jms2321 Posted June 20, 2020 Share Posted June 20, 2020 Vendor: Western Digital Model: WDS100T3X0C-00SJG0 -- Western Digital Black SN750 1TB NVMe Serial Number: 201802800032 Revision: 111110WD Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted June 20, 2020 Author Share Posted June 20, 2020 2 hours ago, jms2321 said: Vendor: Western Digital Model: WDS100T3X0C-00SJG0 -- Western Digital Black SN750 1TB NVMe Revision: 111110WD Hrm. Nothing stands out as being potentially invalid Quote Link to comment
Opawesome Posted June 24, 2020 Share Posted June 24, 2020 (edited) Thank you @jbartlett. This plugin looks amazing. I uploaded a picture of, and info relating to, my 1TB Intel 660p NVME SSD to the database. For some reason, my 16GB thumb drive stick shows as a 15GB thumb drive: 100 Series/C230 Series Chipset Family USB 3.0 xHCI Controller Super Micro Computer Inc (Intel Corporation) USB controller Drive ID: sda (flash) Vendor: SanDisk' Model: Cruzer Fit Serial Number: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Revision: 0 Capacity: 15GB Logical/Physical Sector Size: 512/512 Any idea why ? Not that this is an issue, I am just curious. Best, OP Edited June 24, 2020 by Opawesome Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted June 25, 2020 Author Share Posted June 25, 2020 17 hours ago, Opawesome said: For some reason, my 16GB thumb drive stick shows as a 15GB thumb drive: Any idea why ? Not that this is an issue, I am just curious. Open a telnet prompt and type in "lshw -c disk" which will list most of the storage media attached. Look for your USB media. Mine looks like the following *-disk description: SCSI Disk product: USB Flash Drive vendor: Lexar physical id: 0.0.0 bus info: scsi@0:0.0.0 logical name: /dev/sda version: 1100 serial: AA00000000000489 size: 29GiB (32GB) capabilities: removable configuration: ansiversion=6 logicalsectorsize=512 sectorsize=512 *-medium physical id: 0 logical name: /dev/sda size: 29GiB (32GB) capabilities: partitioned partitioned:dos configuration: signature=c3072e18 Look at the size on both the disk & medium. If they match, your drive was mislabeled. If the Medium is smaller, than the entire device isn't partitioned to it. Quote Link to comment
jms2321 Posted June 25, 2020 Share Posted June 25, 2020 (edited) getting the following error in the docker log. "ERROR","http-apr-8888-exec-1","06/25/2020","08:45:34","",";Lucee was not able to load a Agent dynamically! You need to load one manually by adding the following to your JVM arguments [-javaagent:""/opt/lucee/server/lucee-server/context/lucee-external-agent.jar""];lucee.runtime.exp.ApplicationException: Lucee was not able to load a Agent dynamically! You need to load one manually by adding the following to your JVM arguments [-javaagent:""/opt/lucee/server/lucee-server/context/lucee-external-agent.jar""] Diagnostic file emailed to you! Edited June 25, 2020 by jms2321 added detail Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted June 25, 2020 Author Share Posted June 25, 2020 2 hours ago, jms2321 said: getting the following error in the docker log. "ERROR","http-apr-8888-exec-1","06/25/2020","08:45:34","",";Lucee was not able to load a Agent dynamically! You need to load one manually by adding the following to your JVM arguments [-javaagent:""/opt/lucee/server/lucee-server/context/lucee-external-agent.jar""];lucee.runtime.exp.ApplicationException: Lucee was not able to load a Agent dynamically! You need to load one manually by adding the following to your JVM arguments [-javaagent:""/opt/lucee/server/lucee-server/context/lucee-external-agent.jar""] Diagnostic file emailed to you! I see that in mine too, I'll investigate. I'm assuming the app works fine otherwise? Quote Link to comment
jms2321 Posted June 26, 2020 Share Posted June 26, 2020 Honestly, I died when it started benchmarking the drives on the second hba. I will rerun it tomorrow when I have time to monitor the system closer. Quote Link to comment
Alexstrasza Posted July 7, 2020 Share Posted July 7, 2020 On 6/5/2020 at 8:54 PM, jbartlett said: I'll add some debugging to the scanning process that'll hopefully help pinpoint your issue. Did this debugging get added? I'm still not having drive images download automatically. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted July 9, 2020 Author Share Posted July 9, 2020 On 7/7/2020 at 8:11 AM, Alexstrasza said: Did this debugging get added? I'm still not having drive images download automatically. Not yet. I haven't had time to do so yet. Personal time on the PC has been limited of late. I'll post an update when it is. 1 Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted August 1, 2020 Author Share Posted August 1, 2020 On 7/7/2020 at 8:11 AM, Alexstrasza said: Did this debugging get added? I'm still not having drive images download automatically. I've made some changes to the image search routine to make a log. If you still do not get any images, please comment with the time that you ran your scan (with time zone) so I can find your specific logs. