Jump to content

JorgeB

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    67,092

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    703

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JorgeB

  1. JorgeB
    By using a different one, but controller would be last thing to try, cables and/or PSU are more likely, it can also be the backplane/expander.
  2. JorgeB
    You'll likely get "unmountable: unsupported partition layout" on all data disks, solution it to rebuild one disk at a time so Unraid recreates the partition, you can confirm by unassigning one disk and checking that the emulated disk mounts correctly before rebuilding on top.
  3. JorgeB
    Check/replace cables, can also be the PSU, you'll need to test one thing at a time to rule them out.
  4. JorgeB
    https://forums.unraid.net/topic/46802-faq-for-unraid-v6/?do=findComment&comment=537383
  5. JorgeB
    You should update both if an update is available. Same model/firmware will much likely have the same issues.
  6. JorgeB
    Run a long SMART test on both disks, but more likely a controller/connection/power problem
  7. JorgeB
    Ideally we'd want the diags before rebooting to see what happened, but the disabled disk looks fine and errors on two disks at the same time suggest more a connection/power issue, so check/replace cables and rebuild.
  8. JorgeB
    Cache files system is corrupt, best bet it's to reformat, if it keeps getting corrupt you might have an underlying hardware problem, also note that because of this bug cache pool is not redundant.
  9. JorgeB
    That's a giant badge!! I though they were the typical size.
  10. JorgeB
    It can, supports dual link. Then likely parity wasn't in sync.
  11. JorgeB
    Yes, like mentioned the only acceptable number of errors during memtest is 0.
  12. JorgeB
    If the array is started without a cache device Unraid "forgets" cache config, so now you just need to assign it back, note that if libvirt.img was also on cache there was a new one created on the array, since it's set to /mnt/user.
  13. JorgeB
    It appears so, so you likely have a bad dimm.
  14. JorgeB
    Still not acceptable, make sure RAM is not overclocked, it's known to cause issues with some Ryzen systems.
  15. JorgeB
    Try de tunables tester scrip, default tunables are not very good for larger arrays, also note that if you're using a single link between the HBA and the expander max speed will be around 90MB/s, usu dual link if possible. These usually mean parity is not in sync, unless you're getting disk errors, is this 1st parity check?
  16. JorgeB
    It's what I would try.
  17. JorgeB
    There's a constant problem with the HBA, make sure it's well seated, sufficiently cooled and not a fake Sep 22 05:45:07 Tower kernel: mpt3sas_cm0: fault_state(0x6004)!
  18. JorgeB
    https://forums.unraid.net/topic/59375-hp-proliant-workstation-unraid-information-thread/ Scroll down to the ACPI section.
  19. JorgeB
    Bios update might also help, if none of those work likely only a new board will.
  20. JorgeB
    You might be able to still copy the data normally form the pool, using Krusader or any other toll, if you can't then see the recovery options.
  21. JorgeB
    At that time there was an unclean shutdown detected: Aug 26 22:53:33 husky emhttpd: unclean shutdown detected Like mentioned this detection happens at boot time, it doesn't have anything to do with an aborted or not aborted parity check.
  22. JorgeB
    The same would happen with dual parity, but during a rebuild with single parity Unraid has no way of calculating missing data if there are errors on another disk, so some data on disk2 will be corrupt, unless by luck those sectors don't have data.
  23. JorgeB
    Yeah, this is the actual bullshit answer from Crucial support, it was posted by a FreeNAS user with the same problem on their forum: Which begs the question, if it's so normal why don't other Crucial models have this issue?
  24. JorgeB
    Cache filesystem is corrupt with a fatal problem, you'll need to backup data and re-format, some recovery options here if needed.
  25. JorgeB
    Yes, but parity sync will re-start from the beginning.
×
×
  • Create New...