TRusselo Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 is this what i think it is? I was just looking at buying a unifi dream machine for network management and NVR... Is this docker plus a unifi-video docker the same thing? for free? Or what are the differences? been running my unraid server for couple years with a windows VM and blue iris for NVR, using my ISP modem for management, considered pfsense but never pulled the trigger. Quote Link to comment
Hoopster Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 41 minutes ago, TRusselo said: I was just looking at buying a unifi dream machine for network management The Unifi Dream Machine (UDM) has an integrated controller. It cannot be adopted into this stand alone controller. The Unifi controller is for managing gateway devices/routers, switches and access points in the Unifi family, but, not the UDM. Unifi Video and Unifi Protect are two different NVR software implementations. The software is used for managing cameras, video doorbells, etc. As far as I know there is no docker implementation yet of Unifi Protect software. "Old" hardware can still be managed on Protect. However, I don't think the latest generation hardware designed for Protect can be managed with Unifi Video software. Ubiquiti makes things very hard to understand and keep straight sometimes. Quote Link to comment
Deejayzett Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Hi Any news about update for this? 6.0.45 is out... Andy Quote Link to comment
Spladge Posted February 5, 2021 Share Posted February 5, 2021 (edited) Anybody else updated this recently and not seeing any of their devices or networks any more? EDIT: Default site reverted to an older empty site and selection menu moved - all still there Edited February 5, 2021 by Spladge Quote Link to comment
sota Posted March 1, 2021 Share Posted March 1, 2021 can I lock this container to an older version, 5.14.23, in the same way as linuxserver.is build can be? namely, change repository field to: brettm357/unifi-controller:5.14.23-ls73 or something equivalent? Quote Link to comment
JCarlson Posted March 13, 2021 Share Posted March 13, 2021 Did Brett stop development of this Docker? On 6.1.61 and haven't seen any updates. Quote Link to comment
Caennanu Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 hear hear, wondering same as JCarlson. Current download offers 6.2.25. But this docker hasn't been updated in a couple months. Any idea when and if we can expect the next update? Quote Link to comment
brettm357 Posted June 10, 2021 Author Share Posted June 10, 2021 Updated to 6.2.26 Quote Link to comment
Caennanu Posted June 15, 2021 Share Posted June 15, 2021 On 6/10/2021 at 5:41 AM, brettm357 said: Updated to 6.2.26 Is that a Beta release? can't find this on the download page? Quote Link to comment
officeboy Posted June 18, 2021 Share Posted June 18, 2021 (edited) Updated yesterday and the server died overnight. WiredTigerLogs filled up 1.8 TB of space, any ideas? *Wiped out the logs, and fired the container back up. 4.5gb of logs in under 5 min. I guess I need to just wipe it. Is there an internal location I can steal a config file from? ** syslog shows errors started at Jun 18 00:00:36, seems like a job that would be trying to run? Edited June 18, 2021 by officeboy new info. Quote Link to comment
JamieW Posted September 28, 2021 Share Posted September 28, 2021 Is this still being updated? no updates since June ? Quote Link to comment
brettm357 Posted September 28, 2021 Author Share Posted September 28, 2021 35 minutes ago, JamieW said: Is this still being updated? no updates since June ? Wow time flies - Will update on the weekend Quote Link to comment
JamieW Posted September 28, 2021 Share Posted September 28, 2021 Cheers Brett 🙂 Quote Link to comment
JamieW Posted October 9, 2021 Share Posted October 9, 2021 Hi @brettm357, Are you still going to update this as you mentioned? Quote Link to comment
brettm357 Posted October 11, 2021 Author Share Posted October 11, 2021 On 10/9/2021 at 12:10 PM, JamieW said: Hi @brettm357, Are you still going to update this as you mentioned? Got a problem at the moment cannot seem to manually trigger new build - will advise Quote Link to comment
d0difant Posted October 23, 2021 Share Posted October 23, 2021 On 10/11/2021 at 5:14 AM, brettm357 said: Got a problem at the moment cannot seem to manually trigger new build - will advise What is the reason? Is there a possibility to help you? Quote Link to comment
Geiri Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 Just wondering if we can expect an update, long time since lase update. Please advise. 1 Quote Link to comment
Geiri Posted December 6, 2021 Share Posted December 6, 2021 Do you know if one could manually update the container without using unraid updater? Quote Link to comment
lance-tek Posted December 9, 2021 Share Posted December 9, 2021 On 12/6/2021 at 4:23 PM, Geiri said: Do you know if one could manually update the container without using unraid updater? My question too! I can't get the manual "update" to happen under the maintenance section like I can on my windows VM. I just started using unRaid and was hoping to use the unRaid docker to handle this piece so I can decommission the windows stuff. But my version that I'm currently running is 6.4.54 and I can't restore that backup to the older version. So, though I like the idea, this is currently useless to me without being able to update the unifi controller version in the docker. Quote Link to comment
g0nz0 Posted December 14, 2021 Share Posted December 14, 2021 Will we likely see an update to this container soon so that the log4j vulnerability is patched out? Needs controller version 6.5.54 or above to no longer be vulnerable. Quote Link to comment
Guido Posted December 17, 2021 Share Posted December 17, 2021 @brettm357Any updates? It was already quite some time ago that you commented on this. So far I didn't have an issue with it, but now with the Log4J vulnerability it is rather important to have this patched as soon as possible. If you can't get it working, is there any way we can help out? I can locally build the image using your setup, so your code by itself is working great. If you don't want the help, is it oke if I use your code to create a "new" docker image that will be receiving updates? I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but no updates is not really a great situation at the moment. I hope you won't be offended by my proposal. Quote Link to comment
brettm357 Posted December 20, 2021 Author Share Posted December 20, 2021 On 12/18/2021 at 5:49 AM, Guido said: @brettm357Any updates? It was already quite some time ago that you commented on this. So far I didn't have an issue with it, but now with the Log4J vulnerability it is rather important to have this patched as soon as possible. If you can't get it working, is there any way we can help out? I can locally build the image using your setup, so your code by itself is working great. If you don't want the help, is it oke if I use your code to create a "new" docker image that will be receiving updates? I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but no updates is not really a great situation at the moment. I hope you won't be offended by my proposal. Hi- Would love the help - I did this for a bit of fun to be honest but now when i try to build new image Dockerhub is requesting i start paying for a plan Quote Link to comment
RiDDiX Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 7 minutes ago, brettm357 said: Hi- Would love the help - I did this for a bit of fun to be honest but now when i try to build new image Dockerhub is requesting i start paying for a plan You could try to build within ghcr.io (github). Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 Or deprecate it and advise to switch to LSIO container? Quote Link to comment
sota Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 the switch is pretty painless as well. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.