Everything posted by BRiT
-
unraid-tunables-tester.sh - A New Utility to Optimize unRAID md_* Tunables
Started a test run today, looking forward to sharing the results when done.
-
unraid-tunables-tester.sh - A New Utility to Optimize unRAID md_* Tunables
It could be run through a "screen" session so only the server needs to be active the entire time.
-
unraid-tunables-tester.sh - A New Utility to Optimize unRAID md_* Tunables
From 6.7.2, shows it in /usr/sbin/lswh, and /var/log/packages/ shows lshw-B.02.17-x86_64-r2588-1_SBo_LT so it seems like it's a Limetech package. lshw -version unknown the latest version is B.02.18
-
[Resolved] Accidentally deleted /dev/ files
Reboot or power cycle. Nearly all those are in ram, should be recreated on next start.
-
Drive write speeds really slow (SOLVED)
You should likely get your own topic thread since many users are less likely to post in threads already marked as SOLVED.
-
Need: info on how to install custom docker from github.
Navigate to the Docker page, a direct link if your unraid server is named Tower would be -- http://Tower/Docker
-
unRAID 6 NerdPack - CLI tools (iftop, iotop, screen, kbd, etc.)
Look into User Scripts addons. It's easier to manage your own items via that plugin.
-
[Plug-In] Community Applications
Happens using Win10 OS with Edge using Chrome Engine Dev branch too. Nothing else running on my desktop, so it's not cpu intensive on the client.
-
ZFS filesystem support
This entire plugin thread says otherwise:
-
Shutdown unraid with curl
WTF Hack: append line into /etc/password for a new user with the shell set to /sbin/shutdown this way whenever that user logs in the system will shutdown. 🤣
-
[Plugin] CA Config Editor
It seems to mirror the purpose of "go". Its hooked in via one of the rc.d scripts if my memory hasn't failed me. I haven't seen anyone use it and I see more hooked in via rc.local.shutdown. Apply ECC Bits as needed for this memory dump.
-
[Plugin] CA Appdata Backup / Restore v2
All individual drive are accessible in normal Linux if your boot USB drive is lost. The only complication is if you're using encryption.
-
Unraid OS version 6.7.2 available
Post your entire Diagnostics zip file, not just a syslog. Read the FAQs if you're unaware of what Diagnostics is.
-
Unraid OS version 6.7.2 available
If they're not that bright then they wouldnt be running custom Nvidia or DVB versions in the first place.
-
Unraid OS version 6.7.2 available
Seemingly no issues with update from 6.7.1.
-
ZFS filesystem support
Given what Oracle is doing with the Java License and costs to corporations, I would not be willing to include anything that Oracle now owns in a commercial product.
-
[Plug-In] Community Applications
Yes, please do whatever you can to deliver a Toronto win. 🦎
-
How to unzip and zip bzroot
Have you looked under here? https://github.com/linuxserver/Unraid-DVB/tree/master/build_scripts In particular https://github.com/linuxserver/Unraid-DVB/blob/master/build_scripts/kernel-compile-module.sh
-
[Plug-In] Community Applications
Never underestimate the problems users can cause. 🤡
-
Unraid OS version 6.7 available
Upgraded to 6.7.0 from 6.5.3 and so far so good with nothing standing out as an issue, personal preference for a friendly colorful UI instead of the monotone aside.
-
unraid-tunables-tester.sh - A New Utility to Optimize unRAID md_* Tunables
Quoting these bits to point this out to @Marshalleq
-
Unraid OS version 6.7.1-rc1 available
Just look at the various forum threads on building an AMD Ryzen systems. They chronicle the journey many have had to go through to get AMD systems to last more than an hour.
-
Unraid OS version 6.7.1-rc1 available
Oh, absolutely. I don't and can't fault LT for the security patches. LT's prompt responses for security concerns are to be commended. It just seems like the entire software industry is jumping through so many hoops for what are infinitely small possible attack vectors on consumer devices.
-
Unraid OS version 6.7.1-rc1 available
This isn't about unraid, more of general rant... At this point, I'd rather have an option to enable and disable the patches which are focused and directed on cloud-hosted servers or servers that would be targeted and have actual secure data to protect. Why should normal consumers be forced to run performance heavy security patches? They should be set as a compliance level, like DOD. General security patches are fine since they dont come with 30% perf hits.
-
Unraid OS version 6.7 available
I'm not blaming the user. This really isn't that different from the ReiserFS (RFS) issues. It worked perfectly fine earlier but then issues started popping up as the software evolved (Linux Kernel). The preventative users took the initiative and migrated away from RFS to XFS before it became a larger issue. Others waited until they had larger issues, which always happens during inconvenient times, and were forced to migrate anyways. Switching from hardware with questionable software dynamics to newer hardware with better software dynamics to prevent larger issues is a wise investment for something you're already invested in to keep your data safe. Running a server for data safety is never a One and Done event, it's an ongoing event that requires investment maintenance. Would you rather take your car into the shop for replacement tires when you notice signs of wear and tear or during the first leg of a road-trip vacation where you're forced to put on the anemic spare tire at the side of the road in the middle of nowhere? It's up you whether you take preventative measures or not.