February 15, 20233 yr After 10 minutes of waiting, it completed. It shows a stacktrace: Lucee 5.3.10.97 Error (application) Message Error invoking external process Stacktrace The Error Occurred in /var/www/OnRequestEnd.cfm: line 3 1: <!--- Reset all file permissions ---> 2: <cfexecute name="/bin/chmod" arguments="766 /var/www/SetPerms.sh" timeout="10" /> 3: <cfexecute name="/var/www/SetPerms.sh" timeout="0" /> 4: <!--- Dump all variables ---> 5: <CFSET StructClear(variables)> Java Stacktrace lucee.runtime.exp.ApplicationException: Error invoking external process at lucee.runtime.tag.Execute.doEndTag(Execute.java:266) at onrequestend_cfm$cf.call(/OnRequestEnd.cfm:3) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._doInclude(PageContextImpl.java:1056) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._doInclude(PageContextImpl.java:948) at lucee.runtime.listener.ClassicAppListener._onRequest(ClassicAppListener.java:84) at lucee.runtime.listener.MixedAppListener.onRequest(MixedAppListener.java:45) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl.execute(PageContextImpl.java:2493) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._execute(PageContextImpl.java:2478) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl.executeCFML(PageContextImpl.java:2449) at lucee.runtime.engine.Request.exe(Request.java:45) at lucee.runtime.engine.CFMLEngineImpl._service(CFMLEngineImpl.java:1216) at lucee.runtime.engine.CFMLEngineImpl.serviceCFML(CFMLEngineImpl.java:1162) at lucee.loader.engine.CFMLEngineWrapper.serviceCFML(CFMLEngineWrapper.java:97) at lucee.loader.servlet.CFMLServlet.service(CFMLServlet.java:51) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:764) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:227) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:53) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:189) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:197) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:97) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:541) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:135) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AbstractAccessLogValve.invoke(AbstractAccessLogValve.java:687) at org.apache.catalina.valves.RemoteIpValve.invoke(RemoteIpValve.java:769) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:78) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:360) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:399) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:65) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:890) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1789) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1191) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:659) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829) Timestamp 2/15/23 6:23:28 PM EST
February 16, 20233 yr just for anyone wondering about this, I tried running this on a ZFS pool i was testing. I think it can't get access, and no charts were showing up. Destroying the pool and then formatting with gpt etc allows me to test with this. I'm not sure if it's actually possible to test it with ZFS or alternatives to do so, but I was running on ubuntu to just test.
February 16, 20233 yr Author 6 hours ago, AshranPewter said: just for anyone wondering about this, I tried running this on a ZFS pool i was testing. I think it can't get access, and no charts were showing up. Destroying the pool and then formatting with gpt etc allows me to test with this. I'm not sure if it's actually possible to test it with ZFS or alternatives to do so, but I was running on ubuntu to just test. I haven't done any testing with ZFS yet. I'm currently focused on version 3 of the app but will look into adding support for it in the 2.x versions once a RC is released with ZFS support.
February 16, 20233 yr Author 21 hours ago, zeroframes said: Lucee 5.3.10.97 Error (application) Message Error invoking external process Stacktrace The Error Occurred in /var/www/OnRequestEnd.cfm: line 3 1: <!--- Reset all file permissions ---> 2: <cfexecute name="/bin/chmod" arguments="766 /var/www/SetPerms.sh" timeout="10" /> 3: <cfexecute name="/var/www/SetPerms.sh" timeout="0" /> 4: <!--- Dump all variables ---> 5: <CFSET StructClear(variables)> The SetPerms.sh script opens up all permissions on files DiskSpeed creates so you won't get access denied errors. What's interesting is that you get a timeout on it, it's set with timeout=0 which is non-blocking - kick it off in the background and keep on chugging along. Can you help me figure out which is the problem child? Click on the DiskSpeed icon and select "Console" Then enter in the following commands one at a time. They shouldn't take more than a few seconds each. chmod 766 /var/www/SetPerms.sh chmod -R u-x,go-rwx,go+u,ugo+X /tmp/DiskSpeed chmod -R u=rwx /tmp/DiskSpeed/*.sh chown -R nobody:users /tmp/DiskSpeed chmod -R u-x,go-rwx,go+u,ugo+X /tmp/DiskSpeedTmp chmod -R u=rwx /tmp/DiskSpeedTmp/*.sh chown -R nobody:users /tmp/DiskSpeedTmp The 3rd line may return no files or directory.
February 16, 20233 yr Ive recently discovered a huge performance issue on my server, and it seems like its was affecting this container more than any other. Im resolving that issue right now, and I'll let you know if if fixes DiskSpeed. Partity rebuild should be done tomorrow. Appreciate all the reponses!
