Jump to content

JorgeB

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    67,696

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    708

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JorgeB

  1. JorgeB
    The problem was likely the reboot, if you had unassigned the device pre-reboot it wouldn't have been wiped, but after rebooting it would be considered a pool disk and wiped after unassigning it, though if I'm correct it's still a bug.
  2. JorgeB
    Mover deletes files from a pool after they are successfully moved to the array, if for example the power fails in the middle of moving a file, the one on the array will be incomplete/corrupt and the one on the pool will be fine, you'd them need to deleted the one on the array as the mover won't overwrite existing files.
  3. JorgeB
    btrfs is detecting data corruption, possibly the result of above specs RAM speed like mentioned by ChatNoir or just bad RAM.
  4. JorgeB
    Replace cables on disk5, start array and post new diags.
  5. JorgeB
    Looks more like a power/connection problem, replace/swap cables/slot and if the emulate disk is mounting and contents look correct rebuild on top.
  6. JorgeB
    All the disks are dropping and reconnecting with different identifiers, this could be an enclosure/hba/power/connection problem, if it happens only on writes I would start with power/enclosure.
  7. JorgeB
    Looks like a xfs_repair problem, update to v6.10-rc1 since it includes newer xfs-progs and re-run xfs_repair.
  8. JorgeB
    It's logged as a disk problem, and SMART is showing some issues, you should run an extended SMART test.
  9. JorgeB
    Elements in grown defect list: 60 This is never a good sign, it should be 0, but latest extended test pass, you can run another one to confirm. As for disk20, it failed the SMART test, so it should be replaced.
  10. JorgeB
    If it's a hardware issue it's not easy to diagnose remotely, basically you'd need to smart swapping some parts around.
  11. JorgeB
    Yes, Unraid supports multiple btrfs pools, they can be made of flash devices or disks. If you need to transfer large amounts of data quickly would need an adequate capacity pool, like mentioned pools can also use disks, not just SSDs.
  12. JorgeB
    This is usually a flash drive problem, try a different one.
  13. JorgeB
    Gigabit is limited to around 115MB/s, so those look normal. With 10GbE and when transferring to Unraid, the first few GBs are cached to RAM, them you're limited to device write speed, and with an Unraid array that means the speed of a single disk, same for read speed, so those also look normal, for better speeds you'd need to use pools or SSD/NVMe devices.
  14. JorgeB
    That's all you need to do.
  15. JorgeB
    You should, diags are still important, if nothing else to see what hardware you're using, BTW I didn't mention before, since if the server has been running like that for a long time it's likely not the problem, but running Ryzen with RAM above officially supported speeds is known to in some cases cause stability issues or even data corruption, see here for more info.
  16. JorgeB
    SMART looks fine, run an extended SMART test.
  17. JorgeB
    Marvell controllers are not recommend, they have various kwonn issues, you can try disabling iommu if you don't need it to see if it helps.
  18. JorgeB
    Not only there's filesystem corruption, there's also a missing device: Data Data Metadata System System Id Path single RAID1 RAID1 single RAID1 Unallocated -- --------- --------- --------- --------- -------- -------- ----------- 2 /dev/sdg1 2.00GiB 341.00GiB 5.00GiB 32.00MiB 32.00MiB 117.70GiB 3 missing - 341.00GiB 5.00GiB - 32.00MiB -346.03GiB
  19. JorgeB
    Again nothing relevant logged before the crash.
  20. JorgeB
    Sorry, can't really help since I never used the plugin, you can try posting in the existing plugin support thread.
  21. JorgeB
    You can use 1m cables, but it 0.5m is enough use those instead.
  22. JorgeB
    It's logged on SMART as a disk issue, you should run an extended SMART test.
  23. JorgeB
    NVMe devices don't support SMART tests, at least not generally.
  24. JorgeB
    Diags are after rebooting, so we can't see what happened, but the disk looks healthy, if the emulated disk is mounting and contents look correct replace/swap cables to rule those out and rebuild on top.
  25. JorgeB
    Yes, it's a large side fan on an ATX case, it provides airflow on the LSI, I prefer a large fan close to the controller versus a small fan on it. It is, I told you the same, just don't thing that 150C without fan and 85C fan are realistic numbers, they seem way too high.
×
×
  • Create New...