bmartino1 Posted November 23, 2023 Share Posted November 23, 2023 Are we ready for a network upgrade and change to the next version? https://community.ui.com/releases/UniFi-Network-Application-8-0-7/7818b9df-4845-4c82-ba3c-1218e61010d4 Pete asking next stable tags version change or alpha test? 1 Quote Link to comment
PeteAsking Posted November 23, 2023 Author Share Posted November 23, 2023 7 minutes ago, bmartino1 said: Are we ready for a network upgrade and change to the next version? https://community.ui.com/releases/UniFi-Network-Application-8-0-7/7818b9df-4845-4c82-ba3c-1218e61010d4 Pete asking next stable tags version change or alpha test? Its being created but not ready yet 1 Quote Link to comment
PeteAsking Posted November 23, 2023 Author Share Posted November 23, 2023 The latest version has been pushed to the repository and the first post updated with instructions to upgrade. @bmartino1 @wgstarks 1 Quote Link to comment
wgstarks Posted November 23, 2023 Share Posted November 23, 2023 11 minutes ago, PeteAsking said: The latest version has been pushed to the repository and the first post updated with instructions to upgrade. @bmartino1 @wgstarks Upgraded without any problems. 1 Quote Link to comment
decibelio99 Posted November 23, 2023 Share Posted November 23, 2023 Updated to 8.0.7 without problems 1 Quote Link to comment
PeteAsking Posted November 23, 2023 Author Share Posted November 23, 2023 As upgrading functions as expected I am moving the project from aplha ---> beta 1 Quote Link to comment
bmartino1 Posted November 23, 2023 Share Posted November 23, 2023 (edited) What's the repository tag? or do I need to pull from the template on the community app store again? Stable: 11notes/unifi:8.0.7-unraid Old Stable: n/a - no old stable at this time. Old Old Stable: 11notes/unifi:7.5.187-unraid It's on the first post: Edited November 23, 2023 by bmartino1 answered own question. Quote Link to comment
PeteAsking Posted November 23, 2023 Author Share Posted November 23, 2023 Just now, bmartino1 said: What's the repository tag? or do I need to pull from the template on the community app store again? Please read page 1 and ask questions if you don’t understand. 1 Quote Link to comment
wgstarks Posted November 23, 2023 Share Posted November 23, 2023 3 minutes ago, PeteAsking said: Please read page 1 and ask questions if you don’t understand. Suggestion: Edit the first post and add links to GitHub and dockerhub right at the top. I know the link for tags is contained in the post but putting both links right at the top really improves findability. 1 Quote Link to comment
PeteAsking Posted November 23, 2023 Author Share Posted November 23, 2023 2 minutes ago, wgstarks said: Suggestion: Edit the first post and add links to GitHub and dockerhub right at the top. I know the link for tags is contained in the post but putting both links right at the top really improves findability. Ok I will try fix this tomorrow Quote Link to comment
ssjucrono Posted November 29, 2023 Share Posted November 29, 2023 upgrade went well! container is working great once I got my issues sorted out! 1 Quote Link to comment
PeteAsking Posted November 29, 2023 Author Share Posted November 29, 2023 On 11/23/2023 at 6:22 PM, wgstarks said: Suggestion: Edit the first post and add links to GitHub and dockerhub right at the top. I know the link for tags is contained in the post but putting both links right at the top really improves findability. This was done to the best of my ability. Quote Link to comment
wgstarks Posted November 29, 2023 Share Posted November 29, 2023 13 minutes ago, PeteAsking said: This was done to the best of my ability. At least they’ll be easy to link to in a reply even if nobody ever reads them.😆 1 Quote Link to comment
enJOyIT Posted December 1, 2023 Share Posted December 1, 2023 Can't wait to see this as delta/stable 🙂 1 Quote Link to comment
Qwenton Posted December 2, 2023 Share Posted December 2, 2023 Appreciate all the work you have done. Tried messing with the linuxserver docker using mangodb and it was a complete mess. This template was comparatively a breeze to setup and get started. Good work! I will be following. Is there anywhere I can support you guys and buy you a beer? Quote Link to comment
PeteAsking Posted December 2, 2023 Author Share Posted December 2, 2023 6 hours ago, Qwenton said: Appreciate all the work you have done. Tried messing with the linuxserver docker using mangodb and it was a complete mess. This template was comparatively a breeze to setup and get started. Good work! I will be following. Is there anywhere I can support you guys and buy you a beer? If you donate to a charity that supports a good cause like children in Ukraine or just any cause you feel strongly about or just even to Unicef or some other organisation then you have done more than 99.99% of people and everyone can raise a beer to you for your generosity. 1 Quote Link to comment
Hoopster Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 (edited) Just updated to this Unifi Network Controller container. Installed it and restored 8.0.7 backup file with no issues noted so far. Thank you. An all-in-one container is much preferred to the split docker container path LSIO has implemented. Now the biggest question is how long Ubiquiti will support self-hosted controllers without severely limiting them. They have taken the first step towards that with their latest hardware and controller releases. It looks like they are going to start favoring their own hardware and cloud controller solutions for some advanced features and not supporting them with self-hosted controllers. Now to wait for the new UXG-Lite to come back in stock at ui.com so I can replace my very old USG router/gateway. The new Unifi Express (built in network controller) is not an option because it supports a maximum of five connected Unifi devices (access points, switches, other Express units in a mesh configuration, etc.) and I currently am managing eight (plus USG) with this controller. NOTE: just learned the Unifi Express supports only four additional devices as the Express itself counts in the 5-device limit. Edited December 3, 2023 by Hoopster Quote Link to comment
