June 7, 20206 yr 8 hours ago, ridge said: Yeah it failed for me, both changing the old installation, and creating a brand new one after removing the orphan image when that failed. Error message was: Error response from daemon: Get https://registry.gitlab.com/v2/: x509: certificate is valid for CN_DNSBL, not registry.gitlab.com The CN_DNSBL (DNS Blacklist) looks like it might be coming from firewall blocker or DNS blackhole filter. Are you perhaps running such software, or going through a connection or ISP that is?
June 7, 20206 yr I do not know if this is related to this: but i am getting that in the log when starting Deemix docker: [s6-init] making user provided files available at /var/run/s6/etc...exited 0. [s6-init] ensuring user provided files have correct perms...exited 0. [fix-attrs.d] applying ownership & permissions fixes... [fix-attrs.d] done. [cont-init.d] executing container initialization scripts... [cont-init.d] 10-adduser: executing... usermod: no changes ------------------------------------- _ () | | ___ _ __ | | / __| | | / \ | | \__ \ | | | () | |_| |___/ |_| \__/ Brought to you by linuxserver.io We gratefully accept donations at: https://www.linuxserver.io/donate/ ------------------------------------- GID/UID ------------------------------------- User uid: 99 User gid: 100 ------------------------------------- [cont-init.d] 10-adduser: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 20-download: executing... [cont-init.d] Downloading and unpacking [cont-init.d] First start, cloning repo Cloning into 'deemix'... fatal: unable to access 'https://notabug.org/RemixDev/deemix-pyweb.git/': The requested URL returned error: 502 touch: cannot touch '/deemix/updated': No such file or directory [cont-init.d] 20-download: exited 1. [cont-init.d] 30-config: executing... usermod: no changes [cont-init.d] Setting permissions this may take some time [cont-init.d] 30-config: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 40-install: executing... [cont-init.d] Using ARL token from environment variable [cont-init.d] 40-install: exited 0. [cont-init.d] done. [services.d] starting services ./run: line 3: cd: /deemix: No such file or directory [services.d] Starting with ARL [services.d] done. python3: can't open file '/deemix/server.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory ./run: line 3: cd: /deemix: No such file or directory [services.d] Starting with ARL python3: can't open file '/deemix/server.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory ./run: line 3: cd: /deemix: No such file or directory Edited June 7, 20206 yr by Opawesome
June 7, 20206 yr 15 hours ago, Roxedus said: I just spun up a new instance of deemix and it went smooth. I also updated the template with the new repo, should be live soon. I dont know how it will treat old installations, @Squid should add a deprecating warning, telling people to use registry.gitlab.com/bockiii/deemix-docker instead of bocki/deemix I tested it just updating my old docker, only editing the Repository to registry.gitlab.com/bockiii/deemix-docker and clicked Apply. It updated, and is running now. It took a couple of stops and starts though because notabug.org, where deemix-webui is hosted, is currently under a DDoS attack. If you get this message in the logs, then it's most likely because of the DDoS attack: [cont-init.d] First start, cloning repo Cloning into 'deemix'... fatal: unable to access 'https://notabug.org/RemixDev/deemix-pyweb.git/': The requested URL returned error: 504 When it starts up correctly, it's normal to see this in the log (at least, for me it is normal, it runs and I can access it:): Starting server at http://0.0.0.0:9666 * Serving Flask app "server" (lazy loading) * Environment: production WARNING: This is a development server. Do not use it in a production deployment. Use a production WSGI server instead. * Debug mode: off
June 7, 20206 yr The docker has indeed managed to connect to https://notabug.org/RemixDev/deemix-pyweb.git now and starts. I have one question though regarding permissions. It seems that the Deemix docker creates files with permissions set as 644. Is there any way to change the settings so that the docker creates files with permissions set to 666 instead ? I tried adding a UMASK variable set to 0000 in the docker config but it did not fix the issue. Many thanks, OP Edited June 7, 20206 yr by Opawesome
June 7, 20206 yr Author 10 hours ago, Opawesome said: is there any way to change the settings so that the docker creates files with permissions set to 666 instead ? I asked the developer of the container to use a base that implements umask, i will update you on any development on my request
June 8, 20206 yr 13 hours ago, Roxedus said: I asked the developer of the container to use a base that implements umask, i will update you on any development on my request Thank you very much. I feel much obliged. Best, OP
June 8, 20206 yr I updated to the new repository the other day but started noticing that it was showing up as "not available" in the status column of the docker list. It still launches the webui fine and i can run searches and complete downloads. I'm just not sure why it's not available. I imagine this means I am no longer able to get any sort of update?
June 9, 20206 yr 15 hours ago, DontWorryScro said: I updated to the new repository the other day but started noticing that it was showing up as "not available" in the status column of the docker list. It still launches the webui fine and i can run searches and complete downloads. I'm just not sure why it's not available. I imagine this means I am no longer able to get any sort of update? Same for me. Did you get this sorted?
June 10, 20206 yr On 6/8/2020 at 10:50 PM, DontWorryScro said: I updated to the new repository the other day but started noticing that it was showing up as "not available" in the status column of the docker list. It still launches the webui fine and i can run searches and complete downloads. I'm just not sure why it's not available. I imagine this means I am no longer able to get any sort of update? I had the same issue. I removed the image and pull it back. Now the "not available icon" is gone and replaces by the regular "force update / up to date" button / message. Edited June 10, 20206 yr by Opawesome
June 10, 20206 yr Author From my experience it goes back to the "not available" state when the auoupdater runs, doing a force update after enabling advanced view, shows it as up-to-date. This applies for all the images i use thats not from dockerhub
June 12, 20206 yr Hey guys. The latest Deemix docker seems to be broken. I noticed the port in the config still says 9666 but the documentation mentions 6595. Regardless of what I put in the configuration, I am unable to connect. Removing and adding the container doesn't seem to fix it.
