bonienl Posted January 30, 2014 Author Share Posted January 30, 2014 I just installed this on UnRAID 6 beta 2 last week. It works great and seems to really have extended what Simple Features used to offer. I do have a minor issue. I pulled down both packages to /boot/plugins and installed them, but after a reboot only the webgui is still installed. Took me a couple of times to figure out what was missing, but it was the Dynamix tab along the top. The plugins control package doesn't show up unless I install it again. Did I miss a step? You need to install Plugin Control in /boot/config/plugins Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Copy-n-paste instructions into putty worked like a charm. Now to see if I can break something! Quote Link to comment
meoge Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Copy-n-paste instructions into putty worked like a charm. Now to see if I can break something! Thanks. I apparently can't follow directions since that's what the first post said to do I've moved it to the correct folder and installed it. I'll reboot and test. Quote Link to comment
smdion Posted February 1, 2014 Share Posted February 1, 2014 EDIT: restart fixed issue Quote Link to comment
pyrater Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Please add the following options to the network settings page as they are missing. networkbridge and bridge name see network.cfg in 64bit beta3 Quote Link to comment
bonienl Posted February 3, 2014 Author Share Posted February 3, 2014 Please add the following options to the network settings page as they are missing. networkbridge and bridge name see network.cfg in 64bit beta3 Dynamix webGui 64-bit version 2.1.2 is available with the new network settings added. Use Plugin Control to update the existing webGUI version (no reboot required). Quote Link to comment
meoge Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 The update isn't available under plugin control for me. Is there something I need to do to force it to check for updates? Quote Link to comment
bonienl Posted February 3, 2014 Author Share Posted February 3, 2014 The update isn't available under plugin control for me. Is there something I need to do to force it to check for updates? Sorry, didn't update the version number on github, it is available now! Quote Link to comment
meoge Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Yep, it's there now. Thanks, Quote Link to comment
zottffssen Posted February 7, 2014 Share Posted February 7, 2014 Do you intend to integrate plugin control with the main package at some stage? I only use it for the update function and it feels slightly redundant to have a plugin just for that. I have also found a couple of bugs: - layout weirdness when clicking on any of the disks under 'Array Devices' - unable to change the description for a user Let me know if there is somewhere else you want these reported. Lastly, I've noticed that the settings page is no longer tabbed, was this by design? Quote Link to comment
bonienl Posted February 10, 2014 Author Share Posted February 10, 2014 Do you intend to integrate plugin control with the main package at some stage? I only use it for the update function and it feels slightly redundant to have a plugin just for that. It is offered as a separate plugin, expectation is that future development takes place for third party plugins. - layout weirdness when clicking on any of the disks under 'Array Devices' Can you give a screenshot of your observations? - unable to change the description for a user Yeah, this is a bug. It will be corrected in the next version. Lastly, I've noticed that the settings page is no longer tabbed, was this by design? This is indeed a design change, there is a new setting though, which allows choosing between the new looks and the original tabbed view. Quote Link to comment
dlandon Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 My email notifications are coming across without the from/to filled in. The email is attached and the body of the email says: [Return Code 550] sid: ULRP1n00J1FnHEN01 :: 5.6.0 Lone CR or LF in headers (see RFC2822 section 2.2) I had the email module configured from 5.0.5 and left it figuring that the file format would be the same. Should I start my email configuration from scratch to fix this, or is this a bug? Quote Link to comment
bonienl Posted February 20, 2014 Author Share Posted February 20, 2014 My email notifications are coming across without the from/to filled in. The email is attached and the body of the email says: [Return Code 550] sid: ULRP1n00J1FnHEN01 :: 5.6.0 Lone CR or LF in headers (see RFC2822 section 2.2) I had the email module configured from 5.0.5 and left it figuring that the file format would be the same. Should I start my email configuration from scratch to fix this, or is this a bug? Hmm... not sure why this is happening. The only difference is the 64-bit version of ssmtp. All the rest is the same, it should mean that no reconfiguration is required when moving 'up'. Quote Link to comment
dlandon Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 My email notifications are coming across without the from/to filled in. The email is attached and the body of the email says: [Return Code 550] sid: ULRP1n00J1FnHEN01 :: 5.6.0 Lone CR or LF in headers (see RFC2822 section 2.2) I had the email module configured from 5.0.5 and left it figuring that the file format would be the same. Should I start my email configuration from scratch to fix this, or is this a bug? Hmm... not sure why this is happening. The only difference is the 64-bit version of ssmtp. All the rest is the same, it should mean that no reconfiguration is required when moving 'up'. Let me do some troubleshooting. I did look at the configuration file and all looked good. Quote Link to comment
