ChatNoir

I do, they work well. But I can't tell if they are shielded or not since I don't want to cut them up to see what's what.

Hi, if this drive is still under warranty, I would return it. SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGS VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate POSR-- 083 064 044 - 204116384 3 Spin_Up_Time PO---- 094 094 000 - 0 4 Start_Stop_Count -O--CK 100 100 020 - 5 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct PO--CK 100 100 010 - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate POSR-- 070 060 045 - 10295492 9 Power_On_Hours -O--CK 100 100 000 - 184 10 Spin_Retry_Count PO--C- 100 100 097 - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count -O--CK 100 100 020 - 2 18 Head_Health PO-R-- 100 100 050 - 0 187 Reported_Uncorrect -O--CK 099 099 000 - 1 188 Command_Timeout -O--CK 100 100 000 - 0 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel -O---K 069 061 040 - 31 (Min/Max 23/38) 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count -O--CK 100 100 000 - 0 193 Load_Cycle_Count -O--CK 100 100 000 - 11 194 Temperature_Celsius -O---K 031 040 000 - 31 (0 23 0 0 0) 197 Current_Pending_Sector -O--C- 100 100 000 - 8 198 Offline_Uncorrectable ----C- 100 100 000 - 8 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count -OSRCK 200 200 000 - 0 200 Pressure_Limit PO---K 100 100 001 - 0 240 Head_Flying_Hours ------ 100 253 000 - 172h+47m+15.533s 241 Total_LBAs_Written ------ 100 253 000 - 21725192802 242 Total_LBAs_Read ------ 100 253 000 - 14256207962 Those errors on IDs 187, 197 and 198 are not good on a drive with only 184 hours ON. Even worse, the SMART tests are failed. SMART Extended Self-test Log Version: 1 (1 sectors) Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Extended offline Completed: read failure 90% 184 7160440696 # 2 Extended offline Completed: read failure 90% 184 7160440696

Hi, I am using an IcyDock FatCage MB155SP-B and it works pretty well. Never tried any other so I cannot compare.

This might help : https://unraid.net/services

I would say to try to contact support. But since there is a 30 days free trial + 2x 15 days extensions, I am not sure that there is a refund program. My opinion only, check with limetech.

Nice video from Art of Server on how to find the various roms, bios, firmwares on the Broadcom website.

Hi, I am not 100% sure to understand your question. If you want to remove tiles from the Dashboard, you should : 1. unlock the tiles 2. then close the tiles you do not need (you can take the opportunity to move tiles to suit your needs) 3. optionally, I would advise to lock the dashboard again (so it is back to green) If I misunderstood, please clarify your question.

Je pense que tu n'as pas redirigé le bon port à un moment. Parce que je doute que le Connect autorise n'importe qui a accéder à la partie administration de ton serveur. C'est la raison d'être de ce plugin, un soucis aussi évident aurait déjà été découvert depuis le temps.

Je crois que quand tu es sur ton réseau local, ça doit marcher comme si tu utilisais l'adresse IP. Après, je n'utilise pas cette fonction de Connect, donc je ne peux pas t'aider (ça ne marchait pas si mon ancienne freebox, pas réessayé sur la nouvelle). En tout cas, je confirme que je n'ai pas accès de l'extérieur

Hi @blue8lucian, you should start here : Note that Expanders are not controllers and are only working similarly as a network switch. You would need to connect it to a SAS controler. As for the SATA card, it's hard to judge without a link, but more than 4 SATA connectors on a single PCIe lane generally means one or several port multiplers and that is not recommended. More details in the thread above.

Bonjour, je ne sais pas si tu as trouvé un solution. Ce n'est pas très clair pour moi ce qui te pose problème. Soucis de transcoding HW sous Plex ? De ton CPU ou GPU ?

Bonjour, Je pense que c'est possible mais il faut peut-être une brique logicielle pour faire le routage de ce qui est destiné au serveur ou à ton desktop.

Not sure you can have a better opinion than JorgeB on disk controllers in those forums.

Plenty of tests and comparison of those units on Servethehome (both website et Youtube channel).

Sorry, somehow I missed that. Have you checked your disklog ? It might show something. Your diagnostics might also provide some information. Someone else can perhaps chime in.

What version of Unraid are you using ? I still had a occasionnal issues with 6.12.x but since 6.12.4 it seems to be OK. My old drives do spin down properly even after 1.5 months of up time where before it was working for a time and then it stopped. In my case, I did nothing in particular to 'fix it', it was probably kernel drivers issues that were fixed in one of the last update. But similar symptoms do not always mean the same root cause.