February 19, 20233 yr Author On 2/16/2023 at 3:19 PM, zeroframes said: Ive recently discovered a huge performance issue on my server, and it seems like its was affecting this container more than any other. Im resolving that issue right now, and I'll let you know if if fixes DiskSpeed. Partity rebuild should be done tomorrow. Appreciate all the reponses! Any update?
February 20, 20233 yr I have a couple Intel Optane drives with XFS partitions on them as cache drives. During the initial scan it finds them and says there is 1 partition found on each. When you select them it says no mounted partition found and doesn't show the benchmark button.. Edited February 20, 20233 yr by Wynter
February 21, 20233 yr Author 13 hours ago, Wynter said: I have a couple Intel Optane drives with XFS partitions on them as cache drives. During the initial scan it finds them and says there is 1 partition found on each. When you select them it says no mounted partition found and doesn't show the benchmark button.. Having a partition and a mounted partition that DiskSpeed can see are two different things. Click on the FAQ link below the message for how to set it up. If you don't see the FAQ link, please update your DiskSpeed version.
February 22, 20233 yr @jbartlett Thank you for all your development and support. At some point DiskSpeed started giving me this error: "ApplicationException: Source file [/tmp/DiskSpeed/Instances/local/driveinfo/wd80emaz_83_h0a83_e4g2y34k_8tb/image.png] doesn't exist". Is this a permissions issue or something I can fix? Thanks! Scanning Hardware 23:25:50 Spinning up hard drives 23:26:00 Scanning system storage 23:26:00 Scanning USB Bus 23:26:00 Scanning hard drives 23:26:02 Scanning storage controllers 23:26:02 Scanning USB hubs & devices 23:26:02 Scanning motherboard resources 23:26:02 Fetching known drive vendors from the Hard Drive Database 23:26:02 Found controller 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family 6-port SATA Controller 1 [AHCI mode] 23:26:02 Found drive Western Digital WD80EMAZ Rev: 83.H0A83 Serial: (sdb), 1 partition 23:26:03 Found drive Western Digital WD80EMAZ Rev: 83.H0A83 Serial: (sdc), 1 partition 23:26:03 Found drive Western Digital WD80EMAZ Rev: 83.H0A83 Serial: (sdd), 1 partition 23:26:03 Found controller 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB xHCI 23:26:11 Found drive Generic Flash Disk Rev: 0 Serial: (sda), 1 partition 23:26:11 Found controller SAS3008 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-3 23:26:11 Found drive NETAPP X357_S163A3T8ATE Rev: 0 Serial: (sde), 1 partition 23:26:11 Found drive HGST H7280A525SUN8.0T Rev: 0 Serial: (sdf), 1 partition 23:26:11 Found drive HGST H7280A520SUN8.0T Rev: 0 Serial: (sdg), 1 partition 23:26:11 Found drive NETAPP X357_S163A3T8ATE Rev: 0 Serial: (sdh), 1 partition 23:26:11 Fetching Drive Platter Information 23:26:11 Checking Hard Drive Database for drives Lucee 5.3.10.97 Error (application) Message Source file [/tmp/DiskSpeed/Instances/local/driveinfo/wd80emaz_83_h0a83_e4g2y34k_8tb/image.png] doesn't exist Stacktrace The Error Occurred in /var/www/ScanControllers.cfm: line 2506 2504: <CFSET C=HW[Key].Ports[PortNo].Config> 2505: <CFIF FileExists("#RootDir#/images/inuse/#CurrInstance#/#C.SaveDir#.png") EQ "NO"> 2506: <cffile action="copy" source="#PersistDir#/driveinfo/#C.SaveDir#/image.png" destination="#RootDir#/images/inuse/#CurrInstance#/#C.SaveDir#.png"> 2507: </CFIF> 2508: <CFSET OutTextCSS=C.TextCSS> called from /var/www/ScanControllers.cfm: line 2424 2422: <!--- Eat any errors ---> 2423: </CFCATCH> 2424: </CFTRY> 2425: 2426: <!--- Post HW Scan ---> Java Stacktrace lucee.runtime.exp.ApplicationException: Source file [/tmp/DiskSpeed/Instances/local/driveinfo/wd80emaz_83_h0a83_e4g2y34k_8tb/image.png] doesn't exist at lucee.runtime.tag.FileTag.actionCopy(FileTag.java:566) at lucee.runtime.tag.FileTag.doStartTag(FileTag.java:424) at scancontrollers_cfm$cf.call_000168(/ScanControllers.cfm:2506) at scancontrollers_cfm$cf.call(/ScanControllers.cfm:2424) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._doInclude(PageContextImpl.java:1056) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._doInclude(PageContextImpl.java:948) at lucee.runtime.listener.ClassicAppListener._onRequest(ClassicAppListener.java:65) at lucee.runtime.listener.MixedAppListener.onRequest(MixedAppListener.java:45) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl.execute(PageContextImpl.java:2493) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._execute(PageContextImpl.java:2478) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl.executeCFML(PageContextImpl.java:2449) at lucee.runtime.engine.Request.exe(Request.java:45) at lucee.runtime.engine.CFMLEngineImpl._service(CFMLEngineImpl.java:1216) at lucee.runtime.engine.CFMLEngineImpl.serviceCFML(CFMLEngineImpl.java:1162) at lucee.loader.engine.CFMLEngineWrapper.serviceCFML(CFMLEngineWrapper.java:97) at