PeteAsking Posted December 3, 2023 Author Share Posted December 3, 2023 27 minutes ago, Hoopster said: Now the biggest question is how long Ubiquiti will support self-hosted controllers without severely limiting them. They have taken the first step towards that with their latest hardware and controller releases. It looks like they are going to start favoring their own hardware and cloud controller solutions for some advanced features and not supporting them with self-hosted controllers. What features are missing? Personally would never change from opnsense to an inferior firewall so unclear what features are removed you are alluding to. Quote Link to comment
Hoopster Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 1 minute ago, PeteAsking said: What features are missing? Personally would never change from opnsense to an inferior firewall so unclear what features are removed you are alluding to. Unifi Teleport VPN and Site Magic for this round. This is the first time a Unifi self-hosted controller has not been equal to one running on Ubiquiti hardware or their cloud controller. "Teleport is a zero-configuration VPN that allows you to instantly connect to your UniFi network from a remote location. Users with a Next-Gen gateway or UniFi Cloud Gateway running UniFi OS can access it from Network Settings > Teleport & VPN." Here is a quote from a recent review of the UXG-Lite that expresses some concern for where this may be headed: It’s interesting these features are not supported on self-hosted UniFi Network application installs. It seems like an indication of where they are guiding their customers. The UniFi Network software has always been available for free, but this is the first time a feature line has been drawn between self-hosted and “officially” hosted. It’s possible that more features like this are added over time. Essentially, for a few of the newest and fanciest features, self-hosted controllers aren’t included. These limitations make some sense, but calling it out on the spec sheet makes it feel like a purposeful design choice and business decision. Maybe there is a technical challenge I’m not seeing, but it feels like a subtle way to encourage hardware sales. At best, it is disappointing. At worst, it’s a sign that self-hosted controllers are becoming second class citizens. 1 Quote Link to comment
PeteAsking Posted December 3, 2023 Author Share Posted December 3, 2023 (edited) Probably the vpn is established on the unifi router so understandable it would not exist if you dont have one. I believe you cant use floor plan in the wifiman app if you dont have a unifi router so maybe this isnt the first time anyway. I wouldnt worry all that much about it. They are gimmicky features anyhow. Edited December 3, 2023 by PeteAsking Quote Link to comment
Hoopster Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 1 minute ago, PeteAsking said: Probably the vpn is established on the unifi router so understandable it would not exist if you dont have one. I believe you cant use floor plan in the wifiman app if you dont have a unifi router so maybe this isnt the first time anyway. I wouldnt worry all that much about it. They are gimmicky features anyhow. Yep. The missing features on self-hosted controllers are of no concern to me now. I just hope it does not become a trend with things I do want/need. Quote Link to comment
PeteAsking Posted December 3, 2023 Author Share Posted December 3, 2023 3 minutes ago, Hoopster said: Yep. The missing features on self-hosted controllers are of no concern to me now. I just hope it does not become a trend with things I do want/need. If unifi go out their way to destroy their brand then the usual happens. Everyone just moves to another product when their devices eventually get too old and life goes on. We have seen this happen enough times to enough companies at this point to no longer need to worry. We know someone will eventually just make something better for free and screw the next big company over because we can and always will be able to. Thats why they resent us. Because we are just better than them. And we love it. 1 Quote Link to comment
Thunder7ga Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 This worked great. Transitioned from the soon-to-be unsupported "other" app, and had been trying to migrate to the mongo hosted version, and that was just a nightmare of frustration. Tried this docker this morning, and it just works. Thanks. 2 Quote Link to comment
Hoopster Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 5 hours ago, Thunder7ga said: Tried this docker this morning, and it just works. Thanks. Yes, @PeteAsking has done a great job putting together this container. No offense to him, but if he can make this all-in-one docker container which just works, why does LSIO feel they have to go the separate MongoDB route? I am certainly pleased that someone stepped in to save us from that. 1 Quote Link to comment
wgstarks Posted December 3, 2023 Share Posted December 3, 2023 18 minutes ago, Hoopster said: why does LSIO feel they have to go the separate MongoDB route? https://info.linuxserver.io/issues/2023-09-06-unifi-controller/ Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.