January 26, 20197 yr 21 minutes ago, rbmatt1s said: yep, maybe the container size button in Unraid is wrong? Doubt it. If Sab has a limit log size setting, then its for it's own "logging" internal for whatever reason. The container size log entry is what docker keeps track of. What you need to do is this https://forums.unraid.net/topic/57181-real-docker-faq/#comment-564326 Just make sure you read the post, as it's not completely obvious how things work depending upon your unRaid version. Edited January 26, 20197 yr by Squid
January 26, 20197 yr 14 minutes ago, Squid said: Doubt it. If Sab has a limit log size setting, then its for it's own "logging" internal for whatever reason. The container size log entry is what docker keeps track of. What you need to do is this https://forums.unraid.net/topic/57181-real-docker-faq/#comment-564326 Just make sure you read the post, as it's not completely obvious how things work depending upon your unRaid version. I added the extra param and that fixed everything. thanks Mr. Squid.
January 26, 20197 yr Mr. Squid is my father. I'm SquidSquid, I am your father *heavy breathing* Sent from my EML-L29 using Tapatalk
January 26, 20197 yr 1 minute ago, binhex said: *heavy breathing* I really, really, really hope the heavy breathing is a Vader reference, and not the usual day to day usage that most people associate heavy breathing with.
January 26, 20197 yr I really, really, really hope the heavy breathing is a Vader reference, and not the usual day to day usage that most people associate heavy breathing with.Hehe I will leave it up to you to decide which [emoji39]Sent from my EML-L29 using Tapatalk
January 27, 20197 yr 9 hours ago, Squid said: I really, really, really hope the heavy breathing is a Vader reference, and not the usual day to day usage that most people associate heavy breathing with. He didn't say "I'm your daddy" so I'll go with Vader
February 6, 20197 yr Hey I recently upgraded my ISP connection from 250 to 500 mbit, but i am still seeing download speeds of 25-27 MB/s. I have done a speedtest on the server and its speed is 500/500 and i also did an clean install of sabnzbd on another windows machine and there i got 65 MB/S, so its clearly not internal network or my usenet provider. I have also checked the CPU usage during downloads on my server and its around 10-20%, so that shouldn´t be the bottleneck. Any ideas on what might help?
February 6, 20197 yr 51 minutes ago, fc0712 said: Hey I recently upgraded my ISP connection from 250 to 500 mbit, but i am still seeing download speeds of 25-27 MB/s. I have done a speedtest on the server and its speed is 500/500 and i also did an clean install of sabnzbd on another windows machine and there i got 65 MB/S, so its clearly not internal network or my usenet provider. I have also checked the CPU usage during downloads on my server and its around 10-20%, so that shouldn´t be the bottleneck. Any ideas on what might help? Where is your download folder?
February 6, 20197 yr 5 hours ago, trurl said: Where is your download folder? Its on the cache drive SSD. I have the following Sab performance stats System performance (Pystone) 112422 Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-6100… Download folder speed 319 MB/s (/downloads/incomplete) Complete folder speed 298.1 MB/s (/downloads/complete) So that shouldn't be the bottleneck
February 8, 20197 yr On 12/17/2018 at 12:54 PM, Coolsaber57 said: Do you have your Downloads folder in a Share on the array? Or did you map directly to a cache drive (that's that it looks like to me). I do, but that shouldn't be an issue right? Why is Sabnzbd reporting the array free space wrong?
February 10, 20197 yr On 2/7/2019 at 12:03 AM, fc0712 said: Its on the cache drive SSD. I have the following Sab performance stats System performance (Pystone) 112422 Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-6100… Download folder speed 319 MB/s (/downloads/incomplete) Complete folder speed 298.1 MB/s (/downloads/complete) So that shouldn't be the bottleneck Any ideas? Whenever I try to restart the SABNZBD docker the speed increases to 60-63 MB/s, but then it returns back to 25-30 MB\s after some time. Any ideas what could be the issue then?
February 23, 20197 yr I am using the docker for a long time already. It is working very well, thanks for the development. There are two issues that I never bothered with, but they indicate that I can improve how to set things up: Context: Docker installed on an NVME cache disk. Isolated 4 CPU cores to the Unraid and all dockers and have at least 16Gb of ram assigned to it. Complete, incomplete and wanted folders are mapped to the array. Config path is mapped to the cache disk (next to docker). My two issues are as follows: 1) Unpacking files is taking a very long time period. Much longer compared to when I had it running inside a Windows VM (on NVME). I thought that this may be caused by the array just being slower than nvme, but starting to ask myself whether there is some other reason as it is really slow. Also, it seems to be even slower once several downloaded files queue up (show "waiting"). I am thinking what role ram or CPU may play? Or potentially the size of the docker image? Not sure anything is happening inside the docker image? 2) Download speed can be "spotty". It sometimes goes from 3mb/s to 0.3mb/s and then back to 3mb/s. I always thought this is just how it is due to bandwidth changes. Not sure it was the same when I still used it in Windows. But curious whether this could also be docker related?
February 23, 20197 yr 1 hour ago, steve1977 said: Complete, incomplete and wanted folders are mapped to the array. 1 hour ago, steve1977 said: 1) Unpacking files is taking a very long time period. Much longer compared to when I had it running inside a Windows VM (on NVME). Of course. Writes to the array are always going to be slower than writes to a non-protected device. By and large everyone uses a cache-only share for downloads.
February 23, 20197 yr Got it. Could this also explain download speeds or has any advantage? If not, I am not sure whether the advantage of faster unpacking outweighs the need for more space requirements on the cache disk. My cache disk is a rather small NVME disk.
February 23, 20197 yr It probably would explain it since it's downloading while its unpacking, Even a small old hard drive mounted via Unassigned Devices and used for the downloads share would help huge.
February 23, 20197 yr Not enough space for an extra disk, but I can try moving the complete/incomplete/wanted folders to the NVME cache disk. Radarr is moving things to the array anyways after unpacking, so this may be sufficient to speed up and still contain the space. The other idea would be to use my second NVME disk (UD), but it's holding my VMs and sabnzbd activity may slow down the VM. Edited February 23, 20197 yr by steve1977
February 23, 20197 yr Would it be sufficient to move "incomplete" to the cache and keep "complete" on the array? Edited February 23, 20197 yr by steve1977
February 23, 20197 yr 9 hours ago, Squid said: It probably would explain it since it's downloading while its unpacking, Even a small old hard drive mounted via Unassigned Devices and used for the downloads share would help huge. Ok, I went ahead and moved everything docker-related from cache/array to my second NVME, which is a UD. All has been successfully moved. "Fix common problems" reported that I should switch the docker mounts from "RW" to "RW slave", which I did. Sabnzbd docker seems to work, but shows "Cannot create backup file for /config/sabnzbd.ini.bak" everytime I start/restart the docker. Any thoughts?
February 23, 20197 yr Hey guys, Got an issue, my SabNZB doesn't show the size of my Cache drive, it gives another size which i'm not sure what it is referring too?
February 23, 20197 yr 3 minutes ago, Greygoose said: Hey guys, Got an issue, my SabNZB doesn't show the size of my Cache drive, it gives another size which i'm not sure what it is referring too? This would depend on your container volume mappings and the settings you have within the application itself. You would have to provide that information for us to have any idea.
February 23, 20197 yr 39 minutes ago, Squid said: And the share's settings Yes, that would sort of be the Ultimate Cause. Might even get a clue where those numbers come from just by Computing the User Shares.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.