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted August 1, 2020 Author Share Posted August 1, 2020 (edited) Docker Version 2.8 has been pushed Don't include floppy devices Multiply the SMART LBA Read/Written values by the Logical Sector Size instead of the Sector Size Add more validation logic to clean up Vendor/Model combinations I have rewritten from the ground up the Hard Drive Database website at http://strangejourney.net/hddb/ to display meaningful benchmark graphs. When viewing benchmark data for a particular drive, a graph line is drawn for each unique drive's most recent benchmark is displayed. If 100 people own a given drive and they've all done one or more benchmarks against that drive and uploaded them, the HDDB would have 100 graph lines for those drives. It gives you an idea as to how stable that model is on performance. Take Western Digital model WD30EFRX. It has two revisions, 80.00A80 & 82.00A82. The 1st one is has a slightly wide speed variance up to 30MB/sec at the start of the drive but the 2nd revision has two distinct groupings which indicates that something changed between the two sets but no indication of which drive you got. This graph for a WD40EFRX is indicative of frequent drive failures as well as a fairly wide variance of possible speeds (and also looks like multiple groupings). The speed grouping could be the result of the storage controller it was attached to but I kinda doubt that. Edited August 1, 2020 by jbartlett Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted August 1, 2020 Author Share Posted August 1, 2020 I just noticed that the two graphs with the multiple groupings both have the same revision number which tells me that Western Digital used the same circuitry with different number of platters. A quick query shows this same trend over multiple vendors. There might be some insight into seeing how the same revision fairs on different drive media configurations. Quote Link to comment
JonathanM Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 Wow, this is turning into quite the valuable resource! If you can, maybe the graphs could have a view option to feel less busy by widening the normal ranges into a light background, with the current upload as a single color line. The end result would be a black and white greyscale graph, with a colored line either passing through the normal white range or deviating into the grey or black regions. The graph would start as pure black, each additional data point would add a brightness level divided by the total number of lines plotted. So if all the curves happened to pass through the same point, it would be pure white, and if none of the curves hit that point, it would be black. The first curve would be pure white, 2 curves would be 50% unless they intersected into pure white, et. cetera. If you only have a handful of curves it probably wouldn't be a very useful, but when you have 100's of data points it should start to resemble something intuitively useful. Quote Link to comment
uldise Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 i opened a Brand Image database, then when i click on particular disk, it throws 404 error. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted August 2, 2020 Author Share Posted August 2, 2020 14 hours ago, uldise said: i opened a Brand Image database, then when i click on particular disk, it throws 404 error. Sorry about this. This has been resolved. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted August 3, 2020 Author Share Posted August 3, 2020 On 7/31/2020 at 7:18 PM, jonathanm said: Wow, this is turning into quite the valuable resource! If you can, maybe the graphs could have a view option to feel less busy by widening the normal ranges into a light background, with the current upload as a single color line. The end result would be a black and white greyscale graph, with a colored line either passing through the normal white range or deviating into the grey or black regions. The graph would start as pure black, each additional data point would add a brightness level divided by the total number of lines plotted. So if all the curves happened to pass through the same point, it would be pure white, and if none of the curves hit that point, it would be black. The first curve would be pure white, 2 curves would be 50% unless they intersected into pure white, et. cetera. If you only have a handful of curves it probably wouldn't be a very useful, but when you have 100's of data points it should start to resemble something intuitively useful. That's basically describing a heatmap. Interesting concept that I'll likely explore - notably because I added a graph with all of the benchmarks using the same revision & RPM and it was just a hot mess of lines. Quote Link to comment