You have way more 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate ---R-- 195 195 000 - 2691 and the SMART test also failed # 1 Extended offline Completed: read failure 10% 59101 11293517728 The disk is clearly dying. You should replace.

In you situation, I would definitely replace the drive. ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGS VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate POSR-K 184 098 051 - 621 3 Spin_Up_Time POS--K 189 186 021 - 9516 4 Start_Stop_Count -O--CK 100 100 000 - 649 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct PO--CK 199 199 140 - 32 7 Seek_Error_Rate -OSR-K 100 253 000 - 0 9 Power_On_Hours -O--CK 020 020 000 - 59088 10 Spin_Retry_Count -O--CK 100 100 000 - 0 11 Calibration_Retry_Count -O--CK 100 100 000 - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count -O--CK 100 100 000 - 602 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count -O--CK 200 200 000 - 532 193 Load_Cycle_Count -O--CK 185 185 000 - 47430 194 Temperature_Celsius -O---K 105 096 000 - 47 196 Reallocated_Event_Count -O--CK 172 172 000 - 28 197 Current_Pending_Sector -O--CK 200 200 000 - 4 198 Offline_Uncorrectable ----CK 100 253 000 - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count -O--CK 200 200 000 - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate ---R-- 200 200 000 - 286 Attributes 1 / 5 / 197 / 200 are generally bad news. A few units show sign of a problem to keep an eye on. You are far past the 'few units'. Also, your Extended SMART tests were working but not good either. SMART Extended Self-test Log Version: 1 (1 sectors) Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 59088 - # 2 Short offline Completed without error 00% 59088 - # 3 Short offline Completed without error 00% 57822 - # 4 Short offline Completed without error 00% 57423 - # 5 Extended offline Completed: read failure 10% 50781 11287473616 # 6 Short offline Completed without error 00% 50657 - # 7 Extended offline Completed: read failure 10% 50480 11291383248 # 8 Short offline Completed without error 00% 50353 - # 9 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 46847 - #10 Extended offline Aborted by host 40% 46835 - #11 Short offline Completed without error 00% 46828 - #12 Short offline Completed without error 00% 46827 - #13 Extended offline Aborted by host 90% 46827 - #14 Short offline Completed without error 00% 46827 - #15 Short offline Completed without error 00% 15647 - #16 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 15539 - #17 Short offline Completed without error 00% 15479 - #18 Short offline Completed without error 00% 15335 - Emphasis on Completed: read failure (and the first one was ~9000 power on hours ago). The system should have warnings about those errors on the Dashboard. Now I wonder about the status of your other drives. If you want someone to have a look at your other drives, you should post your diagnostics.

That's by design. If you want support for an existing app, post on the dedicated support thread. If you want to create a support thread for a new app, post it there and ask to have it moved to the appropriate sub-forum.

New hardware would require a newer kernel, so things would have to change, be maintained, etc. And with time features from a more advanced branch would have to be integrated (because users would complain).

contact support

Just to be clear, the initial topic was the lack of GUID on some flashdrive (or ones that are not actually unique). If your flashdrive works, no need to worry too much as long as you have a good backup strategy for your flashdrive.

@cobolstinks when it seems too good to be true ... it often is. From the description its a ASM1064 SATA controller (4 ports on a x1 PCIe) and the 4 SATA connections are then splitted using 3 JMB575 port multipliers. Ports multipliers are a generally not recommended as it would reduce available bandwidth for each device, especially for parity checks and simultaneous data access.* It might be acceptable for very specific use cases but definitely not for most users. You should check this thread :

It would depend on the WC system you use, but I would consider that a WC system has more components thus more single points of failure than a simple fan and that it makes it reliable as a whole. One fan can fail let's say it's 90% reliable on a given period of time. If you have one fan on your WC, at least two tubes, 4 connection points, one pump, one rad (I will not consider a reservoir that might be integrated with another component, same thing for the waterblock). I'll be optimistic and say that all of them have a 95% reliability on the same period of time. I am pretty sure that's overall not as reliable as a single fan. And if it fails, you then have no cooling at all on the chip rather that less cooling with the base heatsink + a fan somewhere (attached to it or on the case). From my point of view, it's not something that I would try on a server that can run 24/7. Especially considering the higher cost, the lack of performance increase and that there is probably no sensor on the board that you can easy read and receive and alert from.

Why ? (It's a genuine question.) I get it for a modern CPU or GPU that would have better performance with better cooling, For simpler chip like a disk controller or NIC, etc. there are no benefit. Good enough is actually good enough. Often the bolt-on fan is not even required if there is enough airflow in the general area of the heatsink. If it's for a fun project, sure. But it will be more complicated, more expensive, less reliable.