lucee.loader.servlet.CFMLServlet.service(CFMLServlet.java:51) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:764) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:227) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:53) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:189) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:197) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:97) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:541) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:135) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AbstractAccessLogValve.invoke(AbstractAccessLogValve.java:687) at org.apache.catalina.valves.RemoteIpValve.invoke(RemoteIpValve.java:769) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:78) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:360) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:399) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:65) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:890) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1789) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1191) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:659) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829) Timestamp 2/21/23 11:26:11 PM EST
February 22, 20233 yr Author 1 hour ago, Kainhander said: @jbartlett Thank you for all your development and support. At some point DiskSpeed started giving me this error: "ApplicationException: Source file [/tmp/DiskSpeed/Instances/local/driveinfo/wd80emaz_83_h0a83_e4g2y34k_8tb/image.png] doesn't exist". Is this a permissions issue or something I can fix? Thanks! Please check your directory ./appdata/DiskSpeed/Instances/local/driveinfo/wd80emaz_83_h0a83_e4g2y34k_8tb for the existence of the file "image.png" and that you can open & view it. It sounds like something's funky with the directory or file with permissions. If you view it on the system, it should have rw/rw/rw permissions. The parent directory should have rwx/rwx/rwx. During the "Checking Hard Drive Database for drives", it downloads the drive's image if found on the HDDB (it does) and if it doesn't, it creates a generic placeholder image in that directory as "image.png". Then it copies that image to the www folder to be accessible to the web server. You can also safely delete the wd80emaz_83_h0a83_e4g2y34k_8tb directory and rescan.
February 22, 20233 yr 10 hours ago, jbartlett said: Please check your directory ./appdata/DiskSpeed/Instances/local/driveinfo/wd80emaz_83_h0a83_e4g2y34k_8tb for the existence of the file "image.png" and that you can open & view it. It sounds like something's funky with the directory or file with permissions. If you view it on the system, it should have rw/rw/rw permissions. The parent directory should have rwx/rwx/rwx. Yep, that was it. For some reason that directory was missing the image file. I just copied it from one of the other similar drive directories and it runs now. Thanks! # ls wd80emaz_83_h0a83_*/ wd80emaz_83_h0a83_1_8tb/: benchmark/ config.json image.png wd80emaz_83_h0a83_2_8tb/: config.json image.png wd80emaz_83_h0a83_3_8tb/: config.json # cp wd80emaz_83_h0a83_2_8tb/image.png wd80emaz_83_h0a83_3_8tb/ # ls wd80emaz_83_h0a83_*/ wd80emaz_83_h0a83_1_8tb/: benchmark/ config.json image.png wd80emaz_83_h0a83_2_8tb/: config.json image.png wd80emaz_83_h0a83_3_8tb/: config.json image.png
February 23, 20233 yr Author 8 hours ago, Kainhander said: Yep, that was it. For some reason that directory was missing the image file. I just copied it from one of the other similar drive directories and it runs now. Thanks! Thank you. I added logic to the next version to catch if the drive's image is missing and refetch it.
February 27, 20233 yr Hey Guys, Maybe I'm being obtuse but is there a way to benchmark USB mounted drives? 3 drives of my array are on external USB enclosures and would love to see what the throughput is compared to the SATA attached storage. Thanks,
February 27, 20233 yr Author 5 hours ago, machineglow said: Hey Guys, Maybe I'm being obtuse but is there a way to benchmark USB mounted drives? 3 drives of my array are on external USB enclosures and would love to see what the throughput is compared to the SATA attached storage. Thanks, Support for USB drives are part of version 3 of the application, currently in development.
February 28, 20233 yr 8 hours ago, jbartlett said: Support for USB drives are part of version 3 of the application, currently in development. Gotcha! thanks for developing the tool! Edited February 28, 20233 yr by machineglow
March 7, 20233 yr On 2/16/2023 at 2:24 PM, jbartlett said: Can you help me figure out which is the problem child? Click on the DiskSpeed icon and select "Console" Then enter in the following commands one at a time. They shouldn't take more than a few seconds each. chmod 766 /var/www/SetPerms.sh chmod -R u-x,go-rwx,go+u,ugo+X /tmp/DiskSpeed chmod -R u=rwx /tmp/DiskSpeed/*.sh chown -R nobody:users /tmp/DiskSpeed chmod -R u-x,go-rwx,go+u,ugo+X /tmp/DiskSpeedTmp chmod -R u=rwx /tmp/DiskSpeedTmp/*.sh chown -R nobody:users /tmp/DiskSpeedTmp The 3rd line may return no files or directory. I opened my Docker container and cat the SetPerms.sh file and there is a trailing command of 'sync' which is what my system was getting hung up on. I removed the line from the file and was able to run the benchmark without issue. Otherwise, I would get the same timeout as the other person was.