June 12, 20206 yr 9 hours ago, jserio said: Hey guys. The latest Deemix docker seems to be broken. I noticed the port in the config still says 9666 but the documentation mentions 6595. Regardless of what I put in the configuration, I am unable to connect. Removing and adding the container doesn't seem to fix it. In the template add a new port 6595. You will also need to change the port for the webui (visible when you enable advanced). If it still does not work try a force update. remember it will take some time to install the software again (you can check to log to see the progress)/.
June 12, 20206 yr 7 hours ago, TheIstar said: In the template add a new port 6595. You will also need to change the port for the webui (visible when you enable advanced). If it still does not work try a force update. remember it will take some time to install the software again (you can check to log to see the progress)/. I finally got the app to update and remove 'not available' tag. I've tried several different ports including 6595/WebUI with no luck. Whenever I attempt to hit the UI it times out. Regardless of UI port I get this in my log.
June 15, 20206 yr On 6/12/2020 at 9:22 PM, dtctechs said: I finally got the app to update and remove 'not available' tag. I've tried several different ports including 6595/WebUI with no luck. Whenever I attempt to hit the UI it times out. Regardless of UI port I get this in my log. Did you change it here? :
June 17, 20206 yr On 6/15/2020 at 4:20 AM, TheIstar said: Did you change it here? : I did but apparently I fat-fingered the address. Everything is working properly, thank you. Edited June 17, 20206 yr by dtctechs
June 21, 20206 yr Any way I could get some help installing/configuing bw_plex. I don't understand what I need to do to get it up and running. I have the ip set to http://192.168.0.3:32400 (as that's my unraids server) I have the Media path set to my Plex Media Library Parent folder (/mnt/user/MediaPlex). And I grabbed the Plex Token from my Preferences.xml for my PMS (the PlexOnlineToken). Every time I start up the docker, it just shuts down almost instantly. Here's what I pull from the log. 2020-06-20 23:55:34,984 :: bw_plex :: INFO :: __init__.py:168 :: Using bw_plex version 0.1.1.dev89+g98269f7.d20200524 2020-06-20 23:55:34,985 :: bw_plex :: INFO :: __init__.py:169 :: default folder set to /config 2020-06-20 23:55:35,544 :: bw_plex :: INFO :: plex.py:1390 :: Added signal handler. 2020-06-20 23:55:35,546 :: bw_plex :: DEBUG :: misc.py:572 :: Getting hashtable 2020-06-20 23:55:35,609 :: bw_plex :: INFO :: misc.py:658 :: Loading existing files in db 2020-06-20 23:55:37,970 :: bw_plex :: DEBUG :: misc.py:587 :: Files in the hashtable Traceback (most recent call last): File "/app/bw_plex/bin/bw_plex", line 11, in <module> sys.exit(fake_main()) File "/app/bw_plex/lib/python3.6/site-packages/bw_plex/cli.py", line 24, in fake_main real_main() File "/app/bw_plex/lib/python3.6/site-packages/bw_plex/plex.py", line 1401, in real_main File "/app/bw_plex/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 829, in __call__ return self.main(*args, **kwargs) File "/app/bw_plex/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 782, in main rv = self.invoke(ctx) File "/app/bw_plex/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1259, in invoke return _process_result(sub_ctx.command.invoke(sub_ctx)) File "/app/bw_plex/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1066, in invoke return ctx.invoke(self.callback, **ctx.params) File "/app/bw_plex/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 610, in invoke return callback(*args, **kwargs) File "/app/bw_plex/lib/python3.6/site-packages/bw_plex/plex.py", line 1306, in watch click.echo('Watching for media on %s' % PMS.friendlyName) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'friendlyName' Am I missing something? Please help. Thanks!
June 23, 20206 yr I have the draw.io docker running. And when I attempt to open an image from google drive, I am asked to authorize the app. When I do, I get the following error.
June 23, 20206 yr 1 hour ago, mattekure said: I have the draw.io docker running. And when I attempt to open an image from google drive, I am asked to authorize the app. When I do, I get the following error. https://github.com/jgraph/drawio/issues/142#issuecomment-441024184 Try that. If it doesn't work, create an issue on their github.
June 24, 20206 yr I'm trying to get the PASTA plugin up and running but I have no idea what to put for the "WebUI" section. There is zero info on github or instructions with the docker container for what needs to go there.
June 24, 20206 yr Author 4 hours ago, ramblinreck47 said: "WebUI" section That is already filled, the webserver runs on port 80 inside the container, map any port of your choosing, and it should work without you changing anything.
June 24, 20206 yr 11 hours ago, Roxedus said: That is already filled, the webserver runs on port 80 inside the container, map any port of your choosing, and it should work without you changing anything. I came here for this same question, it doesn't have a default value and won't let you save the container config without it.
June 24, 20206 yr Author I came here for this same question, it doesn't have a default value and won't let you save the container config without it.It's left empty for you to decide the port that should be exposed to the host, since port 80 is normally used by unraid itself.
June 24, 20206 yr 1 minute ago, Roxedus said: It's left empty for you to decide the port that should be exposed to the host, since port 80 is normally used by unraid itself. Ah ok, could be useful to add that explanation on the template as it wasn't clear (to at least 2 users) what was expected there. Or maybe set a default port and the user can change it if they like?
June 24, 20206 yr Author We have atleast 15 templates that are set up like this, and this is the first time i have heard it is being a "problem"
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.