dlandon Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 My email notifications are coming across without the from/to filled in. The email is attached and the body of the email says: [Return Code 550] sid: ULRP1n00J1FnHEN01 :: 5.6.0 Lone CR or LF in headers (see RFC2822 section 2.2) I had the email module configured from 5.0.5 and left it figuring that the file format would be the same. Should I start my email configuration from scratch to fix this, or is this a bug? Hmm... not sure why this is happening. The only difference is the 64-bit version of ssmtp. All the rest is the same, it should mean that no reconfiguration is required when moving 'up'. Let me do some troubleshooting. I did look at the configuration file and all looked good. I deleted the configuration file and started over. It works now. There is one difference I see between the new and old configuration files. Old: UseTLSCert="NO" New: UseTLSCert="" EDIT: After a reboot, it is back to failing again. Quote Link to comment
dlandon Posted February 21, 2014 Share Posted February 21, 2014 My email notifications are coming across without the from/to filled in. The email is attached and the body of the email says: [Return Code 550] sid: ULRP1n00J1FnHEN01 :: 5.6.0 Lone CR or LF in headers (see RFC2822 section 2.2) I had the email module configured from 5.0.5 and left it figuring that the file format would be the same. Should I start my email configuration from scratch to fix this, or is this a bug? Hmm... not sure why this is happening. The only difference is the 64-bit version of ssmtp. All the rest is the same, it should mean that no reconfiguration is required when moving 'up'. Let me do some troubleshooting. I did look at the configuration file and all looked good. I deleted the configuration file and started over. It works now. There is one difference I see between the new and old configuration files. Old: UseTLSCert="NO" New: UseTLSCert="" EDIT: After a reboot, it is back to failing again. More information. After a re-boot email does not work properly. If I do 'etc/c.d/rc.emailnotify stop' and then '/etc/rc.d/rc.emailnotify start', the emails work properly. Boot up timing problem? Quote Link to comment
bonienl Posted February 22, 2014 Author Share Posted February 22, 2014 More information. After a re-boot email does not work properly. If I do 'etc/c.d/rc.emailnotify stop' and then '/etc/rc.d/rc.emailnotify start', the emails work properly. Boot up timing problem? There was a bug in the PLG file previously not reading the correct section of the stored settings which prevented a service start upon reboot. Can you download the PLG file again or if you want to check yourself, this is the updated section: create(){ tmp="/tmp/create.tmp" sed -n "/^\[$1\]/,/^\[/p" $cfg | grep -v '^\[' > $tmp while read line; do key=$(echo $line | cut -d'=' -f1) val=$(echo $line | cut -d'"' -f2) if [ $(expr index "$val" /) -eq 0 ]; then sed -i "s/^$key=.*/$key=$val/" $2 else sed -i "s:^$key=.*:$key=$val:" $2 fi done <$tmp rm -f $tmp } Quote Link to comment
dlandon Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 More information. After a re-boot email does not work properly. If I do 'etc/c.d/rc.emailnotify stop' and then '/etc/rc.d/rc.emailnotify start', the emails work properly. Boot up timing problem? There was a bug in the PLG file previously not reading the correct section of the stored settings which prevented a service start upon reboot. Can you download the PLG file again or if you want to check yourself, this is the updated section: create(){ tmp="/tmp/create.tmp" sed -n "/^\[$1\]/,/^\[/p" $cfg | grep -v '^\[' > $tmp while read line; do key=$(echo $line | cut -d'=' -f1) val=$(echo $line | cut -d'"' -f2) if [ $(expr index "$val" /) -eq 0 ]; then sed -i "s/^$key=.*/$key=$val/" $2 else sed -i "s:^$key=.*:$key=$val:" $2 fi done <$tmp rm -f $tmp } I made the change to the .plg and re-booted. I get three messages initially. One is with the error and the body says array not started. The second is with the error and the body is the normal status of the array. The last message is a normal email and it says the array is started and is OK. Messages after that are normal. Quote Link to comment
dlandon Posted February 24, 2014 Share Posted February 24, 2014 I really like the new dashboard. Puts everything together in one page for quick review. Very slick. One minor issue on memory. The dashboard shows total physical memory, not the memory assigned to unRAID like the stats page. Quote Link to comment
bonienl Posted February 25, 2014 Author Share Posted February 25, 2014 One minor issue on memory. The dashboard shows total physical memory, not the memory assigned to unRAID like the stats page. In a next version I can put both physical and virtual memory, thanks for the suggestion. Quote Link to comment
Kryspy Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Is there a way to change the disk active light colours? I ask this because I am confused to as why dark green is active and a brighter green which to me mean s active means inactive? Kryspy Quote Link to comment
DaleWilliams Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Is there a way to change the disk active light colours? I ask this because I am confused to as why dark green is active and a brighter green which to me mean s active means inactive? Kryspy Must be a display thing... On my monitor, the 'dark' green is a more saturated color and is clearly 'on'. the lighter green is less saturated in color and looks 'dimmer'. Quote Link to comment
Fuggin Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Is there a way to change the disk active light colours? I ask this because I am confused to as why dark green is active and a brighter green which to me mean s active means inactive? Kryspy Must be a display thing... On my monitor, the 'dark' green is a more saturated color and is clearly 'on'. the lighter green is less saturated in color and looks 'dimmer'. If anything, inactive drives should be greyed out instead of using 2 different shades of the same color. Quote Link to comment
Kryspy Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I actually like the blinking action in the default GUI. Kryspy Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.