Squid

Main, click on each disk and enter in the text for a spin-up group for that drive (anything you want eg: put it in the movies spin up group and also put the other drives in to the same movies spin up group.) No clue (and it's not in the help text) of how to make a drive part of multiple spinup groups like the setting implies.

@Mgutt @alturismo Odds on it's that the USB enclosure returns a single s/n and not 2 s/n's which throws everything in the OS for a bit of a loop since it's all designed (UD included) around unique serial numbers for the drives. Fairly common on USB enclosures.

Most people will leave core 0 (and it's associate hyperthread) for OS access. Beyond that, the cores are associated in pairs on the CPU pinning page, and you'd want to isolate the cores in the pairs for the best performance.

SMB is absolutely ideal for management on the same server. The interface (Explorer) every one already knows exactly how to use it, and the speed is identical to using Krusader / MC directly on the server (eg: for copying / moving files within the same server, the data never actually traverses the network, so you can quite easily hit the speeds of the drives and exceed the network line speed -> eg: copy files between my nvme's I can easily hit 700MB/s (7000 mbps) on a 1 gbps network. Moving between servers however, stuff will get routed through the 3rd party which does have some overhead.

Yes. Use the UD plugin to mount it, and point the image at it (or the folder if you're using a folder instead of an image)

You can easily use MC You just have the smb shares mounted via Unassigned Devices. That all being said, 6.10 will have a File Manager (available as a plugin) which will do this also. Personally, I prefer to use Windows.

Only if I can put your personal cell phone number as how to get help to resolve. There would be a metric ton of posts regarding that. But, if you can convince me that it's the proper way to set things up I'll add it in.

Out of curiosity, is there any difference between doing the update from the Docker Tab vs Apps, Installed Apps? The window methods are different between the two.

Did the restart fix it? Nothing really obvious in the logs relating to this...

OK. Now I'm starting to feel bad for not bothering to ever have set it.

If using the linux server flavour, select their Discord on the dropdown

This is a hardware issue, where your controllers pause ALL I/O waiting for the spinup to be completed, and nothing you can do about the pause itself (other than experimenting with other controllers / motherboards) The fail-safe solution is to set your drives to never spin down

@SpencerJ @zspearmint

The share is definitely empty. Any chance you or someone actually deleted it???

Kinda the same thing.

I would simply delete and then recreate the docker image file ( https://forums.unraid.net/topic/57181-docker-faq/#comment-564309 ), Recreate your proxynet network followed by Apps - Previous Apps and check off what you had installed.

Regardless of being a member of a spin up group, a drive could still spin down due to no activity, and if it has to spin back up to serve another stream you might have buffering on the original stream.

To avoid spinups causing buffering, you would place all drives into a single spin up group, so that when one spins up all of them do. Alternatively, you could also set the drives to never spin down.

Thanks. It thinks you've got 3 deprecated apps installed, but they're all referring to cAdvisor and I think I know why

actually, I just noticed that I've still got a debug line in there for my purposes that shouldn't have made it into the release. Can you give me the output of cat /tmp/blah

ok Thanks... Expect an update to CA tonight / tomorrow

I consider a duplicate to be any 2 apps referring to the exact same dockerhub repository. One or the other will get removed as there's no point in having them both in there to confuse users as to which to use since they're the same. Try going back into Apps and see if it's still showing up now. (If it is, try Apps again in a few more minutes -> you do have to reload the apps tab. You can't simply stay in place)

In that particular case, it's blacklisted because it is an exact duplicate of another template already (and still in) CA which means that it's no big deal Let me play around with that scenario, as I never considered that anyone would ever have a blacklisted template actually installed. But, there's other complications too -> CA never lets you install / reinstall a blacklisted app, so on previous apps it would never give you the option to reinstall it if need be.

Doesn't matter. On a cache-prefer / cache-only system share it winds up on the cache drive anyways. Just disabling, deleting, and re-enabling uses the same path as before