daniel.boone Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 My parity drive rebuild completed with no errors. Cksum match 100% for every file rebuilt from parity. The only question now is why did the parity swap/rebuild not work as intend? Quote Link to comment
Thornwood Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 When you did this was the parity drive still the biggest drive? I think this might be the problem but not sure. Quote Link to comment
molesza Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Installed this to two of my servers. First one upgraded from release 5 beta 12a. No problems there! Second machine upgraded from 4.7 and I get this screen when I start up Here is a screenshot of the disk status on 4.7 Seems it is recognising the drives in the correct places so why is it reporting that the disk is incorrect? Quote Link to comment
prostuff1 Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Installed this to two of my servers. First one upgraded from release 5 beta 12a. No problems there! Second machine upgraded from 4.7 and I get this screen when I start up Here is a screenshot of the disk status on 4.7 Seems it is recognising the drives in the correct places so why is it reporting that the disk is incorrect? The size is different, search in the general support forum for "HPA" Quote Link to comment
molesza Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Thanks. I have read up and see that HPA is a backup of bios on one of my disks. What do I need to do to fix this? So can I go into the bios of the machine and disable HPA and then start the array and allow it to rebuild the drive? Quote Link to comment
daniel.boone Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Today I had some parity disk errors. This seemed to have happened after I fixed the owners and permissions on about 50% of my arrray. Some of the folders still had root as owners while new folders had nobody. I just chown nobody:users and then chmod 770. Idea was to get things close so I could re-run the utility script. After that I added a couple new service accounts. Soon after that the parity drive red balled. I captured the log file and reboot. I rebooted and now my array thinks my parity drive has been replaced (blue ball). I understand I can tell it to trust the array but since I had errors I don't think that is best. I'm now thinking maybe my power supply can't keep up. It's a corsair 500w with a mix of 7200 and 5400 RPM drives. I've already ordered a 750 watt seasonic since I was planning to migrate to a norco in the future. syslog-2011-11-02.zip Quote Link to comment
Rastarize Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Upgraded and everything was running perfectly, but overnight two errors appeared: Nov 2 14:11:40 Tower kernel: sh[21343]: segfault at b6af9d53 ip b7675e1c sp bfe6c50c error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b7635000+15c000] (Errors) Nov 2 14:11:40 Tower kernel: mdcmd (52): spindown 0 (Routine) Nov 2 14:11:40 Tower kernel: hdparm[21344]: segfault at b7129693 ip b765be1c sp bff35950 error 4 in libc-2.11.1.so[b761b000+15c000] (Errors) Are these errors worth worrying about (I can post up the full syslog if preferred)? Quote Link to comment
burnaby_boy Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Since upgrading my server to 5.0-beta13, I've noticed that there can sometimes be a 20-30 second delay when I'm accessing the status page of the server in my web browser. With 4.7, when I clicked on the bookmark in Firefox I would immediately be taken to the page. Any ideas as to what might be causing the delay? I'm wondering if it might be the Realtek NIC on the motherboard, and have an Intel PRO/1000 GT PCI adapter on order to test. Anyway, I'd appreciate some guidance with this. Cheers Quote Link to comment
madburg Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 orange dot = there is data for this share on the cache drive. Cheers, always wondered what that was for! Has anyone tried the Supermicro AOC-USASLP-L8I with b13? I'm running b12, debating whether to upgrade. Do you need any special kind of switch for the link aggregation? I'm just running an unmanaged netgear gigabit. If its a cache share only it will be orange as well. Would be nice to see a different color for cache drive only share (yellow, purple?). Quote Link to comment
speeding_ant Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Since upgrading my server to 5.0-beta13, I've noticed that there can sometimes be a 20-30 second delay when I'm accessing the status page of the server in my web browser. With 4.7, when I clicked on the bookmark in Firefox I would immediately be taken to the page. Any ideas as to what might be causing the delay? I'm wondering if it might be the Realtek NIC on the motherboard, and have an Intel PRO/1000 GT PCI adapter on order to test. Anyway, I'd appreciate some guidance with this. (Syslog attached) Cheers Do you notice any drives spinning up? Quote Link to comment
burnaby_boy Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 No, the last time I logged in, all the drives were spun down. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 No, the last time I logged in, all the drives were spun down. I sometimes get that long delay and can hear drives spinning up one by one. When the page displays, I see that the drives are spun down but if I refresh the page, they're all show as spinning. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Ever since upgrading to b13, I've been getting one of these in my syslog every hour: Nov 2 23:06:01 NAS crond[1229]: ignoring /var/spool/cron/crontabs/root- (non-existent user) Quote Link to comment
aht961 Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Ever since upgrading to b13, I've been getting one of these in my syslog every hour: Nov 2 23:06:01 NAS crond[1229]: ignoring /var/spool/cron/crontabs/root- (non-existent user) Please check this Quote Link to comment
