JoergHH

Snapshots for VMs: Better to perform in running mode (online) or stopped mode (offline)?

I have the code 43 error in the Device Manager. However, I can't change the BIOS setting because the option in question is grayed out. Does anyone have an idea how I can fix this?

Not yet. But I still do. I was hoping that someone would present me with a short version of the config. 😉

@SimonF Thanks so far for the RPI and Unraid part. Anyone who can write me something about the Plex config?

I would like to connect a DVB-C USB stick plugged to a Raspberry Pi to the Plex Docker on the Unraid server to use Live TV & DVR from Plex directly. Can this work and if so, how?

Hmmm, mal "Tools-->Docker Safe New Perms" drüberjagen?

I do not need the WebGUI. How do I get to it via VNC?

I don't really care. You are the programmer. You decide for yourself.

Suggestion for an upcoming version: Full info just like the output of 'zpool list': NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CKPOINT EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT This will also save the shell call.

All right. Don't worry, I can wait, especially since I'm going to recreate the pool with a different ashift value in the future anyway, as described above.

@JorgeB Are you sure you are in the right thread? I don't see any connection between your problem and the ZFS-Companion plugin discussed here.

Never mind. I have already found out myself that SSDs under ZFS "lie" to you about block size. See https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/6373 I will rebuild the pool soon but then with ashift=12. And the pool is actually not really "unhealthy", but rather only unfavorably configured, because it runs error-free. I would appreciate if the plugin in such cases displays the pool as "healthy" but with a warning or even better info. Otherwise, it seems as if you have to intervene, which is not absolutely necessary.

root@server:~# zpool status -x pool: SSD state: ONLINE status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block size. Expect reduced performance. action: Replace affected devices with devices that support the configured block size, or migrate data to a properly configured pool. scan: scrub repaired 0B in 00:02:14 with 0 errors on Wed Apr 14 16:23:24 2021 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM SSD ONLINE 0 0 0 sdi ONLINE 0 0 0 block size: 512B configured, 4096B native ata-INTENSO_270E0782016C00812123 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors root@server:~# root@server:~# zpool list NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CKPOINT EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT SSD 349G 47.9G 301G - - 19% 13% 1.00x ONLINE - root@server:~#

Plugin shows pool status as "unhealthy". On the shell I'v got: root@server:~# zpool status -v pool: SSD state: ONLINE status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block size. Expect reduced performance. action: Replace affected devices with devices that support the configured block size, or migrate data to a properly configured pool. scan: scrub repaired 0B in 00:02:14 with 0 errors on Wed Apr 14 16:23:24 2021 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM SSD ONLINE 0 0 0 sdi ONLINE 0 0 0 block size: 512B configured, 4096B native ata-INTENSO_270E0782016C00812123 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors root@server:~# Any ideas how to fix the status message to become the pool healthy (without data loosing, of course)?

Das sagt erst einmal gar nichts aus. Diese Log-Meldungen habe bzw. hatte ich auch immer, der Matrix lief trotzdem. Was zeigt denn der Zugriff auf die WebGUI unter http://[UNRAID-IP]:8008/_matrix/static/ ? Poste mal Deine komplette homeserver.yaml Leider bin ich derzeit nicht mehr sooo im Matrix-Thema, da ich mich noch mit meinem Unraid-Umzug beschäftige. Daher kann es meinerseits mit einer Antwort immer einige Zeit dauern.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.icecoldapps.synchronizeultimate

Ich nutze und empfehle Jottacloud. Ist mit € 7,50/monatlich für Unlimited Space preislich sehr moderat. Duplicati unterstützt Jottacloud native und die Upload-Geschwindigkeit bei meinem VDSL 100 über 1&1 ist akzeptabel.

Ich verzichte bei meinem neuen Unraid Testsystem 6.9.0(-RC) komplett auf Cache und nutze stattdessen die SSDs mittels ZFS für Docker und VMs. Damit sind dann Snapshots möglich, allerdings nur über die Shell bzw. über Scripts.

Vielleicht überprüfst Du erst mal, ob die SSD nicht einfach nur fehlerhaft im System integriert und selbst eigentlich okay ist. Daher würde ich zunächst die SSD an einen anderen SATA-Port am Mainboard anschließen die SSD an eine andere Stromversorgung anschließen andere Kabel als bisher für die o. g. Punkte verwenden. Dabei immer schön der Reihe nach vorgehen, d. h. erstmal eine Maßnahme durchführen, das Gesamtsystem einige Zeit (Tage?) laufen lassen und gucken, ob das Problem erneut auftritt.

Moin. Für mich sieht es so aus als ob Deine Kingston SSD einen Hau weg hat. (Errors on /dev/ssd1) Ich würde die mal tauschen. Gruß aus Hamburg, JoergHH

No, it doesn't matter what I put in the field "Number of backups to keep:". It doesn't make any difference. The problem is the field formatting. By the way, it is probably not a browser problem. I have tried different ones, always with the same negative result. Edit: Fun fact on the side. The field only accepts values outside the range between 1 and 6.

Hi! I have the following problem with the plugin: The "Number of days to keep backups:" field accepts no numeric entries except 0 (zero). The field "Number of backups to keep:" is already set to default = '0' (zero).

Excuse the stupid question, but what is the advantage of NUT over the internal Unraid 6.x UPS Settings?

After the update to Unraid 6.6.4 scheduled backups won't start anymore. Any idea how to fix this or how to check where the problem is?

Hi everyone. Does anyone have an idea how to make the VNC Web Browser accessible from outside via LetsEncrypt? All my attempts so far have failed. Regards from Hamburg/Germany, JoergHH