Jump to content

JorgeB

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    63,741

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    674

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JorgeB

  1. JorgeB
    http://www.seagate.com/www-content/product-content/barracuda-fam/barracuda-new/en-us/docs/100804071d.pdf Wrong link, linked the ST8000DM0004 instead of the ST8000DM004, all info available suggests that this is in fact an SMR drive.
  2. JorgeB
    That's an older controller, it doesn't support >2TB disks.
  3. JorgeB
    Agree, like with with the IPMI plugin, users with supported Asrock Rack models and Supermicro X10/X11 can already do that. Edit to add: Obviously not all boards support this, but it's the best solution for boards that do.
  4. JorgeB
    If all data on the pool fits on a single device you don't even need to stop your docker/VMs, though it's always a good idea to backup any important data before starting:
  5. JorgeB
    It's an Asmedia 160x, so it will work.
  6. JorgeB
  7. JorgeB
    Not really, I would expect that with mostly large files speed would be normal. I get always above 100MB/s (using turbo write)
  8. JorgeB
    Those I expect can get pretty slow.
  9. JorgeB
    Are these small or large files? I have no speed issues copying TBs at a time to may server that uses 5 of theses disks, including parity, they are all large files though, 4GB and larger.
  10. JorgeB
    I believe is talking about ReFS, the new MS filesystem and AFAIK not supported by unRAID or any other linux OS.
  11. JorgeB
    No harm in trying but pretty sure unRAID doesn't support Infiniband.
  12. JorgeB
    Not really... is this recent behavior? With v6.3 or v6.4 is the same? My cache is a single device at the moment, but recently was using a 8 SSD pool in RAID10 and copied a lot of data daily at about 800/900MB/s (using 10Gbe) without any slowdowns.
  13. JorgeB
    VMs pause when they are out of space, timeout issues are probably causing that, no idea on what's causing the timeouts I'm afraid.
  14. JorgeB
    Some (including me) fear these are chinese fakes, that price is from a merchant, Newegg price is 219.99$, sometimes there's a reason when the price seams to good to be true. I prefer to buy a used server pull on ebay than possibly a new chinese fake.
  15. JorgeB
    Just to report that I've been using the beta for over 24 hours on an X11 and it's working great, thanks
  16. JorgeB
    You can already do that, I edited my post, wrote before seeing how the plugin works.
  17. JorgeB
    Usually FANA is for peripherals, but since there's only one of those most people use FANA for the CPU and the other 4 for peripherals, so it would be nice if the script had and option to reverse that so that FANA responded to CPU temp sensor and the other fans to disks temps. Ignore that, I see you can already select the temp you want that fan group to respond to.
  18. JorgeB
    It is, choose legacy
  19. JorgeB
    https://www.broadcom.com/support/download-search
  20. JorgeB
    I've only seen this issue when there's no space, but unless you post your diagnostics all we can is guess.
  21. JorgeB
    ¿qué? I was talking about your fans, not mine.
  22. JorgeB
    Glad you figured it out but just for future readers that's expected since the UD plugin doesn't support ZFS pools.
  23. JorgeB
    If you have all 3 Notcua fans on FANA setting the profile to "Heavy IO" should keep those at or close to maximum speed while keeping the CPU fan at about 50%.
  24. JorgeB
    No, I hadn't, didn't know that was what its function, but tried it now and it worked.
  25. JorgeB
    I'm not sure what the problem is, but if I do an ipmi-sensors-config --checkout to a file, there's info on all fans.
×
×
  • Create New...