October 5, 20169 yr I don't see what the problem is. Here's the explanation of why they should be the same when apps are communicating with each other http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=40937.msg488507#msg488507 Which is exactly what I tried to tell him, several times.
October 5, 20169 yr I have thanked you for your help multiple times. I didn't appreciate the elitism. Thanks for spending a LOT of free time making these containers and maintaining things. do as you wish
October 5, 20169 yr I have thanked you for your help multiple times. I didn't appreciate the elitism. Thanks for spending a LOT of free time making these containers and maintaining things. do as you wish It's not elitism.... I'm not dignifying that with any further response.
October 5, 20169 yr I suspect I ultimately will have the last laugh..... You're more likely to need help from me/linuxserver than the other way around... But at the end of the day that's your choice. The real irony is I'm one of the more helpful members on the board as are Squid and trurl, I don't get why you want to try and antagonise someone who ultimately has been trying to help you. It's not conducive to the board in general, doesn't create a good impression for someone who's fairly new to the community and trying to get things setup right and may well need more help in the future.
October 5, 20169 yr I suspect I ultimately will have the last laugh..... You're more likely to need help from me/linuxserver than the other way around... But at the end of the day that's your choice. The real irony is I'm one of the more helpful members on the board as are Squid and trurl, I don't get why you want to try and antagonise someone who ultimately has been trying to help you. It's not conducive to the board in general, doesn't create a good impression for someone who's fairly new to the community and trying to get things setup right and may well need more help in the future. Am i off ignore? lol.. no sense in typing an actual reply if i am.
October 5, 20169 yr I suspect I ultimately will have the last laugh..... You're more likely to need help from me/linuxserver than the other way around... But at the end of the day that's your choice. The real irony is I'm one of the more helpful members on the board as are Squid and trurl, I don't get why you want to try and antagonise someone who ultimately has been trying to help you. It's not conducive to the board in general, doesn't create a good impression for someone who's fairly new to the community and trying to get things setup right and may well need more help in the future. Am i off ignore? lol.. no sense in typing an actual reply if i am. @superderpbro While I appreciate your right to an opinion (however much I disagree with it - as well as your attitude to towards my friend who was just trying to help you) what I don't appreciate is you spamming the thread.. I (like many others) have this thread on "notify" so I can help those with issues (if it's in my ability to do so). Receiving that notification and taking the time to open up the thread to read / respond only to see 1 emoticon is ..... frustrating.
October 5, 20169 yr Receiving that notification and taking the time to open up the thread to read / respond only to see 1 emoticon is ..... frustrating. (Couldn't resist)
October 5, 20169 yr Receiving that notification and taking the time to open up the thread to read / respond only to see 1 emoticon is ..... frustrating. (Couldn't resist) ROFL! I suspect I ultimately will have the last laugh..... You're more likely to need help from me/linuxserver than the other way around... But at the end of the day that's your choice. The real irony is I'm one of the more helpful members on the board as are Squid and trurl, I don't get why you want to try and antagonise someone who ultimately has been trying to help you. It's not conducive to the board in general, doesn't create a good impression for someone who's fairly new to the community and trying to get things setup right and may well need more help in the future. Am i off ignore? lol.. no sense in typing an actual reply if i am. @superderpbro While I appreciate your right to an opinion (however much I disagree with it - as well as your attitude to towards my friend who was just trying to help you) what I don't appreciate is you spamming the thread.. I (like many others) have this thread on "notify" so I can help those with issues (if it's in my ability to do so). Receiving that notification and taking the time to open up the thread to read / respond only to see 1 emoticon is ..... frustrating. My apologys danioj. Hope this message wasn't 'spam'
October 5, 20169 yr Receiving that notification and taking the time to open up the thread to read / respond only to see 1 emoticon is ..... frustrating. (Couldn't resist) Where are the docker police when you need them?
October 5, 20169 yr Still on their way with the red jackets atop their horses.... Sent from my LG-H815 using Tapatalk
October 5, 20169 yr Where the hell do you find some of these cartoons from?! Sent from my LG-H815 using Tapatalk
October 24, 20169 yr Weirdo problem - all of a sudden everything downloading is being given the user/nobody permissions. What's the best way to correct this - is it in-app or in the docker config? Thanks! Not a weird problem at all. It's expected when you run as PUID 99 PGUID 100.
October 24, 20169 yr nobody:users is the default way to set files on Unraid. The readme links on the first post explain how to set them, but it sounds more to me an issue with the Windows Unraid smb interaction rather than a problem with how you have the container setup tbh. Sent from my LG-H815 using Tapatalk
October 24, 20169 yr nobody:groups is the default way to set files on Unraid. The readme links on the first post explain how to set them, but it sounds more to me an issue with the Windows Unraid smb interaction rather than a problem with how you have the container setup tbh. Sent from my LG-H815 using Tapatalk Ok I'll poke around with that a bit then. Thank you for the clarification. One other thing, have you checked the umask info on the first post?
November 6, 20169 yr Just out of interest, what kind of load average do people get unpacking downloads? I am trying to diagnose an issue because it seems like there is such a load on the file system other things are being held up.
November 6, 20169 yr Just out of interest, what kind of load average do people get unpacking downloads? I am trying to diagnose an issue because it seems like there is such a load on the file system other things are being held up. Never really paid any attention to the load average, but if you've got an issue with other apps being held up because of this, you should read this FAQ entry http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=40937.msg492111#msg492111
November 6, 20169 yr Another thing you can do is set NZBGet up so that it is downloading to cache but unpacking to an array disk. That way the reads and writes are on different devices.
November 9, 20169 yr Thanks Squid and Trurl. I ended up "fixing" it by pausing downloads whilst an unpack is happening, I think maybe the unpack plus load on my cache drive was causing a high load average due to IO wait. I am not 100% sure but thats ok it seems to be working.
November 13, 20169 yr I set up NZBGet some time ago on one news server. Now, I am trying to add another and when I try to save, I get the following "Could not save configuration in /config/nzbget.conf.........Please check file permissions". I've checked permissions, and all "appdata" shares show as Public. However, this brings me to another question! I seem to have two "appdata" folders. I have one at /mnt/cache/appdata and another at /mnt/user/appdata. The latter is a user share and is currently configured to be Cache-Only. Previously, I had it set to the rotating harddrive array. Which is the best method for the appdata folder....direct cache or the user cache?
November 13, 20169 yr However, this brings me to another question! I seem to have two "appdata" folders. I have one at /mnt/cache/appdata and another at /mnt/user/appdata. The latter is a user share and is currently configured to be Cache-Only. Previously, I had it set to the rotating harddrive array. Which is the best method for the appdata folder....direct cache or the user cache? /mnt/user/appdata encompasses /mnt/cache/appdata When setting the mapping on the template, either will work just fine as long as you are running 6.2+. For 6.1.x you need to use /mnt/cache/appdata My understanding is that lsio redoes the permissions on the appdata folders with every restart of the app, so you might have other issues happening. My be wise to post the docker's log, and the diagnostics to be safe.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.