burnaby_boy Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 No, the last time I logged in, all the drives were spun down. I sometimes get that long delay and can hear drives spinning up one by one. When the page displays, I see that the drives are spun down but if I refresh the page, they're all show as spinning. I just accessed the server for the first time this morning and the status page came up immediately. All drives were spinning. So does attempting to access the status page in 5.0-beta13 cause certain drives to be spun up, thus causing the delay? This would be different behaviour from 4.7 where the page would load instantly no matter what the status of the drives. I am using a Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3P motherboard (HPA off), ultilizing all 8 onboard SATA connections, a Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 card and an Adaptec 1430SA card. Cheers Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 I just accessed the server for the first time this morning and the status page came up immediately. All drives were spinning. So does attempting to access the status page in 5.0-beta13 cause certain drives to be spun up, thus causing the delay? This would be different behaviour from 4.7 where the page would load instantly no matter what the status of the drives. I am using a Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3P motherboard (HPA off), ultilizing all 8 onboard SATA connections, a Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 card and an Adaptec 1430SA card. Cheers It is a different behavior that I've never experienced in 4.7 but have experienced intermediately after taking the dive with beta10. Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Ever since upgrading to b13, I've been getting one of these in my syslog every hour: Nov 2 23:06:01 NAS crond[1229]: ignoring /var/spool/cron/crontabs/root- (non-existent user) Please check this That page says to report it as a bug. So.... Quote Link to comment
numanuma Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Does simply replacing bzimage and bzroot update the netatalk? I'm guessing it does, but i just wanted to check first. Quote Link to comment
dgaschk Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Does simply replacing bzimage and bzroot update the netatalk? I'm guessing it does, but i just wanted to check first. Yes. As stated in the OP. Quote Link to comment
burnaby_boy Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 I just accessed the server for the first time this morning and the status page came up immediately. All drives were spinning. So does attempting to access the status page in 5.0-beta13 cause certain drives to be spun up, thus causing the delay? This would be different behaviour from 4.7 where the page would load instantly no matter what the status of the drives. I am using a Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3P motherboard (HPA off), ultilizing all 8 onboard SATA connections, a Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 card and an Adaptec 1430SA card. Cheers It is a different behavior that I've never experienced in 4.7 but have experienced intermediately after taking the dive with beta10. I added an Intel PRO/1000 GT PCI Ethernet adapter card to my server and disabled the onboard Realtek chip. What a difference! - the delay in accessing the unRaid status page is gone and the transfer times - both ways - seem to have improved. Quote Link to comment
madburg Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Realtek's certificate has been stolen and being used for malicious activity at the very least ("Duqu") Quote Link to comment
burnaby_boy Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 I added an Intel PRO/1000 GT PCI Ethernet adapter card to my server and disabled the onboard Realtek chip. What a difference! - the delay in accessing the unRaid status page is gone and the transfer times - both ways - seem to have improved. Spoke too soon - I tried to access the server this evening and there was a delay again. Initially most of the drives were shown as being spun down. I then refreshed the page and then it showed most of the drives as spinning - very peculiar. Cheers Quote Link to comment
generalz Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 I added an Intel PRO/1000 GT PCI Ethernet adapter card to my server and disabled the onboard Realtek chip. What a difference! - the delay in accessing the unRaid status page is gone and the transfer times - both ways - seem to have improved. Spoke too soon - I tried to access the server this evening and there was a delay again. Initially most of the drives were shown as being spun down. I then refreshed the page and then it showed most of the drives as spinning - very peculiar. (syslog attached) Cheers Mine does it to. despite what people are saying with certain cards it seems to be waking the drives up to get the temp or something when accessing the main page. Quote Link to comment
dgaschk Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 I added an Intel PRO/1000 GT PCI Ethernet adapter card to my server and disabled the onboard Realtek chip. What a difference! - the delay in accessing the unRaid status page is gone and the transfer times - both ways - seem to have improved. Spoke too soon - I tried to access the server this evening and there was a delay again. Initially most of the drives were shown as being spun down. I then refreshed the page and then it showed most of the drives as spinning - very peculiar. (syslog attached) Cheers Mine does it to. despite what people are saying with certain cards it seems to be waking the drives up to get the temp or something when accessing the main page. Are you using any add-ons? Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 The spin-ups on access happened to me with a stock beta installation. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.