JonathanM Posted August 3, 2020 Share Posted August 3, 2020 4 minutes ago, jbartlett said: just a hot mess of lines Yeah, that's what I anticipated based on what you posted, the mess of lines confuses rather than informs. Maybe even explore what a 3D plot would look like, with the current result draped across the 3d landscape, that way you could easily show abnormalities with green where the current plot follows the trend, blending through yellow and then red the farther away from normal you get. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted August 3, 2020 Author Share Posted August 3, 2020 16 hours ago, jonathanm said: Yeah, that's what I anticipated based on what you posted, the mess of lines confuses rather than informs. Maybe even explore what a 3D plot would look like, with the current result draped across the 3d landscape, that way you could easily show abnormalities with green where the current plot follows the trend, blending through yellow and then red the farther away from normal you get. I have two data points, drive location and speed. I'd need a 3rd data point for a 3D representation, what would that be? Quote Link to comment
JonathanM Posted August 3, 2020 Share Posted August 3, 2020 2 hours ago, jbartlett said: I have two data points, drive location and speed. I'd need a 3rd data point for a 3D representation, what would that be? Frequency of appearance in the database of that location and speed. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted August 4, 2020 Author Share Posted August 4, 2020 3 hours ago, jonathanm said: Frequency of appearance in the database of that location and speed. That would be better represented by a color change. The heat map will be a something like an 800x200 grid where the drive size and read speeds are scaled to fit in that. The more times a spot gets hit, the brighter that spot would become. The line between the 11 spots (scanned every 10% plus the start) would be interpolated. Here is a demo that shows a heat map tracking temperatures throughout the year. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted August 7, 2020 Author Share Posted August 7, 2020 Heatmap data has been added to the Hard Drive Database and is displayed for any drive model that has more than 25 drives benchmarked & uploaded. The 9th most popular drive based on uploaded benchmarks is the 8TB Seagate ST8000VN0022. Looking at the graph shows and odd dip at the 4.8GB mark but there are enough seemingly normal scans that you'd think that it might be a fluke but the heatmap scan shows the majority of the drives do have a dip at this point. http://strangejourney.net/hddb/ Quote Link to comment
Jmulligan Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 Hi I just built my first Unraid box and installed this DiskSpeed Docker container to test out the 3 new drives i purchased and installed. I did my first test of each drive and the results are below. From other images ive seen in this forum, the parity drive looks to be about right in regards to speed and the slow drop off in speed. Disk1/DIsk2 however look quite different and im just wondering if that's normal? The 3 drives are all WD Red 4TB (WD40EFAX) The parity drive is plugged into a SATA 6.0Gb/s port Disk1/Disk 2 are plugged into SATA 3.0Gb/s ports The motherboard is an Asus H81M-E Also when i complete the test on Disk1/Disk2 the following note is displayed "Bandwidth was capped on drive Disk 1 (sdd)" So does it look like there is an issue with the drives or am i doing something wrong? Thanks for any help. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted August 14, 2020 Share Posted August 14, 2020 2 hours ago, Jmulligan said: The 3 drives are all WD Red 4TB (WD40EFAX) Those are SMR, they will only show the correct performance after being written completely at least once. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted August 14, 2020 Author Share Posted August 14, 2020 If you notice how the drives have a flat line? That's what the program looks for to determining if bandwidth was capped - or if it seems the drive can output data faster than the drive controller or connection can handle. As per tee-tee jorge's comment, run a pre-clear on those drives and you should get graphs that match the trend on the Hard Drive Database Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.