L0rdRaiden

Any clue on this? please I can not delete them.

What are these "shim" gateways that have appeared in my unraid config? I can't find anything google

Ok, I read wrong your first explanation. I get it now. But still I am trying to understand a scenario where this is usefull or makes any difference vs having all in br0 and the use VLANs to control the traffic.

So you can go from br0 to virtbr0 but anthing in virtbr0 can go out? I am thing now a use case to use virtbr0... since I already use Vlans in my fw.

I understand that br0 is bridge 0 and virbr0 is virtual bridge 0 But since br0 is linked to eth0 and I can assign br0 to all the dockers and VM I want, what is the purpose and differences with virbr0? Thanks in advance

Could you please copy paste your XML configuration? Maybe a screen shot of the confing, not XML would help me as well, thanks

https://github.com/librenms/docker/blob/master/examples/compose/docker-compose.yml How do I configure this in the same IP? I don't think you can reproduce any configuation that easily en dockerman. How can I setup the cron Image.

This is the easiest way to get your chat ID with 1 click

this

yes, and allowed IP's are 10.253.0.1/32 10.10.10.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 I have added 10.253.0.0/24 just in case and it doesn't work either.

No, I have scanned the entire 192.168.1.0/24 (ping) and I only see unraid server while I had several devices connected in the same network that has nothing to do with unraid dockers and VMs Do I have to create a firewall rule to provice visibility beween 192.168.1.0/24 and 10.253.0.0/24?

I guess I must be doing something wrong in my firewall I have added a route I have enabled the host access to custom networks Still, from phone I only see the unraid machine, I can't see any other web service I have in the dockers using their IP's

I have set the tunnel address as default, but once connected I can only see unraid server. Do I need to create a rule in the firewall to provide connectivity beween my LAN and 10.253.0.0? Shouldn't I see my LAN once connected without adding any additional rule? is there any step by step example of someone with a Remote access to LAN connection?

Thanks but, Why this happens? could it be due to non ECC RAM? Is not the first time that it happens to me, is there any way to prevent it?

Why do I get this errors? I'm using zfs in all drives. Is there a way to repair it? I don't have parity. Mar 30 12:05:13 Unraid kernel: BTRFS error (device loop2): block=5791367168 write time tree block corruption detected Mar 30 12:05:13 Unraid kernel: BTRFS: error (device loop2) in btrfs_commit_transaction:2344: errno=-5 IO failure (Error while writing out transaction) Mar 30 12:05:13 Unraid kernel: BTRFS info (device loop2): forced readonly Mar 30 12:05:13 Unraid kernel: BTRFS warning (device loop2): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. Mar 30 12:05:13 Unraid kernel: BTRFS: error (device loop2) in cleanup_transaction:1894: errno=-5 IO failure unraid-diagnostics-20200330-1317.zip

I have configure wireguard like this, I pretend to acces my whole LAN from the Peer. 192.168.1.0/24 Is my LAN In Sophos XG I have configure a FW rule to accept incoming connections from WAN to my public IP in UDP 51820 Then a NAT rule to redirect the incoming connections to that port to UNRAID where wireguard is So I connecto to wireguard server, and I can reach Unraid Server from my phone but that is all, I can not ping my phone ip 192.168.1.231 from any device in my network, windows pc, etc, or I can't reach with my phone to any other IP. Regarding Local server uses NAT, if I enable it does it mean that I won't be able to access to any docker with custom IP from my phone? I would appreciate some help or recommendations to setting up wireguard. I guess it would be cleaner to create the server in another network, disable "local server uses NAT" and then configure the static routing in the firewall.

Same here, using 6.9.0-beta1, many dockers with custom IPs and I have a winserver VM syslog-192.168.1.200.log

The problem is when you have something like this https://github.com/mailcow/mailcow-dockerized/blob/master/docker-compose.yml It would be nice to have in dockerman a way to configure something the way docker compose does it, as a group. In the UI all the dockers could be nested in only one, and lets say you will configure all the dockers in the same template. It should be hard since more changes are in the UI. Somehow dockerman teamplates could be as a dockercompose yml

I want to do the same, does this worked for you at the end? How did you setup the network? I dont understand what did you do with docker compose, didn't you install all the dockers separately? I would appreciate a lot if you can provide a step by step guide with all the details until the creation of each docker, I know how to create each docker manually but I'm confused about the docker compose part and the network config. Thanks

Wait 5 mins then refresh the web.

Delete the docker and use the new template

Is the Auto-unpack feature working for you?

Regarding 6.8.3 What are these? If I have an existing VM how do I enable this? just by seletcion CPU mode: host passthrough? (I always have had it like this) webgui: VMs: enable cpu cache passthrough; AMD + multithreaded This just mean that a new category has been added or are there new security options for dockers? where are they? webgiu: dockerMan: Security enhancement

Considering that memtest86+ is abandomware It coudl be interesting to migrate to memtest86, it has ECC, UEFI, Multicore support, etc. https://www.memtest86.com/

Thanks a lot, now it works, leave this as a reference for others Extra parameters: --cap-add SYS_PTRACE --security-opt apparmor=unconfined --log-opt max-size=200m --log-opt max-file=1 https://hub.docker.com/r/netdata/netdata https://github.com/netdata/netdata/tree/master/packaging/docker https://docs.netdata.cloud/packaging/docker/