jonp Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Considering you are comparing us to valve, I'll take that as a compliment. ;-) Quote Link to comment
JaY_III Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Considering you are comparing us to valve, I'll take that as a compliment. ;-) Never had a crash or any data loss. Nothing is actually broken in your current beta And you keep hinting and teasing of things to come. Quote Link to comment
jonp Posted November 9, 2014 Share Posted November 9, 2014 Considering you are comparing us to valve, I'll take that as a compliment. ;-) Never had a crash or any data loss. Nothing is actually broken in your current beta And you keep hinting and teasing of things to come. unHALFLIFE3? Quote Link to comment
JustinChase Posted November 9, 2014 Author Share Posted November 9, 2014 unHALFLIFE3? unLIFE ? Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted November 9, 2014 Share Posted November 9, 2014 What's the over-under with Thanksgiving as the timeline point? Quote Link to comment
JaY_III Posted November 9, 2014 Share Posted November 9, 2014 Considering you are comparing us to valve, I'll take that as a compliment. ;-) Never had a crash or any data loss. Nothing is actually broken in your current beta And you keep hinting and teasing of things to come. unHALFLIFE3? Well you can count to 3 and valve can't. So we do know something will come Quote Link to comment
MartinQ Posted November 9, 2014 Share Posted November 9, 2014 unHALFLIFE3? unLIFE ? UnLife3 CONFIRMED!!! Quote Link to comment
JustinChase Posted November 9, 2014 Author Share Posted November 9, 2014 UnLife3 CONFIRMED!!! Coming "soon" Quote Link to comment
Thornwood Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 I wonder if something went wrong? Quote Link to comment
jonp Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 We have made a ton of progress in the past week. I'll post a status update in the announcement forum later today with some details. Quote Link to comment
Manticore Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 We have made a ton of progress in the past week. I'll post a status update in the announcement forum later today with some details. Cant wait to see whats after being done. Roll on unElec. I retired my HTPC WAY too soon so I'm hoping its not going to be long more Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 We have made a ton of progress in the past week. I'll post a status update in the announcement forum later today with some details. That's what you said last week and the week before that... Quote Link to comment
reggierat Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Jonp has clearly been drinking Quote Link to comment
bkastner Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Maybe LT just works on Island Time and we just don't have our expectations adjusted accordingly http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=island%20time Quote Link to comment
JaY_III Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 Valve time boys. He clearly works on valve time https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Valve_Time Quote Link to comment
archedraft Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 I am pretty sure I read somewhere that LT is funded by the government as a social experiment... 7 years and counting! Quote Link to comment
WeeboTech Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 unRAID 6 Beta-Next update http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=36237.0 Quote Link to comment
jonp Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 unRAID 6 Beta-Next update http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=36237.0 Thanks weebo! Was about to cross post here as well, but saw you beat me to it! Quote Link to comment
meep Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 Having been around here a while, I'm resigned to the long wait cycle and dashed hopes of delivery. However, there's a snippet in those summary release notes that confirms one of the reasons I stick with unRAID; linux: added driver: SCSI_HPTIOP: support for HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx/4xxx controllers, per customer request. The ongoing willingness to add in seemingly minor tweaks like this for the benefit of a minority of customers is a real plus. This isn't my request, but I've benefited from this policy in the past and I just wanted to say thanks. Peter Quote Link to comment
DanielCoffey Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 With the new beta saying that mail notifications and similar will be included, does this deprecate some of the recommended plugins from the new server configuration guide (such as the plugins in "Install and Configure Mail and SSMTP")? Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 Having been around here a while, I'm resigned to the long wait cycle and dashed hopes of delivery. However, there's a snippet in those summary release notes that confirms one of the reasons I stick with unRAID; linux: added driver: SCSI_HPTIOP: support for HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx/4xxx controllers, per customer request. The ongoing willingness to add in seemingly minor tweaks like this for the benefit of a minority of customers is a real plus. This isn't my request, but I've benefited from this policy in the past and I just wanted to say thanks. Peter Right, but if they built the kernel with every storage driver available as a module then unraid would support the devices by default instead of requiring customers requesting it. I realize that would take up some space but that shouldn't add that much to the image size. Perhaps have modules available as a remounted subdir off the flash drive so it wouldn't increase the root image. Quote Link to comment
jonp Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 Having been around here a while, I'm resigned to the long wait cycle and dashed hopes of delivery. However, there's a snippet in those summary release notes that confirms one of the reasons I stick with unRAID; linux: added driver: SCSI_HPTIOP: support for HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx/4xxx controllers, per customer request. The ongoing willingness to add in seemingly minor tweaks like this for the benefit of a minority of customers is a real plus. This isn't my request, but I've benefited from this policy in the past and I just wanted to say thanks. Peter Right, but if they built the kernel with every storage driver available as a module then unraid would support the devices by default instead of requiring customers requesting it. I realize that would take up some space but that shouldn't add that much to the image size. Perhaps have modules available as a remounted subdir off the flash drive so it wouldn't increase the root image. Sometimes modules may conflict, creating issues instead of resolving them. Just throwing everything and the kitchen sink into our kernel as modules isn't a good idea. Just an FYI and not looking to get into a technical debate over this practice. Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 Having been around here a while, I'm resigned to the long wait cycle and dashed hopes of delivery. However, there's a snippet in those summary release notes that confirms one of the reasons I stick with unRAID; linux: added driver: SCSI_HPTIOP: support for HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx/4xxx controllers, per customer request. The ongoing willingness to add in seemingly minor tweaks like this for the benefit of a minority of customers is a real plus. This isn't my request, but I've benefited from this policy in the past and I just wanted to say thanks. Peter Right, but if they built the kernel with every storage driver available as a module then unraid would support the devices by default instead of requiring customers requesting it. I realize that would take up some space but that shouldn't add that much to the image size. Perhaps have modules available as a remounted subdir off the flash drive so it wouldn't increase the root image. Sometimes modules may conflict, creating issues instead of resolving them. Just throwing everything and the kitchen sink into our kernel as modules isn't a good idea. Just an FYI and not looking to get into a technical debate over this practice. Right, which is why I'd go with a real distro such as Centos / Redhat / Ubuntu that does all of this extensive testing for you. If they ship with the drivers built as modules on their base images then you know there's no troublesome conflicts. Quote Link to comment
jonp Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 Having been around here a while, I'm resigned to the long wait cycle and dashed hopes of delivery. However, there's a snippet in those summary release notes that confirms one of the reasons I stick with unRAID; linux: added driver: SCSI_HPTIOP: support for HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx/4xxx controllers, per customer request. The ongoing willingness to add in seemingly minor tweaks like this for the benefit of a minority of customers is a real plus. This isn't my request, but I've benefited from this policy in the past and I just wanted to say thanks. Peter Right, but if they built the kernel with every storage driver available as a module then unraid would support the devices by default instead of requiring customers requesting it. I realize that would take up some space but that shouldn't add that much to the image size. Perhaps have modules available as a remounted subdir off the flash drive so it wouldn't increase the root image. Sometimes modules may conflict, creating issues instead of resolving them. Just throwing everything and the kitchen sink into our kernel as modules isn't a good idea. Just an FYI and not looking to get into a technical debate over this practice. Right, which is why I'd go with a real distro such as Centos / Redhat / Ubuntu that does all of this extensive testing for you. If they ship with the drivers built as modules on their base images then you know there's no troublesome conflicts. Meh, that's your opinion. Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 Meh, that's your opinion. Yes it is. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.