March 7, 20233 yr Author 1 hour ago, SpartanXXX said: I opened my Docker container and cat the SetPerms.sh file and there is a trailing command of 'sync' which is what my system was getting hung up on. I removed the line from the file and was able to run the benchmark without issue. Otherwise, I would get the same timeout as the other person was. Thanks for that, I'll try to get an update out soon to address this.
March 10, 20233 yr Author Version 2.10.4 pushed * Refetch drive image if missing/accidentally deleted by user * Remove sync command from permission opening script on docker mounted volume for local saved data
March 18, 20233 yr having trouble with this. i installed the docker and it hangs and eventually times out on the scan controllers page. here is the part of the error message that looked relevant without the entire stacktrace. Lucee 5.3.10.120 Error (application) Messagetimeout [90000 ms] expired while executing [/sbin/parted -m /dev/sds unit B print free] StacktraceThe Error Occurred in /var/www/ScanControllers.cfm: line 1964 1962: <CFFILE action="write" file="#PersistDir#/#exe()#_parted_#DriveID#_exec.txt" output="/sbin/parted -m /dev/#DriveID# unit B print free" addnewline="NO" mode="666"> 1963: <CFIF URL.Debug NEQ "FOOBAR"><cfmodule template="cf_flushfs.cfm"></CFIF> 1964: <cfexecute name="/sbin/parted" arguments="-m /dev/#DriveID# unit B print free" variable="PartInfo" timeout="90" /> 1965: <CFFILE action="write" file="#PersistDir#/#exe()#_parted_#DriveID#.txt" output="#PartInfo#" addnewline="NO" mode="666"> 1966: <CFSET TotalPartitions=0> called from /var/www/ScanControllers.cfm: line 1853 1851: </CFIF> 1852: </CFLOOP> 1853: </CFLOOP> 1854: 1855: <!--- Admin drive creation --->
March 20, 20233 yr Author Can you try manually running the command? Click on the DiskSpeed icon in the Unraid UI and select "Console". Then run the following: /sbin/parted -m /dev/sds unit B print free Also, what device is configured with id "sds"?
March 23, 20233 yr On 2/6/2023 at 2:41 AM, jbartlett said: It's not that there are no partitions, it's that no partitions are mounted in a way the app can see them. Did you set up a mapping in the DiskSpeed settings? More information is in the FAQ link shown. This worked for me! Thanks! ✅
March 23, 20233 yr Author @duelistjp - sorry, I didn't realize you were not tagged in my reply 2 posts above. Can you try manually running the command? Click on the DiskSpeed icon in the Unraid UI and select "Console". Then run the following: /sbin/parted -m /dev/sds unit B print free Also, what device is configured with id "sds"?
March 26, 20233 yr So i've just discovered this docker. With latest version installed it wouldn't see my cache drive, would see all other drives in my array though. I forced 2.10 and it recognised and benchmarked my cache drive. The write speeds seem slower than i would expect? Theyre accurate with what i see copying files to the cache drive over a 10gbit lan though
March 29, 20233 yr Author On 3/26/2023 at 3:34 AM, Phire21 said: So i've just discovered this docker. With latest version installed it wouldn't see my cache drive, would see all other drives in my array though. I forced 2.10 and it recognised and benchmarked my cache drive. The write speeds seem slower than i would expect? Theyre accurate with what i see copying files to the cache drive over a 10gbit lan though That version has a flawed benchmarking for SSD's which is why the speeds are low. You have to add a Docker mapping to the current version for the Docker application to benchmark any solid state drives. There should be a FAQ link on viewing SSD's which explains how.
March 31, 20233 yr When trying to benchmark my drives I get this warning: WARNING: You have less than 4 CPUs available (0 total). The Solid State benchmark requires 4 CPU threads in order to get an accurate benchmark. Solid State Benchmarking is not available. I'm on an 8700k, 6 cores 12 threads. I have Enable VMs set to 'No' in unraid since I don't run any VMs, although I did configured the BIOS virtualization for VMs and test to make sure everything is configured to work if I want to run any in the future. No other containers are running, no CPU pinning anywhere. I did try to pin 4, 5, and 6 CPUs to DiskSpeed but still get the warning and unable to benchmark SSDs.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.