played around and just couldn't get it going. Maybe I was trying too many things at the same time. Started a new install/instance of Transmission and it worked fine. Stopped then copied everything over from the old dir to the new then went through the settings.json line by line to make sure I kept as much of the new I needed but pulled over the ol details as well. Now it's all working fine. Just headphones and flexget still on host mode. Everything else, from Coachpotato to XBMC Server now bridged.
July 29, 201411 yr Transmission is notorious for having bad config handling. If you edit the config whist the damon is running you lose the config or break it. Most of the times permissions or this explain people transmission woes. Its one of the reasons I dropped it for deluge
July 29, 201411 yr Author [glow=red,2,300]Video Tutorial Contest:[/glow] There are many common questions regard this plugin, and I know that it's somewhat my fault for poor documentation. The idea was to compile a nice video tutorial for it, but.... Well, as some of you know that I'm brazilian, so my accent while speaking english is terrible. I need someone good enough explaining things to people make a video tutorial for this plugin. There are some topics there must be presented: Prerequisites: - Installation; - Update; Main page: - The meaning of each field in the image and container tables. - Showing logs, files and opening web pages; - Updating a container; - Removing containers and images; - Editing a container (this is an undocumented feature, just click on the container's name); Adding a container: - manipulating the templates - built in and user templates; - explanation of host, bridge and none network modes; - what are Paths and how to map them; - what are Ports and how to map them; - what are Variables and how to work with them.
July 29, 201411 yr Transmission is notorious for having bad config handling. If you edit the config whist the damon is running you lose the config or break it. Most of the times permissions or this explain people transmission woes. Its one of the reasons I dropped it for deluge I would happily move to deluge as I am net new on either so don't really have a preference. However I haven't found a good tutorial on how to configure deluge and it's setup seems far more cumbersome than transmission.
July 31, 201411 yr gfjardim: Hi, is there a reason that the Extended Docker Config doesn't have a template for PlexConnect by needo ? I still used the Extended page for creating it, but I manually filled in the template.
August 2, 201411 yr Are there any plans for this add-on to show if the docker container has been updated since it was installed? I haven't found any easy way to tell that at this point, other than just run the update and see what happens (I may be missing something here, wouldn't be the first time, lol).
August 3, 201411 yr Author [glow=red,2,300]MAJOR UPDATE:[/glow] Version 2014.08.03: -Detect updates: Now, this plugin will search the Docker Registry for new image builds. The data is collected by a daemon named "DockerUpdate" every 30 minutes in the background. To synchronize versions, you will have to update once each container. After that, you will see the Update status change from N/A to Updated. Now, everytime a new built is available, the plugin will show in green "Update". -Bugfixes CreateDocker.php 1) change mkdir mode to 777 2) avoid the creation of empty fields in the xml Dockers.page 1) Fix some weirdness with jQuery Ui not updating popup titles 2) Show image tag in the Image Remove popup title
August 3, 201411 yr Was trying the update features and noticed that when you perform the update and an update is available it leaves the original base image and adds <none>:<none> for the updated bases. - Is it supposed to do that? and is it safe to remove the original base images?
August 3, 201411 yr Author [glow=red,2,300]UPDATE[/glow] VERSION 2014.08.03-6: - Remove the daemonization of DockerUpdate; will update once on plugin install/reinstall/reboot. Why hammer the Registry server? - Add a update reload button on the interface. - Update the XBMCServer template to use bridge mode as default. Change this to host if you use UPNP server.
August 3, 201411 yr Author Was trying the update features and noticed that when you perform the update and an update is available it leaves the original base image and adds <none>:<none> for the updated bases. - Is it supposed to do that? and is it safe to remove the original base images? Strange, never saw this once (9 containers updated). Update removes the old container, then pull the image from the Docker Registry, then recreates it from the user template. Aren't you using some custom build containers? I assume deleting them will do no harm.
August 3, 201411 yr Was trying the update features and noticed that when you perform the update and an update is available it leaves the original base image and adds <none>:<none> for the updated bases. - Is it supposed to do that? and is it safe to remove the original base images? Strange, never saw this once (9 containers updated). Update removes the old container, then pull the image from the Docker Registry, then recreates it from the user template. Aren't you using some custom build containers? I assume deleting them will do no harm. I saw them today after I updated to your new plugin. I just deleted them with no issues. Thanks for updates!
August 3, 201411 yr Author gfjardim: Hi, is there a reason that the Extended Docker Config doesn't have a template for PlexConnect by needo ? I still used the Extended page for creating it, but I manually filled in the template. Short answer: I don't use it. Long answer: I don't have the expertise and the hardware to test it. Maybe you can share your xml in this topic: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=34010.0
August 3, 201411 yr I like your new updater! I noticed when I clicked on needo/nzbmegasearch:latest it said it updated but did not show that on the config page like the others did. It still showed N/A.
August 3, 201411 yr Author I like your new updater! I noticed when I clicked on needo/nzbmegasearch:latest it said it updated but did not show that on the config page like the others did. It still showed N/A. You are right. Since it relies on the <Registry> info from the built in templates, it will not manage the update status, since there's not a NzbMegaSearch built in template.
August 3, 201411 yr Was trying the update features and noticed that when you perform the update and an update is available it leaves the original base image and adds <none>:<none> for the updated bases. - Is it supposed to do that? and is it safe to remove the original base images? Strange, never saw this once (9 containers updated). Update removes the old container, then pull the image from the Docker Registry, then recreates it from the user template. Aren't you using some custom build containers? I assume deleting them will do no harm. I am just using one customized container for airvideo - the rest are from yours and needo's repos. I keep getting the same result with the others, i might remove them all and start again to see if that continues..
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.